This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
Hello! I hope you're having a good day, whenever you get to reading this. I've bee having some difficulties with User: Aashray Saini on the page List of awards and nominations received by Akshay Kumar. Despite numerous warning messages on the user's talk page, the user continues to add the same unsourced information that has been reverted four times. It seems a little heavy-handed to bring this to WP:AIV, so I was hoping you could help with this in some way. Let me know if I should take this elsewhere. Have a great day! Aguy777 ( talk) 07:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Sir I have a question. Do you think that this user is a sock of B103N48? SP013 ( talk) 15:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: The page protection you so wisely imposed on Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput expired yesterday, and this edit today makes me think it's already time to protect that page again. NedFausa ( talk) 19:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I have seen some IP's add the same unsourced content over and over again even after I revert them. Can we get a indefinite protection for this article. SP013 ( talk) 18:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir, I came across an IP who's sole purpose is to add The Hans India articles randomly. Edit history can be seen here. I'm clueless how to handle this, therefore bringing to your notice. Thanks. -- Ab207 ( talk) 09:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir, I am not sure if this bizarre issue is worthy enough of an administrator's attention. But there's a user who just won't talk. Out of 2334 live edits, he has made zero edit summaries. He has zero edits to talk pages. He keeps on removing adding/removing content at his will without explanation. I've notified him about this on his talk page, whacked him with a wet trout to get his attention and even pleaded in native language but it didn't change an iota. Instead he copied my user page in almost in entirety to create his own. I'm sorry if I am wasting your time but wanted to know is there anything I should do or just laugh it off? -- Ab207 ( talk) 20:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Sir I have a strong feeling that there are 2 people using the B103N48 account. If you notice after I have given a statement on his page he had 4 big edits but then he personally attacked me after 10 days of me putting the statement. SP013 ( talk) 14:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The change that I made was reverted stating that the article says its 175 CR. The article says as below.
"According to a report in Manorama, the film has collected Rs 175 crore from theatres and fetched Rs 13 crore from its digital streaming rights. Its satellite rights were sold for Rs 6 crore and it made another Rs 10 crore from TV rights in other languages."
175 was just from theatres and others were added up to the total box office collection, which makes it above 200 CR. The article heading also says the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakeshrnath ( talk • contribs) 13:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Krimuk 2.0 reverted me twice in last 24 hours and continues to revert me over small small things since my comeback and then goes ahead, accuses me of Edit Warring but the truth is I did not revert once (check history). Is this kind of a tactic to intimidate? Since I have come back, I have been super scared of adding anything to any article (even backed by strong sources) because of this irrational fear that might get me out of this amazing place. This constant intimidation has made me opposite of the WP rule that says WP: Be Bold. In fact after editing, I am always waiting for that editor's "approval" (no revert) to see if my edits are good or bad. No one seems to have said anything to that editor anything. What should I do? Because no one can edit in fear. Krish | Talk To Me 22:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Lamba lamba chur has re-added the exact promo edit by sockpuppets of Patiparmeshwar and in their edit summary complained of their edit being repeatedly removed despite that being their first edit to the page under this account, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, You might consider helping with a small but annoying issue - Alvi2608 ( talk · contribs) has been editing different Filmfare Award pages, and particularly strange is their insistence to add Kiron Kher's name to the Best Supporting Actress nominees of 2007 both on 52nd Filmfare Awards and on the film page of Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna. Having checked it, she was not nominated for this film. I started digging in the archives to find the originally published list of nominees on Bollywood Hungama, and cited it on both pages, but the user keeps re-inserting her name, and no messages on user's talk page help deter them from doing so. I've already posted four messages on four different occasions, but the same edits keep coming. If you could think of a way to help out, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Shahid • Talk2me 11:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Since yesterday, the edit history link of each Wiki page is coming in a weird format, and cannot be clicked. Just wanted to clarify if it is just me or there is some issue going on with Wiki.
Thanks ( Panchalidraupadi ( talk) 08:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC))
Things are solved now. Thanks for responding. :)
( Panchalidraupadi ( talk) 14:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC))
According to Twitter user @anything4truth: This CyphoidBomb Name Got Disappear. From Sushantsingh Edited Portion Wikipedia. How Can It Be Possible. This Needs Serious Investigation.
To conduct this serious investigation, @anything4truth calls upon:
Two of these three officials wear impressive uniforms in conducting their duties, so you know this is serious.
@anything4truth concludes: plz Investigate This Wikipedia User Name CyphoidBomb.
Clearly, you have now entered the pantheon of Wikipedia administrators. But please try to stay humble for the sake of us workaday editors who rely upon your example. NedFausa ( talk) 22:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Yesterday the reason of death was updated as under investigation...Today the same NedFausa has updated it back to suicide by hanging...why is this user NedFausa soo desparate to show it suicide!!!I suspect these folks would soo love to see my Name Got Disappear too. NedFausa ( talk) 02:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Cheers - The9Man ( Talk) 07:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC) |
Sir is this allowed as the user ( Priyanka Dutt) that has uploaded the picture appears to be one of the key people for the production house. Wouldn't this be considered as WP:OR. SP013 ( talk) 15:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Is Gautham Menon a producer of the film? If he is, then why is he not listed in the national film awards for that year? TamilMirchi ( talk) 23:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Natly 88. Been a while since I've really spotted any Natly accounts, but pretty sure I've got two pegged. Odd though, they seem to have stopped using one late July and started up another one. Cleanup is not gonna be fun. Ravensfire ( talk) 03:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello @ Cyphoidbomb:, do verify before removing content from any article as you did in Karan Singh Grover, the filming of 3 Dev is completed and few songs are available. Check this out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90KwV7Q50Lc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cmsXMYU8ag. Thanks C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Every edits of User:Mishbir166 are vandalised one with addition of the cast who haven't even acted in the series and also gives vandalised cast description contents. Please see to it. Thanks and regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition of casts in Mahabharat like Pankhuri Awasthy, Rhea Sharma, Shivangi Joshi and others in their edits are vandalised who have never acted in the [1]. Vandalised cast description here [2], [3] where there are no characters named Kusum, Kabir and Kavita in the series Anupamaa. Also, their other edits seems unconstructive. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 06:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
hi Cyphoidbomb, yesterday someone deleted Sabaash Naidu film page (without using talk page). This is unreleased or dropped movie. This page has some information about the film with references. look at that page and decide whether or not to retrieve the information, [4], hope you retrieve the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.181.235.229 ( talk) 11:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Can I get a page protection for this film as there are some IP's changing the collections to the share collections saying that this is the "truth" even though I have said total collections is more important than share. SP013 ( talk) 16:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Sir I have been having a problem at this article with this one specific IP that keeps changing the cast roles. I can't seem to find the reason as to why he is but looking at it, it seems to be vandalism. I would be great if we got a page protection on this. SP013 ( talk) 15:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Can we get a deletion for this redirect as we have a draft for this article but when we try to move it, it won't work and also there wont be IP vandals adding content constantly. SP013 ( talk) 16:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
There is show coming on StarPlus lockdown ki Love story i want to create the show article can you help me in this? Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 13:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Please learn to be more decent in your responses to people, have some humanity. No agenda is being pushed here, but the mere fact that “consensus” keeps pointing to the need to add the word “suicide” when it has not been proven as a “clear case of suicide” shows where ethics in this website are. Learn your knowledge on this topic first, then comment. It was a request to simply remove one word from info box and your response adds a lot of sarcasm & rudeness that was not necessary. The fact that this is of “warring” topic just shows that it is important to multiple users, but it is okay, when the truth comes up then your team will just have to update everything anyway. Thanks. Justiceforssr ( talk) 21:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
I will adjust, but won’t need to - thanks. It’s not for personal reasons, but actual facts that were coming out regarding the case. News reports and doctors are not end all... Justiceforssr ( talk) 06:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
please do not be disrespectful again and ask users if they GRASP the idea or not. Everyone has their own intelligence. Justiceforssr ( talk) 06:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
You've got 218.255.72.0/22 blocked, but I'm seeing them active on 218.255.71.0/22 recently [5]. I've got the range on my list to check, but worth reviewing for possible block. Ravensfire ( talk) 19:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You still around? —usernamekiran (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Ab207, Ravensfire, and Bovineboy2008: Abishekjerold has not used a single summary out of his 273 edits when editing an article to my knowledge. I have also seen him use the talk page only once ever after he created his account. The user does not respond to Warnings at all and he vandalizes pages by A). Changing up the cast order without any reason as to why he is B). Adding unnecessary puffery to a certain cast member without any reliable source. SP013 ( talk) 16:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
There is a user who knows so much despite editing for only two days. TamilMirchi ( talk) 15:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
That was a funny comment. You made my day .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 09:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
User:Atlantic052 is a sock of User:Hectore123. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:28B:AAFD:0:0:216A:D8AD ( talk) 06:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Sir, recently a user seems on an agenda to add images of the subject when she was "at her career peak". First added a new image here, which got copyvio-ed. Then they added this one here. My point is should we be keeping the recent most image or the one taken during the subject's career peak. The original one [12] seems to be in teh article for a considerable time, suggesting it was the preferred one. Also notice the user's harsh language here. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
"The legendary artist is deceased. It is respectable and honorable to present the image that brought the artist success."This sounds like we're actively paying tribute to or memorialising the subject, which is absolutely the wrong motivation. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Can I get a page protection for this film as there are IP's that arbitrarily change the cast and dates of the film. SP013 ( talk) 16:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, who will perform the cleanup for Awards and Nominations section for Sidharth Shukla page? Cristmess619127 ( talk) 17:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, In this edit, I have removed plot of Palnati Yuddham (1947 film) which is copied word-to-word from this Hindu article. Notifying for further action. Regards -- Ab207 ( talk) 14:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Very nice cyphoidbomb keep it up thanks for contributing me
Humanrabbit96 ( talk) 16:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC) |
I have seen multiple IP addresses putting the same unsourced content over and over again so can I get a page protection for this. SP013 ( talk) 17:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
On 30 August 2020, semi-protection will expire. On 23 August,
you gave us a heads-up: Since I've chimed in on some of these discussions, I'll probably pass on renewing any expired protection on these SSR articles and talk pages, but I'm sure you all know that you can always go to WP:RFPP should the issues flare up again. And they will.
I'm sure you're right about what we can expect once protection expires. But before that happens, I'd appreciate your thoughts about lessons learned.
To recap:
There is no question that the semi-protection you imposed was in each instance entirely justified and prevented disruptive editing. However, it also had the effect of making it virtually impossible for unregistered users, or accounts less than 30 days old and with fewer than 500 editsthat are less than four days old and have made less than 10 edits, to submit an edit request. I say virtually because the process such users must follow is so complicated that, in my opinion, only veteran editors can navigate it.
After clicking the View source tab at Sushant Singh Rajput, one is invited to submit an edit request by clicking the blue button and following instructions. Doing so leads to WP:RFED, which is where the going gets tough and the inexperienced get going.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request,one is told,this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.Those instructions in turn explain how to create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {pagelinks} template and the edit being requested. I have plenty of experience in requesting page protection, but even I find this process cumbersome and intimidating.
Perhaps that's the point. In the 27 days since you last semi-protected Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput, there has not been a single edit request. God knows I don't want to go back to the free-for-all disruptive editing that necessitated protection in the first place. But I can't help feeling we're missing some middle ground. Is there no way to lock out vandals and conspiracy theorists without shutting down well-meaning edit requests from presumably sane individuals? NedFausa ( talk) 20:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Article has fixed already it was published long back Charlie063 ( talk) 06:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
If u cant help in fixig it y ur removing tags Charlie063 ( talk) 06:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
It apperas our friend has one. Praxidicae ( talk) 14:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for fixing that draft for me. You are the first person who actually was helpful to me. (The several reviewers could have easily fixed that much, instead of them just stating that the references weren’t adequate...which the references seemed entirely adequate to me.) Do you think I should try to submit it, now? Or will they just keep rejecting it (without them even bothering to look at the refs again)? Also....is there a ‘talk’ page for the draft? ...if so, would you please place a link right in the draft so I can access the talk page? Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:21B1:E29C:4E9E:BC34 ( talk) 23:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
If you have a moment, I have a somewhat complex situation with this article, possibly needing the eyes of an admin with significant experience. It has been in existence since 2008, and was initially created by an editor with a direct conflict of interest (apparently Michael Sutton, who was a member of the team that founded the company [13]). When I started looking at this article, I kept finding copyright violation after copyright violation after copyright violation. I kept removing sections that were copied from elsewhere and kept redoing the earwig detector. What I ended up with was a bare intro and a single line of usable history. The history is a mess. It's extremely difficult to clean without a massive time sink to detect exactly when certain parts of the content that are copyrighted were added and what needs a revdel. So, I took the approach of nuke-it-from-orbit and start over. I've tagged the remains of the article as db-g12, taken from [14]. Honestly, I'm not even positive that website was used to copy the content to here, as there's no date on it. It's possible they copied from here, but I can't tell. It's just a mess. I've created a draft at Draft:Zscaler which I intend on moving to Zscaler once it's deleted. I'm hoping you'll take a look at this and see if it merits deletion as I've suggested, or offer an alternative. Thank you for your time, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 19:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The edits by User:Amiha jhunjhunwala and User:Prema Puriwala are being totally disruptive, deviating from the encyclopedic tone. Despite, my instructions for them in their talk page, there is no reply from the former while the latter claims their edits being proper and unnecessarily bashing my edits. Also, their editing pattern and articles edited by them are mostly similar including their User page description. For instance, both kept on adding Sarita Joshi in Anupamaa repeatedly despite my revertion with a character description while she wasn't even seen the series. When i asked them, they say that reports suggest them casted for the series or they say that Joshi is not shooting owing Covid-19 pandemic. Then, if not seen in the series, how could Joshi have a character description as described in their edits. Like this, I have many more to state on their edits. Need your help and intervention. Please don't ignore this message. With regards Noobie anonymous ( talk) 11:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This editor seems to have some personal problems with my editing format as I have not been editting Anupamaa Wikipedia page since a long time and as I am a new editor I will obviously need time to explore and develop learnings from Wikipedia as I am doing so but Noobie Anonymous has a severe issue as he is continuously reverting my edits though they are correct and according to the Wikipedia rules and regulations like when I write the plot he instantly deletes it and when asked there is no response and often gives lame excuses like my descriptions are too long and many more points I have to say as Noobie Anonymous is totally in a disruptive behaviour while continously sending me mails when I have several times said him not to send and there are many more Issues regarding him I have . So please take a look into this matter ASAP and say him not to continously send mails to me cause it's really bothering me and to repeatedly revert my edits Regards, Your sincerely
Amiha jhunjhunwala. Amiha jhunjhunwala ( talk) 11:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Amiha jhunjhunwala: I don't have any personal problems with you. It is your editing manner being disruptive and not as per MOS:TV which makes me revert back to stable version or correct it. And for plot, it should be as minimum as possible as per MOS:TV and not the entire episode story. Also your edits doesn't even cite any single reliable references from The Times of India, The Indian Express, etc as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. And without trying understanding the Wikipedia policies properly you simply ignore my statements and argue with me. Why should I simply revert without any reason? I just correct those and notify it If your edits are proper why should i notify. As you were not considering my words i notify this to experienced editors. Seems that you and Prema are the same user with different account. You can even cross check with any experienced editors whether your edits are right or wrong. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 13:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@Noobie Anonymous, Just look now what are u doing again and again you are constantly messaging after repeatedly I have saud you not to do it but still just look at yourself why are you messaging have I sent you a mail, no... not at all I have send this mail to an experienced editor Cyphoidbomb So please just let the matter be with us only and it is the last time I am saying u not message me my cell is getting damaged cause of your annoying messages and there is no such rules in the Wikipedia to edit limitedly Wikipedia has given the right to all editors to edit as much possible as one can with no limits cause Wikipedia page is for to give brief description about any topic So who are you to revert editors editing and only edit by yourself .This is a strict warning as not to continously sending me mails, messages and attachments. Thankyou, Regards Amiha jhunjhunwala Amiha jhunjhunwala ( talk) 14:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Thank you so much. Even now they are not accepting their mistakes and blame me unnecessarily and also replaced my proper title card file to their which is not even a title card of Shaadi Mubarak. Despite my instructions in talk page of Anjali Gupta, they replace the flying officer's bio with a Television actress bio of same name even when i said them to create a separate article for the actress and not replacing in flying officer's article. So, Please do keep an eye on both of the accounts and take necessary actions. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
There is this user who is constantly asking me to move several of his drafts to articles. If I do so, then this user is using me. Please warn this user. TamilMirchi ( talk) 17:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry this after never do like that sorry Eswnav ( talk) 17:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
I feel the article Lockdown Ki Love Story has reached its minimum notability and the deletion request could be cancelled and closed. There has been no comments after my comment after the improvements were made by me. I think this discussion could be closed. Please see to it. With regards Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Death story Susant Singh Rajput to be removed and wait for the investigation to complete. Please don't include wikipedia in support Media houses in support of people who want to hide the truth. Be neutral till investigation is over or just cover death issues below a title of Mumbai Police narrative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.196.133.48 ( talk) 16:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
When I edited Kaithi (2019 film), there was an editor who would constantly add the full names of actors. The user is reborn as user:111.92.48.122. TamilMirchi ( talk) 02:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
As List of highest-grossing Indian films is protected, IPs have found their way to List of highest-grossing films in India to add unsoured financials to Indian films. Requesting page protection. -- Ab207 ( talk) 04:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Sir I am confused about this edit right here. [15]. I explained to the user that even though his source is reliable the price that it was sold was a generalization of all the Indian films that were sold on OTT. Can I get some help on determining whether I should keep it or remove it (I reverted SuriyaCR7Fan's edits already). SP013 ( talk) 14:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
User:Cyphoidbomb please look in could you please look at Talk:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series)#Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:E6FF:544E:DCC7:3B46:60CE ( talk) 14:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
This user doing unwanted edit in List of Tamil film actresses article. Please warm this user. Eswnav ( talk) 14:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
I see that you looked at this article, which has been having some edit-warring recently. One of the editors has filed a DRN request. My question for either you or User:CaptainEek is whether there is a content issue that can possibly be mediated, or whether I should close the DRN request as a conduct dispute. (I can see that there are conduct issues, but sometimes conduct issues go away when a content issue is resolved.)
Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
As you said the main cast need not be the stars of the series. Considering the Indian tv series which run for years continuously with a changing casts and plots, many characters which would get a good screenspace except the leads varies throughout. Sometimes, as stated by you a cast would seem main with a significant plot and screenspace for them other than the main stars while through progress there would not be much plot for them or reduced screenspace like a recurring one as seen in many series. Then where should they be listed? Is it that they should be moved to recurring due to their reduced screenspace while progression of the story? I am confused as how and on what basis to list the main cast clearly. Could you please explain briefly?
And considering Indian tv series, credits are only given to the stars of the series which makes it difficult to identify the other main casts. What could be the solution then? Could it be determined based on screenspace of a cast?
With regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:Thanks a lot for your explanation. I totally understand it. But as stated there "main cast members are determined by the series producers (not by popularity, screen time, or episode count) and generally have a set order in the credits", Indian series credits only the stars of the series. So, it would be difficult for determining the main cast other than the leads ourselves, right. What could be done for it then? Noobie anonymous ( talk) 12:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Actually, i missed mentioning a main thing properly in it which i stated there. Please see to it. With regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 08:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: As i stated there, credits are mentioned in any episodes for producers, directors, production house, etc. There is no credits displayed in any episodes for cast members, even for the lead star (here the lead star Ganguly) since few years as evident in the reference. It is that we can say who the lead stars are for sure. Either we can determine the other main cast based on the plot importance given to the characters other than the lead stars. For instance, in Diya Aur Baati Hum, Deepika Singh and Anas Rashid are the only lead stars of the series. As per the entire story line and her role appearance, Neelu Vaghela can be considered as one of the main cast as she is the next main character after the leads with a significant role. Else is there any other solution? Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: In the article I provided, the persons mentioned there are all lead stars only who complain about not crediting even for them. Hope I cleared your doubt. With regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 18:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Cyphoidbomb! Since you've been helpful recently, I might need your admin advice in case you have time (please ignore the message if you're busy).
I took the Dimple Kapadia article to FAC a few months ago. There has been an ongoing debate about the religion of Kapadia's parents, which started on FAC between Fowler&fowler and myself, and never resolved. I was initially reluctant to mention her parents' religion as no sources provided this information from the horse's mouth, but insistence on the part of the user on the FAC (including a threat that unless religion was mentioned, they would oppose the nomination) encouraged me to look for something. And I did. The sources found (including India Today, 1985 and Open, 2019) clearly say her father comes from a Khoja family who embraced Hinduism while still following some of the tradition. But the facts as they appear in sources were not to the other user's liking. Their main claim was that it doesn't really make sense that an Ismalili Khoja family would embrace Hinduism ("not based in any reality that I am aware", as they put it). I found their stand to be in complete violation of WP:OR and WP:V, and refused to comply with their proposed version. The nomination was opposed by them on this ground, and they even kept commenting all over the place, posting long walls of text and messing up the entire page. The nomination was archived because of stability issues (although the user's disruptive conduct was warned by the closing coordinator), but I am willing to resubmit. Before that, I want this issue settled.
Based strictly on the sources, the current version reads as: "Chunibhai was from a wealthy Ismaili Khoja family, whose members had reportedly 'embraced Hinduism' while still regarding Agha Khan as their religious mentor; Bitti was an Ismaili, too, and similarly followed Aga Khan."
I did recently try WP:DRN as a way to resolve this dispute. It didn't work out. I'm not sure RfC is the right way to go. Now I'm looking for another, more efficient way to achieve some sort of consensus. Can you suggest the best course of action? Maybe you'd be willing to offer your input here. Shahid • Talk2me 20:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
See WP:AN/I#ÆCE - Topic ban? — A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 03:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
As you have seen, we have another account now attempting to reorder cast listings. Of note; it appears this account is attempting to supplant film posters to their preferred versions. Contrast File:Mallusingh 2012.jpg, added by this editor in replacement of File:Mallusingh.jpg. The latter has been restored. This editor appears to have been doing a lot of this. See Special:ListFiles/Vaishnav_bk for images they have uploaded that are not yet deleted. I'm going to be cleaning this up, and dropping another warning regarding this issue to the editor. I'm not asking for action on your part; I just wanted to let you know this appears to be a new wrinkle in this never ending cast reordering saga. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 18:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Sir the account " Divya Agarwal " has been redirected to another page and protected. She is a notable actress . I want to create a proper web page for her. Since you are a administrator it's my humble request that you either delete or remove protection from this page. Rjidindiana ( talk) 09:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok sir Thank you
Rjidindiana ( talk) 06:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: hey! I want my Draft: Gold Award for Best Onscreen Jodi move to main space ASAP. Can you help me in this? Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 12:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
As you're experienced editor of the Wikipedia so I want you to check my draft. If anything is wrong, please change it. With Regards Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 12:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:So what I do please tell me? Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 15:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:Okay,thanks for your suggestion. Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 16:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi can you review articles related malayalam movie Rahul Soman talk - contribs 20:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Just asked Rahul Soman talk - contribs 21:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
Hello! I hope you're having a good day, whenever you get to reading this. I've bee having some difficulties with User: Aashray Saini on the page List of awards and nominations received by Akshay Kumar. Despite numerous warning messages on the user's talk page, the user continues to add the same unsourced information that has been reverted four times. It seems a little heavy-handed to bring this to WP:AIV, so I was hoping you could help with this in some way. Let me know if I should take this elsewhere. Have a great day! Aguy777 ( talk) 07:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Sir I have a question. Do you think that this user is a sock of B103N48? SP013 ( talk) 15:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: The page protection you so wisely imposed on Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput expired yesterday, and this edit today makes me think it's already time to protect that page again. NedFausa ( talk) 19:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I have seen some IP's add the same unsourced content over and over again even after I revert them. Can we get a indefinite protection for this article. SP013 ( talk) 18:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir, I came across an IP who's sole purpose is to add The Hans India articles randomly. Edit history can be seen here. I'm clueless how to handle this, therefore bringing to your notice. Thanks. -- Ab207 ( talk) 09:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir, I am not sure if this bizarre issue is worthy enough of an administrator's attention. But there's a user who just won't talk. Out of 2334 live edits, he has made zero edit summaries. He has zero edits to talk pages. He keeps on removing adding/removing content at his will without explanation. I've notified him about this on his talk page, whacked him with a wet trout to get his attention and even pleaded in native language but it didn't change an iota. Instead he copied my user page in almost in entirety to create his own. I'm sorry if I am wasting your time but wanted to know is there anything I should do or just laugh it off? -- Ab207 ( talk) 20:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Sir I have a strong feeling that there are 2 people using the B103N48 account. If you notice after I have given a statement on his page he had 4 big edits but then he personally attacked me after 10 days of me putting the statement. SP013 ( talk) 14:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The change that I made was reverted stating that the article says its 175 CR. The article says as below.
"According to a report in Manorama, the film has collected Rs 175 crore from theatres and fetched Rs 13 crore from its digital streaming rights. Its satellite rights were sold for Rs 6 crore and it made another Rs 10 crore from TV rights in other languages."
175 was just from theatres and others were added up to the total box office collection, which makes it above 200 CR. The article heading also says the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakeshrnath ( talk • contribs) 13:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Krimuk 2.0 reverted me twice in last 24 hours and continues to revert me over small small things since my comeback and then goes ahead, accuses me of Edit Warring but the truth is I did not revert once (check history). Is this kind of a tactic to intimidate? Since I have come back, I have been super scared of adding anything to any article (even backed by strong sources) because of this irrational fear that might get me out of this amazing place. This constant intimidation has made me opposite of the WP rule that says WP: Be Bold. In fact after editing, I am always waiting for that editor's "approval" (no revert) to see if my edits are good or bad. No one seems to have said anything to that editor anything. What should I do? Because no one can edit in fear. Krish | Talk To Me 22:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Lamba lamba chur has re-added the exact promo edit by sockpuppets of Patiparmeshwar and in their edit summary complained of their edit being repeatedly removed despite that being their first edit to the page under this account, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, You might consider helping with a small but annoying issue - Alvi2608 ( talk · contribs) has been editing different Filmfare Award pages, and particularly strange is their insistence to add Kiron Kher's name to the Best Supporting Actress nominees of 2007 both on 52nd Filmfare Awards and on the film page of Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna. Having checked it, she was not nominated for this film. I started digging in the archives to find the originally published list of nominees on Bollywood Hungama, and cited it on both pages, but the user keeps re-inserting her name, and no messages on user's talk page help deter them from doing so. I've already posted four messages on four different occasions, but the same edits keep coming. If you could think of a way to help out, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Shahid • Talk2me 11:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Since yesterday, the edit history link of each Wiki page is coming in a weird format, and cannot be clicked. Just wanted to clarify if it is just me or there is some issue going on with Wiki.
Thanks ( Panchalidraupadi ( talk) 08:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC))
Things are solved now. Thanks for responding. :)
( Panchalidraupadi ( talk) 14:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC))
According to Twitter user @anything4truth: This CyphoidBomb Name Got Disappear. From Sushantsingh Edited Portion Wikipedia. How Can It Be Possible. This Needs Serious Investigation.
To conduct this serious investigation, @anything4truth calls upon:
Two of these three officials wear impressive uniforms in conducting their duties, so you know this is serious.
@anything4truth concludes: plz Investigate This Wikipedia User Name CyphoidBomb.
Clearly, you have now entered the pantheon of Wikipedia administrators. But please try to stay humble for the sake of us workaday editors who rely upon your example. NedFausa ( talk) 22:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Yesterday the reason of death was updated as under investigation...Today the same NedFausa has updated it back to suicide by hanging...why is this user NedFausa soo desparate to show it suicide!!!I suspect these folks would soo love to see my Name Got Disappear too. NedFausa ( talk) 02:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Cheers - The9Man ( Talk) 07:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC) |
Sir is this allowed as the user ( Priyanka Dutt) that has uploaded the picture appears to be one of the key people for the production house. Wouldn't this be considered as WP:OR. SP013 ( talk) 15:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Is Gautham Menon a producer of the film? If he is, then why is he not listed in the national film awards for that year? TamilMirchi ( talk) 23:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Natly 88. Been a while since I've really spotted any Natly accounts, but pretty sure I've got two pegged. Odd though, they seem to have stopped using one late July and started up another one. Cleanup is not gonna be fun. Ravensfire ( talk) 03:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello @ Cyphoidbomb:, do verify before removing content from any article as you did in Karan Singh Grover, the filming of 3 Dev is completed and few songs are available. Check this out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90KwV7Q50Lc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cmsXMYU8ag. Thanks C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Every edits of User:Mishbir166 are vandalised one with addition of the cast who haven't even acted in the series and also gives vandalised cast description contents. Please see to it. Thanks and regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition of casts in Mahabharat like Pankhuri Awasthy, Rhea Sharma, Shivangi Joshi and others in their edits are vandalised who have never acted in the [1]. Vandalised cast description here [2], [3] where there are no characters named Kusum, Kabir and Kavita in the series Anupamaa. Also, their other edits seems unconstructive. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 06:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
hi Cyphoidbomb, yesterday someone deleted Sabaash Naidu film page (without using talk page). This is unreleased or dropped movie. This page has some information about the film with references. look at that page and decide whether or not to retrieve the information, [4], hope you retrieve the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.181.235.229 ( talk) 11:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Can I get a page protection for this film as there are some IP's changing the collections to the share collections saying that this is the "truth" even though I have said total collections is more important than share. SP013 ( talk) 16:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Sir I have been having a problem at this article with this one specific IP that keeps changing the cast roles. I can't seem to find the reason as to why he is but looking at it, it seems to be vandalism. I would be great if we got a page protection on this. SP013 ( talk) 15:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Can we get a deletion for this redirect as we have a draft for this article but when we try to move it, it won't work and also there wont be IP vandals adding content constantly. SP013 ( talk) 16:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
There is show coming on StarPlus lockdown ki Love story i want to create the show article can you help me in this? Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 13:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Please learn to be more decent in your responses to people, have some humanity. No agenda is being pushed here, but the mere fact that “consensus” keeps pointing to the need to add the word “suicide” when it has not been proven as a “clear case of suicide” shows where ethics in this website are. Learn your knowledge on this topic first, then comment. It was a request to simply remove one word from info box and your response adds a lot of sarcasm & rudeness that was not necessary. The fact that this is of “warring” topic just shows that it is important to multiple users, but it is okay, when the truth comes up then your team will just have to update everything anyway. Thanks. Justiceforssr ( talk) 21:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
I will adjust, but won’t need to - thanks. It’s not for personal reasons, but actual facts that were coming out regarding the case. News reports and doctors are not end all... Justiceforssr ( talk) 06:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
please do not be disrespectful again and ask users if they GRASP the idea or not. Everyone has their own intelligence. Justiceforssr ( talk) 06:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
You've got 218.255.72.0/22 blocked, but I'm seeing them active on 218.255.71.0/22 recently [5]. I've got the range on my list to check, but worth reviewing for possible block. Ravensfire ( talk) 19:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You still around? —usernamekiran (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Ab207, Ravensfire, and Bovineboy2008: Abishekjerold has not used a single summary out of his 273 edits when editing an article to my knowledge. I have also seen him use the talk page only once ever after he created his account. The user does not respond to Warnings at all and he vandalizes pages by A). Changing up the cast order without any reason as to why he is B). Adding unnecessary puffery to a certain cast member without any reliable source. SP013 ( talk) 16:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
There is a user who knows so much despite editing for only two days. TamilMirchi ( talk) 15:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
That was a funny comment. You made my day .
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 09:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
User:Atlantic052 is a sock of User:Hectore123. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:28B:AAFD:0:0:216A:D8AD ( talk) 06:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Sir, recently a user seems on an agenda to add images of the subject when she was "at her career peak". First added a new image here, which got copyvio-ed. Then they added this one here. My point is should we be keeping the recent most image or the one taken during the subject's career peak. The original one [12] seems to be in teh article for a considerable time, suggesting it was the preferred one. Also notice the user's harsh language here. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
"The legendary artist is deceased. It is respectable and honorable to present the image that brought the artist success."This sounds like we're actively paying tribute to or memorialising the subject, which is absolutely the wrong motivation. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Can I get a page protection for this film as there are IP's that arbitrarily change the cast and dates of the film. SP013 ( talk) 16:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, who will perform the cleanup for Awards and Nominations section for Sidharth Shukla page? Cristmess619127 ( talk) 17:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, In this edit, I have removed plot of Palnati Yuddham (1947 film) which is copied word-to-word from this Hindu article. Notifying for further action. Regards -- Ab207 ( talk) 14:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Very nice cyphoidbomb keep it up thanks for contributing me
Humanrabbit96 ( talk) 16:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC) |
I have seen multiple IP addresses putting the same unsourced content over and over again so can I get a page protection for this. SP013 ( talk) 17:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
On 30 August 2020, semi-protection will expire. On 23 August,
you gave us a heads-up: Since I've chimed in on some of these discussions, I'll probably pass on renewing any expired protection on these SSR articles and talk pages, but I'm sure you all know that you can always go to WP:RFPP should the issues flare up again. And they will.
I'm sure you're right about what we can expect once protection expires. But before that happens, I'd appreciate your thoughts about lessons learned.
To recap:
There is no question that the semi-protection you imposed was in each instance entirely justified and prevented disruptive editing. However, it also had the effect of making it virtually impossible for unregistered users, or accounts less than 30 days old and with fewer than 500 editsthat are less than four days old and have made less than 10 edits, to submit an edit request. I say virtually because the process such users must follow is so complicated that, in my opinion, only veteran editors can navigate it.
After clicking the View source tab at Sushant Singh Rajput, one is invited to submit an edit request by clicking the blue button and following instructions. Doing so leads to WP:RFED, which is where the going gets tough and the inexperienced get going.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request,one is told,this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.Those instructions in turn explain how to create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {pagelinks} template and the edit being requested. I have plenty of experience in requesting page protection, but even I find this process cumbersome and intimidating.
Perhaps that's the point. In the 27 days since you last semi-protected Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput, there has not been a single edit request. God knows I don't want to go back to the free-for-all disruptive editing that necessitated protection in the first place. But I can't help feeling we're missing some middle ground. Is there no way to lock out vandals and conspiracy theorists without shutting down well-meaning edit requests from presumably sane individuals? NedFausa ( talk) 20:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Article has fixed already it was published long back Charlie063 ( talk) 06:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
If u cant help in fixig it y ur removing tags Charlie063 ( talk) 06:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
It apperas our friend has one. Praxidicae ( talk) 14:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for fixing that draft for me. You are the first person who actually was helpful to me. (The several reviewers could have easily fixed that much, instead of them just stating that the references weren’t adequate...which the references seemed entirely adequate to me.) Do you think I should try to submit it, now? Or will they just keep rejecting it (without them even bothering to look at the refs again)? Also....is there a ‘talk’ page for the draft? ...if so, would you please place a link right in the draft so I can access the talk page? Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:21B1:E29C:4E9E:BC34 ( talk) 23:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
If you have a moment, I have a somewhat complex situation with this article, possibly needing the eyes of an admin with significant experience. It has been in existence since 2008, and was initially created by an editor with a direct conflict of interest (apparently Michael Sutton, who was a member of the team that founded the company [13]). When I started looking at this article, I kept finding copyright violation after copyright violation after copyright violation. I kept removing sections that were copied from elsewhere and kept redoing the earwig detector. What I ended up with was a bare intro and a single line of usable history. The history is a mess. It's extremely difficult to clean without a massive time sink to detect exactly when certain parts of the content that are copyrighted were added and what needs a revdel. So, I took the approach of nuke-it-from-orbit and start over. I've tagged the remains of the article as db-g12, taken from [14]. Honestly, I'm not even positive that website was used to copy the content to here, as there's no date on it. It's possible they copied from here, but I can't tell. It's just a mess. I've created a draft at Draft:Zscaler which I intend on moving to Zscaler once it's deleted. I'm hoping you'll take a look at this and see if it merits deletion as I've suggested, or offer an alternative. Thank you for your time, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 19:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The edits by User:Amiha jhunjhunwala and User:Prema Puriwala are being totally disruptive, deviating from the encyclopedic tone. Despite, my instructions for them in their talk page, there is no reply from the former while the latter claims their edits being proper and unnecessarily bashing my edits. Also, their editing pattern and articles edited by them are mostly similar including their User page description. For instance, both kept on adding Sarita Joshi in Anupamaa repeatedly despite my revertion with a character description while she wasn't even seen the series. When i asked them, they say that reports suggest them casted for the series or they say that Joshi is not shooting owing Covid-19 pandemic. Then, if not seen in the series, how could Joshi have a character description as described in their edits. Like this, I have many more to state on their edits. Need your help and intervention. Please don't ignore this message. With regards Noobie anonymous ( talk) 11:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This editor seems to have some personal problems with my editing format as I have not been editting Anupamaa Wikipedia page since a long time and as I am a new editor I will obviously need time to explore and develop learnings from Wikipedia as I am doing so but Noobie Anonymous has a severe issue as he is continuously reverting my edits though they are correct and according to the Wikipedia rules and regulations like when I write the plot he instantly deletes it and when asked there is no response and often gives lame excuses like my descriptions are too long and many more points I have to say as Noobie Anonymous is totally in a disruptive behaviour while continously sending me mails when I have several times said him not to send and there are many more Issues regarding him I have . So please take a look into this matter ASAP and say him not to continously send mails to me cause it's really bothering me and to repeatedly revert my edits Regards, Your sincerely
Amiha jhunjhunwala. Amiha jhunjhunwala ( talk) 11:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Amiha jhunjhunwala: I don't have any personal problems with you. It is your editing manner being disruptive and not as per MOS:TV which makes me revert back to stable version or correct it. And for plot, it should be as minimum as possible as per MOS:TV and not the entire episode story. Also your edits doesn't even cite any single reliable references from The Times of India, The Indian Express, etc as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. And without trying understanding the Wikipedia policies properly you simply ignore my statements and argue with me. Why should I simply revert without any reason? I just correct those and notify it If your edits are proper why should i notify. As you were not considering my words i notify this to experienced editors. Seems that you and Prema are the same user with different account. You can even cross check with any experienced editors whether your edits are right or wrong. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 13:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@Noobie Anonymous, Just look now what are u doing again and again you are constantly messaging after repeatedly I have saud you not to do it but still just look at yourself why are you messaging have I sent you a mail, no... not at all I have send this mail to an experienced editor Cyphoidbomb So please just let the matter be with us only and it is the last time I am saying u not message me my cell is getting damaged cause of your annoying messages and there is no such rules in the Wikipedia to edit limitedly Wikipedia has given the right to all editors to edit as much possible as one can with no limits cause Wikipedia page is for to give brief description about any topic So who are you to revert editors editing and only edit by yourself .This is a strict warning as not to continously sending me mails, messages and attachments. Thankyou, Regards Amiha jhunjhunwala Amiha jhunjhunwala ( talk) 14:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Thank you so much. Even now they are not accepting their mistakes and blame me unnecessarily and also replaced my proper title card file to their which is not even a title card of Shaadi Mubarak. Despite my instructions in talk page of Anjali Gupta, they replace the flying officer's bio with a Television actress bio of same name even when i said them to create a separate article for the actress and not replacing in flying officer's article. So, Please do keep an eye on both of the accounts and take necessary actions. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
There is this user who is constantly asking me to move several of his drafts to articles. If I do so, then this user is using me. Please warn this user. TamilMirchi ( talk) 17:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry this after never do like that sorry Eswnav ( talk) 17:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
I feel the article Lockdown Ki Love Story has reached its minimum notability and the deletion request could be cancelled and closed. There has been no comments after my comment after the improvements were made by me. I think this discussion could be closed. Please see to it. With regards Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Death story Susant Singh Rajput to be removed and wait for the investigation to complete. Please don't include wikipedia in support Media houses in support of people who want to hide the truth. Be neutral till investigation is over or just cover death issues below a title of Mumbai Police narrative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.196.133.48 ( talk) 16:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
When I edited Kaithi (2019 film), there was an editor who would constantly add the full names of actors. The user is reborn as user:111.92.48.122. TamilMirchi ( talk) 02:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
As List of highest-grossing Indian films is protected, IPs have found their way to List of highest-grossing films in India to add unsoured financials to Indian films. Requesting page protection. -- Ab207 ( talk) 04:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Sir I am confused about this edit right here. [15]. I explained to the user that even though his source is reliable the price that it was sold was a generalization of all the Indian films that were sold on OTT. Can I get some help on determining whether I should keep it or remove it (I reverted SuriyaCR7Fan's edits already). SP013 ( talk) 14:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
User:Cyphoidbomb please look in could you please look at Talk:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series)#Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:E6FF:544E:DCC7:3B46:60CE ( talk) 14:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
This user doing unwanted edit in List of Tamil film actresses article. Please warm this user. Eswnav ( talk) 14:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
I see that you looked at this article, which has been having some edit-warring recently. One of the editors has filed a DRN request. My question for either you or User:CaptainEek is whether there is a content issue that can possibly be mediated, or whether I should close the DRN request as a conduct dispute. (I can see that there are conduct issues, but sometimes conduct issues go away when a content issue is resolved.)
Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
As you said the main cast need not be the stars of the series. Considering the Indian tv series which run for years continuously with a changing casts and plots, many characters which would get a good screenspace except the leads varies throughout. Sometimes, as stated by you a cast would seem main with a significant plot and screenspace for them other than the main stars while through progress there would not be much plot for them or reduced screenspace like a recurring one as seen in many series. Then where should they be listed? Is it that they should be moved to recurring due to their reduced screenspace while progression of the story? I am confused as how and on what basis to list the main cast clearly. Could you please explain briefly?
And considering Indian tv series, credits are only given to the stars of the series which makes it difficult to identify the other main casts. What could be the solution then? Could it be determined based on screenspace of a cast?
With regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:Thanks a lot for your explanation. I totally understand it. But as stated there "main cast members are determined by the series producers (not by popularity, screen time, or episode count) and generally have a set order in the credits", Indian series credits only the stars of the series. So, it would be difficult for determining the main cast other than the leads ourselves, right. What could be done for it then? Noobie anonymous ( talk) 12:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Actually, i missed mentioning a main thing properly in it which i stated there. Please see to it. With regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 08:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: As i stated there, credits are mentioned in any episodes for producers, directors, production house, etc. There is no credits displayed in any episodes for cast members, even for the lead star (here the lead star Ganguly) since few years as evident in the reference. It is that we can say who the lead stars are for sure. Either we can determine the other main cast based on the plot importance given to the characters other than the lead stars. For instance, in Diya Aur Baati Hum, Deepika Singh and Anas Rashid are the only lead stars of the series. As per the entire story line and her role appearance, Neelu Vaghela can be considered as one of the main cast as she is the next main character after the leads with a significant role. Else is there any other solution? Noobie anonymous ( talk) 17:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: In the article I provided, the persons mentioned there are all lead stars only who complain about not crediting even for them. Hope I cleared your doubt. With regards. Noobie anonymous ( talk) 18:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Cyphoidbomb! Since you've been helpful recently, I might need your admin advice in case you have time (please ignore the message if you're busy).
I took the Dimple Kapadia article to FAC a few months ago. There has been an ongoing debate about the religion of Kapadia's parents, which started on FAC between Fowler&fowler and myself, and never resolved. I was initially reluctant to mention her parents' religion as no sources provided this information from the horse's mouth, but insistence on the part of the user on the FAC (including a threat that unless religion was mentioned, they would oppose the nomination) encouraged me to look for something. And I did. The sources found (including India Today, 1985 and Open, 2019) clearly say her father comes from a Khoja family who embraced Hinduism while still following some of the tradition. But the facts as they appear in sources were not to the other user's liking. Their main claim was that it doesn't really make sense that an Ismalili Khoja family would embrace Hinduism ("not based in any reality that I am aware", as they put it). I found their stand to be in complete violation of WP:OR and WP:V, and refused to comply with their proposed version. The nomination was opposed by them on this ground, and they even kept commenting all over the place, posting long walls of text and messing up the entire page. The nomination was archived because of stability issues (although the user's disruptive conduct was warned by the closing coordinator), but I am willing to resubmit. Before that, I want this issue settled.
Based strictly on the sources, the current version reads as: "Chunibhai was from a wealthy Ismaili Khoja family, whose members had reportedly 'embraced Hinduism' while still regarding Agha Khan as their religious mentor; Bitti was an Ismaili, too, and similarly followed Aga Khan."
I did recently try WP:DRN as a way to resolve this dispute. It didn't work out. I'm not sure RfC is the right way to go. Now I'm looking for another, more efficient way to achieve some sort of consensus. Can you suggest the best course of action? Maybe you'd be willing to offer your input here. Shahid • Talk2me 20:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
See WP:AN/I#ÆCE - Topic ban? — A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 03:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
As you have seen, we have another account now attempting to reorder cast listings. Of note; it appears this account is attempting to supplant film posters to their preferred versions. Contrast File:Mallusingh 2012.jpg, added by this editor in replacement of File:Mallusingh.jpg. The latter has been restored. This editor appears to have been doing a lot of this. See Special:ListFiles/Vaishnav_bk for images they have uploaded that are not yet deleted. I'm going to be cleaning this up, and dropping another warning regarding this issue to the editor. I'm not asking for action on your part; I just wanted to let you know this appears to be a new wrinkle in this never ending cast reordering saga. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 18:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Sir the account " Divya Agarwal " has been redirected to another page and protected. She is a notable actress . I want to create a proper web page for her. Since you are a administrator it's my humble request that you either delete or remove protection from this page. Rjidindiana ( talk) 09:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok sir Thank you
Rjidindiana ( talk) 06:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: hey! I want my Draft: Gold Award for Best Onscreen Jodi move to main space ASAP. Can you help me in this? Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 12:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
As you're experienced editor of the Wikipedia so I want you to check my draft. If anything is wrong, please change it. With Regards Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 12:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:So what I do please tell me? Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 15:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:Okay,thanks for your suggestion. Unknownnreasonn ( talk) 16:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi can you review articles related malayalam movie Rahul Soman talk - contribs 20:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Just asked Rahul Soman talk - contribs 21:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)