| This is DMySon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --
Blablubbs (
talk)
13:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
DMySon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You blocked me just after posting my 1st comment in the discussion. I am wondering why i was not notified by any of the editors involved in this discussion? This is a personal attack by a group of editors (It might be possible they all are one person or a group) who want to trap me. This investigation was created on 17 April 2022 by User:Extraordinary Writ without any further notice to me. Now i am surprised that i was not aware about this discussion from the first day but how the other users Hemantha and Mvqr came to know about this discussion? Are they notified by the creator of this investigation?
Furthermore i want to say that i am not aware about the editors Mickyshy, Jeniwolf, Joystick, etc.. If i involved in any of the discussions where these editors are involved, it might be accidently. The above explanations do not have valid points. Any editor can easily copy and paste of other editor's activity. And i don't know how many editors are following my pattern. This is a wrong close, anyone can easily copied my activities weather it is a new or an old user account. I always try to do constructive edits on Wikipedia as per best of my knowledge. Kindly look deeply into this case. DMySon ( talk) 13:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're going to have to do better than that to explain away the evidence in the SPI. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I always held you in high esteem, to say I’m disappointed would be an understatement. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Agra Fort–Ramnagar Tri-Weekly Express has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article does not meet guidelines for WP:NOTABILITY and is an WP:INDISCRIMINATEly created article more suited for a rail information website.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Arnav Bhate (
talk)
14:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Agra Fort–Ramnagar Tri-Weekly Express for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra Fort–Ramnagar Tri-Weekly Express until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.| This is DMySon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --
Blablubbs (
talk)
13:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)DMySon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You blocked me just after posting my 1st comment in the discussion. I am wondering why i was not notified by any of the editors involved in this discussion? This is a personal attack by a group of editors (It might be possible they all are one person or a group) who want to trap me. This investigation was created on 17 April 2022 by User:Extraordinary Writ without any further notice to me. Now i am surprised that i was not aware about this discussion from the first day but how the other users Hemantha and Mvqr came to know about this discussion? Are they notified by the creator of this investigation?
Furthermore i want to say that i am not aware about the editors Mickyshy, Jeniwolf, Joystick, etc.. If i involved in any of the discussions where these editors are involved, it might be accidently. The above explanations do not have valid points. Any editor can easily copy and paste of other editor's activity. And i don't know how many editors are following my pattern. This is a wrong close, anyone can easily copied my activities weather it is a new or an old user account. I always try to do constructive edits on Wikipedia as per best of my knowledge. Kindly look deeply into this case. DMySon ( talk) 13:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're going to have to do better than that to explain away the evidence in the SPI. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I always held you in high esteem, to say I’m disappointed would be an understatement. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Agra Fort–Ramnagar Tri-Weekly Express has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article does not meet guidelines for WP:NOTABILITY and is an WP:INDISCRIMINATEly created article more suited for a rail information website.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Arnav Bhate (
talk)
14:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Agra Fort–Ramnagar Tri-Weekly Express for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra Fort–Ramnagar Tri-Weekly Express until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.