This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
I see you edited the Canyon Ranch article, it's actually a resort, not just a building in Chicago. Look: http://www.canyonranch.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Btipling ( talk • contribs) 19:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for taking care of that, I was going to, but you had a template in there and I wasn't sure how to approach the change. ( Bjorn Tipling 15:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC))
Hello Chupper. I tried to add the citation for U2 moving their assets from Ireland 6 months before the tax break ended, but was prevented by a spam filter. The article at Bloomberg.com is called "Bono, who Preaches Charity, Profits from Buyouts, Tax Breaks." If you google 'Bloomberg.com Bono' you will find it. The article also includes criticisms and citations for the fact that the royalties from the Apple 'Red' project U2 I Pod are not donated to charity. I would have thought that Bloomburg was a reputable source. If so it should be included in the criticism section as Bono is as almost as well known for his humanitarian work as for his music. Regards, Natalie West 16:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC) I looked up the WP entry on Bloomberg and it links to their site, so I am not sure why I was unable to add it. Natalie West 16:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message on my talk page. My motivation was not just to make Anti Psychiatry have a prominent place on the psychiatry page, but to deflect the sometimes out-of-place virulent criticisms of psychiatry that have appeared recently on that page. I worked for over 17 years in an academic Department of Psychiatry of a UK Medical School (though I am a research psychologist), and published many research papers in vario9us fields of psychiatry, and so I hope you can understand that it was not my intention to rubbish psychiatry at all (see WP:AGF). DDStretch (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Chupper, thanks for your response on the discussion page of Bono. I had a look into the subject i raised and found some very reliable sources confirming that he is indeed a Celtic fan, that a rumour had gone around that he was planning to buy shares in the club and that this wasnt true. So i've added a couple of lines about this under 'Other endeavours' and i've included 3 references. Would you let me know whether it is acceptable or not. Thanks again. TammiMagee 14:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnster for this, very kind of you. I'm relieved some recent issues with one page are hopefully on the way to resolution. I was interested to see your points about criticism sections btw - I've sometimes favored them but increasingly felt their solid points could and should be integrated into articles more, at the appropriate points. It is more tricky or time-consuming I suppose, but I've done it to existing subsections once or twice and it did feel more satisfactory and NPOV overall. Cheers, EverSince 16:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
You seem to be the guy who manages {{ Chicago Skyscrapers}}. I am not sure how strict "Downtown" is or whether significant Chicago Skyscrapers should be added. I just created a page for Regents Park (Chicago) and added it to the template. Let me know if you want this out. TonyTheTiger ( talk/ cont/ bio) 21:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for that Chupper! U2 are amazing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TammiMagee ( talk • contribs) 09:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
Hi,
You have been involved with discussions about the section Political positions of Mitt Romney, which got bumped out into a separate article entitled
Political views of Mitt Romney. In case you're interested, there's a discussion underway about whether it's an improvement to name it
Political positions of Mitt Romney, over at
Talk:Political views of Mitt Romney#Requested move.
And, thanks for the Barnstar.
Re:
User talk:Yellowdesk#Second Barnstar
Thanks! I appreciate that you notice. Best regards, --
Yellowdesk
02:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Chupper
I've removed that whole section at Talk:Bono about inserting the text "Bono is a c**t". The guy appears to be trolling, let's not feed him. He actually replied to your straw poll quoting a google search on the phrase. Hopefully he will dissappear. Merbabu 02:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Such reversion would have been avoided if you had consulted other editors of that article on the discussion page first before making such large edits. It is extremely rude to delete an "entire text" based on an uninformed opinion. In fact, it is very much akin to vandalism. I make no apologies for making the reversion. mezzaninelounge 16:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Apology accepted. I in turn apologize if I had caused any offence. mezzaninelounge 17:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
That is a long policy page. What part of it does not allow the link?-- Mihai cartoaje 16:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I saw that you put the "US-centric" tag on Tax Day, and I was just wondering if any other English-speaking countries have a "Tax Day" per se. I know the UK has several of them, and I can't find a reference to any of them as Tax Day; Canada does have an April 30 (employed)/ June 15th (self-employed) tax deadline, but I was also unable to find any references to "Tax Day" on google for Canada. Just a thought - I know taxes are not exclusive to the US, but "Tax Day" is a very specific reference that may BE United States only. CredoFromStart 14:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago Spire only.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by
OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
23:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
I see you edited the Canyon Ranch article, it's actually a resort, not just a building in Chicago. Look: http://www.canyonranch.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Btipling ( talk • contribs) 19:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for taking care of that, I was going to, but you had a template in there and I wasn't sure how to approach the change. ( Bjorn Tipling 15:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC))
Hello Chupper. I tried to add the citation for U2 moving their assets from Ireland 6 months before the tax break ended, but was prevented by a spam filter. The article at Bloomberg.com is called "Bono, who Preaches Charity, Profits from Buyouts, Tax Breaks." If you google 'Bloomberg.com Bono' you will find it. The article also includes criticisms and citations for the fact that the royalties from the Apple 'Red' project U2 I Pod are not donated to charity. I would have thought that Bloomburg was a reputable source. If so it should be included in the criticism section as Bono is as almost as well known for his humanitarian work as for his music. Regards, Natalie West 16:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC) I looked up the WP entry on Bloomberg and it links to their site, so I am not sure why I was unable to add it. Natalie West 16:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message on my talk page. My motivation was not just to make Anti Psychiatry have a prominent place on the psychiatry page, but to deflect the sometimes out-of-place virulent criticisms of psychiatry that have appeared recently on that page. I worked for over 17 years in an academic Department of Psychiatry of a UK Medical School (though I am a research psychologist), and published many research papers in vario9us fields of psychiatry, and so I hope you can understand that it was not my intention to rubbish psychiatry at all (see WP:AGF). DDStretch (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Chupper, thanks for your response on the discussion page of Bono. I had a look into the subject i raised and found some very reliable sources confirming that he is indeed a Celtic fan, that a rumour had gone around that he was planning to buy shares in the club and that this wasnt true. So i've added a couple of lines about this under 'Other endeavours' and i've included 3 references. Would you let me know whether it is acceptable or not. Thanks again. TammiMagee 14:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnster for this, very kind of you. I'm relieved some recent issues with one page are hopefully on the way to resolution. I was interested to see your points about criticism sections btw - I've sometimes favored them but increasingly felt their solid points could and should be integrated into articles more, at the appropriate points. It is more tricky or time-consuming I suppose, but I've done it to existing subsections once or twice and it did feel more satisfactory and NPOV overall. Cheers, EverSince 16:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
You seem to be the guy who manages {{ Chicago Skyscrapers}}. I am not sure how strict "Downtown" is or whether significant Chicago Skyscrapers should be added. I just created a page for Regents Park (Chicago) and added it to the template. Let me know if you want this out. TonyTheTiger ( talk/ cont/ bio) 21:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for that Chupper! U2 are amazing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TammiMagee ( talk • contribs) 09:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
Hi,
You have been involved with discussions about the section Political positions of Mitt Romney, which got bumped out into a separate article entitled
Political views of Mitt Romney. In case you're interested, there's a discussion underway about whether it's an improvement to name it
Political positions of Mitt Romney, over at
Talk:Political views of Mitt Romney#Requested move.
And, thanks for the Barnstar.
Re:
User talk:Yellowdesk#Second Barnstar
Thanks! I appreciate that you notice. Best regards, --
Yellowdesk
02:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Chupper
I've removed that whole section at Talk:Bono about inserting the text "Bono is a c**t". The guy appears to be trolling, let's not feed him. He actually replied to your straw poll quoting a google search on the phrase. Hopefully he will dissappear. Merbabu 02:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Such reversion would have been avoided if you had consulted other editors of that article on the discussion page first before making such large edits. It is extremely rude to delete an "entire text" based on an uninformed opinion. In fact, it is very much akin to vandalism. I make no apologies for making the reversion. mezzaninelounge 16:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Apology accepted. I in turn apologize if I had caused any offence. mezzaninelounge 17:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
That is a long policy page. What part of it does not allow the link?-- Mihai cartoaje 16:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I saw that you put the "US-centric" tag on Tax Day, and I was just wondering if any other English-speaking countries have a "Tax Day" per se. I know the UK has several of them, and I can't find a reference to any of them as Tax Day; Canada does have an April 30 (employed)/ June 15th (self-employed) tax deadline, but I was also unable to find any references to "Tax Day" on google for Canada. Just a thought - I know taxes are not exclusive to the US, but "Tax Day" is a very specific reference that may BE United States only. CredoFromStart 14:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago Spire only.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by
OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
23:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)