This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
Cyphoidbomb,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
Please block this user 49.204.223.21. I warned the user not to make unsourced, disruptive but looks like he/she is rarely paying attention. He/she is constantly engaging in vandalizing movie genres and often resolves to clever edits by first changing the correct genre partially, only to fix the error in next edit so that it can't be directly reverted. Please look into this. These IPs are constantly vandalizing and not everyone is paying attention. ( 77Survivor ( talk) 11:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC))
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pokkiri&oldid=876423939 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pokkiri&oldid=876423910 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pokkiri&oldid=876785686 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Azhagiya_Tamil_Magan&oldid=876811307 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spyder_(film)&oldid=876126448 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spyder_(film)&oldid=876126421 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spyder_(film)&oldid=874923106
As for Pokkiri, the gangster film genre doesn't work in entirety because it's not a gangster film in the first place. It's about a cop who's undercover to take down a gangster. The film is about how the cop eliminates his enemies one by one while also taking care of his loved one. It also does come under crime genre apart from action but gangster films are rooted mostly in drama like The Godfather. I know not all gangster films are the same but this one is easily an all-out action film instead of gangster. This isn't my personal opinion. I'm saying the same way you based your opinion just on the words "gang" and "gangster". Wikipedia itself says an action movie containing criminality is often labelled as a crime thriller by many, but it's not necessarily true. If this one qualifies as a gangster film, then almost every action movie made in India features criminality. Does that make them crime movies/gangster movies? Necessarily not. ( 77Survivor ( talk) 07:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC))
How can I start a discussion about Indian television when WP:INTV is inactive? There is a need to discuss about why Indian television articles just consider the Indian film sources at WP:ICTF as reliable. Why is there no separate guideline and information about other sources for television. For film articles, those sources are apt. But not for television articles. Because Indian media works very differently for films and television. It is incorrect to consider those sources as the only reliable sources for television because the focus of most of those sources is film and bollywood coverage. There should be a separate set of sources that should be considered reliable for ITV. Hope you're understanding what I'm saying. MiaSays ( talk) 15:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Can you help this user on this page [2]. Thanks. Sid95Q ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Atleast look at the table. The edits by that Sid user spoiled the whole arrangement of the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjalimarar95 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Also just so you know New Talent Awards is hosted by Indiantelevison.com which also hosts Indian Telly Awards so it is credible. It does not have a page because it is not an annual event. Does not take away it's credibility. Even Indian Telly Awards will be held after 4 years in Feb end or March. Does it take away it's importance? You really dont know how Indian television works. You guys follow film guidelines and film sources which dont even focus on Indian tv. Adding link so you can confirm RELIABILIY http://www.indiantelevision.com/our-events — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.39.230.229 ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
"It does not have a page because it is not an annual event."LOL! You're attempting to describe the reasoning process that a non-existent person went through to ultimately decide not to create the article. It does not have a page ostensibly because nobody's endeavored to create one.
"You really dont know how Indian television works."There is nothing special about Indian television that requires the inclusion of every award.
"You guys follow film guidelines and film sources which dont even focus on Indian tv."Film guidelines are often embraced by WikiProject Television, but feel free to open a query at WT:TV to get other opinions. The general (non-film/non-TV) community typically requires that list items be properly established as notable. Note an article like List of British former child actors. Virtually everybody on that page has an article that establishes their notability. "But what about India?!" List of Indian child actors. And note List of awards and nominations received by Amitabh Bachchan. Do we spend a lot of time at that article listing all of the minor awards Bachchan won over his career? No, we focus on the biggies. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I need a help. I started User:Titodutta/Draft/Everyone Has a Story which was a bestseller. Now the title Everyone Has a Story which is a redirect to a television show. The televsion article does not mention "Everyone Has a Story". The redirect history shows, it was not notable. I am looking for a second opinion. Could you please have a look and move/not move the page whatever you find the best? Regards.I'll add a categories and low-resolution non-free cover once the articleis on mainspace -- Titodutta ( talk) 09:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
This is Uricnobel. Could you please tell me why you are doing this even after six months. Time and again I have proved my self that I am a loyal wikipedian. Why are you doing this ? There is no legal mechanism for this ? Can I pay any fine and provide some ID proof. If that works. Why dont you discuss my case with arbitration committee. Stop discouraging me. I am here to help wikipedia, I am here to share some of your responsibilities. Take my issue on humanitarian grounds. Contrib2 ( talk) 02:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey, tough request for you. Would mind reviewing this discussion on Bhanwar singh vaish's talk page? They've just about run AussieLegend and my patience out and the next steps are, I'm pretty sure, going to be fairly unpleasant for them. I'm hoping you may be able to get through to them better than we've been able. Appreciate it. Ravensfire ( talk) 04:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I recently noticed the edits of Ghjklopui to List of awards and nominations received by Vijay and having looked at some of their other edits I think it's probable that they are a sock - probably of Bothiman. They have also added images uploaded by Fghjkltyuiop and Lkjhgfdsartyuiop who are clearly the same person (as per their user pages) and I'm thinking that they are probably also Bothiman socks. Could you give those accounts a quick once-over and see if you agree with me? I can make a proper SPI report but I wanted to get some input on my gut feeling first. -- bonadea contributions talk 16:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, can you please take a look at the KGF movie page and fix the infobox and lead section? Someone has messed that up and I don't know how to fix it technically. Csgir ( talk)
Hi! You have retrieved hebbuli in the list of Kannada highest grossing films, but actual thing is Hebbuli is not even collected ₹50 crore in its lifetime, ₹100 core is really funny, you can observe #kgf film mentioned in every Reputed article that its the first ₹100 crore film in #kannada means #sandalwood. So plz don't allow the fake n blog news in wikipedia, because people can lose trust on wiki. Please review my question on #hebbuli.
Thanks Tigerikkada ( talk) 05:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi!Am here to clarify the exact collection of Hebbuli film, You can go via this link https://www.ibtimes.co.in/highest-grossing-kannada-movie-sandalwood-2017-report-card-raajakumara-hebbuli-bharjari-biggest-hits-754310, which is published by #Ibtimes, 2017 total box office report of #Kannada films... Thanks
Hi! I have provided reliable source on Hebbuli collection in previous tweet, n am waiting for your reply. Thanks
I want to say that if everything is right on this article then what the problem to move that page to mainspace. I will not do again but I am saying you are not doing right as Wikipedia is the fast improve site and yet The Voices'Season 3 article not created so shame on us. Including me,you and us Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Hebbuli film was released in 2017 and officially collected ₹30 crore in lifetime of its release, and even it was not added in wiki of highest grossing Kannada films list, but suddenly since 2 days its appearing and our local Channel also noticed Hebbuli in the list and started to suspecting the reliability of Wikipedia... Please try to know the fact of Hebbuli collection. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerikkada ( talk • contribs) 10:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear user. I kindly request u plzz add protection of Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi page. In the following too much unsourced and unrelated editing happening. Thank you... Sush150 ( talk) 06:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
May I please trouble you. You are familiar with Padmalakshmisx's case and behavior, so how likely do you think Paavada is ? Please refer Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Paavada for the case. --Let There Be Sunshine 10:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Is there any possibilities to restore List of highest-grossing Tamil films article now ?, I have already created the article with updated figures/films with limited sections like not including weekend collection section since its problematic. -- Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 08:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Behindwoods gold medal awards 4 and 0 Total 37 .please mention this thanks it's missing Geateres ( talk) 18:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry respected editor I wasnt aware of the fact that IMDb ratings are manipulative in nature.I offer my sincere apologies to you. Srijanx22 ( talk) 20:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi CyphoidBomb, I saw you undid a link that I included for director Krish. Can you share a Wikipedia on how to link names and keywords to Wikipedia pages please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virakiwi ( talk • contribs) 15:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Noted the thought on over-linking. Was curious to know if there are guidelines available. I am personally OK with either. So, leaving it as it is. Virakiwi ( talk) 19:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing the guidelines! Virakiwi ( talk) 19:39, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
You are a person with very good humor..
So I award you with the barnstar of good humor Rnavjr0405 ( talk) 10:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC) |
Noted. Will provide an explanation next time. -- Princessruby ( talk) 17:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
I've improved the article, by removing some portion of information as it wasn't needed, what you were adding was already there in the career section, so re-adding the same information makes the article look dull. It looks better now, so please do not add any more information, but feel free to improve the career section. -- Princessruby ( talk) 10:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi these users I am abubakar 500 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), Uid 906 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Nickelodeon Team ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) look like one person as their edits are same on Shiva (TV series) examples [5] [6] [7]. Now one user is removing content from My User page as well [8]. Thanks. Sid95Q ( talk) 11:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For your kindness sir. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |
Can you please protect Ishq Mein Marjawan? Someone is continuously vandalising it from different ips. KiaraHooda ( talk) 10:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Harihara19091965 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) This user keeps changing figures in Viswasam page with unsourced and predictions of a old source Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 10:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Nikkznikkinikkz created separate page for List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, previously such an article was deleted [9]. Now both are merged. Entries in this article is highly challengeable, with most of the sources either does not cite the given figures or are unverifiable. 137.97.128.59 ( talk) 13:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoidbomb, I was hoping that you might add this article to your watchlist: Waheed Zafar Qasmi. It has been attracting some unusual attention as of late from a small handful of single-purpose accounts. [10] Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 23:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
So far vertercas had joined just 13 days ago but he had done almost 60 edits most of his edits were degrading the Ajith movies. A sock puppet using self proclaimed informations given by prakash uphadhyaya as citing source regarding Vivegam/Viswasam production and financials. Lumbercane ( talk) 02:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi this user Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) again creating multiple pages on same topic as earlier He was earlier doing with other topics here, [11] and here. Users like AussieLegend and Ravensfire tried to help him [12] but No success. Sid95Q ( talk) 00:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
You are Most Welcome Sir
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
15:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tu Sooraj Main Saanjh, Piyaji is sequel series to Diya Aur Baati Hum so why it is not valid for followed_by parameter [13]. Regards. Sid95Q ( talk) 07:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
|followed_by=
and |preceded_by=
parameters are typically used when we are indicating series within a greater franchise. The best example of this is Star Trek:|followed_by=
Star Trek: The Animated Series (1977), which is |followed_by=
Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987), then
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.|preceded_by=
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993).
Star Trek: Enterprise (2001) is |preceded_by=
Star Trek: Voyager. Then we have
Star Trek: Discovery (2017) which is |preceded_by=
Star Trek: Voyager.|related=
.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
08:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)This is very interesting ... Ravensfire ( talk) 18:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb. I am afraid that either one day we might have to give up on pages like List of South African slang words or enforce real tough penalties for WP:OR. User Nelatti has now been blocked three times for the same thing, unsourced and interpretive content, but it looks as if he just could not care less. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 15:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
Please protect the Vinaya Vidheya Rama page as vandals are constantly attacking it and vandalizing the genre. It's an action film and they're constantly making it comedy or satirical fantasy comedy. There's not a bit of that in the film and I understand they're doing so because the film has been negatively received and heavily trolled due to what they call "over-the-top" scenes. What actually hit me hard was that even you failed to notice that.
Please protect the page. These vandals with different IPs are really resorting to vandalism. Here you can see that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vinaya_Vidheya_Rama&oldid=886494704 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vinaya_Vidheya_Rama&oldid=886494743 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vinaya_Vidheya_Rama&oldid=886259643
If you can do a little bit of browsing on your own, you can find this film was heavily trolled for its "unrealistic" and "illogical" scenes. Due to this trolling, a scene featuring the hero traveling between two distant states via standing on the top of a train and arriving within just 5 minutes was cut. There's another scene in which the villain is bitten by the snake and it's the latter who dies. Due to such scenes, the vandals are up with their nonsensical edits.
I can assure you they're vandalizing. It's not a comedy film, and that's not my personal opinion of a genre. It's REALLY NOT a comedy film. Period. ( 77Survivor ( talk) 20:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC))
With due respect, I don't know whether its your ignorance or arrogance to compare a film maker to a plumber. Even if considering they are mere works for bread and butter, have you seen any plumber's name being read out for the sanitary fixtures being used at home or workplace or whatsoever. The answer is a big NO , whereas in the case of film makers whether he's done a single or multiple films, he's name is being listed and read out by thousands of people who watch the piece of work. In case of my draft on Vipin Atley, there might be problems with the references being quoted but that doesn't give anyone the right to demean any works and calling the subject a mere day worker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Najadh ( talk • contribs) 11:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir, is BookMyShow reliable for upcoming films such as this? I mean the movie hasn't released so how is "Booking a Show" relevant. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Bhanwar singh vaish continues to be a problem child. I've had to warn him about adding an mp3 that he downloaded from a website and uploaded as his own work. It's now at FFD so he's moved on to creating categories, all with title case and some with strange naming, like Category:2019 Indian Television Singing season and Category:2019 Indian Television Reality Shows. He clearly doesn't understand categorisation. And then there is Category:List of DAV schools in India which is just a list. I pointed him to Help:Category and WP:CAT on my talk page, [14] but he either didn't bother reading them or doesn't understand. I fear the longer he edits, the worse things will get. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb. I see that you had to step in again; my apologies for the delay in following up on your suggestion. It is now done, hopefully something will come of it. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 12:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Please go to Shreya Ghoshal 's article and fix infobox template immediately. Otherwise it creates vendalisms. Thanks and please reply me after editing. Jay prakash bais ( talk) 15:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much Jay prakash bais ( talk) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I noticed your recent reversion of my edit on this page. I'm on the [[Wikipedia:Typo Team]|Typo Team], and despite Kim Possible having "good article" status, it had at least one spelling error, and ALLCAPS were used in reference titles. Please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters, which states in the All caps and small caps section that ALLCAPS should be reduced even if they were used in titles.
Ira Leviton ( talk) 04:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I have been preparing a draft for a massive edit for the IUPAP page in my sand box. Original wiki page of IUPAP actually has nothing in the name of content. Plz tell should i send my edits fr review through sandbox or edit the whole page and write a long summary of edits
Regards Srijanx_22 Srijanx22 15:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srijanx22 ( talk • contribs)
Ok after finishing my daft in the sandbox should I sent it for review as you have mentioned that there are certain inconsistencies, so in order to avoid further problems in my draft and thus add a proper edit. Thanking You Regards Srijanx22 ( talk) 18:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir, is IndiaOnline reliable especially if used in a BLP article like this one? It says the following in its welcome page
IndiaOnline.in brings you complete business, leisure, travel and tourism, weather, latest news and all other related information about India.
Seems unreliable to me. Kindly help - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir, I cam across this blog from Times of India. It mentions "DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own" at the bottom. Doesn't it become unreliable after this disclaimer? Even the ID picture of the blogger is not the same as the celebrity he/she is trying to personify. Kindly advice - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir can this be used? It seems like a Punjabi film related aggregator site. Didn't find any info about the editors, etc. I believe it should not be used in BLP articles atleast. Kindly advise. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi can you check the conversation between 2 IPs on my talk page. There might be something useful there. Warm Regards. Sid95Q ( talk) 13:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Need to speak urgent .... Need an Important discussion. I am a reputed journalist in Calcutta and i have added all relevant sources. Vinita Chatterjee is a well known bengali actor for all bengali audience. Therefore we have added all the relevant sources n No Blogs... Sources are Newspapers like Times of India, Ebela, Patrika Group, US Based Media Adbhut Media, Hotstar (Channel by Star Tv) etc. Not a single source is a private blog these are all reputed bengali, Hindi n English news portals. As per Bengali culture We donot prefer using Last name without Mr or Miss it is Disrespectful in our culture so i Changed Chatterjee to VINITA. Any other issues please tell me i want to clear all misunderstandings and Differences and give her the respect that she deserves. God bless @ VeronicaJoseph5 and 01:04, April 14, 2019:
Dear Editor, we know miss chatterjee for a long time and all the sources added are credible and i dont need payments to tell the truth. When yesterday i saw some template i was surprised. We Bengali people admire Vinita mam as an inspiration and i felt concerned so i wanted her page to have no mistakes i don't even know who uploaded the original content. I saw something wrong so i helped by adding all Authentic Sources n Removing All Unwanted blogs. So now i made sure there is no discrepancy with the article. U can google about Miss Chatterjee. She inspires millions of us Bengali audience as she is our favorite artist. I wish respect is given to a good artist. Regards. Best wishes. VeronicaJoseph5 ( talk) 01:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
After such a prolonged discussion the only reason i edited added the due respect to our celebrated artist is so that u see the genuinity and credibility of the sources and remove the template. May Peace n Goodness prevail. VeronicaJoseph5 ( talk) 01:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Hope we can mutually respect each others point of view just how i have accepted your style of editing hope u respect the content. On mutual trust i m finally removing the templates. Regards. God bless. Any other verification u can do.. As all the points are verified with credible sources. VeronicaJoseph5 ( talk) 02:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I have to go to bed shortly but I am concerned that this is going to become a source of drama. And I note that you are INVOLVED in the article. If you think it would benefit from 48 hrs of page protection I will oblige. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
What is the way to solve the templates issues? Can you please solve them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uttam Roy28 ( talk • contribs) 04:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb review this page. I added better better citation. Junjathory ( talk) 12:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
good job IsaiahTGothan ( talk) 00:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
I was wondering if you could take a look at ( User talk:69.126.32.165) there contributions, appear to be subtle vandalism of zoo article pages, at a minimum they are adding unsourced content.-- Phospheros ( talk) 06:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello sir, on the article List of Punjabi films of 2019, one user is again and again adding a non notable film “Gangster vs State” while i removed it. Please help! SangrurUser ( talk) 08:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
"Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun.
sir, Souravshetty1 ( talk) 06:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC) OurDemocracy page has been moved to draft can we please get an view of the contents which are promotional. In the content below.
(Redacted)
Souravshetty1 ( talk) 06:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I feel like I remember you and I dealing with an editor a while back who was constantly adding parentheticals, who you ended up blocking. Though this is an unrelated situation, I'm curious if there's any policy or guideline which blatantly states that you can't add parantheticals? I'm dealing with a bit of difficult editor at the moment, who's apparently under the assumption that you don't have to follow any sort of manual of style as long as the information being added is correct. 1 (The information added in the aforementioned revision is correct, but it's unnecessary detail and the wording is clunky). I'd as soon just revert the edit again, but the editor is being particularly stubborn and has been adding a steady stream of biased-sounding crap like this for a while now. It would be good to be able to point them to some parenthetical policy, if there is one, so it's not just my opinion against theirs. Thanks in advance, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 22:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
"The situation is complicated by the hotel concierge, who thinks the gang has kidnapped a maid (who was actually kidnapped by the demon)."
"The situation is complicated by the hotel concierge, who thinks the gang has kidnapped a maid, although she was actually kidnapped by the demon."
See the message an IP editor posted at Talk:Theni Eswar (cinematographer). The article is here because Theni Eswar was recreated as an obvious promotional article so many times it was protected. The sourcing is bad and I doubt this would pass an AFD, but the post from the IP is concerning. Looks like undeclared paid editing by someone and COI editing by the IP. May bring this to the COIN board. Ravensfire ( talk) 16:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Although it is reliable as per WP:ICTF, but there's something fishy about some of its articles. For example one editor wanted to add content about a producer Kamini Dube into her father Hari Shankar Tiwari's article. Initially, I removed the content as it was citing IMDb here. Now he's come up with this from Bollywood Hungama which incidentally is written only today. I've deleted irrelevant stuff but had to keep this link which supports that Kamini Dube's father is Mr. Tiwari. I'm confused. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
maybe this could work to our advantage: we object to content, someone at Bollywood Hungama writes a new article, problem solved!Actually a part of me agrees to this. Would save us a lot of hassle.
Check this one lol. This time by TOI and IANS after I reverted yesterday. Created today with exactly the same words 'spoof+comedy'. Coincidence! - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Also, isn't "spoof comedy" redundant?- That's what I was thinking.
I don't think I've ever seen a dramatic spoof- Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Another one by Times Now here. Seems to have copy pasted from an old original research filled revision of the Madhoo article. Funnily it did not even correct her maiden name 'Madhubala' which it writes as 'Madhubama'. Photogalleries should not be trusted I guess. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello sir, @ Cyphoidbomb:
Hello @ Cyphoidbomb:
Administrators
must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so
will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
Hi Can you protect this page. Same old Season 1 Season 2 page Issue where IPs and New users Disrupting the Main page thinking it is season 1 page. Warm Regards. Sid95Q ( talk) 11:08, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Please delete ' Technical Guruji (YouTube channel)' it's a redirect to Gaurav Chaudhary. No one gonna search Technical Guruji YouTube Channel, please delete this redirect page. And i will make 'Technical Guruji' redirect page to Gourav Chaudhary. Because gourav is known as Technical Guruji. - CptViraj ( talk) 07:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
Cyphoidbomb,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
Please block this user 49.204.223.21. I warned the user not to make unsourced, disruptive but looks like he/she is rarely paying attention. He/she is constantly engaging in vandalizing movie genres and often resolves to clever edits by first changing the correct genre partially, only to fix the error in next edit so that it can't be directly reverted. Please look into this. These IPs are constantly vandalizing and not everyone is paying attention. ( 77Survivor ( talk) 11:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC))
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pokkiri&oldid=876423939 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pokkiri&oldid=876423910 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pokkiri&oldid=876785686 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Azhagiya_Tamil_Magan&oldid=876811307 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spyder_(film)&oldid=876126448 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spyder_(film)&oldid=876126421 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spyder_(film)&oldid=874923106
As for Pokkiri, the gangster film genre doesn't work in entirety because it's not a gangster film in the first place. It's about a cop who's undercover to take down a gangster. The film is about how the cop eliminates his enemies one by one while also taking care of his loved one. It also does come under crime genre apart from action but gangster films are rooted mostly in drama like The Godfather. I know not all gangster films are the same but this one is easily an all-out action film instead of gangster. This isn't my personal opinion. I'm saying the same way you based your opinion just on the words "gang" and "gangster". Wikipedia itself says an action movie containing criminality is often labelled as a crime thriller by many, but it's not necessarily true. If this one qualifies as a gangster film, then almost every action movie made in India features criminality. Does that make them crime movies/gangster movies? Necessarily not. ( 77Survivor ( talk) 07:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC))
How can I start a discussion about Indian television when WP:INTV is inactive? There is a need to discuss about why Indian television articles just consider the Indian film sources at WP:ICTF as reliable. Why is there no separate guideline and information about other sources for television. For film articles, those sources are apt. But not for television articles. Because Indian media works very differently for films and television. It is incorrect to consider those sources as the only reliable sources for television because the focus of most of those sources is film and bollywood coverage. There should be a separate set of sources that should be considered reliable for ITV. Hope you're understanding what I'm saying. MiaSays ( talk) 15:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Can you help this user on this page [2]. Thanks. Sid95Q ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Atleast look at the table. The edits by that Sid user spoiled the whole arrangement of the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjalimarar95 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Also just so you know New Talent Awards is hosted by Indiantelevison.com which also hosts Indian Telly Awards so it is credible. It does not have a page because it is not an annual event. Does not take away it's credibility. Even Indian Telly Awards will be held after 4 years in Feb end or March. Does it take away it's importance? You really dont know how Indian television works. You guys follow film guidelines and film sources which dont even focus on Indian tv. Adding link so you can confirm RELIABILIY http://www.indiantelevision.com/our-events — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.39.230.229 ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
"It does not have a page because it is not an annual event."LOL! You're attempting to describe the reasoning process that a non-existent person went through to ultimately decide not to create the article. It does not have a page ostensibly because nobody's endeavored to create one.
"You really dont know how Indian television works."There is nothing special about Indian television that requires the inclusion of every award.
"You guys follow film guidelines and film sources which dont even focus on Indian tv."Film guidelines are often embraced by WikiProject Television, but feel free to open a query at WT:TV to get other opinions. The general (non-film/non-TV) community typically requires that list items be properly established as notable. Note an article like List of British former child actors. Virtually everybody on that page has an article that establishes their notability. "But what about India?!" List of Indian child actors. And note List of awards and nominations received by Amitabh Bachchan. Do we spend a lot of time at that article listing all of the minor awards Bachchan won over his career? No, we focus on the biggies. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I need a help. I started User:Titodutta/Draft/Everyone Has a Story which was a bestseller. Now the title Everyone Has a Story which is a redirect to a television show. The televsion article does not mention "Everyone Has a Story". The redirect history shows, it was not notable. I am looking for a second opinion. Could you please have a look and move/not move the page whatever you find the best? Regards.I'll add a categories and low-resolution non-free cover once the articleis on mainspace -- Titodutta ( talk) 09:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
This is Uricnobel. Could you please tell me why you are doing this even after six months. Time and again I have proved my self that I am a loyal wikipedian. Why are you doing this ? There is no legal mechanism for this ? Can I pay any fine and provide some ID proof. If that works. Why dont you discuss my case with arbitration committee. Stop discouraging me. I am here to help wikipedia, I am here to share some of your responsibilities. Take my issue on humanitarian grounds. Contrib2 ( talk) 02:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey, tough request for you. Would mind reviewing this discussion on Bhanwar singh vaish's talk page? They've just about run AussieLegend and my patience out and the next steps are, I'm pretty sure, going to be fairly unpleasant for them. I'm hoping you may be able to get through to them better than we've been able. Appreciate it. Ravensfire ( talk) 04:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I recently noticed the edits of Ghjklopui to List of awards and nominations received by Vijay and having looked at some of their other edits I think it's probable that they are a sock - probably of Bothiman. They have also added images uploaded by Fghjkltyuiop and Lkjhgfdsartyuiop who are clearly the same person (as per their user pages) and I'm thinking that they are probably also Bothiman socks. Could you give those accounts a quick once-over and see if you agree with me? I can make a proper SPI report but I wanted to get some input on my gut feeling first. -- bonadea contributions talk 16:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, can you please take a look at the KGF movie page and fix the infobox and lead section? Someone has messed that up and I don't know how to fix it technically. Csgir ( talk)
Hi! You have retrieved hebbuli in the list of Kannada highest grossing films, but actual thing is Hebbuli is not even collected ₹50 crore in its lifetime, ₹100 core is really funny, you can observe #kgf film mentioned in every Reputed article that its the first ₹100 crore film in #kannada means #sandalwood. So plz don't allow the fake n blog news in wikipedia, because people can lose trust on wiki. Please review my question on #hebbuli.
Thanks Tigerikkada ( talk) 05:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi!Am here to clarify the exact collection of Hebbuli film, You can go via this link https://www.ibtimes.co.in/highest-grossing-kannada-movie-sandalwood-2017-report-card-raajakumara-hebbuli-bharjari-biggest-hits-754310, which is published by #Ibtimes, 2017 total box office report of #Kannada films... Thanks
Hi! I have provided reliable source on Hebbuli collection in previous tweet, n am waiting for your reply. Thanks
I want to say that if everything is right on this article then what the problem to move that page to mainspace. I will not do again but I am saying you are not doing right as Wikipedia is the fast improve site and yet The Voices'Season 3 article not created so shame on us. Including me,you and us Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Hebbuli film was released in 2017 and officially collected ₹30 crore in lifetime of its release, and even it was not added in wiki of highest grossing Kannada films list, but suddenly since 2 days its appearing and our local Channel also noticed Hebbuli in the list and started to suspecting the reliability of Wikipedia... Please try to know the fact of Hebbuli collection. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerikkada ( talk • contribs) 10:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear user. I kindly request u plzz add protection of Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi page. In the following too much unsourced and unrelated editing happening. Thank you... Sush150 ( talk) 06:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
May I please trouble you. You are familiar with Padmalakshmisx's case and behavior, so how likely do you think Paavada is ? Please refer Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Paavada for the case. --Let There Be Sunshine 10:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Is there any possibilities to restore List of highest-grossing Tamil films article now ?, I have already created the article with updated figures/films with limited sections like not including weekend collection section since its problematic. -- Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 08:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Behindwoods gold medal awards 4 and 0 Total 37 .please mention this thanks it's missing Geateres ( talk) 18:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry respected editor I wasnt aware of the fact that IMDb ratings are manipulative in nature.I offer my sincere apologies to you. Srijanx22 ( talk) 20:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi CyphoidBomb, I saw you undid a link that I included for director Krish. Can you share a Wikipedia on how to link names and keywords to Wikipedia pages please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virakiwi ( talk • contribs) 15:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Noted the thought on over-linking. Was curious to know if there are guidelines available. I am personally OK with either. So, leaving it as it is. Virakiwi ( talk) 19:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing the guidelines! Virakiwi ( talk) 19:39, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
You are a person with very good humor..
So I award you with the barnstar of good humor Rnavjr0405 ( talk) 10:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC) |
Noted. Will provide an explanation next time. -- Princessruby ( talk) 17:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
I've improved the article, by removing some portion of information as it wasn't needed, what you were adding was already there in the career section, so re-adding the same information makes the article look dull. It looks better now, so please do not add any more information, but feel free to improve the career section. -- Princessruby ( talk) 10:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi these users I am abubakar 500 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), Uid 906 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Nickelodeon Team ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) look like one person as their edits are same on Shiva (TV series) examples [5] [6] [7]. Now one user is removing content from My User page as well [8]. Thanks. Sid95Q ( talk) 11:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For your kindness sir. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |
Can you please protect Ishq Mein Marjawan? Someone is continuously vandalising it from different ips. KiaraHooda ( talk) 10:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Harihara19091965 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) This user keeps changing figures in Viswasam page with unsourced and predictions of a old source Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 10:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Nikkznikkinikkz created separate page for List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, previously such an article was deleted [9]. Now both are merged. Entries in this article is highly challengeable, with most of the sources either does not cite the given figures or are unverifiable. 137.97.128.59 ( talk) 13:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoidbomb, I was hoping that you might add this article to your watchlist: Waheed Zafar Qasmi. It has been attracting some unusual attention as of late from a small handful of single-purpose accounts. [10] Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 23:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
So far vertercas had joined just 13 days ago but he had done almost 60 edits most of his edits were degrading the Ajith movies. A sock puppet using self proclaimed informations given by prakash uphadhyaya as citing source regarding Vivegam/Viswasam production and financials. Lumbercane ( talk) 02:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi this user Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) again creating multiple pages on same topic as earlier He was earlier doing with other topics here, [11] and here. Users like AussieLegend and Ravensfire tried to help him [12] but No success. Sid95Q ( talk) 00:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
You are Most Welcome Sir
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
15:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tu Sooraj Main Saanjh, Piyaji is sequel series to Diya Aur Baati Hum so why it is not valid for followed_by parameter [13]. Regards. Sid95Q ( talk) 07:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
|followed_by=
and |preceded_by=
parameters are typically used when we are indicating series within a greater franchise. The best example of this is Star Trek:|followed_by=
Star Trek: The Animated Series (1977), which is |followed_by=
Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987), then
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.|preceded_by=
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993).
Star Trek: Enterprise (2001) is |preceded_by=
Star Trek: Voyager. Then we have
Star Trek: Discovery (2017) which is |preceded_by=
Star Trek: Voyager.|related=
.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
08:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)This is very interesting ... Ravensfire ( talk) 18:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb. I am afraid that either one day we might have to give up on pages like List of South African slang words or enforce real tough penalties for WP:OR. User Nelatti has now been blocked three times for the same thing, unsourced and interpretive content, but it looks as if he just could not care less. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 15:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
Please protect the Vinaya Vidheya Rama page as vandals are constantly attacking it and vandalizing the genre. It's an action film and they're constantly making it comedy or satirical fantasy comedy. There's not a bit of that in the film and I understand they're doing so because the film has been negatively received and heavily trolled due to what they call "over-the-top" scenes. What actually hit me hard was that even you failed to notice that.
Please protect the page. These vandals with different IPs are really resorting to vandalism. Here you can see that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vinaya_Vidheya_Rama&oldid=886494704 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vinaya_Vidheya_Rama&oldid=886494743 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vinaya_Vidheya_Rama&oldid=886259643
If you can do a little bit of browsing on your own, you can find this film was heavily trolled for its "unrealistic" and "illogical" scenes. Due to this trolling, a scene featuring the hero traveling between two distant states via standing on the top of a train and arriving within just 5 minutes was cut. There's another scene in which the villain is bitten by the snake and it's the latter who dies. Due to such scenes, the vandals are up with their nonsensical edits.
I can assure you they're vandalizing. It's not a comedy film, and that's not my personal opinion of a genre. It's REALLY NOT a comedy film. Period. ( 77Survivor ( talk) 20:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC))
With due respect, I don't know whether its your ignorance or arrogance to compare a film maker to a plumber. Even if considering they are mere works for bread and butter, have you seen any plumber's name being read out for the sanitary fixtures being used at home or workplace or whatsoever. The answer is a big NO , whereas in the case of film makers whether he's done a single or multiple films, he's name is being listed and read out by thousands of people who watch the piece of work. In case of my draft on Vipin Atley, there might be problems with the references being quoted but that doesn't give anyone the right to demean any works and calling the subject a mere day worker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Najadh ( talk • contribs) 11:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir, is BookMyShow reliable for upcoming films such as this? I mean the movie hasn't released so how is "Booking a Show" relevant. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Bhanwar singh vaish continues to be a problem child. I've had to warn him about adding an mp3 that he downloaded from a website and uploaded as his own work. It's now at FFD so he's moved on to creating categories, all with title case and some with strange naming, like Category:2019 Indian Television Singing season and Category:2019 Indian Television Reality Shows. He clearly doesn't understand categorisation. And then there is Category:List of DAV schools in India which is just a list. I pointed him to Help:Category and WP:CAT on my talk page, [14] but he either didn't bother reading them or doesn't understand. I fear the longer he edits, the worse things will get. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb. I see that you had to step in again; my apologies for the delay in following up on your suggestion. It is now done, hopefully something will come of it. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 12:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Please go to Shreya Ghoshal 's article and fix infobox template immediately. Otherwise it creates vendalisms. Thanks and please reply me after editing. Jay prakash bais ( talk) 15:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much Jay prakash bais ( talk) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I noticed your recent reversion of my edit on this page. I'm on the [[Wikipedia:Typo Team]|Typo Team], and despite Kim Possible having "good article" status, it had at least one spelling error, and ALLCAPS were used in reference titles. Please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters, which states in the All caps and small caps section that ALLCAPS should be reduced even if they were used in titles.
Ira Leviton ( talk) 04:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I have been preparing a draft for a massive edit for the IUPAP page in my sand box. Original wiki page of IUPAP actually has nothing in the name of content. Plz tell should i send my edits fr review through sandbox or edit the whole page and write a long summary of edits
Regards Srijanx_22 Srijanx22 15:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srijanx22 ( talk • contribs)
Ok after finishing my daft in the sandbox should I sent it for review as you have mentioned that there are certain inconsistencies, so in order to avoid further problems in my draft and thus add a proper edit. Thanking You Regards Srijanx22 ( talk) 18:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir, is IndiaOnline reliable especially if used in a BLP article like this one? It says the following in its welcome page
IndiaOnline.in brings you complete business, leisure, travel and tourism, weather, latest news and all other related information about India.
Seems unreliable to me. Kindly help - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir, I cam across this blog from Times of India. It mentions "DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own" at the bottom. Doesn't it become unreliable after this disclaimer? Even the ID picture of the blogger is not the same as the celebrity he/she is trying to personify. Kindly advice - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir can this be used? It seems like a Punjabi film related aggregator site. Didn't find any info about the editors, etc. I believe it should not be used in BLP articles atleast. Kindly advise. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi can you check the conversation between 2 IPs on my talk page. There might be something useful there. Warm Regards. Sid95Q ( talk) 13:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Need to speak urgent .... Need an Important discussion. I am a reputed journalist in Calcutta and i have added all relevant sources. Vinita Chatterjee is a well known bengali actor for all bengali audience. Therefore we have added all the relevant sources n No Blogs... Sources are Newspapers like Times of India, Ebela, Patrika Group, US Based Media Adbhut Media, Hotstar (Channel by Star Tv) etc. Not a single source is a private blog these are all reputed bengali, Hindi n English news portals. As per Bengali culture We donot prefer using Last name without Mr or Miss it is Disrespectful in our culture so i Changed Chatterjee to VINITA. Any other issues please tell me i want to clear all misunderstandings and Differences and give her the respect that she deserves. God bless @ VeronicaJoseph5 and 01:04, April 14, 2019:
Dear Editor, we know miss chatterjee for a long time and all the sources added are credible and i dont need payments to tell the truth. When yesterday i saw some template i was surprised. We Bengali people admire Vinita mam as an inspiration and i felt concerned so i wanted her page to have no mistakes i don't even know who uploaded the original content. I saw something wrong so i helped by adding all Authentic Sources n Removing All Unwanted blogs. So now i made sure there is no discrepancy with the article. U can google about Miss Chatterjee. She inspires millions of us Bengali audience as she is our favorite artist. I wish respect is given to a good artist. Regards. Best wishes. VeronicaJoseph5 ( talk) 01:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
After such a prolonged discussion the only reason i edited added the due respect to our celebrated artist is so that u see the genuinity and credibility of the sources and remove the template. May Peace n Goodness prevail. VeronicaJoseph5 ( talk) 01:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Hope we can mutually respect each others point of view just how i have accepted your style of editing hope u respect the content. On mutual trust i m finally removing the templates. Regards. God bless. Any other verification u can do.. As all the points are verified with credible sources. VeronicaJoseph5 ( talk) 02:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I have to go to bed shortly but I am concerned that this is going to become a source of drama. And I note that you are INVOLVED in the article. If you think it would benefit from 48 hrs of page protection I will oblige. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
What is the way to solve the templates issues? Can you please solve them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uttam Roy28 ( talk • contribs) 04:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb review this page. I added better better citation. Junjathory ( talk) 12:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
good job IsaiahTGothan ( talk) 00:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
I was wondering if you could take a look at ( User talk:69.126.32.165) there contributions, appear to be subtle vandalism of zoo article pages, at a minimum they are adding unsourced content.-- Phospheros ( talk) 06:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello sir, on the article List of Punjabi films of 2019, one user is again and again adding a non notable film “Gangster vs State” while i removed it. Please help! SangrurUser ( talk) 08:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
"Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun.
sir, Souravshetty1 ( talk) 06:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC) OurDemocracy page has been moved to draft can we please get an view of the contents which are promotional. In the content below.
(Redacted)
Souravshetty1 ( talk) 06:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I feel like I remember you and I dealing with an editor a while back who was constantly adding parentheticals, who you ended up blocking. Though this is an unrelated situation, I'm curious if there's any policy or guideline which blatantly states that you can't add parantheticals? I'm dealing with a bit of difficult editor at the moment, who's apparently under the assumption that you don't have to follow any sort of manual of style as long as the information being added is correct. 1 (The information added in the aforementioned revision is correct, but it's unnecessary detail and the wording is clunky). I'd as soon just revert the edit again, but the editor is being particularly stubborn and has been adding a steady stream of biased-sounding crap like this for a while now. It would be good to be able to point them to some parenthetical policy, if there is one, so it's not just my opinion against theirs. Thanks in advance, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 22:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
"The situation is complicated by the hotel concierge, who thinks the gang has kidnapped a maid (who was actually kidnapped by the demon)."
"The situation is complicated by the hotel concierge, who thinks the gang has kidnapped a maid, although she was actually kidnapped by the demon."
See the message an IP editor posted at Talk:Theni Eswar (cinematographer). The article is here because Theni Eswar was recreated as an obvious promotional article so many times it was protected. The sourcing is bad and I doubt this would pass an AFD, but the post from the IP is concerning. Looks like undeclared paid editing by someone and COI editing by the IP. May bring this to the COIN board. Ravensfire ( talk) 16:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Although it is reliable as per WP:ICTF, but there's something fishy about some of its articles. For example one editor wanted to add content about a producer Kamini Dube into her father Hari Shankar Tiwari's article. Initially, I removed the content as it was citing IMDb here. Now he's come up with this from Bollywood Hungama which incidentally is written only today. I've deleted irrelevant stuff but had to keep this link which supports that Kamini Dube's father is Mr. Tiwari. I'm confused. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
maybe this could work to our advantage: we object to content, someone at Bollywood Hungama writes a new article, problem solved!Actually a part of me agrees to this. Would save us a lot of hassle.
Check this one lol. This time by TOI and IANS after I reverted yesterday. Created today with exactly the same words 'spoof+comedy'. Coincidence! - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Also, isn't "spoof comedy" redundant?- That's what I was thinking.
I don't think I've ever seen a dramatic spoof- Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Another one by Times Now here. Seems to have copy pasted from an old original research filled revision of the Madhoo article. Funnily it did not even correct her maiden name 'Madhubala' which it writes as 'Madhubama'. Photogalleries should not be trusted I guess. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello sir, @ Cyphoidbomb:
Hello @ Cyphoidbomb:
Administrators
must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so
will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
Hi Can you protect this page. Same old Season 1 Season 2 page Issue where IPs and New users Disrupting the Main page thinking it is season 1 page. Warm Regards. Sid95Q ( talk) 11:08, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Please delete ' Technical Guruji (YouTube channel)' it's a redirect to Gaurav Chaudhary. No one gonna search Technical Guruji YouTube Channel, please delete this redirect page. And i will make 'Technical Guruji' redirect page to Gourav Chaudhary. Because gourav is known as Technical Guruji. - CptViraj ( talk) 07:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)