Do you have the URL for the original image? It would make it easier to make sure it doesn't get deleted in the future. MrKIA11 ( talk) 14:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but WP:COMMONNAME completely misses the point and has no relevance here. This is not some mere capitalization issue but the integrity of the game's title itself. It's like changing "&" to "and" in the title of an article on a book, with no good reason. Despatche ( talk) 19:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I think a more reliable place to take it would be Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Dwanyewest ( talk) 16:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bad sport and a troll for trying to explain the nature of what you've presented, which has nothing to do with moving articles? You'd rather me stick to just being arbitrary instead of explaining why things are arbitrary to begin with?
I have no idea what offended you, and I'm not sure that I want to know, but please tell me anyway. That aside, I think the case for Dariusburst is over. Unless there's anything else you'd like to add, I'd like to move the page after this is dealt with. Civility is a serious issue, and it shouldn't be impossible. Despatche ( talk) 03:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
In the edits you are making regarding the birth day, you seem to be removing (perhaps inadvertently) a lot of other information that does not seem to be controversial. I believe that is why the edits are being reverted. Can you make the edit you believe is necessary to reflect the RfC close without deleting the other information? Thanks, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 23:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You are deleting material which isn't comes from me. You are the driver in this terrible journey of Laura Branigan. In fact, I did some background of you, and honestly, why are you doing this? Is it something you must do to get some satisfaction. I have been in contact with Wikipedia and reported what you are doing. You were not even born to know things which you are deleting. I need to ask you about how you are deciding what is right or wrong. And for god sake, when you are writing Laura was born 1957, you need to read what the rest is saying. How the hell can you write 1957, when you also have Billy's birth year to 1957? I have been in contact with people who knew Laura, and they are laughing at you! "He doesn't seem to know anything, when he write's both Laura and Billy was born 1957. And Brewster, Branigan's never lived in Brewster". That is what people are writing about you! Listen here little gardener...If you write Laura was born 1957, you MUST REWRITE her whole biography and timeline so it suits a birth of 1957. You can't mix 1957 and 1952! Maybe you can in your strange and stupid world, but we who remember Laura, we know the truth. Advice...log out and go back to your garden. Wikipedia and Laura Branigan doesn't need you!-- Born53 swe ( talk) 16:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Laura Branigan, you may be
blocked from editing. The RFC does not support your repeated wholesale removal of material from the article!
Thomas.W
talk 23:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Laura Branigan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 04:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
If you need advice about how to resolve a content dispute (or a conduct dispute), ask at the Teahouse. This dispute appears to have to do with Laura Branigan. Robert McClenon ( talk) 11:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
For god sake, hold back with your rubbish. I have other things to do and sit at wiki as you have. The problem with you is that you are not interesting in learning about Laura and her early life. I have been accused by you for not being reliable in my research of Laura Branigan. This is from The American Academy of Dramatic Arts own website. Notable alumni who has graduated through the years. Laura Branigan graduated 1972 together with Graham Beckel, Peter Weller, Julia Duffy and Melanie Mayron. https://www.aada.edu/alumni/notable-alumni#decade:1960_1970/orderby:year/display:panel. Is this a fake and manipulated page created by me in photoshop? Is it from the academy's own homepage? Is it a trustful and reliable site from the academy? If not, what is wrong with the site? Can you see any wrongs that the academy has done? If not 1972 is the right, which is the right year? If Laura was born 1957 she would have been with graduations of 1977. Can you see Laura at 1977 alumni? If not, why isn't Laura along with them? If Laura graduated 1972, which year was she born? If you choose 1952, it gives an age of 20 at Laura's graduation. If you instead choose 1957, it will give Laura an age of just 13 when she graduated in 1972. I do understand this will or can be very difficult for you, but I need to know. Is the academy's homepage a fraud, a photoshop fabrication or manipulated by someone, I would recommend you to contact them and ask them to correct their errors. They are very nice chatting with. I have done it, so I know.-- Born53 swe ( talk) 13:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Those "Did Laura" is something you can try to answer. Very simple, yes or no. If yes, good, if no, explain shortly what you find was wrong. And a source to motivate your no. OK, let's begin...You can't answer "I don't know"!!
Maybe a long list, but it is necessary to know how much you about Laura Branigan, if you are able to find your own sources, or if you are a just simple wiki expert who knows everything inside wikipedia but nothing outside of it?-- Born53 swe ( talk) 22:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Do you have the URL for the original image? It would make it easier to make sure it doesn't get deleted in the future. MrKIA11 ( talk) 14:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but WP:COMMONNAME completely misses the point and has no relevance here. This is not some mere capitalization issue but the integrity of the game's title itself. It's like changing "&" to "and" in the title of an article on a book, with no good reason. Despatche ( talk) 19:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I think a more reliable place to take it would be Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Dwanyewest ( talk) 16:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bad sport and a troll for trying to explain the nature of what you've presented, which has nothing to do with moving articles? You'd rather me stick to just being arbitrary instead of explaining why things are arbitrary to begin with?
I have no idea what offended you, and I'm not sure that I want to know, but please tell me anyway. That aside, I think the case for Dariusburst is over. Unless there's anything else you'd like to add, I'd like to move the page after this is dealt with. Civility is a serious issue, and it shouldn't be impossible. Despatche ( talk) 03:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
In the edits you are making regarding the birth day, you seem to be removing (perhaps inadvertently) a lot of other information that does not seem to be controversial. I believe that is why the edits are being reverted. Can you make the edit you believe is necessary to reflect the RfC close without deleting the other information? Thanks, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 23:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You are deleting material which isn't comes from me. You are the driver in this terrible journey of Laura Branigan. In fact, I did some background of you, and honestly, why are you doing this? Is it something you must do to get some satisfaction. I have been in contact with Wikipedia and reported what you are doing. You were not even born to know things which you are deleting. I need to ask you about how you are deciding what is right or wrong. And for god sake, when you are writing Laura was born 1957, you need to read what the rest is saying. How the hell can you write 1957, when you also have Billy's birth year to 1957? I have been in contact with people who knew Laura, and they are laughing at you! "He doesn't seem to know anything, when he write's both Laura and Billy was born 1957. And Brewster, Branigan's never lived in Brewster". That is what people are writing about you! Listen here little gardener...If you write Laura was born 1957, you MUST REWRITE her whole biography and timeline so it suits a birth of 1957. You can't mix 1957 and 1952! Maybe you can in your strange and stupid world, but we who remember Laura, we know the truth. Advice...log out and go back to your garden. Wikipedia and Laura Branigan doesn't need you!-- Born53 swe ( talk) 16:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Laura Branigan, you may be
blocked from editing. The RFC does not support your repeated wholesale removal of material from the article!
Thomas.W
talk 23:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Laura Branigan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 04:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
If you need advice about how to resolve a content dispute (or a conduct dispute), ask at the Teahouse. This dispute appears to have to do with Laura Branigan. Robert McClenon ( talk) 11:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
For god sake, hold back with your rubbish. I have other things to do and sit at wiki as you have. The problem with you is that you are not interesting in learning about Laura and her early life. I have been accused by you for not being reliable in my research of Laura Branigan. This is from The American Academy of Dramatic Arts own website. Notable alumni who has graduated through the years. Laura Branigan graduated 1972 together with Graham Beckel, Peter Weller, Julia Duffy and Melanie Mayron. https://www.aada.edu/alumni/notable-alumni#decade:1960_1970/orderby:year/display:panel. Is this a fake and manipulated page created by me in photoshop? Is it from the academy's own homepage? Is it a trustful and reliable site from the academy? If not, what is wrong with the site? Can you see any wrongs that the academy has done? If not 1972 is the right, which is the right year? If Laura was born 1957 she would have been with graduations of 1977. Can you see Laura at 1977 alumni? If not, why isn't Laura along with them? If Laura graduated 1972, which year was she born? If you choose 1952, it gives an age of 20 at Laura's graduation. If you instead choose 1957, it will give Laura an age of just 13 when she graduated in 1972. I do understand this will or can be very difficult for you, but I need to know. Is the academy's homepage a fraud, a photoshop fabrication or manipulated by someone, I would recommend you to contact them and ask them to correct their errors. They are very nice chatting with. I have done it, so I know.-- Born53 swe ( talk) 13:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Those "Did Laura" is something you can try to answer. Very simple, yes or no. If yes, good, if no, explain shortly what you find was wrong. And a source to motivate your no. OK, let's begin...You can't answer "I don't know"!!
Maybe a long list, but it is necessary to know how much you about Laura Branigan, if you are able to find your own sources, or if you are a just simple wiki expert who knows everything inside wikipedia but nothing outside of it?-- Born53 swe ( talk) 22:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)