- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa ( talk) 16:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
User:Djc wi/Wolves at the Gate (band) → Wolves at the Gate (band) –
- For some reason, there is a user name in the title. As a result, searching for the band on Wikipedia will only find a Buffy The Vampire Slayer comic. Google found the page with the user name in the title. PLOSJosh ( talk) 16:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- The current version of the article contains no independent reliable sources, and does not pass the Notability Guidelines for Bands. If the page was moved to article space in its current form it would likely be nominated for deletion due to the lack of acceptable sources. Monty 845 16:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment this is a stale userspace draft, perhaps you wish to adopt it and fix it up to an acceptable standard? -- 76.65.130.165 ( talk) 00:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- You don't need to use RM for this; as an autoconfirmed user, you can do it yourself. However, as noted, it's very likely to be deleted as an article. It would probably even be speedy deleted under criterion A7. It's more or less safe where it is, however. The IP is right—why not try to improve the draft to the point where it could stand as an article? -- BDD ( talk) 19:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose as per the others, this does not meet the criteria to be included in the main namespace. Although a specific !vote isn't necessary, it was a great idea to solicit feedback before moving it yourself. Tiggerjay ( talk) 08:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa ( talk) 16:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
User:Djc wi/Wolves at the Gate (band) → Wolves at the Gate (band) –
- For some reason, there is a user name in the title. As a result, searching for the band on Wikipedia will only find a Buffy The Vampire Slayer comic. Google found the page with the user name in the title. PLOSJosh ( talk) 16:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- The current version of the article contains no independent reliable sources, and does not pass the Notability Guidelines for Bands. If the page was moved to article space in its current form it would likely be nominated for deletion due to the lack of acceptable sources. Monty 845 16:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment this is a stale userspace draft, perhaps you wish to adopt it and fix it up to an acceptable standard? -- 76.65.130.165 ( talk) 00:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- You don't need to use RM for this; as an autoconfirmed user, you can do it yourself. However, as noted, it's very likely to be deleted as an article. It would probably even be speedy deleted under criterion A7. It's more or less safe where it is, however. The IP is right—why not try to improve the draft to the point where it could stand as an article? -- BDD ( talk) 19:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose as per the others, this does not meet the criteria to be included in the main namespace. Although a specific !vote isn't necessary, it was a great idea to solicit feedback before moving it yourself. Tiggerjay ( talk) 08:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.