Hello, Dhj davis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page.
If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the
Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join
WikiProject Medicine (sign up
here or say hello
here).
Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 17:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your additions to delirium. The Siddiqui source is simply excellent. With regards to the 4AT, I had difficulty finding a secondary source (see WP:MEDRS for explanation) that supports the use of this tool. The British delirium guideline (NICE CG103) recommends only CAM (or CAM-ICU) as a screening tool. JFW | T@lk 18:07, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 14:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EDAlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EDA-logos.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 14:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:EDAlogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Marcus
Qwertyus
21:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
If you need a board to approve of any text/revision, then Wikipedia might not be the place to publish it. =) Of course, I still strongly believe in Wikipedia's ability to maintain extraordinarily high-quality text. I am proud of what I've contributed to DVT, for example. But things can change at any moment. For example, I just did this: [1]. Biosthmors ( talk) 20:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
And after looking at it again, I just decided I could improve upon it further. So I did! [2] Best. Biosthmors ( talk) 20:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Before I provide comments, I'll wait for your reply here on your user talk page just to make sure you're still confident you're going to stick around. =) Biosthmors ( talk) 20:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
In my opinion, the best scenario would be one person making the edits, on their own behalf (see WP:ROLE), but of course you could consider peer review feedback from the people at your organization. As you would also consider peer review feedback from competent Wikipedians. And consensus (whatever that means!) carries the day. Biosthmors ( talk) 20:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the update at WP:MEDGA2013! Biosthmors ( talk) 21:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Dhj davis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page.
If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the
Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join
WikiProject Medicine (sign up
here or say hello
here).
Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 17:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your additions to delirium. The Siddiqui source is simply excellent. With regards to the 4AT, I had difficulty finding a secondary source (see WP:MEDRS for explanation) that supports the use of this tool. The British delirium guideline (NICE CG103) recommends only CAM (or CAM-ICU) as a screening tool. JFW | T@lk 18:07, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 14:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EDAlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EDA-logos.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 14:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:EDAlogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Marcus
Qwertyus
21:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
If you need a board to approve of any text/revision, then Wikipedia might not be the place to publish it. =) Of course, I still strongly believe in Wikipedia's ability to maintain extraordinarily high-quality text. I am proud of what I've contributed to DVT, for example. But things can change at any moment. For example, I just did this: [1]. Biosthmors ( talk) 20:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
And after looking at it again, I just decided I could improve upon it further. So I did! [2] Best. Biosthmors ( talk) 20:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Before I provide comments, I'll wait for your reply here on your user talk page just to make sure you're still confident you're going to stick around. =) Biosthmors ( talk) 20:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
In my opinion, the best scenario would be one person making the edits, on their own behalf (see WP:ROLE), but of course you could consider peer review feedback from the people at your organization. As you would also consider peer review feedback from competent Wikipedians. And consensus (whatever that means!) carries the day. Biosthmors ( talk) 20:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the update at WP:MEDGA2013! Biosthmors ( talk) 21:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)