Hello Cvedd-paddick,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged UXP Systems Inc. for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
UXP Systems Inc., a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
14:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
this edit to
UXP Systems Inc.. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.
Hayman30 (
talk)
14:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Note that references should not contain bare urls, see Tesco as an example, but remember to answer my COI request before you do anything else Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Cvedd-paddick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have currently just had a chance to log onto Wikipedia and feel that your decision to block my account indefinitely within a few hours of no response is extremely hasty. Thank you for your tip about the disclosure, I was not paid for this contribution, my knowledge of the software comes from academic studies. If this is something that is necessary to disclose, I would be happy to do so. Furthermore, I would liek to have to the opportunity to contribute to the encyclopedia in a meaningful way, however you have prevented me from learning and growing from this decision. I am asking you to revise your decision in good faith, and allow me to learn how to appropriately share with the Wikipedia community and adjust any further promotional language you believe is still present in the current article. Thanks for your consideration
Decline reason:
Given the blatantly promotional, buzzword-laden tone of the page you wrote, I don't think your claim of being a masters student who academically studies software is accurate. To provide just one example of how your approach differed from that of an academic researcher, you cited business directories and press releases, not peer-reviewed scholarly papers. Huon ( talk) 00:26, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:Jimfbleak I was not the source of the rerouted IP, it does not make sense for me to ask for your assistance in making my article less promotional and acceptable to Wikipedia standards if I was just going to restore your efforts to try and assist me. I cannot however gain experience on Wikipedia if this unnecessary block from the entire site remains.
Hello Cvedd-paddick,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged UXP Systems Inc. for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
UXP Systems Inc., a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
14:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
this edit to
UXP Systems Inc.. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.
Hayman30 (
talk)
14:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Note that references should not contain bare urls, see Tesco as an example, but remember to answer my COI request before you do anything else Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Cvedd-paddick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have currently just had a chance to log onto Wikipedia and feel that your decision to block my account indefinitely within a few hours of no response is extremely hasty. Thank you for your tip about the disclosure, I was not paid for this contribution, my knowledge of the software comes from academic studies. If this is something that is necessary to disclose, I would be happy to do so. Furthermore, I would liek to have to the opportunity to contribute to the encyclopedia in a meaningful way, however you have prevented me from learning and growing from this decision. I am asking you to revise your decision in good faith, and allow me to learn how to appropriately share with the Wikipedia community and adjust any further promotional language you believe is still present in the current article. Thanks for your consideration
Decline reason:
Given the blatantly promotional, buzzword-laden tone of the page you wrote, I don't think your claim of being a masters student who academically studies software is accurate. To provide just one example of how your approach differed from that of an academic researcher, you cited business directories and press releases, not peer-reviewed scholarly papers. Huon ( talk) 00:26, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:Jimfbleak I was not the source of the rerouted IP, it does not make sense for me to ask for your assistance in making my article less promotional and acceptable to Wikipedia standards if I was just going to restore your efforts to try and assist me. I cannot however gain experience on Wikipedia if this unnecessary block from the entire site remains.