Hello, and thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Canterbury University of the Seychelles. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you.
--Dynaflow
babble
19:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
If you do not start using the article talk page to discuss the article, but persist in discussing the article in the article page, then steps will be taken to remove the editing ability of this account. You have been warned, and warned again, and warned again. If there is something about these warnings that you do not understand, contact me on my talk page, or here, and I will answer your questions. Continue to act as you are and you will be banned. Clear? -- Tagishsimon (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I've reverted your recent changes to
Canterbury University of the Seychelles, and moved your commentary to its talk page. Please confine commentary on articles to their talk pages. I notice that you have posted essentailly the same commentary three times in the last five sixteen hours, so consider this a warning about a potential violation of
Wikipedia's three-revert rule -- please do not continue with reposting the same material or you will likely be reported for a three-revert violation. Thank you. --
ArglebargleIV (
talk)
14:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Canterbury University of the Seychelles. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you.
--Dynaflow
babble
19:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
If you do not start using the article talk page to discuss the article, but persist in discussing the article in the article page, then steps will be taken to remove the editing ability of this account. You have been warned, and warned again, and warned again. If there is something about these warnings that you do not understand, contact me on my talk page, or here, and I will answer your questions. Continue to act as you are and you will be banned. Clear? -- Tagishsimon (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I've reverted your recent changes to
Canterbury University of the Seychelles, and moved your commentary to its talk page. Please confine commentary on articles to their talk pages. I notice that you have posted essentailly the same commentary three times in the last five sixteen hours, so consider this a warning about a potential violation of
Wikipedia's three-revert rule -- please do not continue with reposting the same material or you will likely be reported for a three-revert violation. Thank you. --
ArglebargleIV (
talk)
14:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)