|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
ESys Group has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
ESys Group was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-second-department/2013/2012-04022.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ESys Group. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
I've suggested a title change on the talk page. Your input is appreciated.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
ESys Group has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
ESys Group was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-second-department/2013/2012-04022.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ESys Group. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
I've suggested a title change on the talk page. Your input is appreciated.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)