Letting you know that the phrase you attempted to remove in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has been in place for quite some time after multiple editors worked on the lead. If you wish to change it, please open a new discussion on the article's talk page. I've restored the content for now. Thank you. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 11:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Doom guy007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. General Ization Talk 03:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GoneIn60 ( talk) 16:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 17:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. --
GoneIn60 (
talk)
18:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to Edit warring. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 19:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Please go to the talk about to discuss your addition/change. It has been reverted multiple times and you can be blocked even if your reverts are happening days between each other if it is deemed disruptive. I'm not saying that I'm going to block you (I can't) or that I'm going to report you, but this is getting ridiculous. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. --
GoneIn60 (
talk)
08:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. This block is longer than the first because you continue to make the same revert. You should get consensus on talk for any edits that turn out to be controversial. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Letting you know that the phrase you attempted to remove in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has been in place for quite some time after multiple editors worked on the lead. If you wish to change it, please open a new discussion on the article's talk page. I've restored the content for now. Thank you. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 11:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Doom guy007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. General Ization Talk 03:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GoneIn60 ( talk) 16:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 17:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. --
GoneIn60 (
talk)
18:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to Edit warring. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 19:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Please go to the talk about to discuss your addition/change. It has been reverted multiple times and you can be blocked even if your reverts are happening days between each other if it is deemed disruptive. I'm not saying that I'm going to block you (I can't) or that I'm going to report you, but this is getting ridiculous. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. --
GoneIn60 (
talk)
08:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. This block is longer than the first because you continue to make the same revert. You should get consensus on talk for any edits that turn out to be controversial. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)