![]() |
Hi Devadee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hi Paul, Wikipedia might be open source, but cannot be used for promotional purposes for your own DVDs please and the way they are being shoe-horned into other encyclopedia articles is frankly unacceptable. Much as I understand you wish to establish yourself as a film-maker, unless they receive "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", they don't meet the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia:Notability (films). Just being available on Amazon and listed on IMDb isn't considered sufficient for inclusion. Bob talk 23:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black Shuck has been identified as vandalism and reverted by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello Devadee,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Shuck (2012 film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Reedman72 ( talk) 16:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Paul T T Easter,
Stagger (film 2009) and
Black Shuck (2012 film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Ruby
Murray
22:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Easter. Thank you.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
06:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk)
17:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi Devadee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hi Paul, Wikipedia might be open source, but cannot be used for promotional purposes for your own DVDs please and the way they are being shoe-horned into other encyclopedia articles is frankly unacceptable. Much as I understand you wish to establish yourself as a film-maker, unless they receive "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", they don't meet the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia:Notability (films). Just being available on Amazon and listed on IMDb isn't considered sufficient for inclusion. Bob talk 23:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black Shuck has been identified as vandalism and reverted by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello Devadee,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Shuck (2012 film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Reedman72 ( talk) 16:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Paul T T Easter,
Stagger (film 2009) and
Black Shuck (2012 film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Ruby
Murray
22:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Easter. Thank you.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
06:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk)
17:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC) |