You were gentler with the vandal in giving a Level 1 template than I would have been. I will note that the vandal was then indeffed as an apparent throw-away account. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
103.13.101.142 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)--
That user open proxy,see my userpage history ... Vvvaggot ( talk) 03:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey there. I've been noticing a lot of anti-vandalism work by you. So, thanks for helping out. I appreciate it! You should consider joining Operation Enduring Encyclopedia, if you haven't already. -- Mysterious Gopher ( talk, contribs), 03:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- @ Mysterious Gopher: I might, but I do similar work on small wikis. DivineAlpha 03:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
i have some valid criticism of this 'ethical' isp. how can i voice it on wikipedia without it being removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.216.140 ( talk) 03:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
how does this wikipedia thing work? how is it decided that what already exists is valid, correct and fair? eg. i find the greennet article misleading. i know people who have been misled. does wikipedia have a friendly link with greennet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.216.140 ( talk) 03:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- You don't. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. -- Yamla ( talk) 12:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Good work with the foul vandalism onslaught tonight. Name Omitted ( talk) 05:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
You were gentler with the vandal in giving a Level 1 template than I would have been. I will note that the vandal was then indeffed as an apparent throw-away account. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
103.13.101.142 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)--
That user open proxy,see my userpage history ... Vvvaggot ( talk) 03:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey there. I've been noticing a lot of anti-vandalism work by you. So, thanks for helping out. I appreciate it! You should consider joining Operation Enduring Encyclopedia, if you haven't already. -- Mysterious Gopher ( talk, contribs), 03:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- @ Mysterious Gopher: I might, but I do similar work on small wikis. DivineAlpha 03:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
i have some valid criticism of this 'ethical' isp. how can i voice it on wikipedia without it being removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.216.140 ( talk) 03:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
how does this wikipedia thing work? how is it decided that what already exists is valid, correct and fair? eg. i find the greennet article misleading. i know people who have been misled. does wikipedia have a friendly link with greennet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.216.140 ( talk) 03:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- You don't. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. -- Yamla ( talk) 12:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Good work with the foul vandalism onslaught tonight. Name Omitted ( talk) 05:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
| |
| Ten years! |
|---|