Try WP:BDC#Members. - Mgm| (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks mate. I will join WP:BDC
Culverin 08:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
People don't need to be an administrator to contribute to RfA discussions. Generally, they should be established editors who understand what administration is about (adminhood is not meant to be a popularity contest), but one does not need be an admin for that to be the case. Thinking in terms of importance is the wrong angle anyhow. The question is one of judgement and familiarity with the concepts involved. Very new members might think that it'd be cool in an abstract way to be an admin, or might not understand what happens when people who don't understand how things work on Wikipedia start trying to do everything "their way". If neither of these are concerns, then there's no reason not to make your thoughts known on someone running. -- Improv 13:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I do not have any dogs. -- Improv 14:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
{{ help}}
Hello. happy editing
Culverin 09:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I am older than you. hahahahahaha
Please stop eating it is unhealthy. You will have a heart attack. Think of the children.
Cya
Culverin 11:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm not going to be a pharmacist, I wanto to go into public health, which means I'll probably end up working for the government on some level, local state or even federal. Lizz612 19:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[[User:culverin|culverin [[Image:Cannon pic.jpg|10px|User talk:culverin]] 10:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
{helpme|how do you put pictures and styles of font in your signiture}
{{Image:Cannon pic.jpg|10px}} 10:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Sure, I'll redesign it for you. :) Are there any preferences you'd like to specify before I start, like color scheme(s) and organization? Sango 123 19:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing your spelling and Grammar on my page. Dfrg.msc User talk:Dfrg.msc 08:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
|
Dfrg.msc User talk:Dfrg.msc 12:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Good hunting, Culverin 11:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Ha ha! I get it. Good one mate! Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 07:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Check this funky degsin! Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 07:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Contrary to your request: I will not "dirty up my user page, with your impure spelling and grammer, but I ask you to repect mine.
User:culverin Talk . 12:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
User:culverin Talk ]] 13:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
{HELPME|I cant seem to get the small talk link on my signature to work, could somebody help?}
Culverin Talk ]] 13:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes i do have Raw signatue on. But the code will not work.
Please, this is basic stuff. If you fail to grasp this; your posts will be erased from my page, and I expect you to do the same to me.
As for the many others, whom? Also, what are these "false accusations" on your talk page? I never acused you of anything!
What is it that you speak of?
I propose a truce, repect is integral to builing a Wikipedia. Thanks, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 23:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed the cann9ons on your user page - supposedly aimed at Jimbo. And the image of Jimbo's 'first incarnation'. I would ask you to remove them as they can be construed as offensive to Jimbo Wales and they violate wiki policy of No personal attacks (and possibly WP:POINT as well).
Secondly regarding Striv (strive parody), I saw your post on Daniels page. You may have meant no harm with the oiamge / parody BUT it is mildly rude to the guy who created Strive. Also Strive is a WP initiavtive whilst Striv is essentially just a joke - which is something generally discouraged on Wikipedia. If you have a concern about the strive project then please address it sensibly on the relevant page - rather than ridiculing it on your userpage (a possible violation of WP:POINT). Any advice on these issues feel free to ask Thanks --Errant Tmorton166( Talk)( Review me) 13:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Apologies over the images, I didnt look properly - there has been several cases of jimbo bashing and anit-jimbo-ness recently and alot of it isnnt fair. I have to say that I didnt know about those images :D Cya around --Errant Tmorton166( Talk)( Review me) 02:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
CEASE FIRE IN EFFECT
Hey Culverin, nice new signature! I got a new one as well, but I can thank Daniel Bryant for helping me to actualy getting it to work. Anyway, would you be interested on collaberation on the Floriade article? It is need of improvement.
Go to: Floriade and click the Floriade Canberra link.
See you there, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 23:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin Talk 00:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
' Culverin' ? Talk 11:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
' Culverin ? Talk 11:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I have a few peers who are thinking of going into pharmacy. They are getting their Bachelor's degrees in things like Biology, Chemistr, Biochem or the like. Then their going to apply to graduate school pharmacy programs. Thats all I know. Hope that helps. Lizz612 16:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin, I apologise for my "outburst" earlyer and I am sorry for the damage that I did to your page. I hope to work with you more in the future. Thanks, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 04:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin ? Talk 07:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Aye. User: Ultramarine. User: Kilo-Lima. kep?
I love you as well. :) Iola k ana• T 17:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
If you are an admin you have a comfortable button that do it automatically. If you are not you go in the history, you load the page as it was before the vandalism and you save. The software will ask you if you are relly sure to revert the page. If you say yes the rollback will be completed :-) -- J B 11:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia have plenty of well written help pages. 99% of question you will ever have on how to do this and this are already explained far better than I will ever be able to do :-). Anyhow: about redirects try to look at Wikipedia:Redirect and about moving pages try to look at Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page. If anything is not clear feel free to ask :-) -- J B 09:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Please note, your removal of posts without responding is not compliant with Wikipedia etiquette, which states "Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages without replying will probably be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings." Please respond, or formal dispute resolution may be taken against you, which will result in the leniant 24 hour block being reviewed, and possibly extended, regaring your use of abusive sockpuppets to circumvent WP:VAND, WP:NPA as well as impersonating another user. Daniel . Bryant 12:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Based on your blatant abuse of sockpuppets confirmed at
Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Culverin I have blocked you for one month. Note I would have usually blocked a user indefinitely for this but did not based on your good faith contributions in the past. Please do not attempt to circumvent this block via the use of other accounts as this will result in an indefinite block. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. -
Glen
06:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Wasnt it originally decided with the support of user daniel byrant that i be blocked for 24 hours. (with the full evidence shown) why has this been overturned. I know i did wrong, i am not asking for a compleate unblock, i am just asking to be blocked for a time, not for ever. I am willing to do the time for the crime so please consider it. I have made many valid edits. why should one mistake ruin it all.
PS i took the socktemplate off my page at the advice of user: samir. Please look at my talk page history for daniels and samirs comments. If daniel byrant (the victim) is happy for me to be blocked for a time, why shouldnt i?
I am willing to go on probation.
Thankyou for your time Culverin ? Talk 11:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Victim, blocked user and blocking admin have agreed on a comprimise. -- Daniel . Bryant 11:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
? you said you were willing to give me a 2 week block. I can accept that. Would you help me scale the block to 2 weeks?
I know i did wrong. I am willing to do time in the big house but not forever. Culverin ? Talk 11:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
To answer your questions: (1) if you promise never to use abusive sockpuppets again, you can take the tag off of your user page when your block expires and (2) Yes, there are many current administrators who were blocked for silly actions at some time in their career. More importantly, you should be quite thankful of the result, in my opinion. Winhunter was lenient with you: actions similar to yours have resulted in blocks of a week
From my user page history.
If weekly blocks are common why i am i blocked indef?
OK, Glen said he'd reduce the block to three months if you agree. Don't bother will the apology right now - just say if you agree or not. Daniel . Bryant 11:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I believe my punishment should be
I think you are taking this to seriously daniel. But it isnt my place to decise is it. All i ask is for a few weeks block and probation. Culverin ? Talk 11:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Ps You yourself supported a 2 week block didnt you? You said that to dfrg.msc. well anyway, i want to live.
And the template for 3 months and 6 months probation. Culverin ? Talk 11:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
OK, this is it - if you disagree to this, you stay blocked indefinately:-
EITHER:
OR
Which one, the firstor the second - agreeing to neither means you stay indefinately blocked. Daniel . Bryant 11:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I know i have learnt my lesson so why should this continue. I dont think vengence is really going to change anything. What benifit is a indef block for me going to have. I have made valid edits so let me continue to.
Before i make a decision could the we here from user: samir as he is a expert vandal fighter and his input is valued.
Ps could there be a parol period?
Could i have a day or two to decide? Culverin ? Talk 11:34, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Well ill take the deal larry. (yes ill take take the recent deal with a chance of a parol period) But that means you will take credit for all my great edits. Well anyway, why is samir not involved? So with you my legal guardian does that mean we will have to work together, start of hating each other but as we are forced to work together we will form a strong bond and become best friends. Like in the odd couple. I hope not. Well i am going to the big house. Can i get a wikiprison template?
PS why dont you like striv? Culverin ? Talk 11:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc dosnt care about the parody.
Well if you want to mate. You are my guardian. So please go ahead. Culverin ? Talk 11:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I cant wait for the prison template.
Try WP:BDC#Members. - Mgm| (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks mate. I will join WP:BDC
Culverin 08:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
People don't need to be an administrator to contribute to RfA discussions. Generally, they should be established editors who understand what administration is about (adminhood is not meant to be a popularity contest), but one does not need be an admin for that to be the case. Thinking in terms of importance is the wrong angle anyhow. The question is one of judgement and familiarity with the concepts involved. Very new members might think that it'd be cool in an abstract way to be an admin, or might not understand what happens when people who don't understand how things work on Wikipedia start trying to do everything "their way". If neither of these are concerns, then there's no reason not to make your thoughts known on someone running. -- Improv 13:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I do not have any dogs. -- Improv 14:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
{{ help}}
Hello. happy editing
Culverin 09:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I am older than you. hahahahahaha
Please stop eating it is unhealthy. You will have a heart attack. Think of the children.
Cya
Culverin 11:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm not going to be a pharmacist, I wanto to go into public health, which means I'll probably end up working for the government on some level, local state or even federal. Lizz612 19:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[[User:culverin|culverin [[Image:Cannon pic.jpg|10px|User talk:culverin]] 10:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
{helpme|how do you put pictures and styles of font in your signiture}
{{Image:Cannon pic.jpg|10px}} 10:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Sure, I'll redesign it for you. :) Are there any preferences you'd like to specify before I start, like color scheme(s) and organization? Sango 123 19:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing your spelling and Grammar on my page. Dfrg.msc User talk:Dfrg.msc 08:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
|
Dfrg.msc User talk:Dfrg.msc 12:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Good hunting, Culverin 11:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Ha ha! I get it. Good one mate! Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 07:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Check this funky degsin! Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 07:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Contrary to your request: I will not "dirty up my user page, with your impure spelling and grammer, but I ask you to repect mine.
User:culverin Talk . 12:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
User:culverin Talk ]] 13:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
{HELPME|I cant seem to get the small talk link on my signature to work, could somebody help?}
Culverin Talk ]] 13:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes i do have Raw signatue on. But the code will not work.
Please, this is basic stuff. If you fail to grasp this; your posts will be erased from my page, and I expect you to do the same to me.
As for the many others, whom? Also, what are these "false accusations" on your talk page? I never acused you of anything!
What is it that you speak of?
I propose a truce, repect is integral to builing a Wikipedia. Thanks, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 23:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed the cann9ons on your user page - supposedly aimed at Jimbo. And the image of Jimbo's 'first incarnation'. I would ask you to remove them as they can be construed as offensive to Jimbo Wales and they violate wiki policy of No personal attacks (and possibly WP:POINT as well).
Secondly regarding Striv (strive parody), I saw your post on Daniels page. You may have meant no harm with the oiamge / parody BUT it is mildly rude to the guy who created Strive. Also Strive is a WP initiavtive whilst Striv is essentially just a joke - which is something generally discouraged on Wikipedia. If you have a concern about the strive project then please address it sensibly on the relevant page - rather than ridiculing it on your userpage (a possible violation of WP:POINT). Any advice on these issues feel free to ask Thanks --Errant Tmorton166( Talk)( Review me) 13:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Apologies over the images, I didnt look properly - there has been several cases of jimbo bashing and anit-jimbo-ness recently and alot of it isnnt fair. I have to say that I didnt know about those images :D Cya around --Errant Tmorton166( Talk)( Review me) 02:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
CEASE FIRE IN EFFECT
Hey Culverin, nice new signature! I got a new one as well, but I can thank Daniel Bryant for helping me to actualy getting it to work. Anyway, would you be interested on collaberation on the Floriade article? It is need of improvement.
Go to: Floriade and click the Floriade Canberra link.
See you there, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 23:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin Talk 00:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
' Culverin' ? Talk 11:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
' Culverin ? Talk 11:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I have a few peers who are thinking of going into pharmacy. They are getting their Bachelor's degrees in things like Biology, Chemistr, Biochem or the like. Then their going to apply to graduate school pharmacy programs. Thats all I know. Hope that helps. Lizz612 16:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin, I apologise for my "outburst" earlyer and I am sorry for the damage that I did to your page. I hope to work with you more in the future. Thanks, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 04:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin ? Talk 07:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Aye. User: Ultramarine. User: Kilo-Lima. kep?
I love you as well. :) Iola k ana• T 17:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
If you are an admin you have a comfortable button that do it automatically. If you are not you go in the history, you load the page as it was before the vandalism and you save. The software will ask you if you are relly sure to revert the page. If you say yes the rollback will be completed :-) -- J B 11:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia have plenty of well written help pages. 99% of question you will ever have on how to do this and this are already explained far better than I will ever be able to do :-). Anyhow: about redirects try to look at Wikipedia:Redirect and about moving pages try to look at Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page. If anything is not clear feel free to ask :-) -- J B 09:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Please note, your removal of posts without responding is not compliant with Wikipedia etiquette, which states "Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages without replying will probably be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings." Please respond, or formal dispute resolution may be taken against you, which will result in the leniant 24 hour block being reviewed, and possibly extended, regaring your use of abusive sockpuppets to circumvent WP:VAND, WP:NPA as well as impersonating another user. Daniel . Bryant 12:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Based on your blatant abuse of sockpuppets confirmed at
Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Culverin I have blocked you for one month. Note I would have usually blocked a user indefinitely for this but did not based on your good faith contributions in the past. Please do not attempt to circumvent this block via the use of other accounts as this will result in an indefinite block. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. -
Glen
06:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Culverin ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Wasnt it originally decided with the support of user daniel byrant that i be blocked for 24 hours. (with the full evidence shown) why has this been overturned. I know i did wrong, i am not asking for a compleate unblock, i am just asking to be blocked for a time, not for ever. I am willing to do the time for the crime so please consider it. I have made many valid edits. why should one mistake ruin it all.
PS i took the socktemplate off my page at the advice of user: samir. Please look at my talk page history for daniels and samirs comments. If daniel byrant (the victim) is happy for me to be blocked for a time, why shouldnt i?
I am willing to go on probation.
Thankyou for your time Culverin ? Talk 11:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Victim, blocked user and blocking admin have agreed on a comprimise. -- Daniel . Bryant 11:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
? you said you were willing to give me a 2 week block. I can accept that. Would you help me scale the block to 2 weeks?
I know i did wrong. I am willing to do time in the big house but not forever. Culverin ? Talk 11:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
To answer your questions: (1) if you promise never to use abusive sockpuppets again, you can take the tag off of your user page when your block expires and (2) Yes, there are many current administrators who were blocked for silly actions at some time in their career. More importantly, you should be quite thankful of the result, in my opinion. Winhunter was lenient with you: actions similar to yours have resulted in blocks of a week
From my user page history.
If weekly blocks are common why i am i blocked indef?
OK, Glen said he'd reduce the block to three months if you agree. Don't bother will the apology right now - just say if you agree or not. Daniel . Bryant 11:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I believe my punishment should be
I think you are taking this to seriously daniel. But it isnt my place to decise is it. All i ask is for a few weeks block and probation. Culverin ? Talk 11:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Ps You yourself supported a 2 week block didnt you? You said that to dfrg.msc. well anyway, i want to live.
And the template for 3 months and 6 months probation. Culverin ? Talk 11:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
OK, this is it - if you disagree to this, you stay blocked indefinately:-
EITHER:
OR
Which one, the firstor the second - agreeing to neither means you stay indefinately blocked. Daniel . Bryant 11:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I know i have learnt my lesson so why should this continue. I dont think vengence is really going to change anything. What benifit is a indef block for me going to have. I have made valid edits so let me continue to.
Before i make a decision could the we here from user: samir as he is a expert vandal fighter and his input is valued.
Ps could there be a parol period?
Could i have a day or two to decide? Culverin ? Talk 11:34, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Well ill take the deal larry. (yes ill take take the recent deal with a chance of a parol period) But that means you will take credit for all my great edits. Well anyway, why is samir not involved? So with you my legal guardian does that mean we will have to work together, start of hating each other but as we are forced to work together we will form a strong bond and become best friends. Like in the odd couple. I hope not. Well i am going to the big house. Can i get a wikiprison template?
PS why dont you like striv? Culverin ? Talk 11:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc dosnt care about the parody.
Well if you want to mate. You are my guardian. So please go ahead. Culverin ? Talk 11:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I cant wait for the prison template.