From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2020

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2019 Jacksonville Jaguars season, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax ( talk) 15:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

DaveFreudenthal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi DaveFreudenthal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 ( talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2019 Los Angeles Rams season. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 14:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Houston Texans season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Conner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2020 Kansas City Chiefs season
added links pointing to David Johnson and Josh Allen
2020 Green Bay Packers season
added a link pointing to Ronald Jones

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Vandalism

Information icon Hello, I'm Jdavi333. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Green Bay Packers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Jones.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 New Orleans Saints season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Godfrey.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

March 2022

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- AwfulReader( talk) 15:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

WTF?

Why all the page blanking and adding of unsourced comments? -- Valjean ( talk) 16:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The page blanking was a protest since the articles are not written from a NPOV. The comments do not need to be sourced, anyone can look those up and find them. -- DaveFreudenthal

See WP:POINT. PatGallacher ( talk) 17:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Dave, in what sense are they "not written from a NPOV"? Do you not realize that NPOV expressly allows the use of biased sources and biased opinions? We are required to include them as they are part of the "sum total of human knowledge" Wikipedia documents. We are also not allowed to present facts as opinions or opinions as facts, but when the consensus of RS shows certain opinions are factual, then we present them in wikivoice as facts, because opinions can indeed be factual.
So, what parts of those articles are not NPOV? Be specific and use the talk pages there, because that is the proper way to deal with such concerns. Griping will just be deleted as a WP:FORUM violation and get you blocked, and the next block will likely should be indefinite because the type of disruption you have engaged in is serious and shows severe WP:BATTLE mentality and WP:CIR issues. Don't do it again.
Pat is right about the POINT violation, and comments in articles must be sourced by the person adding them. You don't get to push that responsibility onto other editors. Also, article edits without edit summaries can be deleted without further ado, so use accurate edit summaries for every edit that isn't a truly Help:Minor edit. You've been here long enough to know this stuff. Now a bunch of editors have to waste time going through your contribution history to discover any other disruptions you have created. We don't need this crap. -- Valjean ( talk) 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
I apologize. I did not realize that. DaveFreudenthal ( talk) 16:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   JBW ( talk) 16:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

August 2022

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PRAXIDICAE🌈 02:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

August 2022

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Your rapid and unexplained removal of referenced content on many biographies is unacceptable. You are pushing your point of view which is contrary to a core content policy. Cullen328 ( talk) 02:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2020

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2019 Jacksonville Jaguars season, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax ( talk) 15:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

DaveFreudenthal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi DaveFreudenthal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 ( talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2019 Los Angeles Rams season. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 14:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Houston Texans season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Conner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2020 Kansas City Chiefs season
added links pointing to David Johnson and Josh Allen
2020 Green Bay Packers season
added a link pointing to Ronald Jones

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Vandalism

Information icon Hello, I'm Jdavi333. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Green Bay Packers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Jones.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 New Orleans Saints season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Godfrey.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

March 2022

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- AwfulReader( talk) 15:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

WTF?

Why all the page blanking and adding of unsourced comments? -- Valjean ( talk) 16:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The page blanking was a protest since the articles are not written from a NPOV. The comments do not need to be sourced, anyone can look those up and find them. -- DaveFreudenthal

See WP:POINT. PatGallacher ( talk) 17:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Dave, in what sense are they "not written from a NPOV"? Do you not realize that NPOV expressly allows the use of biased sources and biased opinions? We are required to include them as they are part of the "sum total of human knowledge" Wikipedia documents. We are also not allowed to present facts as opinions or opinions as facts, but when the consensus of RS shows certain opinions are factual, then we present them in wikivoice as facts, because opinions can indeed be factual.
So, what parts of those articles are not NPOV? Be specific and use the talk pages there, because that is the proper way to deal with such concerns. Griping will just be deleted as a WP:FORUM violation and get you blocked, and the next block will likely should be indefinite because the type of disruption you have engaged in is serious and shows severe WP:BATTLE mentality and WP:CIR issues. Don't do it again.
Pat is right about the POINT violation, and comments in articles must be sourced by the person adding them. You don't get to push that responsibility onto other editors. Also, article edits without edit summaries can be deleted without further ado, so use accurate edit summaries for every edit that isn't a truly Help:Minor edit. You've been here long enough to know this stuff. Now a bunch of editors have to waste time going through your contribution history to discover any other disruptions you have created. We don't need this crap. -- Valjean ( talk) 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
I apologize. I did not realize that. DaveFreudenthal ( talk) 16:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   JBW ( talk) 16:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

August 2022

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PRAXIDICAE🌈 02:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

August 2022

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Your rapid and unexplained removal of referenced content on many biographies is unacceptable. You are pushing your point of view which is contrary to a core content policy. Cullen328 ( talk) 02:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook