A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Other Goddess Circle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Other Goddess Circle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System ( talk) 20:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Gaudiya Math into
Gaudiya Vaishnavism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 19:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, DayakSibiriak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The Other Goddess Circle".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 22:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for writing this article! b uidh e 04:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
Hizmetli Yıldızı | |
Keep your good words on Tengrism. Beshogur ( talk) 16:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC) |
Çok teşekkürler, many thanks. DayakSibiriak ( talk) 22:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tengrism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kyrgyz ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I want to thank you for your hard work on various articles that you have rewritten using reliable, academic sources in Russian and English language (for instance, " Tengrism"). I wonder if you can help with other articles, for which there are a lot of Russian-language sources which, unfortunately, I am unable to read (for instance, " Bazhovism" and " Ivanovism", which are currently rather incomplete articles, and other articles about religions of Russia). Just one constructive hint: Pay more attention to translation into English, as I have seen various errors. For instance, aliran kapercayaan in Indonesian means "ethnic beliefs" or "gentile beliefs", not "branches of belief", which is a rather nonsense wording. I hope you will continue with your rich contributions!-- Aethelwolf Emsworth ( talk) 12:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I just wanted to express my appreciation for your latest edits on the Judaism article. Debresser ( talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello DS. Thank you for having added Mačuda's paper, it is a good source. It is a monograph about Rodnovery in Russia. I can't access the full text. Does he also discuss Rodnovery in Czechia and the "Rodna Vira" organisation of Richard Bigl?-- Æo ( talk) 18:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The Jewish Barnstar | ||
For you many high-quality improvements to Jewish religious movements and other Judaism-related articles. Debresser ( talk) 15:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hello. Responding to your suggestion in the object of this edit, I think that "Siberian shamanic Rodnovery" (which now has the line about Bulgarians inspired by Tengrism, i.e. Siberian shamanism) should not fall under the section of "ethnic Rodnoveries" together with Slavic tribal, Meryan and Ossetian types, since Siberian shamanism is interethnic and Rodnovers inspired to it are not recreating specific ethnic identities (i.e. "we are Kriviches", "we are Meryans"...) together with the religious identities.-- Æo ( talk) 19:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. WP:RSUE allows the use of non-English language sources. I'm obviously not against the addition of the English version of Shlyapentokh's article, this is not the reason why I reverted. The reason why I reverted is that the English version is not available online and we should add the precise page where the author supports the specific concept, not the entire interval of pages of the article (264–275).-- Æo ( talk) 15:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Hindu theologians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 13:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear DayakSibiriak, many thanks for your good work on categorization. However, I've felt the need to oppose several undiscussed edits you have made to the yoga templates. These seem essentially to be replacing extremely well-known terms like Downward Dog and Surya Namaskar - known to hundreds of millions of people, possibly billions by now - with far more technical and less recognisable terms like "yoga series" and "standing asanas". That seems to me very clearly a retrograde step, making the navboxes less approachable, and without direct links to these major (and heavily visited, the evidence is there) pages, also less navigable. In other words, the edits directly reduced the quality of the navboxes, and of the project. I'm happy to discuss any changes on article or template talk pages (not here, it's not the right forum) but there are strong reasons not to go in the direction your edits have indicated. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I saw you had added "movement" for Radha Soami sects in the Radha Soami article and the same is added in Shiv Dayal Singh article. I wonder how can it be called a movement? In my knowledge, movement is something bigger like Sant Mat movement. This is just a few sects originated from a person. Lightbluerain❄ ( Talk | contribs) 12:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia. However, nobody should be added to Modern yoga gurus unless they are widely attested in multiple Reliable Sources to be a "Yoga guru" - the exact phrase.
It is not enough for a person to be well-known, to teach yoga, to write books, even to be charismatic, to have a following, to have invented a brand of meditation, etc etc.
It must be the exact phrase, cited repeatedly, by multiple sources. The citations must be in their article, supporting a directly written claim that they are a "yoga guru", and repeated in the article "Modern yoga gurus".
ONLY THEN may they be added to the template . I do hope this is clear. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 04:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Um, sorry but I'm seeing the same problem for Kripalvananda, we'd need multiple RS both in his article and in the MYG article, all the sources to say *in terms* that he was a "yoga guru"; if from an offline source then please supported in the ref with quotations also. You provided one source in MYG; his article doesn't even make the claim. We shouldn't need to be revisiting this same issue again and again. Many thanks for your understanding. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on World Vaisnava Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Vaisnava Association. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 12:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Category:Russian sub-ethnic groups has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi DayakSibiriak. Thank you for your work on Spiritual Administration of the Muslims of the Chechen Republic. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good start. The prose needs work to make it more explanatory. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 23:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Other Goddess Circle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Other Goddess Circle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System ( talk) 20:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Gaudiya Math into
Gaudiya Vaishnavism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 19:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, DayakSibiriak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The Other Goddess Circle".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 22:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for writing this article! b uidh e 04:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
Hizmetli Yıldızı | |
Keep your good words on Tengrism. Beshogur ( talk) 16:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC) |
Çok teşekkürler, many thanks. DayakSibiriak ( talk) 22:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tengrism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kyrgyz ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I want to thank you for your hard work on various articles that you have rewritten using reliable, academic sources in Russian and English language (for instance, " Tengrism"). I wonder if you can help with other articles, for which there are a lot of Russian-language sources which, unfortunately, I am unable to read (for instance, " Bazhovism" and " Ivanovism", which are currently rather incomplete articles, and other articles about religions of Russia). Just one constructive hint: Pay more attention to translation into English, as I have seen various errors. For instance, aliran kapercayaan in Indonesian means "ethnic beliefs" or "gentile beliefs", not "branches of belief", which is a rather nonsense wording. I hope you will continue with your rich contributions!-- Aethelwolf Emsworth ( talk) 12:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I just wanted to express my appreciation for your latest edits on the Judaism article. Debresser ( talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello DS. Thank you for having added Mačuda's paper, it is a good source. It is a monograph about Rodnovery in Russia. I can't access the full text. Does he also discuss Rodnovery in Czechia and the "Rodna Vira" organisation of Richard Bigl?-- Æo ( talk) 18:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The Jewish Barnstar | ||
For you many high-quality improvements to Jewish religious movements and other Judaism-related articles. Debresser ( talk) 15:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hello. Responding to your suggestion in the object of this edit, I think that "Siberian shamanic Rodnovery" (which now has the line about Bulgarians inspired by Tengrism, i.e. Siberian shamanism) should not fall under the section of "ethnic Rodnoveries" together with Slavic tribal, Meryan and Ossetian types, since Siberian shamanism is interethnic and Rodnovers inspired to it are not recreating specific ethnic identities (i.e. "we are Kriviches", "we are Meryans"...) together with the religious identities.-- Æo ( talk) 19:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. WP:RSUE allows the use of non-English language sources. I'm obviously not against the addition of the English version of Shlyapentokh's article, this is not the reason why I reverted. The reason why I reverted is that the English version is not available online and we should add the precise page where the author supports the specific concept, not the entire interval of pages of the article (264–275).-- Æo ( talk) 15:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Hindu theologians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 13:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear DayakSibiriak, many thanks for your good work on categorization. However, I've felt the need to oppose several undiscussed edits you have made to the yoga templates. These seem essentially to be replacing extremely well-known terms like Downward Dog and Surya Namaskar - known to hundreds of millions of people, possibly billions by now - with far more technical and less recognisable terms like "yoga series" and "standing asanas". That seems to me very clearly a retrograde step, making the navboxes less approachable, and without direct links to these major (and heavily visited, the evidence is there) pages, also less navigable. In other words, the edits directly reduced the quality of the navboxes, and of the project. I'm happy to discuss any changes on article or template talk pages (not here, it's not the right forum) but there are strong reasons not to go in the direction your edits have indicated. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I saw you had added "movement" for Radha Soami sects in the Radha Soami article and the same is added in Shiv Dayal Singh article. I wonder how can it be called a movement? In my knowledge, movement is something bigger like Sant Mat movement. This is just a few sects originated from a person. Lightbluerain❄ ( Talk | contribs) 12:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia. However, nobody should be added to Modern yoga gurus unless they are widely attested in multiple Reliable Sources to be a "Yoga guru" - the exact phrase.
It is not enough for a person to be well-known, to teach yoga, to write books, even to be charismatic, to have a following, to have invented a brand of meditation, etc etc.
It must be the exact phrase, cited repeatedly, by multiple sources. The citations must be in their article, supporting a directly written claim that they are a "yoga guru", and repeated in the article "Modern yoga gurus".
ONLY THEN may they be added to the template . I do hope this is clear. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 04:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Um, sorry but I'm seeing the same problem for Kripalvananda, we'd need multiple RS both in his article and in the MYG article, all the sources to say *in terms* that he was a "yoga guru"; if from an offline source then please supported in the ref with quotations also. You provided one source in MYG; his article doesn't even make the claim. We shouldn't need to be revisiting this same issue again and again. Many thanks for your understanding. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on World Vaisnava Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Vaisnava Association. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 12:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Category:Russian sub-ethnic groups has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi DayakSibiriak. Thank you for your work on Spiritual Administration of the Muslims of the Chechen Republic. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good start. The prose needs work to make it more explanatory. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 23:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)