Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Santiago Ramón y Cajal because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ---- Rdp060707| talk 05:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Santiago Ramón y Cajal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – NJD-DE ( talk) 13:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
All of the citations I added are reliable and meet community standards. I read the guidelines. Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 18:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Dee Dee Turner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dee Dee Turner ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Please stop making baseless accusations of vandalism against fellow editors, as they might be taken as personal attacks. Thanks. – NJD-DE ( talk) 14:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
External links are not the main content. You are obviously the one making attacks by completely undoing everything entirely, rather than just making edits to improve content that has been added, thus, your behavior qualifies as vandalism. External links are not the main body. Read all of the content at play, and help revise the section. Don't just make blanket deletes. That is clearly outlined as unacceptable behavior on Wikipedia. Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 18:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Dee Dee Turner
Thank you Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 21:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC) Dee Dee Turner
Hi Dee Dee Turner! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Dee Dee Turner! Your additions to Santiago Ramón y Cajal have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 ( talk) 14:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
HI Diannaa, thank you so much for your help and guidance. The information you provided will be very helpful to me in the future. Can I reach out to you in the future for advice regarding future edits? Best, Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 21:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Dee Dee Turner
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Santiago Ramón y Cajal because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ---- Rdp060707| talk 05:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Santiago Ramón y Cajal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – NJD-DE ( talk) 13:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
All of the citations I added are reliable and meet community standards. I read the guidelines. Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 18:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Dee Dee Turner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dee Dee Turner ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Please stop making baseless accusations of vandalism against fellow editors, as they might be taken as personal attacks. Thanks. – NJD-DE ( talk) 14:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
External links are not the main content. You are obviously the one making attacks by completely undoing everything entirely, rather than just making edits to improve content that has been added, thus, your behavior qualifies as vandalism. External links are not the main body. Read all of the content at play, and help revise the section. Don't just make blanket deletes. That is clearly outlined as unacceptable behavior on Wikipedia. Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 18:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Dee Dee Turner
Thank you Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 21:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC) Dee Dee Turner
Hi Dee Dee Turner! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Dee Dee Turner! Your additions to Santiago Ramón y Cajal have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 ( talk) 14:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
HI Diannaa, thank you so much for your help and guidance. The information you provided will be very helpful to me in the future. Can I reach out to you in the future for advice regarding future edits? Best, Dee Dee Turner ( talk) 21:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Dee Dee Turner