This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please note that your recent move of Human rights in the Palestinian National Authority to proposed title was against the outcome of the voting (no consensus). Your closure was reverted by me, please see my comment at Talk:Human rights in the Palestinian National Authority#Requested move. Greyshark09 ( talk) 22:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
I am converting the era tags on all articles related to the Nerva-Antonine Dynasty. If you must revert my edit, please do so, but try to only change the era tag because I usually edit other information as well. Talk pages usually take a while, so I either just completely erase era tags until issues are resolved, or I convert them to a neutral form. Lupus Bellator ( talk) 18:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your tweak a minute ago to Bắc Kạn. Most of these Province capital articles start at 1945, if they have a history section at all, but that's an illustration that there are plentiful sources for the 1880s and earlier. In ictu oculi ( talk) 22:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Cooch. The Charlie Strong and Tennessee Volunteers football articles need to be semi-protected. Word leaked that Strong is the first choice to be the new Vols coach, and the IP vandals have gone nuts. There's also at least one SPA vandal who could use a timeout (User:YeahBoyeeeeee). Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 23:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
He's back, and now editing as User:Flabcschamps960608. It may be time to consider a range block. He's clearly using the USF computer systems or some other institutional network with multiple IP addresses in order to repeatedly create new accounts and evade the blocks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 23:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
How about this one? Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Latish_redone The IP user is obviously a seasoned and bored wikitroller looking to stir things up, as seen in this silly deletion discussion and this even sillier ANI report which he immediately filed when I mentioned suspicions about his identity. An IP trace placed both the current IP and his old IP (as seen in this golden oldie) in Athens, GA with the same ISP. It's pretty obvious. -- Zeng8r ( talk) 14:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
All right, after the holidays, Jaguars games, and a much needed vacation, I'm back. I see that the Latish redone business has been taken care of. I blocked Balificboy as an obvious Dragolink puppet, which was still active as of yesterday. However, I'm not totally sure about CompDude13. This account seems to behave somewhat differently from the others. Dirt, if it's still a problem, can you provide some direct evidence linking that account to the others? Cúchullain t/ c 15:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
I've blocked those two IPs and started a thread at ANI here. Please weigh in there. Cúchullain t/ c 14:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints -- Jayarathina ( talk) 16:56, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Was my edit here reasonable? [3]. Dougweller ( talk) 12:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
I saw that you closed a move request for Lewis a few days back as "no consensus." But my count shows 5 supports to 3 opposes (I do realize that consensus doesn't always follow numbers). At the very least, the discussion should've been relisted. Hot Stop (Talk) 04:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Lewis. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Hot Stop (Talk) 13:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Cooch, can you move Henry Jamison Handy to Jam Handy per WP:COMMONNAME? Subject was universally known by his nickname during his sports and business careers. I can't move it; someone has apparently restricted the article. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 15:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi - I see you recently moved this title. I've been unsure myself about the correct spelling, and online usage seems to be inconsistent (I even found an MLB article in Spanish that uses both forms within a few lines of each other), though leaning toward the plain 'e', but it's been at the accented title for the last 6 years. Is there conclusive evidence that the unaccented 'e' is the right spelling? Colonies Chris ( talk) 10:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Districts are an abstract concept. They only exist when citizens recognize them as such. In this case a reputable news source and the city of Jacksonville itself identified the area as a special district. Not to mention some of the churches in the area themselves. I believe that enough evidence exist to proclaim that this area has a special identity and to not cite it would be leaving a hole in information regarding downtown. You seemed to have no problem with someone creating the King Street Distict page. I even find that to be a little ridiculous, but enough organizations recognize it as such that it has every right o exist. here are some more references to the Cathedral District.
These may not be some of the best sources, but I think it proves my point that at a citizen level the area is recognized as the Cathedral District, whether Downtown Vision or COJ list it or not.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathew105601 ( talk • contribs)
I do agree that the Cathedral District is not as well-known, but as far as its size goes it is close to the size of Brooklyn and Lavilla. Both of these areas have a known history. The area we are referencing has a distinct character difference than with downtown proper. It is referenced by those who inhabit it, and the city has included it in some kind of master planning project. I agree that it is not a district like Southbank is a district, but passive distinctions are made and most urban dwellers in Jacksonville would understand what you meant if you mentioned the Cathedral District. I do not have an agenda here. I'm simple trying to thoughtfully define the place I live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathew105601 ( talk • contribs) 14:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
It's not exactly how I wanted it to appear, but I am satisfied with the changes. Mathew105601 ( talk • contribs —Preceding undated comment added 14:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Do you know why is making a story up at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigation/NVanMinh? NVanMinh ( talk) 07:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lai_Chau_Province&diff=527703698&oldid=527653911 - This is indeed uncontroversial. Kauffner was the one who lower cased all the provinces, but now agrees with re-upper-casing. NVanMinh ( talk) 07:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
OK, so the town of Hong Linh, Ha Tinh now has two talk pages, one here and one here. You don't see any problem with this setup? Kauffner ( talk) 15:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Cuchullain, I am sorry for loading up that secondary Talk page created by Efe's 04 Nov 2011 db-G6 with text objecting to db-G6 No#3. As far as I'm concerned if you wish you can bury what is now redundant chatter in the history under a redirect.
The original Talk Page is relatively unaffected. Efe never moved it, and it still has the WikiProject VN banner, and any content actually related to the town. The only thing missing is the article.
I apologise if this comment isn't helpful. In ictu oculi ( talk) 16:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Just want to thank you for the way you resolved this. I think the way you've tidied up and preserved the talk was done quite well. And is a better fit with process than simply moving the article back to where Efe left the Talk page. The article rather than the Talk page is the main thing after all. I also think this is perhaps something of a one-off case. The real problem here is not so much that Efe created 2 Talk pages on 04 November 2011, but that Efe himself isn't around to give legitimacy to clean up. In the case of the rest of the 500x db-G6 (Graeme Bartlett's number not mine) the original db-G6 admin is still around. So under normal circumstances we wouldn't have a orphan clean up issue. Cheers and best wishes with future administering :) In ictu oculi ( talk) 01:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Seasons greetings to you and yours
Dougweller (
talk) 14:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
All good. In ictu oculi ( talk) 16:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Respected Person, Actually, I have question that Why this page is Deleted from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barani_Institute_of_Information_Technology
I need information of this page. Please shoot me email address about this page on this email address: Crazyzoar@gmail.com
It is important for me. So, please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.41.27.255 ( talk) 19:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I was going to leave BDD likes this. after your most recent comment at the "Go Now" RM, but that seemed a little juvenile, so I hope you'll accept it here. -- BDD ( talk) 17:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably on your watchlist anyway since you restored it but FYI a different editor has just moved by cut and paste. (cur | prev) 14:38, 14 January 2013 Dagrqv (talk | contribs) m . . (26,541 bytes) (+26,482) . . (Making this main page, according to what is most common in the category for parliaments.) (undo) Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 05:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
For excellent judgment in weighing policy and determining consensus in closing RMs, especially the recent one at Puducherry, I award you this well-deserved barnstar. Keep up the good work! BDD ( talk) 18:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
Well, thank you very much! It's nice to get positive feedback. Cúchullain t/ c 19:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Cuchullain. While I agree that there is consensus to move the article, your close rationale is faulty and misreads consensus. Indian English is not a recognized variant of English on Wikipedia so arguing that this is a "clear-cut WP:ENGVAR issue" makes no sense. Discounting common name with "national ties" also flies against policy because WP:COMMONNAME is a policy and national ties guidelines (if any, I don't see anything that exists independent of English and nothing that exists pertaining to Indian English) are merely weak suggestions (cf. Burma/Myanmar). It would have been much better to use the common name data provided by various editors as well as the distinction between the city and the union territory for indicating a preference for Puducherry. Either way, the move itself seems justified so just consider this a thought. -- regentspark ( comment) 19:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
I assume you know a variety about Celtic mythology, design and decoration, and I am hoping you would have known some examples or sources of Celtic fashion which may be useful to use for some information about hairstyle or makeup in fashion other than websources such as this source, would there be any more details of similarity in different hair fashions or any fashions, other than warriors would spiked their hair up with lime to show rank and status or nobility, compared to modern standards of spiked hair. Any record notes on fashion whenever, I am willing to talk about Celtic lifestyles, please reply, if nothing comes to affect, thanks anyway, mate. Cheers ---- GoShow (............................) 17:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Terrific! Keep in my sandbox revision, glad to hear from it. Thank you .-- GoShow (............................) 21:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Concerning this comment: I'm not sure why you describe my comment as unrelated to behavior. Do you not agree that what Niemti is engaging in is the equivalent of "I don't care about what experts think"-nonsense? Is this kind of patronizing refusal to take gender studies seriously not a problem in your view?
Peter Isotalo 17:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I was hoping for a more comprehensive closing statement for this RM, especially for a move.
The concern with moving this article away from its original location is that it could become the new Yoghurt. SSR ( talk) 08:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
I saw your post at ANI re: DragoLink08. It seems that USF may have records that they could use to tie the IP addresses and times back to particular users or machines on their campus, depending on how they are set up. Has this been tried in the past with other schools or large orgs that we don't want to range-block? —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 14:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Cuchullain. I have a question. Concerning this topic ban proposal, should we let this discussion continue or just move forward with this proposal as it has been one week since this ban was proposed and neither I nor Sergecross73 do not want to have this discussion to go off-topic. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 22:47, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Please add text to your close to explain your thinking based on the policy and guidelines as to why you did not decide to move the article. -- PBS ( talk) 22:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, a few weeks ago you closed a WP:RM discussion and moved Enterprise Holdings to Enterprise Rent-A-Car. I believe there was a consensus in that discussion to move my userspace draft at User:Kuyabribri/Enterprise Holdings to Enterprise Holdings. I was wondering if you would be kind enough to revisit that discussion and if you agree there is consensus, move my userspace draft into mainspace. Thanks for your help. — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Cuchullain. When you moved Pondicherry (disambiguation) to the unqualified title, you may not have been aware that WP:FIXDABLINKS says --
There were a couple of hundred links to Pondicherry that were added to other articles before you decided to move the disambiguation page to this title. I see from your contributions that you fixed one of them; it would be appreciated if you would help with the rest. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 21:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Just letting you know that this edit apparently, for reasons beyond me, made the Michigan Amtrak trains all show up as the City of New Orleans, so I undid it. C628 ( talk) 02:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
It was interesting to read about primary topis, but I think your opinion about what would be considered primary topic of riksdag is wrong. 90.232.5.53 ( talk) 06:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Baptist Church of Jacksonville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page K-8 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Cuchullain, I've recently returned after a rather long break and just wanted to stop by and say hi. Looking around, things seem to have changed a bit, and stayed the same a bit, too. Hope all is going well for you, and we'll likely run across each other's path in the future. Best Regards, Notuncurious ( talk) 22:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Could you perhaps give more input on the DragoLink08 situation and the consequent rangeblock for the University of South Florida? I've just gotten a message from Hflw27, who says "I may be able to help with range configuration - I'm in the CSE department of USF and may be able to track down relevant and necessary details. I know that the 131.247.2.* and 131.247.3.0-64 blocks are regulated static IP addresses for Engineering". I'm going to leave a message on his talk page explaining that I implemented the rangeblock on others' recommendations, that I don't really know how to help, and that I'll ask others to help him; if you can help, please respond at his talk page. Please note that you're not the only one I'm asking; I'm leaving this message for five other users who commented on Drago's situation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive783, as well as you. Nyttend ( talk) 02:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
If "no consensus" should be the result, then why am I feeling that 2nd relisting is needed? Song and album look equally popular, as the album is currently the primary topic. Nonetheless, more votes in my opinion should be needed, unless it's pointless. How long should I wait to create the new nomination? -- George Ho ( talk) 02:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please note that your recent move of Human rights in the Palestinian National Authority to proposed title was against the outcome of the voting (no consensus). Your closure was reverted by me, please see my comment at Talk:Human rights in the Palestinian National Authority#Requested move. Greyshark09 ( talk) 22:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
I am converting the era tags on all articles related to the Nerva-Antonine Dynasty. If you must revert my edit, please do so, but try to only change the era tag because I usually edit other information as well. Talk pages usually take a while, so I either just completely erase era tags until issues are resolved, or I convert them to a neutral form. Lupus Bellator ( talk) 18:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your tweak a minute ago to Bắc Kạn. Most of these Province capital articles start at 1945, if they have a history section at all, but that's an illustration that there are plentiful sources for the 1880s and earlier. In ictu oculi ( talk) 22:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Cooch. The Charlie Strong and Tennessee Volunteers football articles need to be semi-protected. Word leaked that Strong is the first choice to be the new Vols coach, and the IP vandals have gone nuts. There's also at least one SPA vandal who could use a timeout (User:YeahBoyeeeeee). Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 23:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
He's back, and now editing as User:Flabcschamps960608. It may be time to consider a range block. He's clearly using the USF computer systems or some other institutional network with multiple IP addresses in order to repeatedly create new accounts and evade the blocks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 23:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
How about this one? Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Latish_redone The IP user is obviously a seasoned and bored wikitroller looking to stir things up, as seen in this silly deletion discussion and this even sillier ANI report which he immediately filed when I mentioned suspicions about his identity. An IP trace placed both the current IP and his old IP (as seen in this golden oldie) in Athens, GA with the same ISP. It's pretty obvious. -- Zeng8r ( talk) 14:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
All right, after the holidays, Jaguars games, and a much needed vacation, I'm back. I see that the Latish redone business has been taken care of. I blocked Balificboy as an obvious Dragolink puppet, which was still active as of yesterday. However, I'm not totally sure about CompDude13. This account seems to behave somewhat differently from the others. Dirt, if it's still a problem, can you provide some direct evidence linking that account to the others? Cúchullain t/ c 15:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
I've blocked those two IPs and started a thread at ANI here. Please weigh in there. Cúchullain t/ c 14:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints -- Jayarathina ( talk) 16:56, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Was my edit here reasonable? [3]. Dougweller ( talk) 12:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
I saw that you closed a move request for Lewis a few days back as "no consensus." But my count shows 5 supports to 3 opposes (I do realize that consensus doesn't always follow numbers). At the very least, the discussion should've been relisted. Hot Stop (Talk) 04:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Lewis. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Hot Stop (Talk) 13:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Cooch, can you move Henry Jamison Handy to Jam Handy per WP:COMMONNAME? Subject was universally known by his nickname during his sports and business careers. I can't move it; someone has apparently restricted the article. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 15:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi - I see you recently moved this title. I've been unsure myself about the correct spelling, and online usage seems to be inconsistent (I even found an MLB article in Spanish that uses both forms within a few lines of each other), though leaning toward the plain 'e', but it's been at the accented title for the last 6 years. Is there conclusive evidence that the unaccented 'e' is the right spelling? Colonies Chris ( talk) 10:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Districts are an abstract concept. They only exist when citizens recognize them as such. In this case a reputable news source and the city of Jacksonville itself identified the area as a special district. Not to mention some of the churches in the area themselves. I believe that enough evidence exist to proclaim that this area has a special identity and to not cite it would be leaving a hole in information regarding downtown. You seemed to have no problem with someone creating the King Street Distict page. I even find that to be a little ridiculous, but enough organizations recognize it as such that it has every right o exist. here are some more references to the Cathedral District.
These may not be some of the best sources, but I think it proves my point that at a citizen level the area is recognized as the Cathedral District, whether Downtown Vision or COJ list it or not.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathew105601 ( talk • contribs)
I do agree that the Cathedral District is not as well-known, but as far as its size goes it is close to the size of Brooklyn and Lavilla. Both of these areas have a known history. The area we are referencing has a distinct character difference than with downtown proper. It is referenced by those who inhabit it, and the city has included it in some kind of master planning project. I agree that it is not a district like Southbank is a district, but passive distinctions are made and most urban dwellers in Jacksonville would understand what you meant if you mentioned the Cathedral District. I do not have an agenda here. I'm simple trying to thoughtfully define the place I live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathew105601 ( talk • contribs) 14:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
It's not exactly how I wanted it to appear, but I am satisfied with the changes. Mathew105601 ( talk • contribs —Preceding undated comment added 14:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Do you know why is making a story up at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigation/NVanMinh? NVanMinh ( talk) 07:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lai_Chau_Province&diff=527703698&oldid=527653911 - This is indeed uncontroversial. Kauffner was the one who lower cased all the provinces, but now agrees with re-upper-casing. NVanMinh ( talk) 07:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
OK, so the town of Hong Linh, Ha Tinh now has two talk pages, one here and one here. You don't see any problem with this setup? Kauffner ( talk) 15:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Cuchullain, I am sorry for loading up that secondary Talk page created by Efe's 04 Nov 2011 db-G6 with text objecting to db-G6 No#3. As far as I'm concerned if you wish you can bury what is now redundant chatter in the history under a redirect.
The original Talk Page is relatively unaffected. Efe never moved it, and it still has the WikiProject VN banner, and any content actually related to the town. The only thing missing is the article.
I apologise if this comment isn't helpful. In ictu oculi ( talk) 16:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Just want to thank you for the way you resolved this. I think the way you've tidied up and preserved the talk was done quite well. And is a better fit with process than simply moving the article back to where Efe left the Talk page. The article rather than the Talk page is the main thing after all. I also think this is perhaps something of a one-off case. The real problem here is not so much that Efe created 2 Talk pages on 04 November 2011, but that Efe himself isn't around to give legitimacy to clean up. In the case of the rest of the 500x db-G6 (Graeme Bartlett's number not mine) the original db-G6 admin is still around. So under normal circumstances we wouldn't have a orphan clean up issue. Cheers and best wishes with future administering :) In ictu oculi ( talk) 01:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Seasons greetings to you and yours
Dougweller (
talk) 14:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
All good. In ictu oculi ( talk) 16:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Respected Person, Actually, I have question that Why this page is Deleted from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barani_Institute_of_Information_Technology
I need information of this page. Please shoot me email address about this page on this email address: Crazyzoar@gmail.com
It is important for me. So, please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.41.27.255 ( talk) 19:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I was going to leave BDD likes this. after your most recent comment at the "Go Now" RM, but that seemed a little juvenile, so I hope you'll accept it here. -- BDD ( talk) 17:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably on your watchlist anyway since you restored it but FYI a different editor has just moved by cut and paste. (cur | prev) 14:38, 14 January 2013 Dagrqv (talk | contribs) m . . (26,541 bytes) (+26,482) . . (Making this main page, according to what is most common in the category for parliaments.) (undo) Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 05:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
For excellent judgment in weighing policy and determining consensus in closing RMs, especially the recent one at Puducherry, I award you this well-deserved barnstar. Keep up the good work! BDD ( talk) 18:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
Well, thank you very much! It's nice to get positive feedback. Cúchullain t/ c 19:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Cuchullain. While I agree that there is consensus to move the article, your close rationale is faulty and misreads consensus. Indian English is not a recognized variant of English on Wikipedia so arguing that this is a "clear-cut WP:ENGVAR issue" makes no sense. Discounting common name with "national ties" also flies against policy because WP:COMMONNAME is a policy and national ties guidelines (if any, I don't see anything that exists independent of English and nothing that exists pertaining to Indian English) are merely weak suggestions (cf. Burma/Myanmar). It would have been much better to use the common name data provided by various editors as well as the distinction between the city and the union territory for indicating a preference for Puducherry. Either way, the move itself seems justified so just consider this a thought. -- regentspark ( comment) 19:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
I assume you know a variety about Celtic mythology, design and decoration, and I am hoping you would have known some examples or sources of Celtic fashion which may be useful to use for some information about hairstyle or makeup in fashion other than websources such as this source, would there be any more details of similarity in different hair fashions or any fashions, other than warriors would spiked their hair up with lime to show rank and status or nobility, compared to modern standards of spiked hair. Any record notes on fashion whenever, I am willing to talk about Celtic lifestyles, please reply, if nothing comes to affect, thanks anyway, mate. Cheers ---- GoShow (............................) 17:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Terrific! Keep in my sandbox revision, glad to hear from it. Thank you .-- GoShow (............................) 21:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Concerning this comment: I'm not sure why you describe my comment as unrelated to behavior. Do you not agree that what Niemti is engaging in is the equivalent of "I don't care about what experts think"-nonsense? Is this kind of patronizing refusal to take gender studies seriously not a problem in your view?
Peter Isotalo 17:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I was hoping for a more comprehensive closing statement for this RM, especially for a move.
The concern with moving this article away from its original location is that it could become the new Yoghurt. SSR ( talk) 08:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
I saw your post at ANI re: DragoLink08. It seems that USF may have records that they could use to tie the IP addresses and times back to particular users or machines on their campus, depending on how they are set up. Has this been tried in the past with other schools or large orgs that we don't want to range-block? —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 14:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Cuchullain. I have a question. Concerning this topic ban proposal, should we let this discussion continue or just move forward with this proposal as it has been one week since this ban was proposed and neither I nor Sergecross73 do not want to have this discussion to go off-topic. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 22:47, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Please add text to your close to explain your thinking based on the policy and guidelines as to why you did not decide to move the article. -- PBS ( talk) 22:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, a few weeks ago you closed a WP:RM discussion and moved Enterprise Holdings to Enterprise Rent-A-Car. I believe there was a consensus in that discussion to move my userspace draft at User:Kuyabribri/Enterprise Holdings to Enterprise Holdings. I was wondering if you would be kind enough to revisit that discussion and if you agree there is consensus, move my userspace draft into mainspace. Thanks for your help. — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Cuchullain. When you moved Pondicherry (disambiguation) to the unqualified title, you may not have been aware that WP:FIXDABLINKS says --
There were a couple of hundred links to Pondicherry that were added to other articles before you decided to move the disambiguation page to this title. I see from your contributions that you fixed one of them; it would be appreciated if you would help with the rest. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 21:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Just letting you know that this edit apparently, for reasons beyond me, made the Michigan Amtrak trains all show up as the City of New Orleans, so I undid it. C628 ( talk) 02:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
It was interesting to read about primary topis, but I think your opinion about what would be considered primary topic of riksdag is wrong. 90.232.5.53 ( talk) 06:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Baptist Church of Jacksonville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page K-8 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Cuchullain, I've recently returned after a rather long break and just wanted to stop by and say hi. Looking around, things seem to have changed a bit, and stayed the same a bit, too. Hope all is going well for you, and we'll likely run across each other's path in the future. Best Regards, Notuncurious ( talk) 22:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Could you perhaps give more input on the DragoLink08 situation and the consequent rangeblock for the University of South Florida? I've just gotten a message from Hflw27, who says "I may be able to help with range configuration - I'm in the CSE department of USF and may be able to track down relevant and necessary details. I know that the 131.247.2.* and 131.247.3.0-64 blocks are regulated static IP addresses for Engineering". I'm going to leave a message on his talk page explaining that I implemented the rangeblock on others' recommendations, that I don't really know how to help, and that I'll ask others to help him; if you can help, please respond at his talk page. Please note that you're not the only one I'm asking; I'm leaving this message for five other users who commented on Drago's situation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive783, as well as you. Nyttend ( talk) 02:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
If "no consensus" should be the result, then why am I feeling that 2nd relisting is needed? Song and album look equally popular, as the album is currently the primary topic. Nonetheless, more votes in my opinion should be needed, unless it's pointless. How long should I wait to create the new nomination? -- George Ho ( talk) 02:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)