SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 06:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you please explain more fully how you drew the conclusion Fahed Nasser Mohamed violated someone's copyright?
I will probably be requesting a deletion review on this article.
I've speculated as to how you might have reached this conclusion.
I asked here in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahed Nasser Mohamed. I am repeating this question, because I am strongly committed to complying with policy. If one of my correspondents has really found a lapse from poolicy I have overlooked I want to get to the bottom of it, and fix other instances of that lapse.
So, I would really appreciate you explaining yourself.
Cheers! Geo Swan ( talk) 19:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
"...the information about the prison should be in the article about the prison, not repeated in every article about a named prisoner. It was apparent when looking at the articles concerned that if the common and repeated material about "the prison" was removed from each "prisoner" article in which it occured, then in many cases the only information about "the prisoner" was "person y is a prisoner held at prison x" - and I believe that this is not sufficient to make person y a notable person within the meaning of wikipedia."
I see you have made similar edits to dozens of articles, with no real attempt to explain yourself. Please stop. [1] Geo Swan ( talk) 18:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
|
"I wouldn't expect to find a discussion on the background to the process for deciding whether a chemical element needs to be kept in a lead box or not in an article for every chemical element and compound. Likewise..."
I saw you left a reply at one talk page. Please don't continue your deletions large excisions until we have discussed this.
Geo Swan (
talk)
18:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I left a note on WP:AN/I asking about whether it was reasonable to expect you to pause. I didn't mention you by name, or the names of any of the articles in question.
FWIW, from my limited experience with WP:AN/I participants don't like it when people try to move the discussion of the issue they differ on to WP:AN/I. I only wanted opinions on the general principle of when contributors can expect another contributor to stop, and pause for discussion. Geo Swan ( talk) 18:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note. Geo Swan ( talk) 20:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I urge you, in the strongest possible terms, to engage in dialogue on your concerns. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AAbdul_Razzak_%28Guantanamo_detainee_942%29&diff=195470380&oldid=195463092
Geo Swan ( talk) 02:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 17:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, last year you requested an AfD for an article that you said lacked notability, NPOV, and was being used for soapbox. An adminstrator has placed it as an AfD again, for similiar reasoning of lacking notability. Would you like to comment on this? [2] Fiveboxes ( talk) 16:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot ( talk) 07:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I've decided to take issue with the speedy deletion of Wolfram Demonstrations Project. I have restored it. I think you should take it to AfD if you think it should be deleted. Michael Hardy ( talk) 05:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello DMcMPO11AAUK - how have you been? Whenever you get the time, please have a look at the University of Health Sciences Antigua article. The reference 10 is a broken link and the reference 11 is invalid! Thanks! DrGladwin ( talk) 19:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Just for you! a_man_alone ( talk) 15:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:BrokenRFCxxx has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Izno (
talk)
02:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Template:ExampleRFCxxx has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Izno (
talk)
02:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 06:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you please explain more fully how you drew the conclusion Fahed Nasser Mohamed violated someone's copyright?
I will probably be requesting a deletion review on this article.
I've speculated as to how you might have reached this conclusion.
I asked here in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahed Nasser Mohamed. I am repeating this question, because I am strongly committed to complying with policy. If one of my correspondents has really found a lapse from poolicy I have overlooked I want to get to the bottom of it, and fix other instances of that lapse.
So, I would really appreciate you explaining yourself.
Cheers! Geo Swan ( talk) 19:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
"...the information about the prison should be in the article about the prison, not repeated in every article about a named prisoner. It was apparent when looking at the articles concerned that if the common and repeated material about "the prison" was removed from each "prisoner" article in which it occured, then in many cases the only information about "the prisoner" was "person y is a prisoner held at prison x" - and I believe that this is not sufficient to make person y a notable person within the meaning of wikipedia."
I see you have made similar edits to dozens of articles, with no real attempt to explain yourself. Please stop. [1] Geo Swan ( talk) 18:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
|
"I wouldn't expect to find a discussion on the background to the process for deciding whether a chemical element needs to be kept in a lead box or not in an article for every chemical element and compound. Likewise..."
I saw you left a reply at one talk page. Please don't continue your deletions large excisions until we have discussed this.
Geo Swan (
talk)
18:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I left a note on WP:AN/I asking about whether it was reasonable to expect you to pause. I didn't mention you by name, or the names of any of the articles in question.
FWIW, from my limited experience with WP:AN/I participants don't like it when people try to move the discussion of the issue they differ on to WP:AN/I. I only wanted opinions on the general principle of when contributors can expect another contributor to stop, and pause for discussion. Geo Swan ( talk) 18:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note. Geo Swan ( talk) 20:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I urge you, in the strongest possible terms, to engage in dialogue on your concerns. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AAbdul_Razzak_%28Guantanamo_detainee_942%29&diff=195470380&oldid=195463092
Geo Swan ( talk) 02:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 17:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, last year you requested an AfD for an article that you said lacked notability, NPOV, and was being used for soapbox. An adminstrator has placed it as an AfD again, for similiar reasoning of lacking notability. Would you like to comment on this? [2] Fiveboxes ( talk) 16:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot ( talk) 07:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I've decided to take issue with the speedy deletion of Wolfram Demonstrations Project. I have restored it. I think you should take it to AfD if you think it should be deleted. Michael Hardy ( talk) 05:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello DMcMPO11AAUK - how have you been? Whenever you get the time, please have a look at the University of Health Sciences Antigua article. The reference 10 is a broken link and the reference 11 is invalid! Thanks! DrGladwin ( talk) 19:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Just for you! a_man_alone ( talk) 15:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:BrokenRFCxxx has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Izno (
talk)
02:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Template:ExampleRFCxxx has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Izno (
talk)
02:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)