From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This wiki account is run by someone with client connections to Defenders Media, 501(c)3), with connections presently to Dr. Mike Licona, Mr. Ted Wright, and Mr. Kurt Jaros. The work on wikipedia related to any of those individuals is unpaid. Defenders Media has never charged services for editing wiki pages for these persons.

March 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{ unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot ( talk) 23:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DefendersMedia ( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I apologize for using the company name and will use this for personal use.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your inappropriate edits. Yamla ( talk) 11:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DefendersMedia ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

How were my edits inappropriate? They were not related to company work. I am not paid for taking the time to edit Licona's page. It became clear to me that a troll has unfairly edited Licona's wiki page. How user Drmies could get away with those "edits" is beyond me. Licona's work on Gospel Differences was published by Oxford Uni Press but user Drmies deleted that section saying that it was a "prune" in his comment. That's ridiculous and removed information about Licona's recent professional work.

Decline reason:

Drmies painstakingly explained the reasons for all his edits in the edit summaries. You saw those edit summaries since you quote them. Still you fail to assume good faith or to ask for clarification but rather choose to blindly revert and engage in personal attacks. Your edits were also quite blatantly promotional. Promoting your clients on Wikipedia is not acceptable, whether or not you are paid for this specific piece of promotion. Tag-teaming in the promotion with a colleague is also not acceptable. Huon ( talk) 02:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I had declined your request, but I forgot I was the one that blocked you, so I removed my decline so a different person can review it. I will leave the message I had; We don't know and have no way to know when you are "on the clock" working or "off the clock". If you work for Defenders media you must comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID even if you are editing on your own time. 331dot ( talk) 15:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC) reply

  • This is now a CheckUser block.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This wiki account is run by someone with client connections to Defenders Media, 501(c)3), with connections presently to Dr. Mike Licona, Mr. Ted Wright, and Mr. Kurt Jaros. The work on wikipedia related to any of those individuals is unpaid. Defenders Media has never charged services for editing wiki pages for these persons.

March 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{ unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot ( talk) 23:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DefendersMedia ( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I apologize for using the company name and will use this for personal use.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your inappropriate edits. Yamla ( talk) 11:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DefendersMedia ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

How were my edits inappropriate? They were not related to company work. I am not paid for taking the time to edit Licona's page. It became clear to me that a troll has unfairly edited Licona's wiki page. How user Drmies could get away with those "edits" is beyond me. Licona's work on Gospel Differences was published by Oxford Uni Press but user Drmies deleted that section saying that it was a "prune" in his comment. That's ridiculous and removed information about Licona's recent professional work.

Decline reason:

Drmies painstakingly explained the reasons for all his edits in the edit summaries. You saw those edit summaries since you quote them. Still you fail to assume good faith or to ask for clarification but rather choose to blindly revert and engage in personal attacks. Your edits were also quite blatantly promotional. Promoting your clients on Wikipedia is not acceptable, whether or not you are paid for this specific piece of promotion. Tag-teaming in the promotion with a colleague is also not acceptable. Huon ( talk) 02:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I had declined your request, but I forgot I was the one that blocked you, so I removed my decline so a different person can review it. I will leave the message I had; We don't know and have no way to know when you are "on the clock" working or "off the clock". If you work for Defenders media you must comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID even if you are editing on your own time. 331dot ( talk) 15:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC) reply

  • This is now a CheckUser block.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook