Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martin Buber have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 15:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you’ve rapidly made a large number of edits changing entry infobox photos. You have not given a reason for the changes and the ones I have checked have not seemed constructive, for example removals of high-quality official photos ( [1], [2]). These seem like arbitrary changes. Please slow down and be more judicious to make sure edits are for the sake of improving the entry. Innisfree987 ( talk) 09:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Dag, please don't replace infobox photos without at minimum an explanation in the edit summary. I've reverted your edit to Gloria Steinem, which replaced a recent photo with one 50 years old. Valereee ( talk) 18:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This was not a typo fix. Please explain. Valereee ( talk) 18:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Valereee (
talk)
18:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Please particularly note the restriction until your account has been active for 30 days and 500 edits. Thank you. Innisfree987 ( talk) 23:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
You have repeatedly called Shadia Abu Ghazaleh a terrorist in Wikipedia's voice despite being reverted - I see the last edit summary states "Blatant POV, see also MOS:LABEL. As I am involved, I cannot sanction you, but I will ask for sanctions if you continue. Doug Weller talk 08:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Pioneers of Israel has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Remsense 诉 03:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Fourth Aliyah has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Dag21902190. I just wanted to let you know that your behavior at various debates categories for discussion are veering into
personal remarks. Remarks like
you are flexing your ignorance of Israeli history or insinuating that people have an ulterior motive for wanting to merge a category (
What’s the real reason for you to want to delete my work?
) is not okay, no matter how upset you might be. I have had my own work deleted before, so I know how it feels. But we are just trying to make Wikipedia the best it can be, and accusing long-term editors of editing in bad faith is not going to get you too far. Let me know if you have any questions,
House
Blaster (
talk · he/they)
23:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Dag. After seeing HouseBlaster's post above, I took a look for myself and was fairly appalled. Here, you say "I hate to break it to you, but you sound like an anti-Israel shill". Here, it's "Why are you misleading people? … What’s the real reason for you to want to delete my work?" And here, "Denying the benefits of a category like this is just blatant anti-Israel bias". HouseBlaster has warned you gently, Dag. I'm warning you sharply: any more such attacks and you will be blocked. Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, an extremely important guideline for a user-generated encyclopedia.
Another point: thank you for
this removal of promotional text (which you had yourself originally added) from
Category:Pioneers of Israel. However, the remaining text is also far too promotional: "Their efforts not only laid the foundation for a Jewish homeland but also fostered a society built on innovation, resilience, and cultural diversity. Their enduring legacy continues to shape Israel's national identity."
It's like reading an advertisement. Since the category is being considered for deletion, I won't insist on removing your nationalist promotion at this point, but will wait and see how that plays out. However... please Dag, consider that this is an encyclopedia, and try to contribute neutrally.
Bishonen |
tålk
12:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
X Hospital has emerged as a prominent beacon of excellence in Y's healthcare landscape, offering cutting-edge medical services and compassionate care to patients from all walks of life. With a reputation for world-class facilities, skilled medical professionals, and advanced technological infrastructure, X Hospital has set a new standard for healthcare delivery in the country.It's unusual that the creator comes back combatively with something like "Are you saying X hospital is not a prominent beacon of excellence in Y's healthcare landscape? Does it not offer cutting-edge medical services and compassionate care to patients from all walks of life? It's widely known as 'the World-Class Facilities Hospital'!" Et cetera. You're one of a kind. Yes, writing advertising copy about one's homeland is nationalistic (as well as irrelevant to the category where it was placed). I'm glad to see you removed some more of it. [3] Bishonen | tålk 07:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
DanCherek (
talk)
04:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Here's an representative example of the text that I removed from the article, following previous warnings you received about copyright violations.
In 1891 he was appointed the representative of the *Odessa Committee of Ḥovevei Zion in Ereẓ Israel, and he became head of the executive committee of the Russian Ḥovevei Zion in Jaffa. He initiated land purchases in Ereẓ Israel, but his plans were soon foiled by land speculations and the financial losses incurred by many investors.
In 1891, Tiomkin was appointed as the representative of the Odessa Committee of Hovevei Zion in Erez Israel, and he became head of the executive committee of the Russian Hovevei Zion in Jaffa. He initiated land purchases in Erev Israel, but his plans were soon foiled by land speculations and the financial losses incurred by many investors.
DanCherek ( talk) 04:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Dag21902190 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Dag21902190 ( talk) 12:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Based on your comments below, I don't think it would be appropriate to unblock you without at least a clear commitment to refraining from any use of AI in the future. Yamla ( talk) 12:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi Yamla, This incident was an isolated mistake, and I assure you it will not happen again. I am making a clear and firm commitment to refrain from using any AI tools in the future. All my contributions will be entirely my own work. I humbly request an opportunity to demonstrate my dedication to the community and rectify this situation. Dag21902190 Hi Derek,
Please consider giving me another chance. This was an unusual mistake, and I now understand the rules against using AI. I promise not to use such tools again and will make sure all my work is my own. Dag21902190 ( talk) 12:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Dag21902190, you are not permitted to modify declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are free to make a new unblock request and a different admin will review it. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I reverted your changes to File:Isaac halevi portrait.png. These were not helpful changes and it's unclear what you thought you were trying to achieve. Please do not make such edits again. -- Yamla ( talk) 20:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martin Buber have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 15:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you’ve rapidly made a large number of edits changing entry infobox photos. You have not given a reason for the changes and the ones I have checked have not seemed constructive, for example removals of high-quality official photos ( [1], [2]). These seem like arbitrary changes. Please slow down and be more judicious to make sure edits are for the sake of improving the entry. Innisfree987 ( talk) 09:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Dag, please don't replace infobox photos without at minimum an explanation in the edit summary. I've reverted your edit to Gloria Steinem, which replaced a recent photo with one 50 years old. Valereee ( talk) 18:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This was not a typo fix. Please explain. Valereee ( talk) 18:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Valereee (
talk)
18:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Please particularly note the restriction until your account has been active for 30 days and 500 edits. Thank you. Innisfree987 ( talk) 23:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
You have repeatedly called Shadia Abu Ghazaleh a terrorist in Wikipedia's voice despite being reverted - I see the last edit summary states "Blatant POV, see also MOS:LABEL. As I am involved, I cannot sanction you, but I will ask for sanctions if you continue. Doug Weller talk 08:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Pioneers of Israel has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Remsense 诉 03:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Fourth Aliyah has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Dag21902190. I just wanted to let you know that your behavior at various debates categories for discussion are veering into
personal remarks. Remarks like
you are flexing your ignorance of Israeli history or insinuating that people have an ulterior motive for wanting to merge a category (
What’s the real reason for you to want to delete my work?
) is not okay, no matter how upset you might be. I have had my own work deleted before, so I know how it feels. But we are just trying to make Wikipedia the best it can be, and accusing long-term editors of editing in bad faith is not going to get you too far. Let me know if you have any questions,
House
Blaster (
talk · he/they)
23:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Dag. After seeing HouseBlaster's post above, I took a look for myself and was fairly appalled. Here, you say "I hate to break it to you, but you sound like an anti-Israel shill". Here, it's "Why are you misleading people? … What’s the real reason for you to want to delete my work?" And here, "Denying the benefits of a category like this is just blatant anti-Israel bias". HouseBlaster has warned you gently, Dag. I'm warning you sharply: any more such attacks and you will be blocked. Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, an extremely important guideline for a user-generated encyclopedia.
Another point: thank you for
this removal of promotional text (which you had yourself originally added) from
Category:Pioneers of Israel. However, the remaining text is also far too promotional: "Their efforts not only laid the foundation for a Jewish homeland but also fostered a society built on innovation, resilience, and cultural diversity. Their enduring legacy continues to shape Israel's national identity."
It's like reading an advertisement. Since the category is being considered for deletion, I won't insist on removing your nationalist promotion at this point, but will wait and see how that plays out. However... please Dag, consider that this is an encyclopedia, and try to contribute neutrally.
Bishonen |
tålk
12:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
X Hospital has emerged as a prominent beacon of excellence in Y's healthcare landscape, offering cutting-edge medical services and compassionate care to patients from all walks of life. With a reputation for world-class facilities, skilled medical professionals, and advanced technological infrastructure, X Hospital has set a new standard for healthcare delivery in the country.It's unusual that the creator comes back combatively with something like "Are you saying X hospital is not a prominent beacon of excellence in Y's healthcare landscape? Does it not offer cutting-edge medical services and compassionate care to patients from all walks of life? It's widely known as 'the World-Class Facilities Hospital'!" Et cetera. You're one of a kind. Yes, writing advertising copy about one's homeland is nationalistic (as well as irrelevant to the category where it was placed). I'm glad to see you removed some more of it. [3] Bishonen | tålk 07:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
DanCherek (
talk)
04:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Here's an representative example of the text that I removed from the article, following previous warnings you received about copyright violations.
In 1891 he was appointed the representative of the *Odessa Committee of Ḥovevei Zion in Ereẓ Israel, and he became head of the executive committee of the Russian Ḥovevei Zion in Jaffa. He initiated land purchases in Ereẓ Israel, but his plans were soon foiled by land speculations and the financial losses incurred by many investors.
In 1891, Tiomkin was appointed as the representative of the Odessa Committee of Hovevei Zion in Erez Israel, and he became head of the executive committee of the Russian Hovevei Zion in Jaffa. He initiated land purchases in Erev Israel, but his plans were soon foiled by land speculations and the financial losses incurred by many investors.
DanCherek ( talk) 04:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Dag21902190 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Dag21902190 ( talk) 12:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Based on your comments below, I don't think it would be appropriate to unblock you without at least a clear commitment to refraining from any use of AI in the future. Yamla ( talk) 12:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi Yamla, This incident was an isolated mistake, and I assure you it will not happen again. I am making a clear and firm commitment to refrain from using any AI tools in the future. All my contributions will be entirely my own work. I humbly request an opportunity to demonstrate my dedication to the community and rectify this situation. Dag21902190 Hi Derek,
Please consider giving me another chance. This was an unusual mistake, and I now understand the rules against using AI. I promise not to use such tools again and will make sure all my work is my own. Dag21902190 ( talk) 12:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Dag21902190, you are not permitted to modify declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are free to make a new unblock request and a different admin will review it. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I reverted your changes to File:Isaac halevi portrait.png. These were not helpful changes and it's unclear what you thought you were trying to achieve. Please do not make such edits again. -- Yamla ( talk) 20:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)