There were two other articles included in the Marc!o Mathers AfD. When you closed the AfD, you made no mention of the other two articles. What will happen with them? IrishGuy talk 19:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey could you please leave a reason for your deletion of The Instance in the deletion log? Sfrostee
Hi - I've got a system for this set up and working fine on IRC - to get into the channel, ask Chanserv (or me) to invite you (you have access level 49). Mart inp23 22:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Was deleted as a page about a year ago by your good self ... curious to know why. as #1 Amazon reviewer she seems a notable person? No biggie, but would be interested. regds ElectricRay 01:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Your telling me that Clarine Harp, a voice actor for Funimation Entertainment and somebody who has been in hits like Fullmetal Alchemist and Speed Grapher is non-notable? Clarine has won an award from prominent anime award site animeondvd.com. She is definitely notable and i ask you to take down that horrendous obstruction from the web page.-- Jack Cox 07:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't know who is re-uploading them, but I took them during the fall PS a year ago. I understand your concerns but the rights to photos remain with the photographer, not the subject. If you read the talk page you will see that there has been consensus to keep some photos, and not others. Apparently the guy with the blue cape doesn't mind his photo up there, but several girls do. I haven't ever readded pictures that the subjects objected to. I can ask whoever is reuploading them to stop if you tell me who they are, but I think you as an admin (you are an admin, right?) would have more authority.-- Illuminato 19:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't—and don't—find much substantive and/or reliable that isn't already contained within Gerald B. Winrod, but I've restored the history and created a redirect anyway. :) RadioKirk ( u| t| c) 14:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
My apologies for being over-zealous in my procedural AfD nomination. Am I to assume that the correct procedure in such cases is to delete the nomination from the log file? If so, that's what I'll do in future. Tevildo 16:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Doc, thank you for advising this user to stop making personal comments, but they have made allegations about a living Councillor on page 'swallows wood'
a permanant ban maybe? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.104.50.161 ( talk) 10:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC).
Doc, at the risk of becoming hysterical, I'm flat-out shocked at this close. I'd ask that you review the material provided. There's quite simply no evidence that this product amounts to anything more than something near-and-dear to the hearts of a few, yet struggles to meet the most basic of inclusion guidelines regardless of how they are stretched. If you don't want to look it over again, please do let me know and I'll whack it on deletion review. (I've re-written that last bit four times and can't seem to make it sound nicer. I put my own items up there at times, so I don't mean naything by it.) - brenneman 01:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I have provided proper reffernces with weblinks as proof and validation. What's the problem?
Hello Doc Glasgow,
I was surprised to see my contribution to the Richard Branson external links was removed. I was wondering how it may have offended. It seemed to be an appropriate link to a useful resource - useful to people interested in Richard Branson the person. Regards,Speermeister
You are aware that we have no policy to ignore vandalism, and in fact we do the very opposite? For instance, WP:POST always highlights vandalism from the media, we have Wikipedia:Most vandalized pages and WP:CVU, as well as Wikipedia:Long term abuse? - Ta bu shi da yu 10:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
It's interesting to see that this article has been like that for months now, and only untill recently it's now all of a sudden not accepted. It is not criticism, it's pure facts. Facts those involved in this company don't want people to know about for their own reasons. Like the fact that they were fined $115,000 by the State of Arizona and banned from doing business in South Dakota. These are facts not criticism. This is simply to give people a fair and balanced view of this company. Not everything there is negative. It's both positive and negative and all of it is factual. I'll post the information elsewhere were it cannot be modified by moderators. Delete my user account entirely while you're at it.
I think that after all those villain lists being delete, that this one survived would be a tragedy. Axem Titanium 03:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Here is the disputed sentence:
A former member of the Conservative Party, he has served as a councillor for the party on Adur District Council near Brighton. [1] [2]
Can you please give me one good reason (other than that I lost my cool, for which I apologise) why this sourced material should not be included in the article? Mendoza has strong political opinions, and his past political activities are therefore relevant. User:Samuel Blanning is unable to discuss the issue, he has locked the discussion page and has deleted a valid question that I put to him. 195.92.67.74 22:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
You have deleted the Ewing Irrigation page without proper research of the company. Ewing Irrigation is the 2nd largest wholesale distributor of landscape and irrigation products next to John Deere Landscaping. ( http://www.irrigation.org/ibt/0108/p18.htm -- This article indicates that fact).
And in regards to not having articles published on our book, please look at these articles http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/01/03/news/californian/temecula/9_10_061_2_07.prt, http://www.azcentral.com/community/gilbert/articles/1204gr-book1206.html, among other published in trade magazines.
Ewing Irrigation pioneered the turf irrigation movement in America. Just because Ewing Irrigation is a B2B company, only exposed to industry professionals, and privately held with undisclosed, unpublished sales figures, doesn't mean the company is not notable. Reconsider deletion please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.9.131.203 ( talk) 22:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
Hey Puppet,
Before you want to talk to me. Please recall what your kindergarten teacher's teaching as how to figure out a "person" and a "school"
Shame on YOU
I have removed material from St. Michaels University School that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. As for changing me, we'll see. :) Best regards, Newyorkbrad 19:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Turnip? turrrrnip. but...but...turnip? -- InkSplotch 02:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I have filed a request for arbitration which involves you. Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Giano_II. John254 04:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher 00:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I strongly advise you to take a look at this. Omotorwayo ( talk) 14:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
It's ironic, isn't it? You said to close one MfD because is would be unhelpful and increase the drama, but then you have to chose whether to file an MfD on those talk pages. I feel as strongly as you do about this. Is there a way to restore, blank and protect? I won't do anything silly, don't worry, as the server hiccups have me worried. And what exactly are these server hiccups people are talking about? Is that like why people are told never to delete AN or ANI or the Sandbox? Carcharoth ( talk) 03:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Doc, please see my reply on my talk page. Paul August ☎ 02:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
This article, to which you contributed, will be featured on the Main Page on January 5, 2008. [3] Risker ( talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Despite the fact that your little edit was funny, isn't it against the rules to edit other people's userpages for fun? -- Alisyn talk 22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi ... I only did a quick weight test to rate it. I wanted to make sure it was known to the bio project before it was DYKed. I have added an infobox but refrained from adding an "image wanted" as I guess you have looked as you report very sketchy bio info being available. Good luck .... painters biogs always look good ... even if they die not so rich. Victuallers ( talk) 22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that it looks like User:Pcarbonn did not take your exhortation seriously and decided to revert my changes without discussion. ScienceApologist ( talk) 22:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
And now it seems like User:MigFP is getting in on it. I don't know why they think that reverting will help. Still no sign of discussion from them on the talkpage. ScienceApologist ( talk) 22:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your caution, but im not to be personal attacks, i mean; no racializm in this site, only i want to neutrality... *** Эɱ®εč¡κ *** and his friend 00:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
There were two other articles included in the Marc!o Mathers AfD. When you closed the AfD, you made no mention of the other two articles. What will happen with them? IrishGuy talk 19:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey could you please leave a reason for your deletion of The Instance in the deletion log? Sfrostee
Hi - I've got a system for this set up and working fine on IRC - to get into the channel, ask Chanserv (or me) to invite you (you have access level 49). Mart inp23 22:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Was deleted as a page about a year ago by your good self ... curious to know why. as #1 Amazon reviewer she seems a notable person? No biggie, but would be interested. regds ElectricRay 01:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Your telling me that Clarine Harp, a voice actor for Funimation Entertainment and somebody who has been in hits like Fullmetal Alchemist and Speed Grapher is non-notable? Clarine has won an award from prominent anime award site animeondvd.com. She is definitely notable and i ask you to take down that horrendous obstruction from the web page.-- Jack Cox 07:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't know who is re-uploading them, but I took them during the fall PS a year ago. I understand your concerns but the rights to photos remain with the photographer, not the subject. If you read the talk page you will see that there has been consensus to keep some photos, and not others. Apparently the guy with the blue cape doesn't mind his photo up there, but several girls do. I haven't ever readded pictures that the subjects objected to. I can ask whoever is reuploading them to stop if you tell me who they are, but I think you as an admin (you are an admin, right?) would have more authority.-- Illuminato 19:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't—and don't—find much substantive and/or reliable that isn't already contained within Gerald B. Winrod, but I've restored the history and created a redirect anyway. :) RadioKirk ( u| t| c) 14:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
My apologies for being over-zealous in my procedural AfD nomination. Am I to assume that the correct procedure in such cases is to delete the nomination from the log file? If so, that's what I'll do in future. Tevildo 16:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Doc, thank you for advising this user to stop making personal comments, but they have made allegations about a living Councillor on page 'swallows wood'
a permanant ban maybe? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.104.50.161 ( talk) 10:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC).
Doc, at the risk of becoming hysterical, I'm flat-out shocked at this close. I'd ask that you review the material provided. There's quite simply no evidence that this product amounts to anything more than something near-and-dear to the hearts of a few, yet struggles to meet the most basic of inclusion guidelines regardless of how they are stretched. If you don't want to look it over again, please do let me know and I'll whack it on deletion review. (I've re-written that last bit four times and can't seem to make it sound nicer. I put my own items up there at times, so I don't mean naything by it.) - brenneman 01:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I have provided proper reffernces with weblinks as proof and validation. What's the problem?
Hello Doc Glasgow,
I was surprised to see my contribution to the Richard Branson external links was removed. I was wondering how it may have offended. It seemed to be an appropriate link to a useful resource - useful to people interested in Richard Branson the person. Regards,Speermeister
You are aware that we have no policy to ignore vandalism, and in fact we do the very opposite? For instance, WP:POST always highlights vandalism from the media, we have Wikipedia:Most vandalized pages and WP:CVU, as well as Wikipedia:Long term abuse? - Ta bu shi da yu 10:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
It's interesting to see that this article has been like that for months now, and only untill recently it's now all of a sudden not accepted. It is not criticism, it's pure facts. Facts those involved in this company don't want people to know about for their own reasons. Like the fact that they were fined $115,000 by the State of Arizona and banned from doing business in South Dakota. These are facts not criticism. This is simply to give people a fair and balanced view of this company. Not everything there is negative. It's both positive and negative and all of it is factual. I'll post the information elsewhere were it cannot be modified by moderators. Delete my user account entirely while you're at it.
I think that after all those villain lists being delete, that this one survived would be a tragedy. Axem Titanium 03:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Here is the disputed sentence:
A former member of the Conservative Party, he has served as a councillor for the party on Adur District Council near Brighton. [1] [2]
Can you please give me one good reason (other than that I lost my cool, for which I apologise) why this sourced material should not be included in the article? Mendoza has strong political opinions, and his past political activities are therefore relevant. User:Samuel Blanning is unable to discuss the issue, he has locked the discussion page and has deleted a valid question that I put to him. 195.92.67.74 22:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
You have deleted the Ewing Irrigation page without proper research of the company. Ewing Irrigation is the 2nd largest wholesale distributor of landscape and irrigation products next to John Deere Landscaping. ( http://www.irrigation.org/ibt/0108/p18.htm -- This article indicates that fact).
And in regards to not having articles published on our book, please look at these articles http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/01/03/news/californian/temecula/9_10_061_2_07.prt, http://www.azcentral.com/community/gilbert/articles/1204gr-book1206.html, among other published in trade magazines.
Ewing Irrigation pioneered the turf irrigation movement in America. Just because Ewing Irrigation is a B2B company, only exposed to industry professionals, and privately held with undisclosed, unpublished sales figures, doesn't mean the company is not notable. Reconsider deletion please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.9.131.203 ( talk) 22:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
Hey Puppet,
Before you want to talk to me. Please recall what your kindergarten teacher's teaching as how to figure out a "person" and a "school"
Shame on YOU
I have removed material from St. Michaels University School that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. As for changing me, we'll see. :) Best regards, Newyorkbrad 19:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Turnip? turrrrnip. but...but...turnip? -- InkSplotch 02:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I have filed a request for arbitration which involves you. Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Giano_II. John254 04:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher 00:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I strongly advise you to take a look at this. Omotorwayo ( talk) 14:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
It's ironic, isn't it? You said to close one MfD because is would be unhelpful and increase the drama, but then you have to chose whether to file an MfD on those talk pages. I feel as strongly as you do about this. Is there a way to restore, blank and protect? I won't do anything silly, don't worry, as the server hiccups have me worried. And what exactly are these server hiccups people are talking about? Is that like why people are told never to delete AN or ANI or the Sandbox? Carcharoth ( talk) 03:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Doc, please see my reply on my talk page. Paul August ☎ 02:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
This article, to which you contributed, will be featured on the Main Page on January 5, 2008. [3] Risker ( talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Despite the fact that your little edit was funny, isn't it against the rules to edit other people's userpages for fun? -- Alisyn talk 22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi ... I only did a quick weight test to rate it. I wanted to make sure it was known to the bio project before it was DYKed. I have added an infobox but refrained from adding an "image wanted" as I guess you have looked as you report very sketchy bio info being available. Good luck .... painters biogs always look good ... even if they die not so rich. Victuallers ( talk) 22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that it looks like User:Pcarbonn did not take your exhortation seriously and decided to revert my changes without discussion. ScienceApologist ( talk) 22:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
And now it seems like User:MigFP is getting in on it. I don't know why they think that reverting will help. Still no sign of discussion from them on the talkpage. ScienceApologist ( talk) 22:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your caution, but im not to be personal attacks, i mean; no racializm in this site, only i want to neutrality... *** Эɱ®εč¡κ *** and his friend 00:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)