This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
What sort of personal attacks have I made? I attack nobody, I am a peaceful Aryan man and I use my words and not my sword. I made an edit to bring the truth of the Atlantean soul to the surface and it was deleted, an uncalled for act. I was sent a message that I may discuss the removal with the one who did such act. I did, and now you are threatening me? I would like to speak with the owner of this site, as this is uncalled for provacation on your part. Return my dialogue with the remover at once, and keep out of my affairs. ~ Aryan Traveller —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.31.224.121 ( talk • contribs) 2006-06-24 07:49:07 (UTC)
Sorry, no hoax. I was in Quartzite when I saw this matter. Go to www.acru.com to see this matter yourself. Martial Law 02:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Dictyosiphonaceae. You forgot to put the vandal's name in the template on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. -- Kjkolb 11:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Seen the deletion review, didn't agree with it. Added a prod to see if it would get through. Not going to take it to AfD though. Viridae 03:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry mate, we're working out the kinks in the program. Its currently in V 0.0.6rc3 . Thanks for letting me know! We'll use this information to improve it. -- Steve-o 08:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, just like to tell you, that the message on the talk page was never actually "overwritten". I am a developer of MWT, and i'd like to say that your feedback is very much appreciated. We're looking into the problem with the article. MichaelBillington 09:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
It seems to be open for editing after the discussion closed. The last remark appears unsourced to ip or user. Do you think it wise for the discussion page, once a thing has closed, to remain open for subsequent editing? Surely the wrh stuff won't be the only admin subject that permits people to feel heated action after the fact is legitimate. I figure there's good ways to restore the record at point of closure or wiki couldn't survive, but why present the opportunity for the hazard? Roukan 20:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
As it happens the specific thing I mentioned is now sourced, but the discussion continues. I'll try the admin listed at the top of the page. Thanks. Roukan 20:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Nah, what can be added? Heh you're fast, maybe you should be an admin thanks.
Roukan
20:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Why did you request that your tak page be deleted? Circeus 03:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
What sort of personal attacks have I made? I attack nobody, I am a peaceful Aryan man and I use my words and not my sword. I made an edit to bring the truth of the Atlantean soul to the surface and it was deleted, an uncalled for act. I was sent a message that I may discuss the removal with the one who did such act. I did, and now you are threatening me? I would like to speak with the owner of this site, as this is uncalled for provacation on your part. Return my dialogue with the remover at once, and keep out of my affairs. ~ Aryan Traveller —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.31.224.121 ( talk • contribs) 2006-06-24 07:49:07 (UTC)
Sorry, no hoax. I was in Quartzite when I saw this matter. Go to www.acru.com to see this matter yourself. Martial Law 02:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Dictyosiphonaceae. You forgot to put the vandal's name in the template on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. -- Kjkolb 11:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Seen the deletion review, didn't agree with it. Added a prod to see if it would get through. Not going to take it to AfD though. Viridae 03:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry mate, we're working out the kinks in the program. Its currently in V 0.0.6rc3 . Thanks for letting me know! We'll use this information to improve it. -- Steve-o 08:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, just like to tell you, that the message on the talk page was never actually "overwritten". I am a developer of MWT, and i'd like to say that your feedback is very much appreciated. We're looking into the problem with the article. MichaelBillington 09:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
It seems to be open for editing after the discussion closed. The last remark appears unsourced to ip or user. Do you think it wise for the discussion page, once a thing has closed, to remain open for subsequent editing? Surely the wrh stuff won't be the only admin subject that permits people to feel heated action after the fact is legitimate. I figure there's good ways to restore the record at point of closure or wiki couldn't survive, but why present the opportunity for the hazard? Roukan 20:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
As it happens the specific thing I mentioned is now sourced, but the discussion continues. I'll try the admin listed at the top of the page. Thanks. Roukan 20:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Nah, what can be added? Heh you're fast, maybe you should be an admin thanks.
Roukan
20:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Why did you request that your tak page be deleted? Circeus 03:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)