At this point I would like to appeal to the high panel for a real look at this rent my vacation home USA[edit]
The references submitted meet all criteria and the work is not an ad of any kind Drjonesesq (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
That's the point the references are now all hardback books and the deletion now requires to be reinstated with the new references thank you Drjonesesq Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Easy to see the site is corrupt please ban me and my students. Your in deep with competitors wonder how much money they donated. Make sure and hurry to delete and suppress information from the public so you control what everyone will read. This is a embarrassment as a encyclopedia and you should be ashamed as this is nothing more than a place to advertise you proved that. Did not even check the hardback books please ban me you run a site so corrupt and I will post this all over the net you will see you cant silence me you bully. You cant even wait for the appeal can you. In 3 weeks I will start to post what you have done in all media formats so be careful when you try to silence voices for profit..Drjonesesq (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2013 That is not correct that it did not pass, it passed look at the history and comments. Are you now saying something new to prevent the article some other way now that the references are there. I want this situation appeal to the high panel .
At this point I would like to appeal to the high panel for a real look at this. This was accepted then declined after 4 days then I got into it and found real hardback references since the other 106 were turned down for PR reasons. Now we have hardback independent books listed with numbers and still a hard way to go. This is absurd, lascivious and a public embarrassment as this is not the Wikipedia way. : Drjonesesq ( talk) 19:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
No I am not that person but I did talk with them and do not agree with they way the students were treated. Drjonesesq ( talk) 22:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
look at the page for admin no answer yet? Please restore the work done and get on with our lives. Thanks also Drjonesesq ( talk) 08:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Drjonesesq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
At this point I would like to appeal to the high panel for a real look at this rent my vacation home USA[edit]
The references submitted meet all criteria and the work is not an ad of any kind Drjonesesq (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Having reviewed your request at WP:REFUND, I have to say that you're going about that the wrong way. First, you suggest you litigation - that's the quickest way to become indefinitely blocked from this private website. Second, you suggest that there are "other motives in place" - that's the most ridiculous thing on the face of the planet: admins apply the rules and policies, and most certainly do not have "other motives". Your absolute WP:BATTLE mentality is wrong - you're refusing to read the simplest of inclusion criteria, and aggressively attacking people who work hard to keep this encyclopedia (note: not business directory) a place of knowledge ES &L 11:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a false causations of my character and the article was excepted and published. Now that references were found that meet criteria you say I work there and it is a ad ? is that right and is that slander. Drjonesesq ( talk) 11:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Lets start over the article was already published so it is not an ad of any kind. The company is large the largest vacation rental network in the USA and your argument is made of straw. I ask what is wrong with the books used and look at home away same style of article Drjonesesq ( talk) 11:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
My argument is now based on fact and the article must be restored as requested in the best interest of the Wikipedia and reliability of knowledge expected by its users. In conclusion restore the article. Drjonesesq ( talk) 12:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The sandbox article is not the article it was deleted. The one published was done by someone else and then redone by me with different references please see history of RENT MY VAACTION HOME USA Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Also I am not going to address the comments that were not researched above about "not being accepted" and will also not respond to insults like this one posted above " "slander" around when you clearly do not understand what the word means" Did you need to say that ? sounds real bad for a forum like this. Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
That's the point the references are now all hardback books and the deletion now requires to be reinstated with the new references thank you Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
That is not true check the log that is made up by you for some reason check APERSON or apperson who approved it the first time.
Drjonesesq (
talk)
19:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
I do know the students who did the work and they were not treated with respect for the work they did. Drjonesesq ( talk) 22:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The relevant discussion was about not having hard references from books. Try not to comment on discussions that you have not read. This one was about hard book references and not the side show you try to make it out to be. Lets stick to the point and here are the references. I have other commitments and will chat later please do not delete everything. Drjonesesq ( talk) 22:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC).
We Posted on deleting admin as well. Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Your tone is why we must go to a higher level. Does that scare you ! please look at this high panel before he deletes everything again. Drjonesesq ( talk) 00:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
At this point I would like to appeal to the high panel for a real look at this rent my vacation home USA[edit]
The references submitted meet all criteria and the work is not an ad of any kind Drjonesesq (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
That's the point the references are now all hardback books and the deletion now requires to be reinstated with the new references thank you Drjonesesq Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Easy to see the site is corrupt please ban me and my students. Your in deep with competitors wonder how much money they donated. Make sure and hurry to delete and suppress information from the public so you control what everyone will read. This is a embarrassment as a encyclopedia and you should be ashamed as this is nothing more than a place to advertise you proved that. Did not even check the hardback books please ban me you run a site so corrupt and I will post this all over the net you will see you cant silence me you bully. You cant even wait for the appeal can you. In 3 weeks I will start to post what you have done in all media formats so be careful when you try to silence voices for profit..Drjonesesq (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2013 That is not correct that it did not pass, it passed look at the history and comments. Are you now saying something new to prevent the article some other way now that the references are there. I want this situation appeal to the high panel .
At this point I would like to appeal to the high panel for a real look at this. This was accepted then declined after 4 days then I got into it and found real hardback references since the other 106 were turned down for PR reasons. Now we have hardback independent books listed with numbers and still a hard way to go. This is absurd, lascivious and a public embarrassment as this is not the Wikipedia way. : Drjonesesq ( talk) 19:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
No I am not that person but I did talk with them and do not agree with they way the students were treated. Drjonesesq ( talk) 22:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
look at the page for admin no answer yet? Please restore the work done and get on with our lives. Thanks also Drjonesesq ( talk) 08:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Drjonesesq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
At this point I would like to appeal to the high panel for a real look at this rent my vacation home USA[edit]
The references submitted meet all criteria and the work is not an ad of any kind Drjonesesq (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Having reviewed your request at WP:REFUND, I have to say that you're going about that the wrong way. First, you suggest you litigation - that's the quickest way to become indefinitely blocked from this private website. Second, you suggest that there are "other motives in place" - that's the most ridiculous thing on the face of the planet: admins apply the rules and policies, and most certainly do not have "other motives". Your absolute WP:BATTLE mentality is wrong - you're refusing to read the simplest of inclusion criteria, and aggressively attacking people who work hard to keep this encyclopedia (note: not business directory) a place of knowledge ES &L 11:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a false causations of my character and the article was excepted and published. Now that references were found that meet criteria you say I work there and it is a ad ? is that right and is that slander. Drjonesesq ( talk) 11:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Lets start over the article was already published so it is not an ad of any kind. The company is large the largest vacation rental network in the USA and your argument is made of straw. I ask what is wrong with the books used and look at home away same style of article Drjonesesq ( talk) 11:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
My argument is now based on fact and the article must be restored as requested in the best interest of the Wikipedia and reliability of knowledge expected by its users. In conclusion restore the article. Drjonesesq ( talk) 12:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The sandbox article is not the article it was deleted. The one published was done by someone else and then redone by me with different references please see history of RENT MY VAACTION HOME USA Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Also I am not going to address the comments that were not researched above about "not being accepted" and will also not respond to insults like this one posted above " "slander" around when you clearly do not understand what the word means" Did you need to say that ? sounds real bad for a forum like this. Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
That's the point the references are now all hardback books and the deletion now requires to be reinstated with the new references thank you Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
That is not true check the log that is made up by you for some reason check APERSON or apperson who approved it the first time.
Drjonesesq (
talk)
19:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
I do know the students who did the work and they were not treated with respect for the work they did. Drjonesesq ( talk) 22:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The relevant discussion was about not having hard references from books. Try not to comment on discussions that you have not read. This one was about hard book references and not the side show you try to make it out to be. Lets stick to the point and here are the references. I have other commitments and will chat later please do not delete everything. Drjonesesq ( talk) 22:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC).
We Posted on deleting admin as well. Drjonesesq ( talk) 14:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Your tone is why we must go to a higher level. Does that scare you ! please look at this high panel before he deletes everything again. Drjonesesq ( talk) 00:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)