Link to the Romanian history business: User talk:Dpotop/Romanian history business.
If you have some time, please help preserve info in this article, and protect it from vandalism. : Dc76 18:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
This got deleted, unfortunately. Any idea what its source was or what tag we could put to make it remain? I liked that picture. Biruitorul 17:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Have you seen this? What exactly should I make? It's very strange and very stressful.--
Tones benefit 18:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok, but today I'm not the only one who complained. Another editor asked him on his page to stop intimidating him.-- Tones benefit 18:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
How can I prove he's wrong when he is? How can I deal the situation when he deletes sourced information and he tells me if I revert to my version I will be blocked? I like Moldova but it seems to be hard to edit about it. Anyway, I will avoid him as much as possible. I created a page of slurs (they are true) just because he was frontal attacked me also.-- Tones benefit 19:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Romanian Communist Party and have been blocked for 24 hours. Please take the time to review the policy carefully. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Please, insist that this be solved. Forcing blocks on other editors for own edit waring (the acitons of User:Anonimu) is not a thing that can be taken lightly. User:Slim Virgin has not responded yet. Could you, please, let me know if he/she does not in the near future. His/her reticence in answering are perfectly understandable, but imho the 3RR block must be cleared from your log, and at least a serious warning must be issued to Anonimu. Otherwise, it sets a serious precedent.: Dc76 10:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok, let's still assume good faith from Slim Virgin. Maybe he/she did not have time to reply yet. I will post a message right away at his/her page. Your number of rv is irrelevant here, because you reverted obvious POV-pushing, and only other editor on that page would have done the same. It is the abuse of regulations by Anonimu to push POV against everyone and block editors trying to prevent his vandalism. : Dc76 10:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
I answered you here.: Dc76\ talk 18:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Romanians of Serbia-- 152.3.200.168 14:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Dpotop, this is regarding this AfD. I was astonished by your vote as I do think the article is totally and utterly unsalvageable, whether or not it is a precise translation of that on ro.wiki. To make things clear: I don't want to hide the wrongful acts Hungarians committed while the Second Vienna Award was in effect (or at any other time) and I believe none of the established Hungarian editors want to do so; indeed I would revert anyone who tries to remove sourced and unbiased accounts of such events. However, this article has no chance of becoming either, unless you replace it completely, title and content – in which case it is much easier to remove it entirely (thus avoiding having to explain sentence by sentence why it is unacceptable) and expand the already existing and much more correct stubs. Regards, K issL 16:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Since I have been civil towards you, this ad hominem comment is as unexpected as it is unwelcome. It is clear enough to me that Dahn and yourself dislike each other, but that doesn't help me understand what you think I did "just as wrong as Dahn did". Regarding the other claims:
Please refrain from such comments in the future. Regards, K issL 15:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Treaty of Trianon, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop removing referenced material from the article without serious discussion on the article's talk page, because that is considered vandalism. Squash Racket 09:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I found another source on this discussion. Cheers, -- Olahus 19:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I am well aware, but thank you for the reminder. See here for a proposed strategy. Biruitorul 00:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome, I'm glad to talk to you again. TSO1D 15:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
can I see a link with what are you having problems with? Nergaal ( talk) 14:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Quite right, and thanks for the note. I posted a reply there. Biruitorul ( talk) 22:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
You might be interested in an article I have just created, List of Senior Securitate Officers (because I could not feet right away the info into Securitate). It might or it might not make sense to have a separate article. If you are interested, feel welcome to edit it/them., and to use these pictures: Securitate 1 Securitate 2 Securitate 3 Securitate 4 100px|Teohari Georgescu Alexandru Draghici Alexandru Nicolschi, or any of the pictures on my user page (in fact I put them exactly so that people can use them in different articles). I'm not claiming they are very good. But they are better than nothing. : Dc76\ talk 20:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Un Crăciun şi un An Nou fericit!-- MariusM ( talk) 16:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! -- R O A M A T A A | msg 18:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Dpotop ( talk) 13:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Can I ask your opinion about this, pls? : Dc76\ talk 19:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Try to keep cool no matter what, this is not the first, nor the last of a kind. I would not, though, attribute it to just Russians, since there are many honest and good natured ones, even here at wikipedia. I wouldn't also attribute it to average Russian, since they don't care about issues like Moldova more than we care about, say issues like Moscow. It is a small group of pro-Soviet die-hards, many of them also xenophobic, that is and will always be the problem. There are many of those frustrated with their real state of affairs. Notice that the biggest problems never come from Russians from Russia, but from some of the Russophones from Ukraine, Belorussia, etc. ... because they feel frustration with the world around. Just like many of the early Romanian communist party activists. A sense of desinheritedness, and a total reluctance to integrate, if not even hate of their host countries. It is just a social phenomenon... : Dc76\ talk 11:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 13:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
salutare. m-ai intrebat cum de sunt hutul si totusi romîn in documente. pai în romînia traiesc aproximativ 70 000 de ucraineni potrivit ultimului recensamînt, si mult mai multi in realitate (majoritatea nu se mai declara ucraineni, mai ales pt ca isi iau sotii / soti romîni ori de alte etnii), iar dintre acestia, majoritatea celor din judetele suceava si maramures sunt hutuli.
de ex. in liceu aveam alti 3 hutuli in clasa, doua fete si un baiat. toti trei vorbeau limba ucraineana (ma rog, dialectul hutul), insa din clasa doar eu eram declarat ucrainean la recensamînt
-- Hultanu ( talk) 13:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
You recently added a POV claim to Edict of Turda. You have called the article propaganda, but have not indicated what you object to. Please be more specific. Elphion ( talk) 07:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I've edited the article significantly. Could you review it for neutrality? Thanks. Elphion ( talk) 15:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
...of the early 1990s throughout the former USSR! It is an instruction for all Russian "guests": Suitcase, train station, Russia!
Milhist Coordinator election | ||
Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject election. I'm more than happy to serve the project for another six months! --
Eurocopter (
talk) 16:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Russian-Circassian War |
Is Xasha Moldopudo? 90 1 AQ ( talk) 05:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Whoa, man, calm down. This really isn't worth the nerve tissue you waste there. Going emotional won't help any. I intend to talk to him so that he can outline his position more clearly. Then it can be constructively criticized, if need be. -- Illythr ( talk) 11:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I'll take a look when the matter settles down a little - it seems these wars regularly flare up, which is unfortunate. By the way, your question inadvertently led to this, so perhaps you could weigh in on the matter. Biruitorul ( talk) 04:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, any editor working on topics related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this warning are subject to blocking.
Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.
Accordingly, you are hereby restricted to one revert per two days for two weeks on all related articles. Any incivility on the talk page, and you will be banned from there, and the article, for a period of two days. If you wish to appeal this, please do so before other admins or the Arbitration Committee, rather than copy&paste comments across multiple pages (please exercise restraint on this front, especially). Thanks. El_C 11:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
It's up and running, please join! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) ( talk) 02:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, probably you will be interested in development of the Moldovan Wine articles. If yes, I am pleased to invite you to join it on the Project:MoldovanWines project page. Best regards, -- serhio talk 17:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Based on the discussion in this article's talk page, I made a proposal [4] and gave its rationale [5]. You are receiving this standard message because during the last 12 months you have editted either this article or its talk page, or both. Dc76\ talk 01:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Nice to see you around here. Since I know you're a fan of Romanian civil society, I'm sure you'll enjoy this article! ;) - Biruitorul Talk 06:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! -- Codrin.B ( talk) 21:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards! |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 04:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Link to the Romanian history business: User talk:Dpotop/Romanian history business.
If you have some time, please help preserve info in this article, and protect it from vandalism. : Dc76 18:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
This got deleted, unfortunately. Any idea what its source was or what tag we could put to make it remain? I liked that picture. Biruitorul 17:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Have you seen this? What exactly should I make? It's very strange and very stressful.--
Tones benefit 18:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok, but today I'm not the only one who complained. Another editor asked him on his page to stop intimidating him.-- Tones benefit 18:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
How can I prove he's wrong when he is? How can I deal the situation when he deletes sourced information and he tells me if I revert to my version I will be blocked? I like Moldova but it seems to be hard to edit about it. Anyway, I will avoid him as much as possible. I created a page of slurs (they are true) just because he was frontal attacked me also.-- Tones benefit 19:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Romanian Communist Party and have been blocked for 24 hours. Please take the time to review the policy carefully. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Please, insist that this be solved. Forcing blocks on other editors for own edit waring (the acitons of User:Anonimu) is not a thing that can be taken lightly. User:Slim Virgin has not responded yet. Could you, please, let me know if he/she does not in the near future. His/her reticence in answering are perfectly understandable, but imho the 3RR block must be cleared from your log, and at least a serious warning must be issued to Anonimu. Otherwise, it sets a serious precedent.: Dc76 10:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok, let's still assume good faith from Slim Virgin. Maybe he/she did not have time to reply yet. I will post a message right away at his/her page. Your number of rv is irrelevant here, because you reverted obvious POV-pushing, and only other editor on that page would have done the same. It is the abuse of regulations by Anonimu to push POV against everyone and block editors trying to prevent his vandalism. : Dc76 10:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
I answered you here.: Dc76\ talk 18:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Romanians of Serbia-- 152.3.200.168 14:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Dpotop, this is regarding this AfD. I was astonished by your vote as I do think the article is totally and utterly unsalvageable, whether or not it is a precise translation of that on ro.wiki. To make things clear: I don't want to hide the wrongful acts Hungarians committed while the Second Vienna Award was in effect (or at any other time) and I believe none of the established Hungarian editors want to do so; indeed I would revert anyone who tries to remove sourced and unbiased accounts of such events. However, this article has no chance of becoming either, unless you replace it completely, title and content – in which case it is much easier to remove it entirely (thus avoiding having to explain sentence by sentence why it is unacceptable) and expand the already existing and much more correct stubs. Regards, K issL 16:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Since I have been civil towards you, this ad hominem comment is as unexpected as it is unwelcome. It is clear enough to me that Dahn and yourself dislike each other, but that doesn't help me understand what you think I did "just as wrong as Dahn did". Regarding the other claims:
Please refrain from such comments in the future. Regards, K issL 15:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Treaty of Trianon, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop removing referenced material from the article without serious discussion on the article's talk page, because that is considered vandalism. Squash Racket 09:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I found another source on this discussion. Cheers, -- Olahus 19:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I am well aware, but thank you for the reminder. See here for a proposed strategy. Biruitorul 00:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome, I'm glad to talk to you again. TSO1D 15:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
can I see a link with what are you having problems with? Nergaal ( talk) 14:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Quite right, and thanks for the note. I posted a reply there. Biruitorul ( talk) 22:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
You might be interested in an article I have just created, List of Senior Securitate Officers (because I could not feet right away the info into Securitate). It might or it might not make sense to have a separate article. If you are interested, feel welcome to edit it/them., and to use these pictures: Securitate 1 Securitate 2 Securitate 3 Securitate 4 100px|Teohari Georgescu Alexandru Draghici Alexandru Nicolschi, or any of the pictures on my user page (in fact I put them exactly so that people can use them in different articles). I'm not claiming they are very good. But they are better than nothing. : Dc76\ talk 20:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Un Crăciun şi un An Nou fericit!-- MariusM ( talk) 16:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! -- R O A M A T A A | msg 18:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Dpotop ( talk) 13:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Can I ask your opinion about this, pls? : Dc76\ talk 19:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Try to keep cool no matter what, this is not the first, nor the last of a kind. I would not, though, attribute it to just Russians, since there are many honest and good natured ones, even here at wikipedia. I wouldn't also attribute it to average Russian, since they don't care about issues like Moldova more than we care about, say issues like Moscow. It is a small group of pro-Soviet die-hards, many of them also xenophobic, that is and will always be the problem. There are many of those frustrated with their real state of affairs. Notice that the biggest problems never come from Russians from Russia, but from some of the Russophones from Ukraine, Belorussia, etc. ... because they feel frustration with the world around. Just like many of the early Romanian communist party activists. A sense of desinheritedness, and a total reluctance to integrate, if not even hate of their host countries. It is just a social phenomenon... : Dc76\ talk 11:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 13:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
salutare. m-ai intrebat cum de sunt hutul si totusi romîn in documente. pai în romînia traiesc aproximativ 70 000 de ucraineni potrivit ultimului recensamînt, si mult mai multi in realitate (majoritatea nu se mai declara ucraineni, mai ales pt ca isi iau sotii / soti romîni ori de alte etnii), iar dintre acestia, majoritatea celor din judetele suceava si maramures sunt hutuli.
de ex. in liceu aveam alti 3 hutuli in clasa, doua fete si un baiat. toti trei vorbeau limba ucraineana (ma rog, dialectul hutul), insa din clasa doar eu eram declarat ucrainean la recensamînt
-- Hultanu ( talk) 13:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
You recently added a POV claim to Edict of Turda. You have called the article propaganda, but have not indicated what you object to. Please be more specific. Elphion ( talk) 07:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I've edited the article significantly. Could you review it for neutrality? Thanks. Elphion ( talk) 15:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
...of the early 1990s throughout the former USSR! It is an instruction for all Russian "guests": Suitcase, train station, Russia!
Milhist Coordinator election | ||
Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject election. I'm more than happy to serve the project for another six months! --
Eurocopter (
talk) 16:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Russian-Circassian War |
Is Xasha Moldopudo? 90 1 AQ ( talk) 05:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Whoa, man, calm down. This really isn't worth the nerve tissue you waste there. Going emotional won't help any. I intend to talk to him so that he can outline his position more clearly. Then it can be constructively criticized, if need be. -- Illythr ( talk) 11:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I'll take a look when the matter settles down a little - it seems these wars regularly flare up, which is unfortunate. By the way, your question inadvertently led to this, so perhaps you could weigh in on the matter. Biruitorul ( talk) 04:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, any editor working on topics related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this warning are subject to blocking.
Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.
Accordingly, you are hereby restricted to one revert per two days for two weeks on all related articles. Any incivility on the talk page, and you will be banned from there, and the article, for a period of two days. If you wish to appeal this, please do so before other admins or the Arbitration Committee, rather than copy&paste comments across multiple pages (please exercise restraint on this front, especially). Thanks. El_C 11:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
It's up and running, please join! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) ( talk) 02:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, probably you will be interested in development of the Moldovan Wine articles. If yes, I am pleased to invite you to join it on the Project:MoldovanWines project page. Best regards, -- serhio talk 17:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Based on the discussion in this article's talk page, I made a proposal [4] and gave its rationale [5]. You are receiving this standard message because during the last 12 months you have editted either this article or its talk page, or both. Dc76\ talk 01:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Nice to see you around here. Since I know you're a fan of Romanian civil society, I'm sure you'll enjoy this article! ;) - Biruitorul Talk 06:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! -- Codrin.B ( talk) 21:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards! |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 04:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)