Welcome!
Hello, Cumberbund, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Jkelly
20:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
As I mentioned to WorkingHard in his talk page, I believe that the edit war has gotten out of hand and that he should not lose control of himself with name calling. I recommend that either you or he take up the issue with Arbitration. The Arbitration Committee is an excellent source to settle things. Take care Tony the Marine 04:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Go to this page Requests for arbitration. Follow thre instructions and explain the situation in detail. Let them know that the arguement is beyond a simple dispute that could have been settled in a talk page and is in need of arbitration. Also, let them know all the parties involved in thr dispute. Take care. Tony the Marine 22:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry you've suffered from what seems to be a false accusation. When accusations are clearly false (ie just lies, not a content dispute gone global) you can revert the accusation. Bear in mind that reverting a legitimate edit (even if you don't agree with its content) is viewed as vandalism, however. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
You may be surprised to know you are dealing with a few of the people intimatley involved with this case. All edits to Wiki have been shown verifiable via links such as cnn, msnbc, as well as links to the actual court documents. For some reason you must have fallen in love with the user Cumberbund, who is in fact a webmaster that wanted the webhosting job and we decided NOT to hire him because of his criminal history. We DID in fact hire Charlotte Web Hosting, which you can plainly see in the supporting links, (CNN has a TON of them) This user Cumberbund has erased anything on the Jessica page he does not agree with. The unfortunate thing about it is, everything we post is FACT and verifiable via affadavits from court and coroner's reports. Cumberbund may choose to disagree with them, but he is doing nothing more then vandilising Wiki, using the tried and true "troll" way of arguing, (Act like the victim in the argument) We may not be as Wiki inclined as he is, that does not mean our points are not valid as much, or in this case way more then his, as we actually hold in our hand court released documents. Cumberbund is in fact a 34 year old person with a very extensive criminal history, you may leave us an email address for more information for conclusive PROOF. Cumberbund has NO reason to be on wiki except to take off any mention of webhosting whatsoever, like the spoiled child who didn't get a lolipop, he whines, and you so far have been doing an EXCELLENT job of helping him. Instead of going in gun ho, read the links, do the research, THEN come to Wiki to have your say. He says the webhosting is not relevant to her story, then ask him why for months he has ONLY made edits to remove the webhosting part and leaving everything else untouched. If he had been hired to host the site, you can BET he would be all over wiki.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Lunsford
Look at every one of his contributions, he is using wiki for nothing more then a personal harrassment tool. Feeding into him isn't what we'd expect from this kind of person Nicholas.
If you have ANY doubts at all of his sockpuppetry, run an ip search for his postings all over Wiki, you might be very amused. He has already been told by OTHER admins to LEAVE information that has been verified on the jessica lunsford entry, which he has refused to do. I'd also like to mention, he says that the webhosting is not important part of her story, it was VERY important, it DID do a verifiable 9 million unique hits in 10 hours, Alexa DOES show it, and yet once again, google this:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=charlottewebhosting+lunsford+&btnG=Search
Of course, you know, for him it's (If I didn't host it, no one will) He has spent the last YEAR making websites all over the net talking about Jessica Lunsford, putting DOWN Mark Lunsofrd AND Jessica, as well as trying to libel/slander Charlotte Web Hosting in any way he can. I'm sure he's found a friend in you on Wiki. 65.184.18.231 06:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Your report on my talk page was an interesting read. Since WorkingHard blanked the talk page, I have made a replica and protected it. You can view it here. The evidence is possible, but all of those edits happened months ago, and so there is no current threat. I have already blocked one of the IP addresses and another admin blocked the other. All of the IP addresses haven't edited Wikipedia in some time. If you need anything else, contact me again on my talk page. Thanks, Iola k ana• T 11:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Cumberbund, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Jkelly
20:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
As I mentioned to WorkingHard in his talk page, I believe that the edit war has gotten out of hand and that he should not lose control of himself with name calling. I recommend that either you or he take up the issue with Arbitration. The Arbitration Committee is an excellent source to settle things. Take care Tony the Marine 04:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Go to this page Requests for arbitration. Follow thre instructions and explain the situation in detail. Let them know that the arguement is beyond a simple dispute that could have been settled in a talk page and is in need of arbitration. Also, let them know all the parties involved in thr dispute. Take care. Tony the Marine 22:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry you've suffered from what seems to be a false accusation. When accusations are clearly false (ie just lies, not a content dispute gone global) you can revert the accusation. Bear in mind that reverting a legitimate edit (even if you don't agree with its content) is viewed as vandalism, however. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
You may be surprised to know you are dealing with a few of the people intimatley involved with this case. All edits to Wiki have been shown verifiable via links such as cnn, msnbc, as well as links to the actual court documents. For some reason you must have fallen in love with the user Cumberbund, who is in fact a webmaster that wanted the webhosting job and we decided NOT to hire him because of his criminal history. We DID in fact hire Charlotte Web Hosting, which you can plainly see in the supporting links, (CNN has a TON of them) This user Cumberbund has erased anything on the Jessica page he does not agree with. The unfortunate thing about it is, everything we post is FACT and verifiable via affadavits from court and coroner's reports. Cumberbund may choose to disagree with them, but he is doing nothing more then vandilising Wiki, using the tried and true "troll" way of arguing, (Act like the victim in the argument) We may not be as Wiki inclined as he is, that does not mean our points are not valid as much, or in this case way more then his, as we actually hold in our hand court released documents. Cumberbund is in fact a 34 year old person with a very extensive criminal history, you may leave us an email address for more information for conclusive PROOF. Cumberbund has NO reason to be on wiki except to take off any mention of webhosting whatsoever, like the spoiled child who didn't get a lolipop, he whines, and you so far have been doing an EXCELLENT job of helping him. Instead of going in gun ho, read the links, do the research, THEN come to Wiki to have your say. He says the webhosting is not relevant to her story, then ask him why for months he has ONLY made edits to remove the webhosting part and leaving everything else untouched. If he had been hired to host the site, you can BET he would be all over wiki.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Lunsford
Look at every one of his contributions, he is using wiki for nothing more then a personal harrassment tool. Feeding into him isn't what we'd expect from this kind of person Nicholas.
If you have ANY doubts at all of his sockpuppetry, run an ip search for his postings all over Wiki, you might be very amused. He has already been told by OTHER admins to LEAVE information that has been verified on the jessica lunsford entry, which he has refused to do. I'd also like to mention, he says that the webhosting is not important part of her story, it was VERY important, it DID do a verifiable 9 million unique hits in 10 hours, Alexa DOES show it, and yet once again, google this:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=charlottewebhosting+lunsford+&btnG=Search
Of course, you know, for him it's (If I didn't host it, no one will) He has spent the last YEAR making websites all over the net talking about Jessica Lunsford, putting DOWN Mark Lunsofrd AND Jessica, as well as trying to libel/slander Charlotte Web Hosting in any way he can. I'm sure he's found a friend in you on Wiki. 65.184.18.231 06:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Your report on my talk page was an interesting read. Since WorkingHard blanked the talk page, I have made a replica and protected it. You can view it here. The evidence is possible, but all of those edits happened months ago, and so there is no current threat. I have already blocked one of the IP addresses and another admin blocked the other. All of the IP addresses haven't edited Wikipedia in some time. If you need anything else, contact me again on my talk page. Thanks, Iola k ana• T 11:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)