Everything is up to the mark.
All info is correct
You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeatedly moving Draft:PrabalKumar Basu back into mainspace. When this block expires, you are welcome to continue to edit the draft, but do not move it back to mainspace again until the problems identified at the AfD are fixed and a reviewer accepts the draft. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
You are not going through the article properly. This article has been cited properly with proper references. This article is original work and all informations are correct and up to the mark. Why are you deleting it without reading it properly? Dass sundaram ( talk) 16:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass Sundaram
I have moved the article to the main space because this article is totally an original work and all references has been given properly. Without reading it you are just deleting it without any reason. Is this your standard? Can't you verify the article neutrally, being impartial? Why are you deleting the article without any reason. Read it properly and open all the reference links then you will understand all informations are correct.
Dass sundaram (
talk)
16:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass sundaram
I hope you will reply ASAP. Dass sundaram ( talk) 16:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass Sundaram
![]() |
Hello, Dass sundaram!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Chris Troutman (
talk)
22:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Everything is up to the mark.
All info is correct
You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeatedly moving Draft:PrabalKumar Basu back into mainspace. When this block expires, you are welcome to continue to edit the draft, but do not move it back to mainspace again until the problems identified at the AfD are fixed and a reviewer accepts the draft. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
You are not going through the article properly. This article has been cited properly with proper references. This article is original work and all informations are correct and up to the mark. Why are you deleting it without reading it properly? Dass sundaram ( talk) 16:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass Sundaram
I have moved the article to the main space because this article is totally an original work and all references has been given properly. Without reading it you are just deleting it without any reason. Is this your standard? Can't you verify the article neutrally, being impartial? Why are you deleting the article without any reason. Read it properly and open all the reference links then you will understand all informations are correct.
Dass sundaram (
talk)
16:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass sundaram
I hope you will reply ASAP. Dass sundaram ( talk) 16:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass Sundaram
![]() |
Hello, Dass sundaram!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Chris Troutman (
talk)
22:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
|