|
|
Thanks for reverting that misplaced comment or whatever you want to call it on my user page. =) The editor just got indefinitely blocked by another admin. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 02:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you point me in the direction of the discussion that turned most of the Pokemon articles into redirects? Or tell me which policies the Diglett article supposedly violates? Who decides which Pokemon are notable enough to get their own article anyway? I'd like to fight for that Diglett article... I love Diglett and it feels like such a step backward to reduce that whole thing to a redirect. <3 Diglett. TheCoffee ( talk) 19:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 10:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Suspiria (album).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey,
You deleted my move of the article, aldough there was a consensus. Please undo it (I wasn't vandalising the article). thanks.
KVDP ( talk) 10:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I propose moving the article to Human-powered Flight for the following reasons: 1. It's a more accurate description of the subject 2. It would be consistent with the entry for " Human-powered transport" which contains a section "Human-powered aircraft" 3. It is a much more widely used term for the subject as revealed by a Google search
If anyone has any serious objections and valid reasons for not moving please post them here. If not I'll go ahead and move it. Gr8white 03:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
If there's a rear guard that wants to rename everything with 'man' in it, I'm certainly not a member of it. If there was an established precedent for "Man-powered flight" I'd be totally in favor of retaining the name. I'm suggesting replacing terminology that virtually nobody uses (not even the sporting aviation group mentioned above, which uses "manpowered aircraft") with what almost everyone else does. Not sure why that's considered being "politically correct". Gr8white 21:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
You recently reverted an edit [2] by User:65.4.103.44 to Hovercraft in which a lot of text was deleted. This was a valid deletion of text that had somehow become duplicated. Bovlb ( talk) 01:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone has hacked me and I seem to do things I'm not 'spose too... So sorry again :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.235.242 ( talk) 05:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
IF you look at the article SavEVe moved the page without bringing it up on the talk page. I'm reverting it because it wasn't talked about. 66.152.198.210 ( talk) 08:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
i didn't understand why you reverted my edit. That Prithvi_missile deserves its own page and i have also mentioned that in discussion page.-- Ajay ijn ( talk) 14:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure i will link back in the original article. I have to also summarize the content in the original article Ajay ijn ( talk) 14:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, DeadEyeArrow. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted vandalism on your userpage. I hope you're happy! Schfifty Three 01:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Your stats look good. Have you ever considered adminship? Dloh cierekim Deleted? 09:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please let people use Wikipedia for once, do something about all this censoring of 9/11 truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.7.182.15 ( talk) 13:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Ah! Good sleuthing. :) I was guessing Norwegian because I found the "Kulturhistorisk museum" in Oslo. I suppose it stands to reason that there's going to be a lot of similar (or same) words in that language group. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Obviously the bot was malfunctioning or poorly coded. I have removed the section because it is historically inaccurate and serves only as a racist attack that completely ignores Arab states' involvement and behavior in their deplorable treatment of "Palestinians" as such.
Hint: it's not the State of Israel that has legislation preventing Arabs from the areas that Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq took over in 1948 (area that wasn't even pegged to be part of Israel) from ever holding jobs or becoming citizens of any Arab country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1948remembered ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Do me a favor, then ... at least go and support the move, since I have clearly shown several sources (including the official Gobierno do Chile) that indicate they are municipalities, not communes. Thank you. Rarelibra ( talk) 17:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please, stop copying and pasting to move a page. It's against guideline and there are licensing issues when you do so. Read WP:MOVE for more info. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 18:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear, I would like to inform you that I am a user who write Sunda kingdom for the first time. I am of an opinion that the tittle must be capitalized, thus I copy the content of "Sunda kingdom" to page "Sunda Kingdom" and redirect the old page to the new one. The content is the same so I think there is no promblem at all.
Sincerely, -- Hadiyana ( talk) 09:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, PB-244854, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PB-244854. Thank you. -- JJLatWiki ( talk) 00:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for causing confusing, but i'm trying to make an edit, but the bot won't let me. i'm moving a large section from Satellite to List of orbits, and it kept reverting me.. it recommended to move it in smaller chunks, so that's what i was doing - now you are about to block me! please understand your mistake.. thanks, 82.6.96.66 ( talk) 15:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out at Gurkha.
Cheers, Gorkhali ( talk) 17:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
hi. curious as to the copyright laws you're referring to when you removed my articles. the large one was written 30 yrs ago and the others are short excerpts from books or magazines.
thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devsdough ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I'm an employee at OHNY. You recently reverted my edit of the OHNY page, and I'm not sure why. I would appreciate it if you didn't do it again. Thanks.
Look I'm trying to fix the desambiguation page, so Pablo García would be Pablo García (disambiguation), then Pablo Garcia (footballer) would be Pablo Garcia, all the information will be given on the top of the pages of Pablo García, I would really appreciate your help. Also there's only two Pablo García and Pablo Garcia, the other ones are: Pablo Marcano García and Juan Pablo García, so we olny need to do what I told you before. Please help me finish this. Thanks Rockk3r Talk 12:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry sir, i won't do it again. I thought it's a better idea than Requesting Move. A M M A R 16:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me a hand back at Majin Buu Saga. The activity of those anons is quite strange, is it not? Seems to be the same user manipulating them in order to add the same plot cruft. Should their edits to Saiyan Saga, Freeza Saga, and Cell Saga be undone per violating WP:PLOT and WP:CRUFT? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 19:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Whatever happened to blocking that one dude on the same IP who kept vandalizing Turban right after your warning? Man, check that history log! Casull ( talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Will you please stop redirecting and making my changes disappear. This series has (The Twilight Zone) after each episode name, except this particular episode. If you don't want a redirect move, then please move it, but stop undoing my good work. 121.208.180.8 ( talk) 17:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Last name is small case would like "M" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryleemichael ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The rollback feature is only for use to revert simple vandalism. It gives the message "this edit was so worthless that it does not justify even an edit summary". This revert was not appropriate to use rollback for. Further misuse of the rollback privilege may result in it being withdrawn. Stifle ( talk) 17:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Why do you nominate my article for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamlowlikeyou ( talk • contribs) 17:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the move feature would not allow me to use it, I was forced to cut and paste. What other options are there? Koalorka ( talk) 20:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi: could you point me in the direction of the wikicode for the template you used on 68.238.77.211's talkpage re template removal from Mia Jones? I've needed wording recently to warn re template removal, and this is more specific than those listed at Wikipedia:Template messages (unless I'm being spectacularly unobservant, which is quite possible). Many thanks. -- Karenjc ( talk) 21:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the help on my user page. I've been battling that guy for days. Grsz11 ( talk) 19:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping. He simply is unwilling to follow WP policies, the e-mail harassment, the revealing RL ids, the major league reverting, the talk page spamming, all interfere with what could be valuable contributions. Shame, his viewpoint may be close to NPOV than most of our editors, but he just won't play by the rules.
I will continue to pick through his edits and incorporate the good. In the meantime, I have asked for semi-protection.
Do you think there is any way that in reviewing the ban we might change his behavior? I'd be open to trying if there were some chance of success. Jd2718 ( talk) 20:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm interested in helping fight vandalism on wikipedia... how do I go about this??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.227.142 ( talk) 15:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked the user for 15 minutes, hopefully that will get him to read the talk page. Thanks for the heads up, Prodego talk 19:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that bizarre edit on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, you're welcome. He even said you were involved with my userpage...:S WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 21:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Done. Hope that helped! It may be wise to start up a topic on the talk page concerning the suggested move, just to gain consensus. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 07:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix, someone seemed to take me fixing their vandalism badly... -- Nate1481( t/ c) 10:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on user page on Feb 16.Noticed it only today.Wikipedia works based on dedicated users like you. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 23:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Eh? Dloh cierekim 00:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Just had to stop by . . . I misread your edit summary here and could have sworn you said you were reverting a hottie. :P - Warthog Demon 00:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, DeadEyeArrow! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.
Finally, I'd like to appologise for any delay, and wish you luck with VandalProof! Ale_Jrb talk 19:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Re your message: Sure, feel free to copy away. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 23:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Look Ma, Wikipedians! This fix is good by me, but image control is not my forte. Things seem to change all the time around here. I`m getting back online soon so I can devote some quality time to the project. Keep up the good work O Noble Wikipedian! Hamster Sandwich ( talk) 23:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
You recently made the edit in relation to Michael Ruffin to revert opinions from this user using an IP [3]
If you have a look at his history you will see he has already gotten one warning from the ClueBot in relation to another edit [4] I dont know how this works but i think you should give this user one last warning. Im just a beginner at this but this user has not made 1 constructive edit. Its better to get vandals early rather than late right? Roadrunnerz45 ( talk) 00:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar on my userpage! Schfifty Three 02:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the edit on the NYLF, I cleaned up the parental advisory. I was suprised to see some older articles on the web getting responses and replies from several sites in the past few days. As a parent who has been bombarded with their junk mail for years, and spoken to them directly and to The College Boards, it can take a second rewrite to remove the personal opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Storpappa ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the vandal edit on my userpage. I have been noticing his guy vandalize for a while and Ill give him another warning. A Raider Like Indiana (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Yo, just so you know, being a neologism is not a sufficient reason for an article to be speedy deleted - it needs to meet one of the criteria at WP:CSD. I declined your speedy on Quim (slang) for this reason. Please consider taking future articles on neologisms to Afd. Regards, скоморохъ 12:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
It looks like while trying to revert vandalism that you accidentally reverted to a vandalized version. I have undone this. Just letting you know :).-- Urban Rose 14:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
This guy has been vandalising all afternoon, and has gone on past your 'last warning' on his talk page. I'm new to the anti-vandal system. What action is appropriate to take next in this case? Rockfall ( talk) 16:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Just for my understanding, why did you change the Tyrell Biggs article in a pretty awful way, only then to change it back to its original state? -- Iterator12n Talk 16:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
sorry i didn't understood how the disambugation system works. Someone added it thou (in a correct manner). but don't know who Jaberucg ( talk) 21:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
|
|
Thanks for reverting that misplaced comment or whatever you want to call it on my user page. =) The editor just got indefinitely blocked by another admin. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 02:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you point me in the direction of the discussion that turned most of the Pokemon articles into redirects? Or tell me which policies the Diglett article supposedly violates? Who decides which Pokemon are notable enough to get their own article anyway? I'd like to fight for that Diglett article... I love Diglett and it feels like such a step backward to reduce that whole thing to a redirect. <3 Diglett. TheCoffee ( talk) 19:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 10:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Suspiria (album).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey,
You deleted my move of the article, aldough there was a consensus. Please undo it (I wasn't vandalising the article). thanks.
KVDP ( talk) 10:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I propose moving the article to Human-powered Flight for the following reasons: 1. It's a more accurate description of the subject 2. It would be consistent with the entry for " Human-powered transport" which contains a section "Human-powered aircraft" 3. It is a much more widely used term for the subject as revealed by a Google search
If anyone has any serious objections and valid reasons for not moving please post them here. If not I'll go ahead and move it. Gr8white 03:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
If there's a rear guard that wants to rename everything with 'man' in it, I'm certainly not a member of it. If there was an established precedent for "Man-powered flight" I'd be totally in favor of retaining the name. I'm suggesting replacing terminology that virtually nobody uses (not even the sporting aviation group mentioned above, which uses "manpowered aircraft") with what almost everyone else does. Not sure why that's considered being "politically correct". Gr8white 21:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
You recently reverted an edit [2] by User:65.4.103.44 to Hovercraft in which a lot of text was deleted. This was a valid deletion of text that had somehow become duplicated. Bovlb ( talk) 01:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone has hacked me and I seem to do things I'm not 'spose too... So sorry again :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.235.242 ( talk) 05:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
IF you look at the article SavEVe moved the page without bringing it up on the talk page. I'm reverting it because it wasn't talked about. 66.152.198.210 ( talk) 08:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
i didn't understand why you reverted my edit. That Prithvi_missile deserves its own page and i have also mentioned that in discussion page.-- Ajay ijn ( talk) 14:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure i will link back in the original article. I have to also summarize the content in the original article Ajay ijn ( talk) 14:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, DeadEyeArrow. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted vandalism on your userpage. I hope you're happy! Schfifty Three 01:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Your stats look good. Have you ever considered adminship? Dloh cierekim Deleted? 09:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please let people use Wikipedia for once, do something about all this censoring of 9/11 truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.7.182.15 ( talk) 13:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Ah! Good sleuthing. :) I was guessing Norwegian because I found the "Kulturhistorisk museum" in Oslo. I suppose it stands to reason that there's going to be a lot of similar (or same) words in that language group. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Obviously the bot was malfunctioning or poorly coded. I have removed the section because it is historically inaccurate and serves only as a racist attack that completely ignores Arab states' involvement and behavior in their deplorable treatment of "Palestinians" as such.
Hint: it's not the State of Israel that has legislation preventing Arabs from the areas that Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq took over in 1948 (area that wasn't even pegged to be part of Israel) from ever holding jobs or becoming citizens of any Arab country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1948remembered ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Do me a favor, then ... at least go and support the move, since I have clearly shown several sources (including the official Gobierno do Chile) that indicate they are municipalities, not communes. Thank you. Rarelibra ( talk) 17:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please, stop copying and pasting to move a page. It's against guideline and there are licensing issues when you do so. Read WP:MOVE for more info. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 18:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear, I would like to inform you that I am a user who write Sunda kingdom for the first time. I am of an opinion that the tittle must be capitalized, thus I copy the content of "Sunda kingdom" to page "Sunda Kingdom" and redirect the old page to the new one. The content is the same so I think there is no promblem at all.
Sincerely, -- Hadiyana ( talk) 09:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, PB-244854, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PB-244854. Thank you. -- JJLatWiki ( talk) 00:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for causing confusing, but i'm trying to make an edit, but the bot won't let me. i'm moving a large section from Satellite to List of orbits, and it kept reverting me.. it recommended to move it in smaller chunks, so that's what i was doing - now you are about to block me! please understand your mistake.. thanks, 82.6.96.66 ( talk) 15:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out at Gurkha.
Cheers, Gorkhali ( talk) 17:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
hi. curious as to the copyright laws you're referring to when you removed my articles. the large one was written 30 yrs ago and the others are short excerpts from books or magazines.
thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devsdough ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I'm an employee at OHNY. You recently reverted my edit of the OHNY page, and I'm not sure why. I would appreciate it if you didn't do it again. Thanks.
Look I'm trying to fix the desambiguation page, so Pablo García would be Pablo García (disambiguation), then Pablo Garcia (footballer) would be Pablo Garcia, all the information will be given on the top of the pages of Pablo García, I would really appreciate your help. Also there's only two Pablo García and Pablo Garcia, the other ones are: Pablo Marcano García and Juan Pablo García, so we olny need to do what I told you before. Please help me finish this. Thanks Rockk3r Talk 12:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry sir, i won't do it again. I thought it's a better idea than Requesting Move. A M M A R 16:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me a hand back at Majin Buu Saga. The activity of those anons is quite strange, is it not? Seems to be the same user manipulating them in order to add the same plot cruft. Should their edits to Saiyan Saga, Freeza Saga, and Cell Saga be undone per violating WP:PLOT and WP:CRUFT? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 19:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Whatever happened to blocking that one dude on the same IP who kept vandalizing Turban right after your warning? Man, check that history log! Casull ( talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Will you please stop redirecting and making my changes disappear. This series has (The Twilight Zone) after each episode name, except this particular episode. If you don't want a redirect move, then please move it, but stop undoing my good work. 121.208.180.8 ( talk) 17:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Last name is small case would like "M" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryleemichael ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The rollback feature is only for use to revert simple vandalism. It gives the message "this edit was so worthless that it does not justify even an edit summary". This revert was not appropriate to use rollback for. Further misuse of the rollback privilege may result in it being withdrawn. Stifle ( talk) 17:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Why do you nominate my article for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamlowlikeyou ( talk • contribs) 17:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the move feature would not allow me to use it, I was forced to cut and paste. What other options are there? Koalorka ( talk) 20:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi: could you point me in the direction of the wikicode for the template you used on 68.238.77.211's talkpage re template removal from Mia Jones? I've needed wording recently to warn re template removal, and this is more specific than those listed at Wikipedia:Template messages (unless I'm being spectacularly unobservant, which is quite possible). Many thanks. -- Karenjc ( talk) 21:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the help on my user page. I've been battling that guy for days. Grsz11 ( talk) 19:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping. He simply is unwilling to follow WP policies, the e-mail harassment, the revealing RL ids, the major league reverting, the talk page spamming, all interfere with what could be valuable contributions. Shame, his viewpoint may be close to NPOV than most of our editors, but he just won't play by the rules.
I will continue to pick through his edits and incorporate the good. In the meantime, I have asked for semi-protection.
Do you think there is any way that in reviewing the ban we might change his behavior? I'd be open to trying if there were some chance of success. Jd2718 ( talk) 20:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm interested in helping fight vandalism on wikipedia... how do I go about this??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.227.142 ( talk) 15:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked the user for 15 minutes, hopefully that will get him to read the talk page. Thanks for the heads up, Prodego talk 19:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that bizarre edit on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, you're welcome. He even said you were involved with my userpage...:S WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 21:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Done. Hope that helped! It may be wise to start up a topic on the talk page concerning the suggested move, just to gain consensus. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 07:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix, someone seemed to take me fixing their vandalism badly... -- Nate1481( t/ c) 10:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on user page on Feb 16.Noticed it only today.Wikipedia works based on dedicated users like you. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 23:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Eh? Dloh cierekim 00:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Just had to stop by . . . I misread your edit summary here and could have sworn you said you were reverting a hottie. :P - Warthog Demon 00:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, DeadEyeArrow! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.
Finally, I'd like to appologise for any delay, and wish you luck with VandalProof! Ale_Jrb talk 19:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Re your message: Sure, feel free to copy away. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 23:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Look Ma, Wikipedians! This fix is good by me, but image control is not my forte. Things seem to change all the time around here. I`m getting back online soon so I can devote some quality time to the project. Keep up the good work O Noble Wikipedian! Hamster Sandwich ( talk) 23:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
You recently made the edit in relation to Michael Ruffin to revert opinions from this user using an IP [3]
If you have a look at his history you will see he has already gotten one warning from the ClueBot in relation to another edit [4] I dont know how this works but i think you should give this user one last warning. Im just a beginner at this but this user has not made 1 constructive edit. Its better to get vandals early rather than late right? Roadrunnerz45 ( talk) 00:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar on my userpage! Schfifty Three 02:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the edit on the NYLF, I cleaned up the parental advisory. I was suprised to see some older articles on the web getting responses and replies from several sites in the past few days. As a parent who has been bombarded with their junk mail for years, and spoken to them directly and to The College Boards, it can take a second rewrite to remove the personal opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Storpappa ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the vandal edit on my userpage. I have been noticing his guy vandalize for a while and Ill give him another warning. A Raider Like Indiana (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Yo, just so you know, being a neologism is not a sufficient reason for an article to be speedy deleted - it needs to meet one of the criteria at WP:CSD. I declined your speedy on Quim (slang) for this reason. Please consider taking future articles on neologisms to Afd. Regards, скоморохъ 12:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
It looks like while trying to revert vandalism that you accidentally reverted to a vandalized version. I have undone this. Just letting you know :).-- Urban Rose 14:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
This guy has been vandalising all afternoon, and has gone on past your 'last warning' on his talk page. I'm new to the anti-vandal system. What action is appropriate to take next in this case? Rockfall ( talk) 16:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Just for my understanding, why did you change the Tyrell Biggs article in a pretty awful way, only then to change it back to its original state? -- Iterator12n Talk 16:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
sorry i didn't understood how the disambugation system works. Someone added it thou (in a correct manner). but don't know who Jaberucg ( talk) 21:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)