Due to personal commitments, I'll be away for some time. I hate to keep harping on it but if Highway Cello & co feels the need to vandalise, edit, picking on and alter even my user talk to your liking, policy or not - I suggest taking a break from wikipedia and actually getting a life.
If everything stays the same when I get back, this matter is dropped forever.
Digisouth14
15:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Soon to archived, working on how to do so. If anyone feels the need to see, just head over to history. ( Changes to the page coming when I'm back )
Also a test to see if I'm still being watched by certain individuals.
Digisouth14
10:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You are making edits to Wikipedia which are breaking the Manual of Style house style which users are supposed to follow. Please stop. These are the agreed rules which everyone abides by. Continuous changing of content in articles to break agreed-upon MoS rules, when you have been asked to stop, is often seen as vandalism. Constant vandalism may lead to you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. H ig hway Return to Oz... 00:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Afterword - Please reread what does vandalism mean. Reference :
WP:VAND Just because you do not like another's contribution means it's vandalism.
Digisouth14
10:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Afterword - I'd advise you to go back and read
WP:NPOV and
WP:MOS again. Again It doesn't mean just because you do not like another editor's writing means their's is POV. Engaging in
revert wars by editing within seconds is also counter-productive.
Digisouth14
11:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked you for disruption. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. -- Pilotguy ( roger that) 01:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
No editor or group of editors has "special rights" over any other editor with regards to an article (see WP:OWN). In fact, all editors should assume good faith with regard to any edit made to an article. Articles are written based on the consensus agreement of the editors working on the article along with Wikipedia policies such as WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:VERIFY, WP:CITE and WP:RS. These are, of course, not the only policies or guidelines that may apply to a particular article (see WP:MOS and WP:MOS-JP). If a dispute between two or more editors occurs about the wording of a section, then the dispute should be resolved on the article's talk page. If, however, the dispute cannot be resolved, then follow the recommendations on dispute resolution page. Editors that engage in a revert war can be subject to a temporary ban (see WP:3RR) by an administrator. -- TheFarix ( Talk) 01:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you showing me the guidelines and policys of Wikipedia TheFarix. I really appreciate it as I'm a new user to wikipedia
and do not yet know how things work. My apologies for not following some of the guidelines as I felt some of the remarks were made unfairly but I know now that this kind of self-delation is not allowed.
Digisouth14
15:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. H ig hway Return to Oz... 11:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
To HighwayCello, Please do not engage in personal attacks. Refer to
WP:NPA or try to start an edit war. If an admin has determined according to guidelines that I'm violating the rules of wikipedia, he/she will see fit to revoke my privilages.
Digisouth14
15:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Due to personal commitments, I'll be away for some time. I hate to keep harping on it but if Highway Cello & co feels the need to vandalise, edit, picking on and alter even my user talk to your liking, policy or not - I suggest taking a break from wikipedia and actually getting a life.
If everything stays the same when I get back, this matter is dropped forever.
Digisouth14
15:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Soon to archived, working on how to do so. If anyone feels the need to see, just head over to history. ( Changes to the page coming when I'm back )
Also a test to see if I'm still being watched by certain individuals.
Digisouth14
10:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You are making edits to Wikipedia which are breaking the Manual of Style house style which users are supposed to follow. Please stop. These are the agreed rules which everyone abides by. Continuous changing of content in articles to break agreed-upon MoS rules, when you have been asked to stop, is often seen as vandalism. Constant vandalism may lead to you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. H ig hway Return to Oz... 00:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Afterword - Please reread what does vandalism mean. Reference :
WP:VAND Just because you do not like another's contribution means it's vandalism.
Digisouth14
10:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Afterword - I'd advise you to go back and read
WP:NPOV and
WP:MOS again. Again It doesn't mean just because you do not like another editor's writing means their's is POV. Engaging in
revert wars by editing within seconds is also counter-productive.
Digisouth14
11:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked you for disruption. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. -- Pilotguy ( roger that) 01:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
No editor or group of editors has "special rights" over any other editor with regards to an article (see WP:OWN). In fact, all editors should assume good faith with regard to any edit made to an article. Articles are written based on the consensus agreement of the editors working on the article along with Wikipedia policies such as WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:VERIFY, WP:CITE and WP:RS. These are, of course, not the only policies or guidelines that may apply to a particular article (see WP:MOS and WP:MOS-JP). If a dispute between two or more editors occurs about the wording of a section, then the dispute should be resolved on the article's talk page. If, however, the dispute cannot be resolved, then follow the recommendations on dispute resolution page. Editors that engage in a revert war can be subject to a temporary ban (see WP:3RR) by an administrator. -- TheFarix ( Talk) 01:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you showing me the guidelines and policys of Wikipedia TheFarix. I really appreciate it as I'm a new user to wikipedia
and do not yet know how things work. My apologies for not following some of the guidelines as I felt some of the remarks were made unfairly but I know now that this kind of self-delation is not allowed.
Digisouth14
15:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. H ig hway Return to Oz... 11:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
To HighwayCello, Please do not engage in personal attacks. Refer to
WP:NPA or try to start an edit war. If an admin has determined according to guidelines that I'm violating the rules of wikipedia, he/she will see fit to revoke my privilages.
Digisouth14
15:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)