This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.harpercollins.co.uk/Contents/Title/Pages/default.aspx?objId=39574. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 12:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello, DanielleSteel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

By the way, it would probably be good to change your name, lest people thing you are really Danielle Steel. You can do so at WP:CHU, or at least post a note on your user page that clarifies you are not Danielle Steel.

Again, welcome!  Mango juice ^talk 12:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.harpercollins.co.uk/Contents/Title/Pages/default.aspx?objId=39574. As a copyright violation, Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Original Sin (Tasmina Perry novel).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Turgan ^Talk 13:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Guilty Pleaures (novel), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.harpercollins.co.uk/Our_Titles/Pages/Home.aspx?objID=39571. As a copyright violation, Guilty Pleaures (novel) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Guilty Pleaures (novel) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Guilty Pleaures (novel) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Guilty Pleaures (novel) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Guilty Pleaures (novel).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Turgan ^Talk 13:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to Daddy's Girl (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Turgan ^Talk 13:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Material copied from Daddy's Girl {{ citation}}: Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) ( help)

The recent edit you made to Gold Diggers (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Turgan ^Talk 13:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Material copied from Gold Diggers {{ citation}}: Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) ( help)

I have nominated Eternity ∞ Discography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternity ∞ Discography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —  Hysteria18 ^{( Talk • Contributions)} 18:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rogue (novel), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.randomhouse.com/features/steel/bookshelf/display.pperl?9780385340250. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 22:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi. I notice that you have been warned several times for introducing material taken from elsewhere to Wikipedia, usually plot summaries. Note that we cannot use plot summaries taken from elsewhere without permission from the copyright holder anywhere on the site. I see that you have reworded the summary at Rogue (novel), and it looks much better although it is best to simply write completely original content, based upon facts and other summaries rather than changing the original. Unfortunately, this really is a final warning for introducing copyrighted material without permission; doing it again will result in a block. If we allow contributors to add infringing content, Wikipedia could be exposed to legal action and this could be disastrous for the project. I do note that you have tried to rectify the situation, which suggests that you are a good faith contributor. As such, if you need any help or have any questions, I'd be happy to help you. Regards, – Toon 23:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of One Day at a Time (novel), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://romancereaderatheart.com/pubsandpromos/2009/feb09/ODT_DS.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 13:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:DanielleSteelRogue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 06:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. You've been asked several times to consider changing your username. A username cannot promote a person, business or sevice and at may not be the name of a famous person. In addition, please do not cut and paste directly from online sources as this is a violation of copyright law. Thanks. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 19:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

This account, DanielleSteel, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

Names should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a "real-world" group or organization. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

1. Add {{ unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ransom (Steel novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ransom (Steel novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RayScript ( talk) 20:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply