Your recent actions clearly violate the terms of your unblock. Brandon ( talk) 10:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
DollyD ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have done absolutely nothing wrong. My only recent action has been to vote in an RfA of MZMcBride, an editor I admire. I am not an alternate account of MZMcBride. I have not abused any multiple accounts and find this accusation rather tiresome. DollyD (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have reviewed the checkuser data and concur with Brandon's findings. -- (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 18:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user who blocked me was a checkuser, so they could clearly see that I haven't abused any accounts if they took the time. Very disappointing. DollyD ( talk) 11:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I have emailed my evidence to the functionaries mailing list and have requested a review. It is also accessible to ArbCom if they deem it appropriate to review themselves. Brandon ( talk) 12:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I would like to see the supposed "multiple accounts" I have been abusing, along with firm evidence that they are me. If this cannot be produced, I will be making a complaint about the user Brandon to the Audit Subcommittee. Thanks! DollyD ( talk) 11:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
You are banned and there's nothing you can do about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light of Groth ( talk • contribs) 05:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Your recent actions clearly violate the terms of your unblock. Brandon ( talk) 10:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
DollyD ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have done absolutely nothing wrong. My only recent action has been to vote in an RfA of MZMcBride, an editor I admire. I am not an alternate account of MZMcBride. I have not abused any multiple accounts and find this accusation rather tiresome. DollyD (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have reviewed the checkuser data and concur with Brandon's findings. -- (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 18:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user who blocked me was a checkuser, so they could clearly see that I haven't abused any accounts if they took the time. Very disappointing. DollyD ( talk) 11:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I have emailed my evidence to the functionaries mailing list and have requested a review. It is also accessible to ArbCom if they deem it appropriate to review themselves. Brandon ( talk) 12:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I would like to see the supposed "multiple accounts" I have been abusing, along with firm evidence that they are me. If this cannot be produced, I will be making a complaint about the user Brandon to the Audit Subcommittee. Thanks! DollyD ( talk) 11:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
You are banned and there's nothing you can do about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light of Groth ( talk • contribs) 05:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)