This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
potato doesn't belong in that article
This user is a recent changes patroller. |
JKshaw ( talk) 23:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
The article that I have in mind is different because it is in the view of the cost of the Pension sistems to the State balance. There are to evidence the public law and the private law that regulate the pension sistems and their inpact in the economy. There are the implicit public debt that the public pension sistems carry to the States and the intergenerational conflict that create. I want continue. See Laurence Kotlikoff -- Conigliomannaro ( talk) 16:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Do you reckon Yanascarr and Pimpstain are socks? I don't think it's worth bothering with an SPI. — George8211 / T 21:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto Peters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
We are defining a term, not writing a biographical page; I don't see what makes the picture necessary. Leaving out the picture harms no one and ensures people don't get offended. Adding the picture doesn't benefit anyone, and yet may offend some. Which is the better option, then? The picture doesn't even count as knowledge - it is epistemic trash; it is not an actual representation of the figure it tries to depict - what is not real is not considered knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uthman Ibn Sabeel ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
I wanted to know why you have deleted my post on Krishna? I had posted something which is verified by our teachings of hinduism and Sampradayas if you know this matter.
Please clarify, Abhijeet Abhijeetradhakrishna ( talk) 15:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC).
Hi, I have a question on one of your page; Mohammedan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammedan. There is no such thing as Mohammedan. The name of the Prophet is Muhammed and the name of religion is Islam and followers of that religion are Muslims. Can you please fix that? It is highly offensive and I deeply appreciate your time and effort. Thank you------Muslimah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muslimah411 ( talk • contribs)
I did read the page on my first article, I thought I followed the rules. If you could send me my entry to go to ask for tips in the tea room how to edit it to an acceptable manner that would be appreciated. I thought it said it was okay to put all the sources on the bottom at the beginning. The points that may sound a bit unambiguous are backed up in the citations. In one of the citations a senior member of peercoin (one the most popular PoS coins) speaks well of Neucoin thus it is in fact quickly gaining respect in the community. I did not state any opinions about the pricing for the presale but thought it was information that belonged in the wiki. The first source gives information on each team member of the coin and shows that they all are in fact successful. Darteous ( talk) 18:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Neucoin. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Darteous ( talk) 06:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Seems like they keep on putting refs that don't work and removing blp prods-here: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula Wgolf ( talk) 17:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Here is another article by them Sworup Raj Acharya. Wgolf ( talk) 18:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear,editor Daniel
I am quite amazing as you told me that I don't understand english but I do agree to some degree saying that I have made mistakes on using proper standard of English such as tone,cohesion and more with the view of grammar.It's OK to point even those mistakes so that I can go improving such mistakes in further edits.It may sometime happen because of problems in typing so, more what I wanted to inform you that the any article wrote in English Wikipedia can be read by all language peoples as it's a international language and also I intended to do that but you told me to try in any other language. Yea,that's good idea and I am a nepali Wikipedian as well as English so, as far as I know it's not better to say me so .With best regard Mahendra Niraula ( talk) 06:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hallo, I noticed that in this edit you added {{ incoherent}} to an undoubtedly incoherent bundle of rubbish, but unfortunately the template doesn't mean "incoherent" in that sense: it displays as "This article or section lacks a single coherent topic", which was one of the few problems the article didn't have! I'm not sure which template is the best for "This is so badly written as to be virtually unintelligble and shows that the contributing editor can't write English well enough to be contributing to the English Wikipedia and has very little idea about what is suitable content for an encyclopedia article", but it's not this one. Ascii002 has done great work in cleaning up this article, and others from the same editor. I'm wearying of trying to help him: one more really bad edit and it'll be ANI. Thanks for your help. Pam D 07:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi DanielRigal, sorry about my foolish edit to Guildford. Where I live, country town means a town in the country; I didn't realise it has a special meaning in England until I clicked the wikilink after you reverted my edit. Thanks for gently correcting my ignorance. Coolabahapple ( talk) 16:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I proposed the article to be deleted due to "This article has notability issue. Is it worthy to include each and every person in Wikipedia?". I will let you about issues with other articles if I have enough time with me. 18:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Oh dear! That wasn't good. I've disabled it from running on Wikipedia now. I couldn't figure out why that was showing for me on the page earlier and I tried disabling it, but I didn't realise it had managed to actually inject that text into the page... Thanks! JaJaWa | talk 22:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to let you know that I've deleted the page, salted it against recreation, and blocked the people involved. It looks like there was some sockpuppetry going on, so if you see that name pop up anywhere else, let me know. If it's a new account it'll likely be a sock so I'll block it as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to do with the Vaughan Bell article, see Talk:Vaughan Bell. Proxima Centauri ( talk) 09:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, do you know how to revert more than one edit? I have just noticed that editor (Bahanaboy) deliberately is destroying my edits and other editors'. Besides, his Minion War has been reverted twice so far, and he keeps adding it again to the article "1985". But the Minion War is only one of his edits that destroys other editors' work. I spent lots of time to list names in alphabetical order, and then he mixed everything up. Of course I could repair it one by one, but he has made many edits, and repairing them would take too much time. His all edits from June 19, 2015 on should be reverted and the point is I don't know how to revert them all with one move. Editors should stand up against such behavior. Could you, please help me deal with his malicious activity. Radosław Wiśniewski ( talk) 06:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Radosław Wiśniewski
I ended up deleting and salting the page. I found one new news source but not anything that would overturn the prior AfD. The other material used on the page didn't really show any promise either. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diane Robin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Relic, NCIS and Chris Columbus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 13 July 2015 (UT
Diane Robin has appeared in over 100 television and films. Her credits can be verified on IMDB which is the industry standard to check credits.Also information in Variety, TV guide, Actors access, google, tube, twitter.There are many pictures which could be included in the article, how can they be downloaded?Please list her birthdate as July 23,no year necessary.
Hi, thank you for your edit! I was worried I might have committed some copyvio.
I noticed you said you made the article "inteligable" (think you mean intelligible), but you've edited out a crucial part of the Wallace Group. According to the source 2 and 3 of the article, "The University is part of the Wallace Group of seven of the best sporting universities in the UK" (Loughborough) and "Part of the Wallace Group of seven of the best sporting universities in the UK" (St Andrews), I was wondering what your reason was for editing that part out?
Thanks! (Apologies if this is the incorrect place to leave a message)
Kioj156 ( talk) 00:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll have another go at editing it in the morning and try to phrase it better.
Kioj156 ( talk) 01:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daniel. I appreciate that you have a userbox that tells me the answer to my question is "no", so my apologies for disturbing you. That said, the box has been there a long time so I was hoping you might feel differently about it these days. Would you be prepared to be an administator? It looks like the tools might come in handy for some of the work you do around here and I'd be happy to nominate you if you were willing to run. Best, WJBscribe (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, DanielRigal. Thanks for staying on top of the Selim Belmaachi hoax and spam fest. I have added to the SPI case and blocked and deleted/salted the articles. I've also left a message at Commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#145 hoax photos requesting deletion of the 145 Selim Belmaachi hoax photos there. (Just so we won't need to tag them all individually). And I hope a Commons administrator will do a mass block of the numerous sock accounts there. I appreciate you making me aware of the problem through your tags and talk page comments. Please let me know directly if you run into any further problems with this mess. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
With appreciation for your vigilance in eliminating the vast cross-wiki Belmaachi hoax and sock farm, I award you this barnstar. — CactusWriter (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC) |
When an editor, whether an anonymous editor or registered one, gives a reason for an edit, with a link to a Manual of Style, guideline or policy, it's usually best to read the thing rather than asking why. If you don't understand if it was applied correctly, ask at the MoS. In this case MOS:OPENPARA lists five things that should be listed in the opening paragraph. Place of birth is not listed. "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and in the lead if relevant to the person's notability, but they should not be mentioned in the opening brackets of the lead sentence alongside the birth and death dates." Sorry. 208.81.212.222 ( talk) 23:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Daniel, your votes on these AfDs were actually quite insightful for me. I checked the sources, but I would have never known that Lincolnshire was local radio and not BBC national, as I'm not familiar enough with UK media details. I also appreciate the independent validation on the magazines (which I was fairly certain of). Anyhow, I wanted to explain my reasoning on the separate AfDs, but I don't want to keep interjecting myself into the discussions (as I think it looks pushy for noms to keep chiming in after a certain point).
Anyhow, as you've noticed, there's some technicalities involved, and while common sense would argue one way, strict interpretation might go the other, It is those technicalities I was concerned about, as when I discussed the matter before PROD, I got the sense it could go either way. Therefore, I didn't want to predicate any one AfD on any other. Also, as much as it might be nonsensical to keep albums and not the band (or vice versa), there is indeed policy handling that. NALBUMS states "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist or ensemble to merit a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline." MSJapan ( talk) 02:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Psst! I think you mean pursuing. Perusing is what he expected us to do with those ridiculous rants. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
What I added to the Black Hebrew Israelites page is not nonsense. Thats your opinion. What I added is a fact from the Bible. It applies here since the page references people of the Bible. The page seems to have been written by someone who has a tone of nonbelief. You obviously not being a Black Hebrew Israelite yourself, seem pretty concerned about the content of this page. Let the true Black Hebrew Israelites edit the page and you move on to editing something else. You're just proving the fact that you dont want the truth out there. If you weren't threatened by what I added or deleted, you wouldnt bother to continue this back and forth of your supposed correction. Its sad how our country continues to TRY and convince us so called African Americans that we have zero history. You should be ashamed of yourself. Our culture is waking up to the truth. I for one am sick and tired of the continuos lie and will stalk this page everytime you make an edit. Believe you me, I will not take this laying down. J Yah Yisrael ( talk) 23:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Give you this for your work in the AFD area which can be tiresome and frustrating - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 17:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC) |
There is no speedy deletion criterion for products that corresponds to A7. It has been discussed several times, and been decisively rejected--see the archives of WT:CSDUnless it's G11, its necessary to use prod. DGG ( talk ) 03:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Right, I will let this go if you can do the same to EVERY radio station across the UK. It seems unfair you are for some station having names! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.65.188 ( talk) 19:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Aloha, I am sorry for my mistakes. My name is Pavel Makovsky and I am owner and President of LIGS University. This first time when I create a new page. I wanted add our logo. Best Regards Pavel Makovsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by PavelMakovsky ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daniel Regarding the removal of activities on the Christian Solidarity Worldwide page. The citation your refer to talks of teh Roman Catholic organisation Christian Solidarity. This is not the same organisation as Christian Solidarity Worldwide who are an ecumenical group (and members of the protestant body the Evangelical Alliance) working for religious freedom for all internationally. Hope that clarifies things? I've removed the reference and added a note accordingly Thanks Scot 212.139.212.100 ( talk) 13:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
You have attempted to edit my entries made earlier today. Please double-check your arguments, since my entries fully comply with the Wikipedia rules (they report verifiable fact supported by trutwirthy links), whereas your edits violate the rules of Wikipedia. Donempirer ( talk) 22:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Donempirer
Dear DanielRigal, Dear Eeekster, As is clearly stated by the Wikipedia rules, a journalist is a public figure responsible for all his/her actions. If such actions potentially lead to encouraging violence that is against the international law which is repsected by Wikipedia. The cases reported above fail into this category. This is not about personal biases or likes. This is about serious professional misconduct which should be treated as such. The cases documented in the Wikipedia entries are supported by verifiable links, and thus you are acting against the Wikipedia rules while trying to remove these entries. Please stop your disrespect to the rules of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donempirer ( talk • contribs) 22:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Based on some off-site info, I get the sense that Caidin might have cognitive issues, so I dunno if "twerp" is really warranted (not that it ever really would be...) Anyhow, not meant as a criticism of you, just as an FYI. You did a fine job. :D Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Any chance you've got a cached copy of the Time Cube page in your browser there, if it's still redirecting? Per my last comment on the talk page, I think this is just an innocuous (if annoying) thing that Network Solutions do when your domain expires, and they're not doing it on that domain any more. -- McGeddon ( talk) 20:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi DanielRigal: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America 1000 16:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America 1000 18:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daniel - I'm a new contributor to wikipedia -- I've been using the Sandbox as an authoring tool, saving my work in progress along the way but I now see that has not been a good decision and my incomplete entries have drawn flags. But now that I've invested time into editing, could you please give me seven days to complete our entries. My purpose for contributions is to add select notable works in an entirely subjective fashion, however, since my method of authoring involved pasting blurbs from other materials as sources which Wiki has correctly deemed as promotional, I've seemed to trip every flag in your system. Sorry about that. No promotional objectives here. Again, after these pages I will author offline, as I didn't know that sandbox published entries live. Please let me know. Adliano ( talk) 01:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adliano ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
For your information, we have a page about him, on fr.wikipedia.org: fr:Wikipédia:Vandalisme en cours/Affaire Selim Belmaachi. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 20:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
So, if you feel that "you" don't like presenter names included in articles, how about you go through the likes of Mix 96 and Pirate FM. Also, The Breeze. I'll more than happily help you go through them all! 86.171.173.171 ( talk) 00:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
potato doesn't belong in that article
This user is a recent changes patroller. |
JKshaw ( talk) 23:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
The article that I have in mind is different because it is in the view of the cost of the Pension sistems to the State balance. There are to evidence the public law and the private law that regulate the pension sistems and their inpact in the economy. There are the implicit public debt that the public pension sistems carry to the States and the intergenerational conflict that create. I want continue. See Laurence Kotlikoff -- Conigliomannaro ( talk) 16:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Do you reckon Yanascarr and Pimpstain are socks? I don't think it's worth bothering with an SPI. — George8211 / T 21:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto Peters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
We are defining a term, not writing a biographical page; I don't see what makes the picture necessary. Leaving out the picture harms no one and ensures people don't get offended. Adding the picture doesn't benefit anyone, and yet may offend some. Which is the better option, then? The picture doesn't even count as knowledge - it is epistemic trash; it is not an actual representation of the figure it tries to depict - what is not real is not considered knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uthman Ibn Sabeel ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
I wanted to know why you have deleted my post on Krishna? I had posted something which is verified by our teachings of hinduism and Sampradayas if you know this matter.
Please clarify, Abhijeet Abhijeetradhakrishna ( talk) 15:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC).
Hi, I have a question on one of your page; Mohammedan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammedan. There is no such thing as Mohammedan. The name of the Prophet is Muhammed and the name of religion is Islam and followers of that religion are Muslims. Can you please fix that? It is highly offensive and I deeply appreciate your time and effort. Thank you------Muslimah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muslimah411 ( talk • contribs)
I did read the page on my first article, I thought I followed the rules. If you could send me my entry to go to ask for tips in the tea room how to edit it to an acceptable manner that would be appreciated. I thought it said it was okay to put all the sources on the bottom at the beginning. The points that may sound a bit unambiguous are backed up in the citations. In one of the citations a senior member of peercoin (one the most popular PoS coins) speaks well of Neucoin thus it is in fact quickly gaining respect in the community. I did not state any opinions about the pricing for the presale but thought it was information that belonged in the wiki. The first source gives information on each team member of the coin and shows that they all are in fact successful. Darteous ( talk) 18:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Neucoin. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Darteous ( talk) 06:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Seems like they keep on putting refs that don't work and removing blp prods-here: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula Wgolf ( talk) 17:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Here is another article by them Sworup Raj Acharya. Wgolf ( talk) 18:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear,editor Daniel
I am quite amazing as you told me that I don't understand english but I do agree to some degree saying that I have made mistakes on using proper standard of English such as tone,cohesion and more with the view of grammar.It's OK to point even those mistakes so that I can go improving such mistakes in further edits.It may sometime happen because of problems in typing so, more what I wanted to inform you that the any article wrote in English Wikipedia can be read by all language peoples as it's a international language and also I intended to do that but you told me to try in any other language. Yea,that's good idea and I am a nepali Wikipedian as well as English so, as far as I know it's not better to say me so .With best regard Mahendra Niraula ( talk) 06:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hallo, I noticed that in this edit you added {{ incoherent}} to an undoubtedly incoherent bundle of rubbish, but unfortunately the template doesn't mean "incoherent" in that sense: it displays as "This article or section lacks a single coherent topic", which was one of the few problems the article didn't have! I'm not sure which template is the best for "This is so badly written as to be virtually unintelligble and shows that the contributing editor can't write English well enough to be contributing to the English Wikipedia and has very little idea about what is suitable content for an encyclopedia article", but it's not this one. Ascii002 has done great work in cleaning up this article, and others from the same editor. I'm wearying of trying to help him: one more really bad edit and it'll be ANI. Thanks for your help. Pam D 07:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi DanielRigal, sorry about my foolish edit to Guildford. Where I live, country town means a town in the country; I didn't realise it has a special meaning in England until I clicked the wikilink after you reverted my edit. Thanks for gently correcting my ignorance. Coolabahapple ( talk) 16:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I proposed the article to be deleted due to "This article has notability issue. Is it worthy to include each and every person in Wikipedia?". I will let you about issues with other articles if I have enough time with me. 18:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Oh dear! That wasn't good. I've disabled it from running on Wikipedia now. I couldn't figure out why that was showing for me on the page earlier and I tried disabling it, but I didn't realise it had managed to actually inject that text into the page... Thanks! JaJaWa | talk 22:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to let you know that I've deleted the page, salted it against recreation, and blocked the people involved. It looks like there was some sockpuppetry going on, so if you see that name pop up anywhere else, let me know. If it's a new account it'll likely be a sock so I'll block it as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to do with the Vaughan Bell article, see Talk:Vaughan Bell. Proxima Centauri ( talk) 09:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, do you know how to revert more than one edit? I have just noticed that editor (Bahanaboy) deliberately is destroying my edits and other editors'. Besides, his Minion War has been reverted twice so far, and he keeps adding it again to the article "1985". But the Minion War is only one of his edits that destroys other editors' work. I spent lots of time to list names in alphabetical order, and then he mixed everything up. Of course I could repair it one by one, but he has made many edits, and repairing them would take too much time. His all edits from June 19, 2015 on should be reverted and the point is I don't know how to revert them all with one move. Editors should stand up against such behavior. Could you, please help me deal with his malicious activity. Radosław Wiśniewski ( talk) 06:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Radosław Wiśniewski
I ended up deleting and salting the page. I found one new news source but not anything that would overturn the prior AfD. The other material used on the page didn't really show any promise either. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diane Robin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Relic, NCIS and Chris Columbus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 13 July 2015 (UT
Diane Robin has appeared in over 100 television and films. Her credits can be verified on IMDB which is the industry standard to check credits.Also information in Variety, TV guide, Actors access, google, tube, twitter.There are many pictures which could be included in the article, how can they be downloaded?Please list her birthdate as July 23,no year necessary.
Hi, thank you for your edit! I was worried I might have committed some copyvio.
I noticed you said you made the article "inteligable" (think you mean intelligible), but you've edited out a crucial part of the Wallace Group. According to the source 2 and 3 of the article, "The University is part of the Wallace Group of seven of the best sporting universities in the UK" (Loughborough) and "Part of the Wallace Group of seven of the best sporting universities in the UK" (St Andrews), I was wondering what your reason was for editing that part out?
Thanks! (Apologies if this is the incorrect place to leave a message)
Kioj156 ( talk) 00:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll have another go at editing it in the morning and try to phrase it better.
Kioj156 ( talk) 01:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daniel. I appreciate that you have a userbox that tells me the answer to my question is "no", so my apologies for disturbing you. That said, the box has been there a long time so I was hoping you might feel differently about it these days. Would you be prepared to be an administator? It looks like the tools might come in handy for some of the work you do around here and I'd be happy to nominate you if you were willing to run. Best, WJBscribe (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, DanielRigal. Thanks for staying on top of the Selim Belmaachi hoax and spam fest. I have added to the SPI case and blocked and deleted/salted the articles. I've also left a message at Commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#145 hoax photos requesting deletion of the 145 Selim Belmaachi hoax photos there. (Just so we won't need to tag them all individually). And I hope a Commons administrator will do a mass block of the numerous sock accounts there. I appreciate you making me aware of the problem through your tags and talk page comments. Please let me know directly if you run into any further problems with this mess. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
With appreciation for your vigilance in eliminating the vast cross-wiki Belmaachi hoax and sock farm, I award you this barnstar. — CactusWriter (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC) |
When an editor, whether an anonymous editor or registered one, gives a reason for an edit, with a link to a Manual of Style, guideline or policy, it's usually best to read the thing rather than asking why. If you don't understand if it was applied correctly, ask at the MoS. In this case MOS:OPENPARA lists five things that should be listed in the opening paragraph. Place of birth is not listed. "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and in the lead if relevant to the person's notability, but they should not be mentioned in the opening brackets of the lead sentence alongside the birth and death dates." Sorry. 208.81.212.222 ( talk) 23:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Daniel, your votes on these AfDs were actually quite insightful for me. I checked the sources, but I would have never known that Lincolnshire was local radio and not BBC national, as I'm not familiar enough with UK media details. I also appreciate the independent validation on the magazines (which I was fairly certain of). Anyhow, I wanted to explain my reasoning on the separate AfDs, but I don't want to keep interjecting myself into the discussions (as I think it looks pushy for noms to keep chiming in after a certain point).
Anyhow, as you've noticed, there's some technicalities involved, and while common sense would argue one way, strict interpretation might go the other, It is those technicalities I was concerned about, as when I discussed the matter before PROD, I got the sense it could go either way. Therefore, I didn't want to predicate any one AfD on any other. Also, as much as it might be nonsensical to keep albums and not the band (or vice versa), there is indeed policy handling that. NALBUMS states "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist or ensemble to merit a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline." MSJapan ( talk) 02:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Psst! I think you mean pursuing. Perusing is what he expected us to do with those ridiculous rants. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
What I added to the Black Hebrew Israelites page is not nonsense. Thats your opinion. What I added is a fact from the Bible. It applies here since the page references people of the Bible. The page seems to have been written by someone who has a tone of nonbelief. You obviously not being a Black Hebrew Israelite yourself, seem pretty concerned about the content of this page. Let the true Black Hebrew Israelites edit the page and you move on to editing something else. You're just proving the fact that you dont want the truth out there. If you weren't threatened by what I added or deleted, you wouldnt bother to continue this back and forth of your supposed correction. Its sad how our country continues to TRY and convince us so called African Americans that we have zero history. You should be ashamed of yourself. Our culture is waking up to the truth. I for one am sick and tired of the continuos lie and will stalk this page everytime you make an edit. Believe you me, I will not take this laying down. J Yah Yisrael ( talk) 23:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Give you this for your work in the AFD area which can be tiresome and frustrating - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 17:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC) |
There is no speedy deletion criterion for products that corresponds to A7. It has been discussed several times, and been decisively rejected--see the archives of WT:CSDUnless it's G11, its necessary to use prod. DGG ( talk ) 03:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Right, I will let this go if you can do the same to EVERY radio station across the UK. It seems unfair you are for some station having names! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.65.188 ( talk) 19:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Aloha, I am sorry for my mistakes. My name is Pavel Makovsky and I am owner and President of LIGS University. This first time when I create a new page. I wanted add our logo. Best Regards Pavel Makovsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by PavelMakovsky ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daniel Regarding the removal of activities on the Christian Solidarity Worldwide page. The citation your refer to talks of teh Roman Catholic organisation Christian Solidarity. This is not the same organisation as Christian Solidarity Worldwide who are an ecumenical group (and members of the protestant body the Evangelical Alliance) working for religious freedom for all internationally. Hope that clarifies things? I've removed the reference and added a note accordingly Thanks Scot 212.139.212.100 ( talk) 13:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
You have attempted to edit my entries made earlier today. Please double-check your arguments, since my entries fully comply with the Wikipedia rules (they report verifiable fact supported by trutwirthy links), whereas your edits violate the rules of Wikipedia. Donempirer ( talk) 22:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Donempirer
Dear DanielRigal, Dear Eeekster, As is clearly stated by the Wikipedia rules, a journalist is a public figure responsible for all his/her actions. If such actions potentially lead to encouraging violence that is against the international law which is repsected by Wikipedia. The cases reported above fail into this category. This is not about personal biases or likes. This is about serious professional misconduct which should be treated as such. The cases documented in the Wikipedia entries are supported by verifiable links, and thus you are acting against the Wikipedia rules while trying to remove these entries. Please stop your disrespect to the rules of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donempirer ( talk • contribs) 22:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Based on some off-site info, I get the sense that Caidin might have cognitive issues, so I dunno if "twerp" is really warranted (not that it ever really would be...) Anyhow, not meant as a criticism of you, just as an FYI. You did a fine job. :D Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Any chance you've got a cached copy of the Time Cube page in your browser there, if it's still redirecting? Per my last comment on the talk page, I think this is just an innocuous (if annoying) thing that Network Solutions do when your domain expires, and they're not doing it on that domain any more. -- McGeddon ( talk) 20:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi DanielRigal: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America 1000 16:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America 1000 18:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daniel - I'm a new contributor to wikipedia -- I've been using the Sandbox as an authoring tool, saving my work in progress along the way but I now see that has not been a good decision and my incomplete entries have drawn flags. But now that I've invested time into editing, could you please give me seven days to complete our entries. My purpose for contributions is to add select notable works in an entirely subjective fashion, however, since my method of authoring involved pasting blurbs from other materials as sources which Wiki has correctly deemed as promotional, I've seemed to trip every flag in your system. Sorry about that. No promotional objectives here. Again, after these pages I will author offline, as I didn't know that sandbox published entries live. Please let me know. Adliano ( talk) 01:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adliano ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
For your information, we have a page about him, on fr.wikipedia.org: fr:Wikipédia:Vandalisme en cours/Affaire Selim Belmaachi. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 20:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
So, if you feel that "you" don't like presenter names included in articles, how about you go through the likes of Mix 96 and Pirate FM. Also, The Breeze. I'll more than happily help you go through them all! 86.171.173.171 ( talk) 00:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |