Welcome!
Hello, Dendirrek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
TeaDrinker
10:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the contributions on the armoured vehicles of the Eastern Bloc. You're doing a wonderful job there! -- MoRsE ( talk) 12:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
My pleasure! However I still have to figure out some things like how to add images and how to make new pages (MT-LBu etc.). dendirrek ( talk) 13:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Dendirrek, could you please cite your sources for the operators' section in the BTR 3 article. Regards, Bogdan що? 22:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the referencing process maybe be somewhat confusing at first. The whole point is not to cite in the "references" section, but in the article. In other words, to cite (with a small number, ha-ha) just put "<ref> source </ref> "behind whatever you want to cite and what you type within the tags will appear in the reflist.
So for example, when we have a statement that needs citation, "Wikipedia is a website". All you need to do is find a source and place it within the ref tags. Like so...Wikipedia is a website [1]. (I wrote "Appears down here" in the tags).
If what I'm saying sounds stupid, it's all explained in detail at WP:CITE#HOW. Hope it helps, Bogdan що? 23:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
What are your sources? Can you give me the addresses of websites you're using? Can you give me the names of books/military magazines you're using as reference? - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
I must agree that what you say makes a lot of sense but the name of the ATGM system used in T-80B wasn't Kobra but 9K112-2. "Kobra" was the nickname for 9M112 ATGM.
Regards. SuperTank17 ( talk) 18:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
Thank you for letting me know about the errors I'll try to correct them now. I have a little more time now so I can do it. My main goal is to make those articles as close to the truth as possible so that people can learn as much as possible about the subject of the articles. So they won't have to search through books, magazines and Internet to learn about it.
Let me know about any other errors you may find and I'll try to remove them to the best of my ability.
Regards. SuperTank17 ( talk) 13:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
In T-62 article witch you recently edited you write that BTS-4V was a medium armoured tractor. However the JED The Military Equipment Directory says that BTS-4V was an ARV just like BTS series ARVs based on T-54/T-55.
Regards. - SuperTank17 11:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
JED The Military Equipment Directory has an article about Ramses tank which is supposed to be a T-54 upgrade. On Wikipedia there's a Ramses II tank which is supposed to be based on T-55. Were there two Ramses tanks (one, modernization of T-54 and the other one the modernization of T-55) or is it just that the name on the JED The Military Equipment Directory is missing "second"?
Regards. - SuperTank17 19:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
While several sources claim that series production of the Ramses II started and that in 1996, already 260 were in service, there is no proof whatsoever of that. It's almost certain that this programme was halted after Egypte received several hundred M60A1/A3's and M1A1's. Jane's Armour and Artillery 2003-2004 also says that by early 2003, series production hadn't started yet. However, some older T-54/55 tanks were probably fitted with a 105mm gun, smoke grenade launchers and a German-made AEG search light. dendirrek 19:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
There some very serious differences between what's written on Wikipedia and JED The Military Equipment Directory:
It says that the first model of the T-54, the T-54-1 was an initial trials version and T-54-2 was first version to be build in quantity.
It also says that the standard T-54 wasn't the T-54-3 but a different vehicle.
It also says that T-54-2 appeared in 1947, T-54-3 in 1949 and T-54 in 1951.
Can you please clear this up?
Regards. - SuperTank17 21:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
I found this [1]
Was there a T-55AM2 with Merida FCS?
Regards. - SuperTank17 16:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Regards. - SuperTank17 18:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I'm guess that those two modernizations are also something that you don't agree about with JED but what are those tanks in following pictures if they aren't T-55AMV6?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 22:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I was just reading through some stuff on JED site about T-80 models and I came across T-80AV and T-80AKV which are supposed to be T-80A and T-80AK with ERA. But according to my research the basic T-80A model was already fitted with Kontakt-1 ERA.
So I decided to ask you this question as you know some very reliable sources: Was there a T-80AV and a T-80AKV?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 20:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Good Evening.
So we can say that T-72 is a further development of T-62 with some features of the T-64A?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 22:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
Why did you removed the T-72PPM? There's a photographic evidence of a firefighting vehicle based on T-72.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 11:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
All I did was mention the T-72G and T-72GM were western designations for T-72M/M1 in service with East Germany.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 12:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Good Evening.
What is the more correct designation for ZSU-57-2? ZSU-57-2 or ZSU-57/2? I met both of these designations and they appear to be used at random.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 21:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I wondering what is that thing on the roof of that ZSU-57-2 the picture of which is to the right? Is some kind of add-on armour to give it protection from attacks from above? And what is that thing in the front of the hull? Some kind of crate?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 21:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
Are those vehicles completely bogus or are just the designations bogus?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I think that BMP-1GR is something like the Leopard-1A5(BE) used by Belgium which was just a designation for Leopard V tanks exported to Belgium.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 19:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Good evening.
JED and Gary's Combat Vehicle Reference Guide suggest that the BMP-1P is simply a BMP-1 armed with 9M111 Fagot (AT-4 Spigot) ATGM, 9M111-2 Fagot (AT-4B Spigot B) ATGM, 9M113 Konkurs (AT-5 Spandrel) ATGM or 9M113M Konkurs-M (AT-5B Spandrel B) ATGM instead of 9M14 Malyutka (AT-3 Sagger) ATGM. While upgrades like six smoke grenade dischargers and kovriki turret armour were added in BMP-1PM version.
Is this true?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 00:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Good evening.
I have another question: Are those designators for "BMP-1/BMP-2 fitted with appliqué armour for use in Afghanistan" real or are those the same case as the T-62E?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 20:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Image:BM Bulat.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Image:BM Bulat.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Image:BM Bulat.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
04:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I found this picture on JED: http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_007.jpg
The picture most probably shows one of many wrecks of Soviet vehicles left in Afghanistan but this one is particularly interesting because it looks like it has (or at least had) a turret from BMP-1 or maybe even BRM-1 as it doesn't seem to have the ATGM launcher.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
It says in the article about BRDM-2 that it has a spotlight in front of the front hatches but there are many pictures of BRDM-2 without the spotlight. Is it because it was taken off or was it added in later production models?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
Do you have any idea what those vehicles below might be?
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_009.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_010.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_011.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_013.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_014.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_015.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_016.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_017.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_020.jpg
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I have a question. The BRDM-2 has four infra red driving lights but are the driving lights on BRDM-1, D-442 FUG and D-944 PSzH also infra red?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
What is that thing in the rear of PT-76 turret? Some sources say that it's a fume extractor while some describe it as a "circular bulge of an air intake". Now the first version is very probable but here's the problem: I found the same thing while looking at pictures of PT-76 Model 3 which didn't have the fume extractor. Do you have any kind of information that might help me with this problem?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I'm having a problem with this Iraqi OT-62A pciture that I found on JED:
http://www.jedsite.info/fulltrack-oscar/oscar/ot-62_series/iraq-aa/iqaa_001.jpg
It says that it is an Iraqi OT-62A armed with Czechoslovak twin 30 mm M-53/59 anti-aircraft auto canons in an open-tub mount but I can't seem to find side hatches and I'm not sure if the second projecting bay really is there. Can you help me with this?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 19:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I have been researching the Type 63 recently and I found two pictures of a strange new variant I can't identify.
The vehicle that I'm talking about has angular turret and is armed with 105 mm rifled gun, the same as the one fitted in Type 63-I, Type 63G and Type 63A tanks.
http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-tango/tango-type/type-63_series/zts-63m/zts63m_001.jpg - the variant I'm talking about next to a Type 63-I or Type 63G
http://www.sinodefence.com/army/tank/images/type63_04large.jpg - the variant I'm talking about next to a Type 63-I or Type 63G
Do you have any idea what variant that maybe?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 22:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I can give a source: Stroea, Adrian; Băjenaru, Gheorghe (2010) (in Romanian). Artileria română în date și imagini (Romanian artillery in data and images). Editura Centrului Tehnic-Editorial al Armatei. ISBN 978-606-524-080-3. Page 161. Mr. Stroea is the alternate head of training and doctrine for the Romanian Land Forces, I'm pretty sure he is a reliable source. Moreover, there are some small articles in the Romanian media about joint cooperation between Communist Romania and PRC after 1968. ( http://www.jurnalul.ro/scinteia/jurnalul-national/relatiile-militare-romano-chineze-print-530126.html)
The M81 and M82 were joint coop between PRC and Communist Romania. Documentation was usually supplied by PRC, while the Romanian engineers improved or adapted the designs.Also, the M1975/77 100 mm AT gun was designed by Romanian engineers and built using Chinese technology (machinery) at Arsenal Resita.-- Mircea87 ( talk) 16:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Dendirrek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
TeaDrinker
10:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the contributions on the armoured vehicles of the Eastern Bloc. You're doing a wonderful job there! -- MoRsE ( talk) 12:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
My pleasure! However I still have to figure out some things like how to add images and how to make new pages (MT-LBu etc.). dendirrek ( talk) 13:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Dendirrek, could you please cite your sources for the operators' section in the BTR 3 article. Regards, Bogdan що? 22:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the referencing process maybe be somewhat confusing at first. The whole point is not to cite in the "references" section, but in the article. In other words, to cite (with a small number, ha-ha) just put "<ref> source </ref> "behind whatever you want to cite and what you type within the tags will appear in the reflist.
So for example, when we have a statement that needs citation, "Wikipedia is a website". All you need to do is find a source and place it within the ref tags. Like so...Wikipedia is a website [1]. (I wrote "Appears down here" in the tags).
If what I'm saying sounds stupid, it's all explained in detail at WP:CITE#HOW. Hope it helps, Bogdan що? 23:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
What are your sources? Can you give me the addresses of websites you're using? Can you give me the names of books/military magazines you're using as reference? - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
I must agree that what you say makes a lot of sense but the name of the ATGM system used in T-80B wasn't Kobra but 9K112-2. "Kobra" was the nickname for 9M112 ATGM.
Regards. SuperTank17 ( talk) 18:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
Thank you for letting me know about the errors I'll try to correct them now. I have a little more time now so I can do it. My main goal is to make those articles as close to the truth as possible so that people can learn as much as possible about the subject of the articles. So they won't have to search through books, magazines and Internet to learn about it.
Let me know about any other errors you may find and I'll try to remove them to the best of my ability.
Regards. SuperTank17 ( talk) 13:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
In T-62 article witch you recently edited you write that BTS-4V was a medium armoured tractor. However the JED The Military Equipment Directory says that BTS-4V was an ARV just like BTS series ARVs based on T-54/T-55.
Regards. - SuperTank17 11:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
JED The Military Equipment Directory has an article about Ramses tank which is supposed to be a T-54 upgrade. On Wikipedia there's a Ramses II tank which is supposed to be based on T-55. Were there two Ramses tanks (one, modernization of T-54 and the other one the modernization of T-55) or is it just that the name on the JED The Military Equipment Directory is missing "second"?
Regards. - SuperTank17 19:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
While several sources claim that series production of the Ramses II started and that in 1996, already 260 were in service, there is no proof whatsoever of that. It's almost certain that this programme was halted after Egypte received several hundred M60A1/A3's and M1A1's. Jane's Armour and Artillery 2003-2004 also says that by early 2003, series production hadn't started yet. However, some older T-54/55 tanks were probably fitted with a 105mm gun, smoke grenade launchers and a German-made AEG search light. dendirrek 19:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
There some very serious differences between what's written on Wikipedia and JED The Military Equipment Directory:
It says that the first model of the T-54, the T-54-1 was an initial trials version and T-54-2 was first version to be build in quantity.
It also says that the standard T-54 wasn't the T-54-3 but a different vehicle.
It also says that T-54-2 appeared in 1947, T-54-3 in 1949 and T-54 in 1951.
Can you please clear this up?
Regards. - SuperTank17 21:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
I found this [1]
Was there a T-55AM2 with Merida FCS?
Regards. - SuperTank17 16:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Regards. - SuperTank17 18:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I'm guess that those two modernizations are also something that you don't agree about with JED but what are those tanks in following pictures if they aren't T-55AMV6?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 22:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I was just reading through some stuff on JED site about T-80 models and I came across T-80AV and T-80AKV which are supposed to be T-80A and T-80AK with ERA. But according to my research the basic T-80A model was already fitted with Kontakt-1 ERA.
So I decided to ask you this question as you know some very reliable sources: Was there a T-80AV and a T-80AKV?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 20:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Good Evening.
So we can say that T-72 is a further development of T-62 with some features of the T-64A?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 22:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
Why did you removed the T-72PPM? There's a photographic evidence of a firefighting vehicle based on T-72.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 11:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
All I did was mention the T-72G and T-72GM were western designations for T-72M/M1 in service with East Germany.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 12:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Good Evening.
What is the more correct designation for ZSU-57-2? ZSU-57-2 or ZSU-57/2? I met both of these designations and they appear to be used at random.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 21:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I wondering what is that thing on the roof of that ZSU-57-2 the picture of which is to the right? Is some kind of add-on armour to give it protection from attacks from above? And what is that thing in the front of the hull? Some kind of crate?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 21:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
Are those vehicles completely bogus or are just the designations bogus?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Good evening.
I think that BMP-1GR is something like the Leopard-1A5(BE) used by Belgium which was just a designation for Leopard V tanks exported to Belgium.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 19:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Good evening.
JED and Gary's Combat Vehicle Reference Guide suggest that the BMP-1P is simply a BMP-1 armed with 9M111 Fagot (AT-4 Spigot) ATGM, 9M111-2 Fagot (AT-4B Spigot B) ATGM, 9M113 Konkurs (AT-5 Spandrel) ATGM or 9M113M Konkurs-M (AT-5B Spandrel B) ATGM instead of 9M14 Malyutka (AT-3 Sagger) ATGM. While upgrades like six smoke grenade dischargers and kovriki turret armour were added in BMP-1PM version.
Is this true?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 00:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Good evening.
I have another question: Are those designators for "BMP-1/BMP-2 fitted with appliqué armour for use in Afghanistan" real or are those the same case as the T-62E?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 20:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Image:BM Bulat.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Image:BM Bulat.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Image:BM Bulat.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
04:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I found this picture on JED: http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_007.jpg
The picture most probably shows one of many wrecks of Soviet vehicles left in Afghanistan but this one is particularly interesting because it looks like it has (or at least had) a turret from BMP-1 or maybe even BRM-1 as it doesn't seem to have the ATGM launcher.
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
It says in the article about BRDM-2 that it has a spotlight in front of the front hatches but there are many pictures of BRDM-2 without the spotlight. Is it because it was taken off or was it added in later production models?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
Do you have any idea what those vehicles below might be?
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_009.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_010.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_011.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_013.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_014.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_015.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_016.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_017.jpg
http://www.jedsite.info/afv/bravo/brdm-2_series/z-unknown/unk-brdm2_020.jpg
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I have a question. The BRDM-2 has four infra red driving lights but are the driving lights on BRDM-1, D-442 FUG and D-944 PSzH also infra red?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 16:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
What is that thing in the rear of PT-76 turret? Some sources say that it's a fume extractor while some describe it as a "circular bulge of an air intake". Now the first version is very probable but here's the problem: I found the same thing while looking at pictures of PT-76 Model 3 which didn't have the fume extractor. Do you have any kind of information that might help me with this problem?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I'm having a problem with this Iraqi OT-62A pciture that I found on JED:
http://www.jedsite.info/fulltrack-oscar/oscar/ot-62_series/iraq-aa/iqaa_001.jpg
It says that it is an Iraqi OT-62A armed with Czechoslovak twin 30 mm M-53/59 anti-aircraft auto canons in an open-tub mount but I can't seem to find side hatches and I'm not sure if the second projecting bay really is there. Can you help me with this?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 19:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
I have been researching the Type 63 recently and I found two pictures of a strange new variant I can't identify.
The vehicle that I'm talking about has angular turret and is armed with 105 mm rifled gun, the same as the one fitted in Type 63-I, Type 63G and Type 63A tanks.
http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-tango/tango-type/type-63_series/zts-63m/zts63m_001.jpg - the variant I'm talking about next to a Type 63-I or Type 63G
http://www.sinodefence.com/army/tank/images/type63_04large.jpg - the variant I'm talking about next to a Type 63-I or Type 63G
Do you have any idea what variant that maybe?
Regards. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 22:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I can give a source: Stroea, Adrian; Băjenaru, Gheorghe (2010) (in Romanian). Artileria română în date și imagini (Romanian artillery in data and images). Editura Centrului Tehnic-Editorial al Armatei. ISBN 978-606-524-080-3. Page 161. Mr. Stroea is the alternate head of training and doctrine for the Romanian Land Forces, I'm pretty sure he is a reliable source. Moreover, there are some small articles in the Romanian media about joint cooperation between Communist Romania and PRC after 1968. ( http://www.jurnalul.ro/scinteia/jurnalul-national/relatiile-militare-romano-chineze-print-530126.html)
The M81 and M82 were joint coop between PRC and Communist Romania. Documentation was usually supplied by PRC, while the Romanian engineers improved or adapted the designs.Also, the M1975/77 100 mm AT gun was designed by Romanian engineers and built using Chinese technology (machinery) at Arsenal Resita.-- Mircea87 ( talk) 16:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)