The current time in New Zealand is 08:59, 27 May 2024 NZST [ refresh
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
On Charlotte Kretschmann, you have insisted on keeping the "notability" tag for her article, and cite the AfD pages for Pearl Berg and Elizabeth Francis as reasons for doing so. This is despite the fact that simply being the oldest person in Germany is not the reason justified in general, or even for the edit you reverted of mine, for having her page.
WP:BIO gives clear criteria on whether a person is considered notable or not.
There are entire articles about Kretschmann spanning multiple years from The Local, Der Spiegel, Bild, and others that show in-depth coverage of her longevity.
There is only one primary source in the entire article, and it is a link to her Instagram photo diary, and is only in supplement to 9 secondary in-line citations throughout the rest of the article. I fail to see what argument you have for questioning her notability for Wikipedia. EytanMelech ( talk) 20:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, there.
I was wondering if you would agree to give your personal opinion on my arguments for editing the page. To be honest, I was kind of expecting to hear counterarguments from you as you are the one who raised an objection by asking for consensus.
Thanks in advance. Cordially.-- Johnn Francis ( talk) 05:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. Browsing through the edit history of a rather chaotic page I noticed this revert: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hari_Hari&diff=prev&oldid=1128245079 Believe it or not, the edit you reverted wasn't vandalism... Williams' dictionary does actually give the meaning "Paphirus largillierti and Dosinia subrosea, bivalve molluscs" - i.e. clams - to harihari, hahari. It's almost certainly not where the Post Office got the name from, though (at the time Harihari was named, the Post Office were busy reverse engineering names in te reo Māori for post offices). Daveosaurus ( talk) 03:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
You have placed a cleanup tag on this articla, with the edit summary that thae article is full of Full of " WP:EDITORIAL and/or WP:COPYVIO". Please indicate where there is copyright violation (and wich source is plagiarized) and editorialising. HLGallon ( talk) 10:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, User DerbyCountyinNZ. The natural impulse is to applaud your desire to improve film plots, but evidently you are unfamiliar with the WP:MOS Plot Summary guidelines ( here). They limit plot summaries to 400-700 words. Please adjust your edits to plot summaries accordingly. Thank you. 2601:196:180:DC0:4DD6:CB1C:77E5:8408 ( talk) 13:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The current time in New Zealand is 08:59, 27 May 2024 NZST [ refresh
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
On Charlotte Kretschmann, you have insisted on keeping the "notability" tag for her article, and cite the AfD pages for Pearl Berg and Elizabeth Francis as reasons for doing so. This is despite the fact that simply being the oldest person in Germany is not the reason justified in general, or even for the edit you reverted of mine, for having her page.
WP:BIO gives clear criteria on whether a person is considered notable or not.
There are entire articles about Kretschmann spanning multiple years from The Local, Der Spiegel, Bild, and others that show in-depth coverage of her longevity.
There is only one primary source in the entire article, and it is a link to her Instagram photo diary, and is only in supplement to 9 secondary in-line citations throughout the rest of the article. I fail to see what argument you have for questioning her notability for Wikipedia. EytanMelech ( talk) 20:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, there.
I was wondering if you would agree to give your personal opinion on my arguments for editing the page. To be honest, I was kind of expecting to hear counterarguments from you as you are the one who raised an objection by asking for consensus.
Thanks in advance. Cordially.-- Johnn Francis ( talk) 05:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. Browsing through the edit history of a rather chaotic page I noticed this revert: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hari_Hari&diff=prev&oldid=1128245079 Believe it or not, the edit you reverted wasn't vandalism... Williams' dictionary does actually give the meaning "Paphirus largillierti and Dosinia subrosea, bivalve molluscs" - i.e. clams - to harihari, hahari. It's almost certainly not where the Post Office got the name from, though (at the time Harihari was named, the Post Office were busy reverse engineering names in te reo Māori for post offices). Daveosaurus ( talk) 03:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
You have placed a cleanup tag on this articla, with the edit summary that thae article is full of Full of " WP:EDITORIAL and/or WP:COPYVIO". Please indicate where there is copyright violation (and wich source is plagiarized) and editorialising. HLGallon ( talk) 10:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, User DerbyCountyinNZ. The natural impulse is to applaud your desire to improve film plots, but evidently you are unfamiliar with the WP:MOS Plot Summary guidelines ( here). They limit plot summaries to 400-700 words. Please adjust your edits to plot summaries accordingly. Thank you. 2601:196:180:DC0:4DD6:CB1C:77E5:8408 ( talk) 13:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)