Thank you for contacting me. I've reviewed the article and made a few edits, which UCRGrad has already reverted. It seems that the article does have a slant against UCR; while User:UCRGrad has apparently taken the time to reference much of it, the overbearing negativity and undue weight create problems. (Not to mention some of the picture captions.) I would recommend an article Request for Comment to bring in plenty of outside opinions. If you would like me to take care of the RfC, just drop me a note. Cheers! Deltabeignet 06:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Apparently 909er, who may or may not be UCRGrad, just decided to become a userpage vandal: [1]. You think it's getting to be time for an RFC? Maybe even an RFAr? szyslak ( t, c, e) 06:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I made a user subpage for preparation (feel free to add to it), and I propose we use its talk page for any further discussion about this. – Tifego (t) 04:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for contacting me. I've reviewed the article and made a few edits, which UCRGrad has already reverted. It seems that the article does have a slant against UCR; while User:UCRGrad has apparently taken the time to reference much of it, the overbearing negativity and undue weight create problems. (Not to mention some of the picture captions.) I would recommend an article Request for Comment to bring in plenty of outside opinions. If you would like me to take care of the RfC, just drop me a note. Cheers! Deltabeignet 06:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Apparently 909er, who may or may not be UCRGrad, just decided to become a userpage vandal: [1]. You think it's getting to be time for an RFC? Maybe even an RFAr? szyslak ( t, c, e) 06:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I made a user subpage for preparation (feel free to add to it), and I propose we use its talk page for any further discussion about this. – Tifego (t) 04:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)