![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
i haven't undone contributions of others, it's the opposite : others (meaning : usually black metal's fans) have undone my contributions because they think wikipedia is about point of view, not about telling the truth. So do you ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sant Erwan ( talk • contribs) 11:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The vandal thought he or she was being funny or insulting, but you made me laugh when I saw your response in the edit summary here. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 20:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
is at it again. I have requested page protection, but thought the other two IPs inserting crap about killers/murderers [9] might need to be temp-blocked or something... ugh, the things people come up with. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 22:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear
I've provided reliable academic papers. I urged User:Argyriou to join the discussion, but he never did. The following link -Zatsuwa, Monosagu (2005). "Beware, soft ground and the standard penetration test" (in Japanese). Public Works Research Institute.- is without a doubt what I found and he repeatedly kept deleting my writing as well as the link and stole the link as his for his writing even though he does not understand what it says. This can be confirmed from SPT history.
If you examine the SPT talk page,and its history as well as ANI, I am positive you would understand that I have provided all the necessary and reliable source to validate my writings, and I never enforced my points to User:Argyriou or others; I have been very open to discussion. He is the one who kept deleting my writings and cussing without solid reasons.
One more thing about three-revert rule in Boring(earth). I know about three-revert rule, but i though I could revert more than three if it was reverted by more than one other user. I am no expert in Wikipedia, and I never intended an edit-war.
I reported User:Argyriou's act as vandalism because there was a huge discussion about this issue in SPT talk and ANI a while ago, and I specifically pointed out about the link issue as well as others, and I thought it was settled. I urged him to join the discussion but he never did. And a couple of days ago, he deleted my writings and stole my link source as his again. I looked at Wikipedia:Vandalism, and it seems his act fits the description of vandalism. This is why I reported. I honestly do not know if this reporting is an act of edit-war.
Sincerely, Yoshi123Yoshi ( talk) 07:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
DMacks: When dealing with chemicals like 2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile that can cause harm to people and environment, how does one decide "too many quotes"? If you read through the quotes in this entry, you'll find that they wind up contradicting each other -- that this chemical is safe but then is banned in the EU and (under Toxicity) according to the UN IPCS and US CDC can cause harm to the environment (which is the intended use: to effect the environment, starting with tree roots)... Respectfully -- Aboudaqn ( talk) 12:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
^ Krett12 ( talk) 01:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Don't you think, sentence is contradictory ? (Her next movie was ?) Shachiindra ( talk) 06:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi DMacks, I want to bring this to your notice. This user Turehnde is removing content from many pages which include Karanvir Bohra, Surbhi Jyoti, Parth Samthaan and many more. When I reverted those edits the user is citing that content was removed from Karan Singh Grover without discussion. So the user is applying same rules over these pages according to him/her. Please take action on this. Regards, Digvijay411 ( talk) 4:51 , 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your improvements to the dopamine article. Now all I have to do is find a good ref for all that stuff . . .
Looie496 (
talk)
13:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary, I did not add the content that you are concerned about. The uncited claim was in the article before I ever edited it. 71.175.72.159 ( talk) 00:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, would it be possible to reduce the protection level of Joe Hockey's article? He has recently retired from the Parliament, and several sum-ups of his career are coming out, and the article has been semi-protected (without a visible padlock) since last December. There have been no attempts at vandalism since then - could the protection level be changed to pending changes level or fully unprotected? Thanks. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 00:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Dmacks, if an editor edits logged out, the IP adress is revealed- if it was accidental and unintended, is there a means of deleting the IP address from the edit history (re. WP:OUTING I guess)? cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
mother fuckers Bfan20 ( talk) 06:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello DMacks Can you unprotected the article Cloudfone From Materialtechnology — Preceding unsigned comment added by Materialtechnology ( talk • contribs) 05:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
addresses with FACE:B00C in their range are used by internet.org app service and not "geologically localized" in that a person in south asia can get allocated an address for a time which will be later cycled to any person in EU or NA. blocking entire ranges is too much collateral damage. please look deeply into this. block the sock accounts, not ip ranges. speaking as a victim of ip rangeblock associated with someone I did not know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahfuzur rahman shourov ( talk • contribs) 05:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
problem is that everyone in the world who are using internet.org gets assigned IP in the face:b00c range and internet.org system cycles the ip on a global scale, not regionally. so, because of some vandals in the ip range, innocent users get blocked. and the vandals can get away by creating accounts in "not face:b00c" range and logging into the vandal accounts using internet.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahfuzur rahman shourov ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
When you substituted a new diagram (set), you did not correspondingly amend the footnote, which refers to the old diagram. PraeceptorIP ( talk) 17:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Read your updates on the case linked above. I'm thinking of designing an edit filter for this non-privileged users placing privileged templates. Any thoughts? Have you noticed any trends? Ping me upon reply. -- JustBerry ( talk) 05:49, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you discussing Giant covalent vs network covalent in the page Covalent Bond. I wonder if you're interested in this: /info/en/?search=Talk:Network_covalent_bonding . I'm suggesting to change the title of the the page Giant covalent bonding. I hope someone will give some advice on this DHMO hk ( talk) 14:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I am trying to protect the article from My very best wishes. My first edit was at 03:52, 28 August 2015, when I removed allegations that ECHR had recognized that Tymoshenko had been tortured in detention. I provided a reference to the actual judgement of the court, which explicitly rejects these claims. Lidaz then started an edit war to reinstate the false claim about the court's recognition. I asked Future Perfect at Sunrise for help. He rewrote part of the article which had been rewritten by Lidaz in terrible English. It turned out Lidaz was a sock and he was blocked indefinitely. Since IPs started reinstated the same edits, Dennis Brown semi protected the page. Sometimes after that another user, Gal777, started to reintroduce the same edits. He turned out to be a sock of Lidaz and was idefinitely blocked too. Now, Volunteer Marek changed " the Ukrainian Supreme Court closed the case and found that "no crime was committed"." into "the Ukrainian Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights closed the case and found that "no crime was committed"", thus associating the ECHR to the judgement of the the Ukrainian Supreme Court, which is factually false. He seems to enjoy the support of My very best wishes who strangely contradicts his own previous edits. In any case, my action has been conservative. I tried to maintain the consensus reached with Future Perfect at Sunrise and Dennis Brown. Therefore, I do not understand why you accuse me of edit warring, while giving a free pass to MVBW and VM to introduce changes that are factually wrong. Ask Dennis Brown or FPS, they are well aware of the whole affair. Thank you. Againstdisinformation ( talk) 04:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
A Cheese burger.Please reply me to talk you. DennisJohn12 ( talk) 03:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi my name is Gabriele Corcos, you just deleted my page (twice). I am setting up a bio page and will absolutely release my content from copyright, just wanted to let you know that this is me, in first person and all copyright in question is mine (no share holders). Please let me know if I am doing anything wrong, I really need this page to go up. Thanks Gabriele Corcos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetuscangun ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
As the copyvio alert on your talkpage says, "If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure." But see also WP:COI to learn whether you should be writing about yourself, and WP:BIO regarding whether you merit an article at all (regardless of who writes it). As a new editor, maybe our " Your First Article" guide would be a good first read to learn about wikipedia. DMacks ( talk) 19:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello , The page Karanvir Bohra is currently vandalised by many anonymous users. Could you please protect the article from getting vandalised by adding protection for few days. Yours Sincerely, Digvijay411 ( talk · contribs) 13:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Why does it need a link associated with it? - Denimadept ( talk) 04:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for stopping the Talk:Karanvir Bohra/GA1 from continuing. I have noticed some funny coincidences in this case from then onwards. Chronology is as follows:
I happened to notice this because Derevation had on 5th also nominated another film article Singh Is Bliing which didn't even have plot section in it then. And then he also jumped in the Talk:Shreya Ghoshal/GA1 which was not needed at all. Just bringing to your notice because you have administered Bohra's page and might know the history of these editors. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 12:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
How do i rename a page? Jdogmad ( talk) 04:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Aurora Borealis Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:FischerDetroit2010Census.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, DMacks. User:Liz suggested that you might be able to help me. I have a colleague who has been working on the William Lofland Dudley article. Neither of us has an academic background in chemistry or the physical sciences. Would you be willing to review the article content as relates to the subject's academic career and work in chemistry, and perhaps do a little sniffing around for additional content to round out the related sections of the article? I have three graduate degrees (one in economics, two in law), but I am clearly off the reservation when I start discussing academic chemistry and related research. Please let me know if you can help. No rush. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 13:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi DMacks, Khowar language, is currently semi-protected please set the protection level to; Pending changes protected (level 1). Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Þørnø $ ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corey–Link reaction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reduction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Why did you rollback my edits to Kent Hovind’s wiki? I don't think it's a fair statement to say that the entire scientific community discredit all of Kent Hovind's claims. Would you agree?
Michaelcadcock ( talk) 22:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry DMacks. I'm new here. Thanks for the explanation! Michaelcadcock ( talk) 01:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! With these night owl nights you're always pulling, here's some hydration.
![]() |
Only beginning a new discussion seeing as I am unable to post my thoughts on the existing thread. Anyway... Out of curiosity DMacks, what exactly are the "sources and proof" that have in your opinion counted Dr. Hovind' work as discredited? And to also be "fair", I believe you gave too much of a runaround and difficult answer (and you didn't even answer the direct question) to the user Mickaelcadcock for a simple question. Purely, I am curious as to what exactly you've edited to his page as well as the "discrediting proof", seeing as I've monitored his description by Wiki users who can write whatever they so choose regardless of validity for quite some time now and I'm displeased that all I see are lashing opinions spoken in a negative and bias way. TruthOverEgoAndFear ( talk) 02:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
DMacks, I will review what is readily available to me, however I note that you are once again making something simple (my question) very unclear and elongated (your answer). If you intend to debate the words "fair" and "valid" as being interpreted any other way besides "factual and without personal motive" then I have a hard time trusting in your credibility and or intellect. I mean absolutely no insult In any of this, but you don't need a college degree to interpret a word you learned in kindergarten. Sounding intelligent and being it are two different things. I shall respond to any reply when I review on my end. Once again I mean no harm, I would just respect a straight simple answer to a simple question. Additionally, "entirely rejected in the scientific community" does not mean it isn't factual. Readily I admit I have not followed Dr. Hovind or his work for a great deal of time however what I have dug into shows validity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthOverEgoAndFear ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
DMacks Incorrect on your statement of my "paragraph" question/answer. If you review my very first involvement, only one sentence was annotated with a question mark, making it the only (short and simple) question. The rest was response opinion/fact to your prior actions and I see you took it as generally superfluous regardless of valid point. I then ask this question (having now reread the entire article and reviewed some of the "sources" (and I say sources lightly seeing as links are broken or content is gone from their linked pages altogether)): If nothing about that article's content is to be discussed here on your user talkpage, why then do you believe you are a proper or adequate decider of the content of the page who is above reproach? Also, I notice that despite my stance for a professional discussion (save one lapse on both our part) I realize I am being pressing. I am however asking your (implied underline) thoughts and sources, not for you to hide behind WP policy which I have not violated by asking you a direct question for source material on the content you personally edited, seeing as the links on my end are broken or missing.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
$wgContentNamespaces
.
[60]Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
DMacks, I would like to contact you regarding the indefinite blocking of an account by you. My query relates to our decision on how to dispose of the matter with the individual in question. Therefore, How would I contact you in private to discuss? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSCU ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
The benzene structure of Spiropentadiene was 3D animation and also part of my midterm assignment was to add the 3D struture, please understand me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShinRyu Forgers ( talk • contribs) 04:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I beg your pardon, I need your explanation, please. "Incorrect structure", please explain. "Annoying Animation", please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShinRyu Forgers ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you have a look at Vedalam? I think you introduced the pending changes but it does not seem effective, or does it? I believe the previous type of protection was better. Or perhaps some other solution exists. Thanks, -- WikiHannibal ( talk) 15:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Helllo DMacks, in Aug 2013, you deleted page Salarpur under G12. This page was then created by some other editor. I just wanted keep you informed that I have recreated this page. Let me know if you have any observations. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to drop this here but WP:RFPP is backlogged and you recently commented at ANI. An IP is trolling at Talk:Jesus. Please block 31.219.124.176 or semiprotect the talk page. Johnuniq ( talk) 10:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my information stupid get lost Mithilsoni200 ( talk) 08:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry about reverting the page any longer. I shall be replacing the references with 3rd party refs. the IP is being a total dickbag about it, but I'll edit it to suit wiki standards.
I find it insane how Wikipedia seems to block primary sources, though. -- Kizzycocoa ( talk) 22:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
i haven't undone contributions of others, it's the opposite : others (meaning : usually black metal's fans) have undone my contributions because they think wikipedia is about point of view, not about telling the truth. So do you ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sant Erwan ( talk • contribs) 11:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The vandal thought he or she was being funny or insulting, but you made me laugh when I saw your response in the edit summary here. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 20:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
is at it again. I have requested page protection, but thought the other two IPs inserting crap about killers/murderers [9] might need to be temp-blocked or something... ugh, the things people come up with. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 22:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear
I've provided reliable academic papers. I urged User:Argyriou to join the discussion, but he never did. The following link -Zatsuwa, Monosagu (2005). "Beware, soft ground and the standard penetration test" (in Japanese). Public Works Research Institute.- is without a doubt what I found and he repeatedly kept deleting my writing as well as the link and stole the link as his for his writing even though he does not understand what it says. This can be confirmed from SPT history.
If you examine the SPT talk page,and its history as well as ANI, I am positive you would understand that I have provided all the necessary and reliable source to validate my writings, and I never enforced my points to User:Argyriou or others; I have been very open to discussion. He is the one who kept deleting my writings and cussing without solid reasons.
One more thing about three-revert rule in Boring(earth). I know about three-revert rule, but i though I could revert more than three if it was reverted by more than one other user. I am no expert in Wikipedia, and I never intended an edit-war.
I reported User:Argyriou's act as vandalism because there was a huge discussion about this issue in SPT talk and ANI a while ago, and I specifically pointed out about the link issue as well as others, and I thought it was settled. I urged him to join the discussion but he never did. And a couple of days ago, he deleted my writings and stole my link source as his again. I looked at Wikipedia:Vandalism, and it seems his act fits the description of vandalism. This is why I reported. I honestly do not know if this reporting is an act of edit-war.
Sincerely, Yoshi123Yoshi ( talk) 07:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
DMacks: When dealing with chemicals like 2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile that can cause harm to people and environment, how does one decide "too many quotes"? If you read through the quotes in this entry, you'll find that they wind up contradicting each other -- that this chemical is safe but then is banned in the EU and (under Toxicity) according to the UN IPCS and US CDC can cause harm to the environment (which is the intended use: to effect the environment, starting with tree roots)... Respectfully -- Aboudaqn ( talk) 12:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
^ Krett12 ( talk) 01:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Don't you think, sentence is contradictory ? (Her next movie was ?) Shachiindra ( talk) 06:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi DMacks, I want to bring this to your notice. This user Turehnde is removing content from many pages which include Karanvir Bohra, Surbhi Jyoti, Parth Samthaan and many more. When I reverted those edits the user is citing that content was removed from Karan Singh Grover without discussion. So the user is applying same rules over these pages according to him/her. Please take action on this. Regards, Digvijay411 ( talk) 4:51 , 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your improvements to the dopamine article. Now all I have to do is find a good ref for all that stuff . . .
Looie496 (
talk)
13:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary, I did not add the content that you are concerned about. The uncited claim was in the article before I ever edited it. 71.175.72.159 ( talk) 00:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, would it be possible to reduce the protection level of Joe Hockey's article? He has recently retired from the Parliament, and several sum-ups of his career are coming out, and the article has been semi-protected (without a visible padlock) since last December. There have been no attempts at vandalism since then - could the protection level be changed to pending changes level or fully unprotected? Thanks. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 00:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Dmacks, if an editor edits logged out, the IP adress is revealed- if it was accidental and unintended, is there a means of deleting the IP address from the edit history (re. WP:OUTING I guess)? cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
mother fuckers Bfan20 ( talk) 06:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello DMacks Can you unprotected the article Cloudfone From Materialtechnology — Preceding unsigned comment added by Materialtechnology ( talk • contribs) 05:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
addresses with FACE:B00C in their range are used by internet.org app service and not "geologically localized" in that a person in south asia can get allocated an address for a time which will be later cycled to any person in EU or NA. blocking entire ranges is too much collateral damage. please look deeply into this. block the sock accounts, not ip ranges. speaking as a victim of ip rangeblock associated with someone I did not know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahfuzur rahman shourov ( talk • contribs) 05:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
problem is that everyone in the world who are using internet.org gets assigned IP in the face:b00c range and internet.org system cycles the ip on a global scale, not regionally. so, because of some vandals in the ip range, innocent users get blocked. and the vandals can get away by creating accounts in "not face:b00c" range and logging into the vandal accounts using internet.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahfuzur rahman shourov ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
When you substituted a new diagram (set), you did not correspondingly amend the footnote, which refers to the old diagram. PraeceptorIP ( talk) 17:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Read your updates on the case linked above. I'm thinking of designing an edit filter for this non-privileged users placing privileged templates. Any thoughts? Have you noticed any trends? Ping me upon reply. -- JustBerry ( talk) 05:49, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you discussing Giant covalent vs network covalent in the page Covalent Bond. I wonder if you're interested in this: /info/en/?search=Talk:Network_covalent_bonding . I'm suggesting to change the title of the the page Giant covalent bonding. I hope someone will give some advice on this DHMO hk ( talk) 14:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I am trying to protect the article from My very best wishes. My first edit was at 03:52, 28 August 2015, when I removed allegations that ECHR had recognized that Tymoshenko had been tortured in detention. I provided a reference to the actual judgement of the court, which explicitly rejects these claims. Lidaz then started an edit war to reinstate the false claim about the court's recognition. I asked Future Perfect at Sunrise for help. He rewrote part of the article which had been rewritten by Lidaz in terrible English. It turned out Lidaz was a sock and he was blocked indefinitely. Since IPs started reinstated the same edits, Dennis Brown semi protected the page. Sometimes after that another user, Gal777, started to reintroduce the same edits. He turned out to be a sock of Lidaz and was idefinitely blocked too. Now, Volunteer Marek changed " the Ukrainian Supreme Court closed the case and found that "no crime was committed"." into "the Ukrainian Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights closed the case and found that "no crime was committed"", thus associating the ECHR to the judgement of the the Ukrainian Supreme Court, which is factually false. He seems to enjoy the support of My very best wishes who strangely contradicts his own previous edits. In any case, my action has been conservative. I tried to maintain the consensus reached with Future Perfect at Sunrise and Dennis Brown. Therefore, I do not understand why you accuse me of edit warring, while giving a free pass to MVBW and VM to introduce changes that are factually wrong. Ask Dennis Brown or FPS, they are well aware of the whole affair. Thank you. Againstdisinformation ( talk) 04:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
A Cheese burger.Please reply me to talk you. DennisJohn12 ( talk) 03:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi my name is Gabriele Corcos, you just deleted my page (twice). I am setting up a bio page and will absolutely release my content from copyright, just wanted to let you know that this is me, in first person and all copyright in question is mine (no share holders). Please let me know if I am doing anything wrong, I really need this page to go up. Thanks Gabriele Corcos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetuscangun ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
As the copyvio alert on your talkpage says, "If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure." But see also WP:COI to learn whether you should be writing about yourself, and WP:BIO regarding whether you merit an article at all (regardless of who writes it). As a new editor, maybe our " Your First Article" guide would be a good first read to learn about wikipedia. DMacks ( talk) 19:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello , The page Karanvir Bohra is currently vandalised by many anonymous users. Could you please protect the article from getting vandalised by adding protection for few days. Yours Sincerely, Digvijay411 ( talk · contribs) 13:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Why does it need a link associated with it? - Denimadept ( talk) 04:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for stopping the Talk:Karanvir Bohra/GA1 from continuing. I have noticed some funny coincidences in this case from then onwards. Chronology is as follows:
I happened to notice this because Derevation had on 5th also nominated another film article Singh Is Bliing which didn't even have plot section in it then. And then he also jumped in the Talk:Shreya Ghoshal/GA1 which was not needed at all. Just bringing to your notice because you have administered Bohra's page and might know the history of these editors. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 12:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
How do i rename a page? Jdogmad ( talk) 04:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Aurora Borealis Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:FischerDetroit2010Census.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, DMacks. User:Liz suggested that you might be able to help me. I have a colleague who has been working on the William Lofland Dudley article. Neither of us has an academic background in chemistry or the physical sciences. Would you be willing to review the article content as relates to the subject's academic career and work in chemistry, and perhaps do a little sniffing around for additional content to round out the related sections of the article? I have three graduate degrees (one in economics, two in law), but I am clearly off the reservation when I start discussing academic chemistry and related research. Please let me know if you can help. No rush. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 13:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi DMacks, Khowar language, is currently semi-protected please set the protection level to; Pending changes protected (level 1). Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Þørnø $ ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corey–Link reaction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reduction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Why did you rollback my edits to Kent Hovind’s wiki? I don't think it's a fair statement to say that the entire scientific community discredit all of Kent Hovind's claims. Would you agree?
Michaelcadcock ( talk) 22:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry DMacks. I'm new here. Thanks for the explanation! Michaelcadcock ( talk) 01:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! With these night owl nights you're always pulling, here's some hydration.
![]() |
Only beginning a new discussion seeing as I am unable to post my thoughts on the existing thread. Anyway... Out of curiosity DMacks, what exactly are the "sources and proof" that have in your opinion counted Dr. Hovind' work as discredited? And to also be "fair", I believe you gave too much of a runaround and difficult answer (and you didn't even answer the direct question) to the user Mickaelcadcock for a simple question. Purely, I am curious as to what exactly you've edited to his page as well as the "discrediting proof", seeing as I've monitored his description by Wiki users who can write whatever they so choose regardless of validity for quite some time now and I'm displeased that all I see are lashing opinions spoken in a negative and bias way. TruthOverEgoAndFear ( talk) 02:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
DMacks, I will review what is readily available to me, however I note that you are once again making something simple (my question) very unclear and elongated (your answer). If you intend to debate the words "fair" and "valid" as being interpreted any other way besides "factual and without personal motive" then I have a hard time trusting in your credibility and or intellect. I mean absolutely no insult In any of this, but you don't need a college degree to interpret a word you learned in kindergarten. Sounding intelligent and being it are two different things. I shall respond to any reply when I review on my end. Once again I mean no harm, I would just respect a straight simple answer to a simple question. Additionally, "entirely rejected in the scientific community" does not mean it isn't factual. Readily I admit I have not followed Dr. Hovind or his work for a great deal of time however what I have dug into shows validity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthOverEgoAndFear ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
DMacks Incorrect on your statement of my "paragraph" question/answer. If you review my very first involvement, only one sentence was annotated with a question mark, making it the only (short and simple) question. The rest was response opinion/fact to your prior actions and I see you took it as generally superfluous regardless of valid point. I then ask this question (having now reread the entire article and reviewed some of the "sources" (and I say sources lightly seeing as links are broken or content is gone from their linked pages altogether)): If nothing about that article's content is to be discussed here on your user talkpage, why then do you believe you are a proper or adequate decider of the content of the page who is above reproach? Also, I notice that despite my stance for a professional discussion (save one lapse on both our part) I realize I am being pressing. I am however asking your (implied underline) thoughts and sources, not for you to hide behind WP policy which I have not violated by asking you a direct question for source material on the content you personally edited, seeing as the links on my end are broken or missing.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
$wgContentNamespaces
.
[60]Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
DMacks, I would like to contact you regarding the indefinite blocking of an account by you. My query relates to our decision on how to dispose of the matter with the individual in question. Therefore, How would I contact you in private to discuss? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSCU ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
The benzene structure of Spiropentadiene was 3D animation and also part of my midterm assignment was to add the 3D struture, please understand me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShinRyu Forgers ( talk • contribs) 04:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I beg your pardon, I need your explanation, please. "Incorrect structure", please explain. "Annoying Animation", please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShinRyu Forgers ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you have a look at Vedalam? I think you introduced the pending changes but it does not seem effective, or does it? I believe the previous type of protection was better. Or perhaps some other solution exists. Thanks, -- WikiHannibal ( talk) 15:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Helllo DMacks, in Aug 2013, you deleted page Salarpur under G12. This page was then created by some other editor. I just wanted keep you informed that I have recreated this page. Let me know if you have any observations. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to drop this here but WP:RFPP is backlogged and you recently commented at ANI. An IP is trolling at Talk:Jesus. Please block 31.219.124.176 or semiprotect the talk page. Johnuniq ( talk) 10:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my information stupid get lost Mithilsoni200 ( talk) 08:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry about reverting the page any longer. I shall be replacing the references with 3rd party refs. the IP is being a total dickbag about it, but I'll edit it to suit wiki standards.
I find it insane how Wikipedia seems to block primary sources, though. -- Kizzycocoa ( talk) 22:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)