|
April 2014
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Good morning. I noticed you Undid my editing of the Madison Rising Page. I changed some things to make it more unbiased and fact based. I would appreciate it if you leave my edits be, unless you have some sort of personal stake in the article. If you have an issue with anything that I correct on that page, please let me know. I am trying to eliminate the controversy and make it as clean and unbiased as possible. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djabram ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the explination. I am fairly new to editing. I have done a little before...., I removed the "See also" section of this article because they seemed inflamatory, deragatory, and there is no evidence to substantiate linking that article to the references. I changed the wording of the article, because it is also filled with disputed information. I do not believe any of my changes can be factually disputed I appreciate your assistance and admire your dedication to ensuring Wikipedia remains a credible source of information. Please understand I am not trying to vandalize that page,I am simply trying to ensure it is actually correct. I will continue to learn to ensure I am following correct procedure. djabram 10:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the help on the Madison Rising page. In haste, I may have reverted some of your work yesterday. Sincere apologies!
Cypella ( talk) 04:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I hope I'm not stepping on your toes at all in my recent IFL edits. I gave them all some structure. I'd love your input on what I've done. DMC511 16:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at ongoing peer review on the WINC (AM) article. The article was promoted to GA status on April 10 and this is the PR prior to going to FAC.
The reviewer on the article, User:Finetooth, doesn't know much about radio stations and User:Casliber (the GA reviewer) says it looks a little "rough" still. Both agree a third set of eyes would be helpful, so we have pinged and messaged User:Hamiltonstone and User:Mlaffs, but since you work on radio station articles, I'm hoping you might be able to help as well. Thanks in advance... Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:40, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madison Rising may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dravecky,
I feel guilty adding so many links and then leaving it to you to do whatever it is you're doing to them. What's it called? I assume there's a tutorial somewhere...? I'd love to help.
Also, I'm not comfortable with the neologistic genre "Patriotic Rock". I was an AM/FM DJ too (30 yrs. in Tokyo.) Never heard 'a that beast. Why not call a spade a spade and just leave it as the title of the linked page,
American patriotic music? Awaiting your always measured judgement. Cheers!
Cypella (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dravecky,
I just wanted to apologize for reverting you there, I wasn't aware
the different method is fine,
I disagree with it but I'm pretty sure edit warring is going to solve nothing lol,
Anyway thanks,
Regards,
→Davey2010→
→Talk to me!→ 20:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
April 2014
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Good morning. I noticed you Undid my editing of the Madison Rising Page. I changed some things to make it more unbiased and fact based. I would appreciate it if you leave my edits be, unless you have some sort of personal stake in the article. If you have an issue with anything that I correct on that page, please let me know. I am trying to eliminate the controversy and make it as clean and unbiased as possible. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djabram ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the explination. I am fairly new to editing. I have done a little before...., I removed the "See also" section of this article because they seemed inflamatory, deragatory, and there is no evidence to substantiate linking that article to the references. I changed the wording of the article, because it is also filled with disputed information. I do not believe any of my changes can be factually disputed I appreciate your assistance and admire your dedication to ensuring Wikipedia remains a credible source of information. Please understand I am not trying to vandalize that page,I am simply trying to ensure it is actually correct. I will continue to learn to ensure I am following correct procedure. djabram 10:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the help on the Madison Rising page. In haste, I may have reverted some of your work yesterday. Sincere apologies!
Cypella ( talk) 04:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I hope I'm not stepping on your toes at all in my recent IFL edits. I gave them all some structure. I'd love your input on what I've done. DMC511 16:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at ongoing peer review on the WINC (AM) article. The article was promoted to GA status on April 10 and this is the PR prior to going to FAC.
The reviewer on the article, User:Finetooth, doesn't know much about radio stations and User:Casliber (the GA reviewer) says it looks a little "rough" still. Both agree a third set of eyes would be helpful, so we have pinged and messaged User:Hamiltonstone and User:Mlaffs, but since you work on radio station articles, I'm hoping you might be able to help as well. Thanks in advance... Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:40, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madison Rising may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dravecky,
I feel guilty adding so many links and then leaving it to you to do whatever it is you're doing to them. What's it called? I assume there's a tutorial somewhere...? I'd love to help.
Also, I'm not comfortable with the neologistic genre "Patriotic Rock". I was an AM/FM DJ too (30 yrs. in Tokyo.) Never heard 'a that beast. Why not call a spade a spade and just leave it as the title of the linked page,
American patriotic music? Awaiting your always measured judgement. Cheers!
Cypella (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dravecky,
I just wanted to apologize for reverting you there, I wasn't aware
the different method is fine,
I disagree with it but I'm pretty sure edit warring is going to solve nothing lol,
Anyway thanks,
Regards,
→Davey2010→
→Talk to me!→ 20:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |