|
I rolled back your recent edit, we would need a reliable sources for this kind of edit. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Amway very well may be a scam or pyramid scheme, but the site you have linked to would not be considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. If you can find, say, a newspaper or well known consumer website that says the same thing then that would be acceptable. ... discospinster talk 23:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Even if you found a reliable source, as suggested above, you couldn't restore the information now, as you've reverted 3 times. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
|
I rolled back your recent edit, we would need a reliable sources for this kind of edit. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Amway very well may be a scam or pyramid scheme, but the site you have linked to would not be considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. If you can find, say, a newspaper or well known consumer website that says the same thing then that would be acceptable. ... discospinster talk 23:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Even if you found a reliable source, as suggested above, you couldn't restore the information now, as you've reverted 3 times. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)