You had a very nice lead section, but I may consider adding just slightly more detail explaining why. Furthermore, I made an edit to you title saying Bibliography and made it say References. Also you may consider adding a citation in the place I noted it. Your citations seem pretty solid to me; however you may consider adding a few more so as to expand the amount you can add to the article. Overall, your language seems very interesting. Best of Luck!
Mahaksh Kotdawala
Bummer. You've obviously put a lot of effort into this. The one thing missing are references; there isn't a single one here for me to grade. Can you restore these? Chuck Haberl ( talk) 21:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
You had a very nice lead section, but I may consider adding just slightly more detail explaining why. Furthermore, I made an edit to you title saying Bibliography and made it say References. Also you may consider adding a citation in the place I noted it. Your citations seem pretty solid to me; however you may consider adding a few more so as to expand the amount you can add to the article. Overall, your language seems very interesting. Best of Luck!
Mahaksh Kotdawala
Bummer. You've obviously put a lot of effort into this. The one thing missing are references; there isn't a single one here for me to grade. Can you restore these? Chuck Haberl ( talk) 21:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)