|
You should read WP:SOCK. I think you may have edited here under both this username and a different IP address. This may unfairly skew the conversation and consensus over a decision. Please post on my talk page if you have any questions on this policy. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 19:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Monica Lewinsky, you will be
blocked from editing.
Gwernol 20:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
This is absolutely out-of-line for you to do. What I posted was also backed up by something in the discussion thread. I believe it is normal protocol to put a warning before going to level 4im. This is absolutely out-of-line to be posting that and I resent it. You should not allow personal point of view to skewer an article or POV to punish an editor. Please be cautious in the future. -- DiamondElusive ( talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
It is not my own personal bias, it is quite self-evident by reading the article. Please do not critize or pass judgment on other editors because of your own POV/ political motivation in regards to sensitivities, and accuracy. If you can be neutral about this, you will see what I mean. And second of all, I really do not appreciate the strong arm tactics that you are using. What ever happened to the chain of correction, such as Level 1, Level 2, Level 3. You jump immediately into Level 4im which is completely inappropriate. -- DiamondElusive ( talk) 20:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Tut, tut. that wasn't very wise. I've blocked this account, as well as your IP for 24 hours for harassment, sockpuppetry and vandalism. Further repeats of this behavior will result in longer blocks being imposed. Gwernol 21:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
|
You should read WP:SOCK. I think you may have edited here under both this username and a different IP address. This may unfairly skew the conversation and consensus over a decision. Please post on my talk page if you have any questions on this policy. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 19:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Monica Lewinsky, you will be
blocked from editing.
Gwernol 20:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
This is absolutely out-of-line for you to do. What I posted was also backed up by something in the discussion thread. I believe it is normal protocol to put a warning before going to level 4im. This is absolutely out-of-line to be posting that and I resent it. You should not allow personal point of view to skewer an article or POV to punish an editor. Please be cautious in the future. -- DiamondElusive ( talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
It is not my own personal bias, it is quite self-evident by reading the article. Please do not critize or pass judgment on other editors because of your own POV/ political motivation in regards to sensitivities, and accuracy. If you can be neutral about this, you will see what I mean. And second of all, I really do not appreciate the strong arm tactics that you are using. What ever happened to the chain of correction, such as Level 1, Level 2, Level 3. You jump immediately into Level 4im which is completely inappropriate. -- DiamondElusive ( talk) 20:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Tut, tut. that wasn't very wise. I've blocked this account, as well as your IP for 24 hours for harassment, sockpuppetry and vandalism. Further repeats of this behavior will result in longer blocks being imposed. Gwernol 21:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)