Welcome!
Hello, Dance With The Devil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Otolemur crassicaudatus (
talk) 05:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you watchlist this article. A recent edit war started and a user is repeatedly removing criticism from lead. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 11:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
While Wikipedia is not a forum, that is not an acceptable reason for blanking out parts of a talk page. While one of the comments you removed might be valid to remove due to its general incivility (and that is questionable, as some of us don't find that reason acceptable either) the second wasn't except so far as it was a reply to the first. Please acquaint yourself with WP:TALK#Editing comments before doing any further blanking of talk pages. -- coldacid ( talk| contrib) 21:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your kind thought. The barnstar is very much appreciated. Majorly talk 23:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Calling someone a terrorist sympathizer, as you did in this edit summary:
is totally unacceptable and constitutes a bald personal attack. There is an RfC ongoing at Talk:Osama bin Laden regarding this very issue, to which you are invited to participate. siℓℓy rabbit ( talk) 23:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kashmir conflict. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Toddst1 (
talk) 13:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I have somewhat enhanced the article Illegal immigration in India. Please review and comment on the talk page if the NPOV banner can be removed.
Thanks -- Iball ( talk) 16:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Dance With The Devil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Otolemur crassicaudatus (
talk) 05:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you watchlist this article. A recent edit war started and a user is repeatedly removing criticism from lead. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 11:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
While Wikipedia is not a forum, that is not an acceptable reason for blanking out parts of a talk page. While one of the comments you removed might be valid to remove due to its general incivility (and that is questionable, as some of us don't find that reason acceptable either) the second wasn't except so far as it was a reply to the first. Please acquaint yourself with WP:TALK#Editing comments before doing any further blanking of talk pages. -- coldacid ( talk| contrib) 21:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your kind thought. The barnstar is very much appreciated. Majorly talk 23:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Calling someone a terrorist sympathizer, as you did in this edit summary:
is totally unacceptable and constitutes a bald personal attack. There is an RfC ongoing at Talk:Osama bin Laden regarding this very issue, to which you are invited to participate. siℓℓy rabbit ( talk) 23:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kashmir conflict. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Toddst1 (
talk) 13:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I have somewhat enhanced the article Illegal immigration in India. Please review and comment on the talk page if the NPOV banner can be removed.
Thanks -- Iball ( talk) 16:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)