Welcome!
Hello, Dgljr5121973, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 11:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, for dealing with the Bach cantatas in great detail. Please: before changing more, have a look at the discussions related to the topic in Classical music, resulting in a form as shown in BWV 144, for example. Please note: no text, no translation, no detailed instrumentation for each single movement. All these facts are easily found in the external links. BWV 1 and the ones following were not yet adjusted, - if you want to do that, great! - Please consider to move the table above to a user page, to leave this page for discussion, suggestion: User:Dgljr5121973/Bach. Happy editing, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
One more thought: you may be interested to watch the project Classical music and participate in the discussions. You find the past discussions, for example about the Bach cantatas, in their archives, just use the Search function there. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Db musms1147101 ante001r.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 19:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Dgljr5121973, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Dgljr5121973/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Great start! Please change Violin to violin, as long as the general term is meant, not a title or a specific violin, same for other instruments, vocal score, chorale, ... You may have noticed that (after a debate) the names of the Bach Passions have no dot, "St" instead of "St.". -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
What's growing in your sandbox is no toy, but on a grand scale! I offer two general suggestions: get a subset ready of what you have in mind and copy that to a user page for a more general discussion of experienced editors, plus avoid "bold" as a means of highlighting. (I did the same thing in my first article.) Almost the only wanted "bold" is the name of the article (and alternatives of that name and redirects to the page, if applicable). You probably know that there is a Manual of style (which I never used, just copied examples). -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
As I am not sure if you watch the pages you edit (to do so just click on the star right of "history"): I formatted your edit in Visitation, not bold (s.a.), use the standard template for Bible quote, reduce the Latin variant (it's in the link to Magnificat). The parenthesis about Elisabeth is very complicated and could be replaced by a summary and another Bible quote. What do you think? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
You improved this list greatly, thank you! But please keep in mind: it is rather long already. Someone added the prescribed readings lately, which had been discussed as unwanted, and which - being without a link - serve no purpose for people who don't know the Bible by those terms. They are linked and explained in every cantata. The list was made (I guess) to give an overview of which cantata was composed for which liturgical occasion. Composed, not performed, please. It is also not the place to expand on the history of a work, - please consider to rather write a short article on BWV 200. - If you want to improve the list further - I always wanted but didn't find the time yet - there should be no links from headings, and headings should not contain brackets, for example "Pentecost (Whit Sunday)"; Whit Sunday should go to the text instead or disappear. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Additional question: so far I considered Epiphany the end of the Christmas time, looking at the Christmas Oratorio, Part VI for Epiphany? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Only now did I notice the article, good! Please supply a "lead" (lede), a summary of what the article is about, compare St Matthew Passion. Please link only once to the same topic, unless it's a very long article or it's in a table where every line should stand by itself. A matter of uniform Wikipedia style: please reduce "bold" to the article name, as mentioned above? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Please let me know (here), why your competent list Bach has the date of the first performance of BWV 173a as 1722, whereas Dürr puts it between 1717 and 1722, and bach cantatas say 1717, 1720-1722? Other input also welcome, of course, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Protestant Reformation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enlightenment and Ban ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your effort for Eyn geystlich Gesangk Buchleyn, but it was the first hymnal for choir. The Achtliederbuch and Enchiridion had only melodies. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Actually, all the hymnals were for Choir, whether they had melodies or not. BTW, the hymnals were not only intended for Choirs, but also for the congregation, as Luther himself was the first advocate for congregational singing.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Dgljr5121973,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk) 22:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
|
I am afraid that I find four complete tables simply overwhelming. Can you find a solution that lists only the differences? If not, I will suggest to split the article in four. - Major changes to a Good article should first be discussed on the talk page. - Please check where you dropped references, I noticed several cases, . - I don't have the time to check individually, - the loss of referencing is a good reason to revert. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
ps: The many reference errors can help you finding where you lost references. Good luck fixing, will check tomorrow. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
ps: its not Flute and Violin, but flute and violin, no link, no capitals, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
ps: Do you know how to read edit summaries? I explained that it is enough to say once that the Evangelist is a tenor and the voice of Jesus bass. Please take care of the referencing issue, urgently so. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
So you did some original research, and did not provide a reference? No, under such circumstances nothing should be reinstated. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 05:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Dgljr5121973, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 11:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, for dealing with the Bach cantatas in great detail. Please: before changing more, have a look at the discussions related to the topic in Classical music, resulting in a form as shown in BWV 144, for example. Please note: no text, no translation, no detailed instrumentation for each single movement. All these facts are easily found in the external links. BWV 1 and the ones following were not yet adjusted, - if you want to do that, great! - Please consider to move the table above to a user page, to leave this page for discussion, suggestion: User:Dgljr5121973/Bach. Happy editing, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
One more thought: you may be interested to watch the project Classical music and participate in the discussions. You find the past discussions, for example about the Bach cantatas, in their archives, just use the Search function there. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Db musms1147101 ante001r.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 19:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Dgljr5121973, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Dgljr5121973/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Great start! Please change Violin to violin, as long as the general term is meant, not a title or a specific violin, same for other instruments, vocal score, chorale, ... You may have noticed that (after a debate) the names of the Bach Passions have no dot, "St" instead of "St.". -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
What's growing in your sandbox is no toy, but on a grand scale! I offer two general suggestions: get a subset ready of what you have in mind and copy that to a user page for a more general discussion of experienced editors, plus avoid "bold" as a means of highlighting. (I did the same thing in my first article.) Almost the only wanted "bold" is the name of the article (and alternatives of that name and redirects to the page, if applicable). You probably know that there is a Manual of style (which I never used, just copied examples). -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
As I am not sure if you watch the pages you edit (to do so just click on the star right of "history"): I formatted your edit in Visitation, not bold (s.a.), use the standard template for Bible quote, reduce the Latin variant (it's in the link to Magnificat). The parenthesis about Elisabeth is very complicated and could be replaced by a summary and another Bible quote. What do you think? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
You improved this list greatly, thank you! But please keep in mind: it is rather long already. Someone added the prescribed readings lately, which had been discussed as unwanted, and which - being without a link - serve no purpose for people who don't know the Bible by those terms. They are linked and explained in every cantata. The list was made (I guess) to give an overview of which cantata was composed for which liturgical occasion. Composed, not performed, please. It is also not the place to expand on the history of a work, - please consider to rather write a short article on BWV 200. - If you want to improve the list further - I always wanted but didn't find the time yet - there should be no links from headings, and headings should not contain brackets, for example "Pentecost (Whit Sunday)"; Whit Sunday should go to the text instead or disappear. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Additional question: so far I considered Epiphany the end of the Christmas time, looking at the Christmas Oratorio, Part VI for Epiphany? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Only now did I notice the article, good! Please supply a "lead" (lede), a summary of what the article is about, compare St Matthew Passion. Please link only once to the same topic, unless it's a very long article or it's in a table where every line should stand by itself. A matter of uniform Wikipedia style: please reduce "bold" to the article name, as mentioned above? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Please let me know (here), why your competent list Bach has the date of the first performance of BWV 173a as 1722, whereas Dürr puts it between 1717 and 1722, and bach cantatas say 1717, 1720-1722? Other input also welcome, of course, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Protestant Reformation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enlightenment and Ban ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your effort for Eyn geystlich Gesangk Buchleyn, but it was the first hymnal for choir. The Achtliederbuch and Enchiridion had only melodies. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Actually, all the hymnals were for Choir, whether they had melodies or not. BTW, the hymnals were not only intended for Choirs, but also for the congregation, as Luther himself was the first advocate for congregational singing.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Dgljr5121973,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk) 22:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
|
I am afraid that I find four complete tables simply overwhelming. Can you find a solution that lists only the differences? If not, I will suggest to split the article in four. - Major changes to a Good article should first be discussed on the talk page. - Please check where you dropped references, I noticed several cases, . - I don't have the time to check individually, - the loss of referencing is a good reason to revert. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
ps: The many reference errors can help you finding where you lost references. Good luck fixing, will check tomorrow. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
ps: its not Flute and Violin, but flute and violin, no link, no capitals, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
ps: Do you know how to read edit summaries? I explained that it is enough to say once that the Evangelist is a tenor and the voice of Jesus bass. Please take care of the referencing issue, urgently so. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dgljr5121973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
So you did some original research, and did not provide a reference? No, under such circumstances nothing should be reinstated. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 05:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)