Swimmerfreak94 (
talk |
contribs) |
|||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
:::Yes, Christianity. Source: Barack Obama. [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
:::Yes, Christianity. Source: Barack Obama. [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
⚫ |
::::Does everyone tell the truth all the time? NO. and Muslims are allowed to lie to advance the cause of their religion. Of course he wouldn't want anyone to know if he was Muslim because he'd be in t-r-o-u-b-l-e. Hmm...[[User:Swimmerfreak94|Swimmerfreak94]] ([[User talk:Swimmerfreak94|talk]]) 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::::It must be scary living in a paranoid, delusional world. <small>(And please try to keep these discussions linear.)</small> [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] offending me, "DKqwerty" [[User:JonasanRat7|JonasanRat7]] ([[User talk:JonasanRat7|talk]])JonasanRat7 |
::[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] offending me, "DKqwerty" [[User:JonasanRat7|JonasanRat7]] ([[User talk:JonasanRat7|talk]])JonasanRat7 |
||
:::In what way have I offended you? [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
:::In what way have I offended you? [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
[[User:Swimmerfreak94|Swimmerfreak94]] ([[User talk:Swimmerfreak94|talk]]) 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Literaturegeek |
T@1k?
06:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article
Paroxetine has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did and why. Thank you. Regarding
this reversion, please do not characterize good-faith editing as
WP:Vandalism. Remember that one of Wikipedia's core guidelines is
Wikipedia:Assume good faith.
--Dynaflow
babble
11:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hey DK. I appreciate your good faith discussion. I actually did add a source if you look at the history. There are of course lots more. Cheers. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 05:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
This is all relative.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Care to explain those removals? You even claimed the MD link didn't mention MD - very ironic. I didn't see much wrong with those sections, not at least meriting a total removal. If you don't integrate some of the texts back into the article, I'll figure a way to make them legitimate, but like I said, total removal of those sections is very much uncalled for. Otvaltak ( talk) 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Excuse us here at the UWEC, but in actual truths, we actually were not really testing-we were partly redesigning certain portions of French fries, and we'd never purposely vandalize any articles. Sorry of the mistake-please give us any insights or view you have on the article portion we edited. We represent University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire-in the reality, testings aren't what we are here doing. Please help us out so that the testing notes will not pop onto our college usertalk pages again. We're sorry for inconvenience caused by that editing we did with "French fries." What was the problem?
The UWEC at 173.19.119.172 ( talk) 04:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I am a very awkward, I am very straight forward and random. And no, I do not see it as conflict of Interests. I love my neighbor and my enemy, but I do not follow their steps nor their beliefs. I DO NOT DISCRIMINATE, I am not a hypocrite. I am a Republican, and believe in Republican and Christian values. The band t.A.T.u. is my favorite band, i love their music not their actions. I have proof that Barack Obama is a Muslim, but I can not express myself. I believe my Freedom of Speech and Right are violated. I edited United States of America showing that it was formed under Christian founders, but they deleted my sentences and say I just committed vandalism. I believe Wikipedia is not being fair to me, i can not edit or show my point of view, only the others. JonasanRat7 ( talk)JonasanRat7 —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC).
Swimmerfreak94 (
talk |
contribs) |
|||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
:::Yes, Christianity. Source: Barack Obama. [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
:::Yes, Christianity. Source: Barack Obama. [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
⚫ |
::::Does everyone tell the truth all the time? NO. and Muslims are allowed to lie to advance the cause of their religion. Of course he wouldn't want anyone to know if he was Muslim because he'd be in t-r-o-u-b-l-e. Hmm...[[User:Swimmerfreak94|Swimmerfreak94]] ([[User talk:Swimmerfreak94|talk]]) 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::::It must be scary living in a paranoid, delusional world. <small>(And please try to keep these discussions linear.)</small> [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] offending me, "DKqwerty" [[User:JonasanRat7|JonasanRat7]] ([[User talk:JonasanRat7|talk]])JonasanRat7 |
::[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] offending me, "DKqwerty" [[User:JonasanRat7|JonasanRat7]] ([[User talk:JonasanRat7|talk]])JonasanRat7 |
||
:::In what way have I offended you? [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
:::In what way have I offended you? [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
[[User:Swimmerfreak94|Swimmerfreak94]] ([[User talk:Swimmerfreak94|talk]]) 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Literaturegeek |
T@1k?
06:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article
Paroxetine has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did and why. Thank you. Regarding
this reversion, please do not characterize good-faith editing as
WP:Vandalism. Remember that one of Wikipedia's core guidelines is
Wikipedia:Assume good faith.
--Dynaflow
babble
11:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hey DK. I appreciate your good faith discussion. I actually did add a source if you look at the history. There are of course lots more. Cheers. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 05:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
This is all relative.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Care to explain those removals? You even claimed the MD link didn't mention MD - very ironic. I didn't see much wrong with those sections, not at least meriting a total removal. If you don't integrate some of the texts back into the article, I'll figure a way to make them legitimate, but like I said, total removal of those sections is very much uncalled for. Otvaltak ( talk) 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Excuse us here at the UWEC, but in actual truths, we actually were not really testing-we were partly redesigning certain portions of French fries, and we'd never purposely vandalize any articles. Sorry of the mistake-please give us any insights or view you have on the article portion we edited. We represent University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire-in the reality, testings aren't what we are here doing. Please help us out so that the testing notes will not pop onto our college usertalk pages again. We're sorry for inconvenience caused by that editing we did with "French fries." What was the problem?
The UWEC at 173.19.119.172 ( talk) 04:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I am a very awkward, I am very straight forward and random. And no, I do not see it as conflict of Interests. I love my neighbor and my enemy, but I do not follow their steps nor their beliefs. I DO NOT DISCRIMINATE, I am not a hypocrite. I am a Republican, and believe in Republican and Christian values. The band t.A.T.u. is my favorite band, i love their music not their actions. I have proof that Barack Obama is a Muslim, but I can not express myself. I believe my Freedom of Speech and Right are violated. I edited United States of America showing that it was formed under Christian founders, but they deleted my sentences and say I just committed vandalism. I believe Wikipedia is not being fair to me, i can not edit or show my point of view, only the others. JonasanRat7 ( talk)JonasanRat7 —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC).