|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Your use of the Fact template on the Tiesto and Paul Oakenfold articles is inappropriate. If you read the verifiability policy, you will see that while all information must be verifiable, not all information must be sourced. The policy explicitly states: "It must be possible to attribute all information in Wikipedia to reliable, published sources that are appropriate for the content in question. However, in practice it is only necessary to provide inline citations for quotations and for any information that has been challenged or that is likely to be challenged.[1]"
You have been putting excessive numbers of citation needed templates on information that is clearly not likely to be legitimately challenged, nor are they quotations. Adding that many templates to the articles makes them extremely difficult to read, and your willingness to revert other editors to keep them in is disruptive. Please stop doing this, as if you continue you may find yourself blocked for disruptive editing. It is against policy, and it is not in the Wikipedia spirit. Neither, for that matter, are your accusations against other editors trying to clean up the mess you left. ⇒ SWATJester Son of the Defender 10:49, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
That said, your outstanding legal threats remain, at this point, an unsurmountable barrier to your editing here.
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Your use of the Fact template on the Tiesto and Paul Oakenfold articles is inappropriate. If you read the verifiability policy, you will see that while all information must be verifiable, not all information must be sourced. The policy explicitly states: "It must be possible to attribute all information in Wikipedia to reliable, published sources that are appropriate for the content in question. However, in practice it is only necessary to provide inline citations for quotations and for any information that has been challenged or that is likely to be challenged.[1]"
You have been putting excessive numbers of citation needed templates on information that is clearly not likely to be legitimately challenged, nor are they quotations. Adding that many templates to the articles makes them extremely difficult to read, and your willingness to revert other editors to keep them in is disruptive. Please stop doing this, as if you continue you may find yourself blocked for disruptive editing. It is against policy, and it is not in the Wikipedia spirit. Neither, for that matter, are your accusations against other editors trying to clean up the mess you left. ⇒ SWATJester Son of the Defender 10:49, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
That said, your outstanding legal threats remain, at this point, an unsurmountable barrier to your editing here.