![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for a prompt reply. I was not able to write soon after because I was busy in editing and publishing a book , released on Saturday at the Maramon Convention and in trying to find more about your recommended reliable sources.
I was not able to find details of this Baun. What is his full name and what is the title of his book? About Neill, I assume that you are talking about Bishop Stephen Neill. I am afraid that you have not read his book. Now I am colleting details of his work in India and a few other things concerning him. Encyclopedia Britannica is certainly a reliable source for matters connetced with Britain and about British people. By the way do you consider original documents as reliable? Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 17:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Dear Cuchullain,
Thank you for your nice letter. Last week two books were released and now I am busy preparing another one.
About Neill, I wanted to make sure that you were talking about Bishop Stepen Neill who was a missionary in South India. I have read some of his books and if I am not mistaken I heard him addressing a gathering when he visited my town. I try to read all your edits regarding St. Thomas Christians because I am one of them. So please continue writing. If I am not mistaken, I have been to your State a few years ago. Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 18:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you think this would be notable if created? http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=38419 Also i would like to know when would be the right time to recreate the new US teams such as Denver etc.. maybe when something is confirmed on their website or a month before comp starts? Youndbuckerz ( talk) 09:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
The edits that I have made to the wikipedia page on Matthew Shirk are done to make the page more neutral. Since you left me the message I have removed other material that is negative and is referenced to the Folio weekly, an alternative news source that has a reputation for getting facts twisted. My goal is to make the page more neutral, plain and simple. I'm not the same person that has also been editing and adding as you suggested. Everything being done is within the Wikipedia policy. Your removal of reliable information raises questions about your neutrality. ( Bushnellmacomb ( talk) 19:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC))
The economic impact of high-speed rail is relevant to Scott's decision to reject funding. It's also not negative; you're reading in your own view (several theories could explain based on cost-benefit why "rejecting" those jobs was the right move). Your argument based on original research and BLP is flawed because a FDOT study does not meet the criteria of original research, the information is not inherently negative, and the source is reliable. I'm reverting the page to include the job information. This issue is best left discussed in the Discussion page and not in an edit war between you and whoever put the information in the first place. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.177.19 ( talk) 22:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Dear, I think you should have discussed deletion before deleting the "castle age", Preferably on its or mine talk page. I found it suitable to be created as I think people may come to wikipedia searching for It. The stats shows this page was able to attract substantial viewer-ship. Though being an Administrator you have right/ authority to delete a page if you find it suitable. I think a discussion with creator or editors would have been better. I believe the Admin-ship authority comes with responsibility. I think use of this power without discussion may deter new users in terms of contribution.
The popularity of this game can be gauzed by number of users or number of clicks. Arshan.abbas ( talk) 16:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Check out Talk:Science in the Middle Ages#On vote Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 01:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
The movable feast: Talk:Dark_Ages#Requested_move Kauffner ( talk) 10:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate your editing and comments regarding this article. - Tim1965 ( talk) 01:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
the part of the article on Jesse Jaymes' song, which is part of his musical career and it is not biographically relevent under those pretenses as per wiki. the information does not speculate about jesse itzler.
as per wiki Edit summary: "Reverting, discuss on the talk page before making changes"
This is a red flag if the person writing this edit summary doesn't say anything about it on the talk page! No one owns Wikipedia articles, not even Jimbo Wales (see WP:OWN). If someone is going to demand that others discuss on the talk page before making any changes to an article, fairness demands that he too discuss it on the talk page. Also, he should remain open to what is said in the talk page. When others heed the request to "discuss on the talk page before making changes," it does not give veto authority to the person who requested this.
Nophonenophone ( talk) 15:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
the evidence is there, the document was thoroughly referenced. the discussion shall be moved from here to the article's talk page. you removed an entire section and a very large amount of information based on vague explanation at best. your reasons were outlined, but i contend that the proof is "in the pudding" already. I agree with the above statement. your methods are such as to dissuade others interested in editing wiki projects Nophonenophone ( talk) 16:23, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
This website is being used to promote works by MK Hume, see Compmate ( talk · contribs) whose only edits are to promote the author. I'm not sure what to do about it. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. K. Hume which is going nowhere. Just noticed you have removed some of this stuff, but where would we go to get other comments on Books Monthly, if that is a good idea of course. Thanks. -- Dougweller ( talk) 08:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
USA Rugby League website launches tommorrow and will probably give us a better idea of their plans for 2011. Maybe it would be time to recreate the pages as it seems most teams who will be involved have already been announced, perhaps see tomorrow and see whether they are worth recreating? Youndbuckerz ( talk) 07:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Oneida FC, RI Rebellion and NJT Titans? should i start those now? It says those are teams that are guaranteed to play- no forfeits etc.. Youndbuckerz ( talk) 08:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I will get started on them as soon as i have time. One team i believe i should also start are the Denver Wolverines as they have a website running and iirc they have news articles on them the others arent quite at that stage yet. Website is up at usarugbyleague.com it has the full clubs and developing regions Youndbuckerz ( talk) 22:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I have re-created them because I believe they are part of the leagues developing teams http://www.usarugbyleague.com/about/developing-regions/ and that they will eventually become a full member team of the USARL. One team- the OC Outlaws are confirmed to be joining as a full member team in 2012 http://www.usarugbyleague.com/2011/03/orange-county-outlaws-make-official-announcement-to-enter-usa-rugby-league/ and I believe more will follow in becoming full member teams. If they are deleted is there an easy way for me to keep the info/logos on here so i dont have to go through and re-ad all the info again? Youndbuckerz ( talk) 06:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
No worries, redirect is alright if you can save the info that will save the hard work of having to re=add all the info again. Youndbuckerz ( talk) 10:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, i recently copy-edited the Motormaster article as part of the Wikipedia copt-edit drive, however User_talk:Mathewignash has reverted twice the changes and even cited them as being "bad" including removing a very valid "more footnotes" needed tag. I raised the issue with them on their talk page: User_talk:Mathewignash#Motormaster to no response at the moment. I also informed them that i'd ask for an admins opinion, and as you are familar with Mathewignash and i've come across you before, i thought you'd be the best choice.
So essentially i'm asking for you to look at the article and see whether mine is as claimed: Reverted the bad edits made, that don't follow correct formatting' and that Mathewignash's version should take preference in regards to Wikipedia manual of style and etc. etc. or the copy-edited version. A proper comparison can be found here as they include both our final versions of the article.
I believe i need to ask an admin to intervene to settle this. Mabuska (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
There has been a major revision of the the
Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus ( talk) 07:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Actually you advanced two levels, to Master Editor. Congratulations, and thank you for your many contributions! Herostratus ( talk) 07:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
...of Gremlins! I think I will add a screenshot and that Video Game Critic review, and if the article makes it through AfD, nominate it for WP:Did you know. 28bytes ( talk) 01:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Danny Hanson. I wanted to clear up some things you've posted. The Alexandria Storm was never associated with the Fairfax Eagles. I was the coach of the Eagles and when Steve Grant decided to move to Texas this year, I began the idea of the Storm. I was then approached by the Slayers to be their head coach. I asked several Eagles players to move over with me. Steve had no hand in the merger with the Slayers. Since I am now active with the Slayers, I have no intention of starting the Alexandria Storm and the Eagles are now defunct.
Cheers, Hansondw ( talk) 19:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Danny
No worries. That was the release and it was accurate at the time of release. Good idea regarding the press release. I'll definitely do that soon.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hansondw ( talk • contribs)
![]() | On 30 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gremlins (Atari 2600), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the rare 1984 video game Gremlins, the player must either prevent the furry Mogwai from eating the hamburgers at the bottom of the screen, or shoot them after they transform into gremlins? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm also bothered by all the edits adding 2010 population numbers. I haven't been able to find the figures on the US census site, except as a downloadable data file, and the interactive sites some newspapers have put up don't link very well as citations, and may not be available all that long, either. I've been reverting un-cited changes, but I'm ready to give up on that. One problem I see is that I'm not sure that the numbers are final. I gather there is the possibility of adjustments being made. Do you know if this is being addressed anywhere on WP? -- Donald Albury 00:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk) 17:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
As a participant who has voiced an opinion over at the TF WikiProject about proposals to change the article formats, a set out proposal has been provided and as a participant in the overall discussions, your agreement or disagreement in regards to them is required, if you so wish to provide an answer. Link to proposals here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Transformers#What_the_proposal_actually_is Mabuska (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I reverted one of your reversions, as your argument was wrong. Neither of the citations for the race/ethnicity box says Caucasian, so I reverted your edit because If this is what's reported, it's what we say works against you (Census citation says white, the other citation does not use the words White or Caucasian at all).
The incorrect separation of Asian and South Asian apparently (regrettably) is what the UF citation says, so I let your reversion stand. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 23:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny ( talk) 18:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
I notice you wiped out my edits to this page (with the edit summary "clean-up", as if there was something grubby about them!) and to the Spain section of Columbus Day. I've commented here; perhaps you could explain what the problem is... Moonraker12 ( talk) 10:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Oops. Missed the boxer. Do you think your hatnote will suffice? RashersTierney ( talk) 12:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
When would be the time to recreate the development teams in the USARL? When they play their first game? I know you have explained that they are not notable and there is not enough verifiability this source http://www.golocalprov.com/sports/ris-first-semi-pro-rugby-team-debuts/ mentions the development teams if you have any questions about the league you could also drop a line to info@usarugbyleague.com I believe the West Coast teams have planned to attend 9s etc. not full league games. Just let me know when you think they will be ready to re create them and i will greatly do so. Youndbuckerz ( talk) 07:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Would you also be able to check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hurricanes_Rugby_League and see whether the Hurricanes Rugby League page is worthy to be on wikipedia. Thanks Youndbuckerz ( talk) 09:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
The image in the article shows the song title as "Theme from Cheers (Where Everybody Knows Your Name)", not the more simplified title. You should consider moving it back to accurately reflect the title of the song and not the common name for it. Ѕōŧŧōľäċqǔä ( talk) 15:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I am new to Wiki and I appreciate your status as master editor and am willing to take your guidance; however, I hope you will use some discretion instead of simply undoing everything I am trying to do for my city Ocala, FL… I gladly take the hint and agree to drop the “International Relations” section (an idea I borrowed from another city) and also lose the reference to Columbia… but must insist that the rest is in fact an improvement and also much desired by my superiors at the City. There was no section at all for our sister cities when I began… What you see is also what I did. Give a guy a break will ya? We are expecting visitors from Ireland this week! Please leave this edit alone for a while, can you handle it? -- Wormdust ( talk) 00:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
So, we meet again!
I've just noticed your reply on the Sir Lamiel talk page (sorry, I've not been around much recently); I’ve replied
over there (just to give you a heads-up).
Moonraker12 (
talk) 12:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
.
Dear Sir, Please kindly confirm, is it OK with below reference to be used in the articles.
1) isbn=9781434323576,
publisher=AuthorHouse Author name: Aleem Shamim Book name: Prophet Muhammad(s) and His Family chapter:Some Observations About Prophet's Marriages AND Chapter: Mothers of Believers Page 76-86
2) if we can use this report as a reference http://www.outreachworld.org/Files/u_texas/IslamandFeminism.pdf
A user User:Faizhaider had doubt about its authenticity and vacated the section, just because he could not find it thru simple google search. Kindly advice, is it should and must that provided references should be reachable thru simple google search? otherwise the source information will be removed?
I would also like to report about the misuse of the WP authority given to the user User:Faizhaider as he is creating inconvenience and disturbance on the article Aisha, as informed by him, to me on the talk page of Fatimah he is Shia. therefore he does not make any disturbance on the article Fatimah thou there are number of un-sourced, primary sourced and frictional works without reference and he does not allow any user to work on it, he will simply revert it with un-necessary reasons. -- Omer123hussain ( talk) 16:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
.--
Kumioko (
talk) 02:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry I haven't had time to look at the most recent round of editing / discussion. I hope to be able to do this tomorrow (Friday) or over the weekend. Richwales ( talk · contribs) 05:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
You are reverting a little much, Cuchu. Please engage in conversation. Not trying to say you are right or wrong, just the constant reverting and threats of blocks are not making for a nice environment.
Richmondian ( talk) 00:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Man, here we are again with the Fairfax Eagles page :-) Surely I'm permitted to remove discussion comments that I posted? When we were going back and forward on there I was not aware that conversation was going to become public record. In any case, I'd like my comments removed.
On another note, the logo that's posted on the Eagles page is one that we do not have license for. It was a revised logo created by the league in 2010. If I send you the original logo that we own the rights to can you post that instead? I figured it's easier/better to do it this way than have me change it, have you change it back, have me change it again, etc., etc.
Thanks, Steve —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.81.55 ( talk) 12:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay mate, all sounds good, thanks for the reply.
Hi. Just FYI, there's a discussion going on at Wikipedia:RfA reform 2011/Task force regarding possible changes to the RfA procedure. Richwales ( talk · contribs) 19:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Cooch, I have a small problem. There have been a series of IP users who continue to delete the 2011 SEC regular season championship from this article. The IP users are located in Greenville, South Carolina, and may be the same user with a dynamic IP address. Could we protect the page for a week or so? Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 19:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Cuchullain,
After checking around, and thinking about it, I think the problem is pmanderson. Sure, I would think that, but If you check his block log:
It's enormous.
I was getting quite angry, because I couldn't understand why his arguments didn't make any sense, but he just clearly never backs down.
He really is edit warring the policy isn't he? Blueboar isn't good either, but neither of them are getting consensus (by which I mean, we all agree and then make changes), rather than just ganging up on the policy, like blueboar and pmanderson is.
It's a policy, you're supposed to agree. But I think if stick together and make a good faith effort to enforce that all changes have to be agreed then it will be OK. At the moment blueboar and pmanderson are kinda running wild.
We can't let blueboar and particularly pmanderson or anyone else (me either) make any changes without getting agreement, that clearly doesn't work.
Yes? Can you assume I'm making this offer in good faith? If we get (say) WhatAmIDoing on board we can enforce it, because we would have the majority. I've already put the same thing on his talk page.
Otherwise it's just going to spiral out of control, pmanderson won't back down on anything, and blueboar will tend to back him up. I'm proposing the opposite of edit warring, we go with consensus, and any changes made by pmanderson (or anyone else) gets undone by one of us, and moved to the talk page, where we discuss it, and if it's consensus only then do we action it.
What do you say? Rememberway ( talk) 08:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
There is a new competiton coming to Florida, it will act as a feeder club system to the Axemen. Just want to know your thoughts. Should pages be created for the team/competition or just mentioned in Jacksonville Axemen. http://www.jaxaxe.com/Home/tabid/129/newsid540/501/Default.aspx Youndbuckerz ( talk) 21:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk) 17:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
I disagree with your recent reversion of the article Sibel_Kekilli. If you believe that I used "mangled language" you should change the text in order to improve the language, but keep the information intact instead of just revert the text to the previous version. Following are my considerations regarding the version of the article I have edited:
˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domingos ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
United States National Archives WikiProject |
---|---|
|
Do you think it is time for the National Rugby League USA page to be deleted? The comp has failed to kick off and probably never will, it is likely the USARL will turn pro within 3-10 years at least, with the right structures in place.¬¬¬¬
It might do to merge it with AMNRL. A couple of well-cited sentences in a section of the AMNRL article will probably suffice. I'll think about it when I get some more time. Cúchullain t/ c 14:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for a prompt reply. I was not able to write soon after because I was busy in editing and publishing a book , released on Saturday at the Maramon Convention and in trying to find more about your recommended reliable sources.
I was not able to find details of this Baun. What is his full name and what is the title of his book? About Neill, I assume that you are talking about Bishop Stephen Neill. I am afraid that you have not read his book. Now I am colleting details of his work in India and a few other things concerning him. Encyclopedia Britannica is certainly a reliable source for matters connetced with Britain and about British people. By the way do you consider original documents as reliable? Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 17:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Dear Cuchullain,
Thank you for your nice letter. Last week two books were released and now I am busy preparing another one.
About Neill, I wanted to make sure that you were talking about Bishop Stepen Neill who was a missionary in South India. I have read some of his books and if I am not mistaken I heard him addressing a gathering when he visited my town. I try to read all your edits regarding St. Thomas Christians because I am one of them. So please continue writing. If I am not mistaken, I have been to your State a few years ago. Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 18:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you think this would be notable if created? http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=38419 Also i would like to know when would be the right time to recreate the new US teams such as Denver etc.. maybe when something is confirmed on their website or a month before comp starts? Youndbuckerz ( talk) 09:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
The edits that I have made to the wikipedia page on Matthew Shirk are done to make the page more neutral. Since you left me the message I have removed other material that is negative and is referenced to the Folio weekly, an alternative news source that has a reputation for getting facts twisted. My goal is to make the page more neutral, plain and simple. I'm not the same person that has also been editing and adding as you suggested. Everything being done is within the Wikipedia policy. Your removal of reliable information raises questions about your neutrality. ( Bushnellmacomb ( talk) 19:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC))
The economic impact of high-speed rail is relevant to Scott's decision to reject funding. It's also not negative; you're reading in your own view (several theories could explain based on cost-benefit why "rejecting" those jobs was the right move). Your argument based on original research and BLP is flawed because a FDOT study does not meet the criteria of original research, the information is not inherently negative, and the source is reliable. I'm reverting the page to include the job information. This issue is best left discussed in the Discussion page and not in an edit war between you and whoever put the information in the first place. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.177.19 ( talk) 22:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Dear, I think you should have discussed deletion before deleting the "castle age", Preferably on its or mine talk page. I found it suitable to be created as I think people may come to wikipedia searching for It. The stats shows this page was able to attract substantial viewer-ship. Though being an Administrator you have right/ authority to delete a page if you find it suitable. I think a discussion with creator or editors would have been better. I believe the Admin-ship authority comes with responsibility. I think use of this power without discussion may deter new users in terms of contribution.
The popularity of this game can be gauzed by number of users or number of clicks. Arshan.abbas ( talk) 16:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Check out Talk:Science in the Middle Ages#On vote Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 01:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
The movable feast: Talk:Dark_Ages#Requested_move Kauffner ( talk) 10:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate your editing and comments regarding this article. - Tim1965 ( talk) 01:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
the part of the article on Jesse Jaymes' song, which is part of his musical career and it is not biographically relevent under those pretenses as per wiki. the information does not speculate about jesse itzler.
as per wiki Edit summary: "Reverting, discuss on the talk page before making changes"
This is a red flag if the person writing this edit summary doesn't say anything about it on the talk page! No one owns Wikipedia articles, not even Jimbo Wales (see WP:OWN). If someone is going to demand that others discuss on the talk page before making any changes to an article, fairness demands that he too discuss it on the talk page. Also, he should remain open to what is said in the talk page. When others heed the request to "discuss on the talk page before making changes," it does not give veto authority to the person who requested this.
Nophonenophone ( talk) 15:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
the evidence is there, the document was thoroughly referenced. the discussion shall be moved from here to the article's talk page. you removed an entire section and a very large amount of information based on vague explanation at best. your reasons were outlined, but i contend that the proof is "in the pudding" already. I agree with the above statement. your methods are such as to dissuade others interested in editing wiki projects Nophonenophone ( talk) 16:23, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
This website is being used to promote works by MK Hume, see Compmate ( talk · contribs) whose only edits are to promote the author. I'm not sure what to do about it. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. K. Hume which is going nowhere. Just noticed you have removed some of this stuff, but where would we go to get other comments on Books Monthly, if that is a good idea of course. Thanks. -- Dougweller ( talk) 08:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
USA Rugby League website launches tommorrow and will probably give us a better idea of their plans for 2011. Maybe it would be time to recreate the pages as it seems most teams who will be involved have already been announced, perhaps see tomorrow and see whether they are worth recreating? Youndbuckerz ( talk) 07:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Oneida FC, RI Rebellion and NJT Titans? should i start those now? It says those are teams that are guaranteed to play- no forfeits etc.. Youndbuckerz ( talk) 08:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I will get started on them as soon as i have time. One team i believe i should also start are the Denver Wolverines as they have a website running and iirc they have news articles on them the others arent quite at that stage yet. Website is up at usarugbyleague.com it has the full clubs and developing regions Youndbuckerz ( talk) 22:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I have re-created them because I believe they are part of the leagues developing teams http://www.usarugbyleague.com/about/developing-regions/ and that they will eventually become a full member team of the USARL. One team- the OC Outlaws are confirmed to be joining as a full member team in 2012 http://www.usarugbyleague.com/2011/03/orange-county-outlaws-make-official-announcement-to-enter-usa-rugby-league/ and I believe more will follow in becoming full member teams. If they are deleted is there an easy way for me to keep the info/logos on here so i dont have to go through and re-ad all the info again? Youndbuckerz ( talk) 06:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
No worries, redirect is alright if you can save the info that will save the hard work of having to re=add all the info again. Youndbuckerz ( talk) 10:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, i recently copy-edited the Motormaster article as part of the Wikipedia copt-edit drive, however User_talk:Mathewignash has reverted twice the changes and even cited them as being "bad" including removing a very valid "more footnotes" needed tag. I raised the issue with them on their talk page: User_talk:Mathewignash#Motormaster to no response at the moment. I also informed them that i'd ask for an admins opinion, and as you are familar with Mathewignash and i've come across you before, i thought you'd be the best choice.
So essentially i'm asking for you to look at the article and see whether mine is as claimed: Reverted the bad edits made, that don't follow correct formatting' and that Mathewignash's version should take preference in regards to Wikipedia manual of style and etc. etc. or the copy-edited version. A proper comparison can be found here as they include both our final versions of the article.
I believe i need to ask an admin to intervene to settle this. Mabuska (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
There has been a major revision of the the
Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus ( talk) 07:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Actually you advanced two levels, to Master Editor. Congratulations, and thank you for your many contributions! Herostratus ( talk) 07:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
...of Gremlins! I think I will add a screenshot and that Video Game Critic review, and if the article makes it through AfD, nominate it for WP:Did you know. 28bytes ( talk) 01:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Danny Hanson. I wanted to clear up some things you've posted. The Alexandria Storm was never associated with the Fairfax Eagles. I was the coach of the Eagles and when Steve Grant decided to move to Texas this year, I began the idea of the Storm. I was then approached by the Slayers to be their head coach. I asked several Eagles players to move over with me. Steve had no hand in the merger with the Slayers. Since I am now active with the Slayers, I have no intention of starting the Alexandria Storm and the Eagles are now defunct.
Cheers, Hansondw ( talk) 19:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Danny
No worries. That was the release and it was accurate at the time of release. Good idea regarding the press release. I'll definitely do that soon.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hansondw ( talk • contribs)
![]() | On 30 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gremlins (Atari 2600), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the rare 1984 video game Gremlins, the player must either prevent the furry Mogwai from eating the hamburgers at the bottom of the screen, or shoot them after they transform into gremlins? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm also bothered by all the edits adding 2010 population numbers. I haven't been able to find the figures on the US census site, except as a downloadable data file, and the interactive sites some newspapers have put up don't link very well as citations, and may not be available all that long, either. I've been reverting un-cited changes, but I'm ready to give up on that. One problem I see is that I'm not sure that the numbers are final. I gather there is the possibility of adjustments being made. Do you know if this is being addressed anywhere on WP? -- Donald Albury 00:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk) 17:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
As a participant who has voiced an opinion over at the TF WikiProject about proposals to change the article formats, a set out proposal has been provided and as a participant in the overall discussions, your agreement or disagreement in regards to them is required, if you so wish to provide an answer. Link to proposals here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Transformers#What_the_proposal_actually_is Mabuska (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I reverted one of your reversions, as your argument was wrong. Neither of the citations for the race/ethnicity box says Caucasian, so I reverted your edit because If this is what's reported, it's what we say works against you (Census citation says white, the other citation does not use the words White or Caucasian at all).
The incorrect separation of Asian and South Asian apparently (regrettably) is what the UF citation says, so I let your reversion stand. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 23:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny ( talk) 18:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
I notice you wiped out my edits to this page (with the edit summary "clean-up", as if there was something grubby about them!) and to the Spain section of Columbus Day. I've commented here; perhaps you could explain what the problem is... Moonraker12 ( talk) 10:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Oops. Missed the boxer. Do you think your hatnote will suffice? RashersTierney ( talk) 12:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
When would be the time to recreate the development teams in the USARL? When they play their first game? I know you have explained that they are not notable and there is not enough verifiability this source http://www.golocalprov.com/sports/ris-first-semi-pro-rugby-team-debuts/ mentions the development teams if you have any questions about the league you could also drop a line to info@usarugbyleague.com I believe the West Coast teams have planned to attend 9s etc. not full league games. Just let me know when you think they will be ready to re create them and i will greatly do so. Youndbuckerz ( talk) 07:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Would you also be able to check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hurricanes_Rugby_League and see whether the Hurricanes Rugby League page is worthy to be on wikipedia. Thanks Youndbuckerz ( talk) 09:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
The image in the article shows the song title as "Theme from Cheers (Where Everybody Knows Your Name)", not the more simplified title. You should consider moving it back to accurately reflect the title of the song and not the common name for it. Ѕōŧŧōľäċqǔä ( talk) 15:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I am new to Wiki and I appreciate your status as master editor and am willing to take your guidance; however, I hope you will use some discretion instead of simply undoing everything I am trying to do for my city Ocala, FL… I gladly take the hint and agree to drop the “International Relations” section (an idea I borrowed from another city) and also lose the reference to Columbia… but must insist that the rest is in fact an improvement and also much desired by my superiors at the City. There was no section at all for our sister cities when I began… What you see is also what I did. Give a guy a break will ya? We are expecting visitors from Ireland this week! Please leave this edit alone for a while, can you handle it? -- Wormdust ( talk) 00:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
So, we meet again!
I've just noticed your reply on the Sir Lamiel talk page (sorry, I've not been around much recently); I’ve replied
over there (just to give you a heads-up).
Moonraker12 (
talk) 12:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
.
Dear Sir, Please kindly confirm, is it OK with below reference to be used in the articles.
1) isbn=9781434323576,
publisher=AuthorHouse Author name: Aleem Shamim Book name: Prophet Muhammad(s) and His Family chapter:Some Observations About Prophet's Marriages AND Chapter: Mothers of Believers Page 76-86
2) if we can use this report as a reference http://www.outreachworld.org/Files/u_texas/IslamandFeminism.pdf
A user User:Faizhaider had doubt about its authenticity and vacated the section, just because he could not find it thru simple google search. Kindly advice, is it should and must that provided references should be reachable thru simple google search? otherwise the source information will be removed?
I would also like to report about the misuse of the WP authority given to the user User:Faizhaider as he is creating inconvenience and disturbance on the article Aisha, as informed by him, to me on the talk page of Fatimah he is Shia. therefore he does not make any disturbance on the article Fatimah thou there are number of un-sourced, primary sourced and frictional works without reference and he does not allow any user to work on it, he will simply revert it with un-necessary reasons. -- Omer123hussain ( talk) 16:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
.--
Kumioko (
talk) 02:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry I haven't had time to look at the most recent round of editing / discussion. I hope to be able to do this tomorrow (Friday) or over the weekend. Richwales ( talk · contribs) 05:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
You are reverting a little much, Cuchu. Please engage in conversation. Not trying to say you are right or wrong, just the constant reverting and threats of blocks are not making for a nice environment.
Richmondian ( talk) 00:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Man, here we are again with the Fairfax Eagles page :-) Surely I'm permitted to remove discussion comments that I posted? When we were going back and forward on there I was not aware that conversation was going to become public record. In any case, I'd like my comments removed.
On another note, the logo that's posted on the Eagles page is one that we do not have license for. It was a revised logo created by the league in 2010. If I send you the original logo that we own the rights to can you post that instead? I figured it's easier/better to do it this way than have me change it, have you change it back, have me change it again, etc., etc.
Thanks, Steve —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.81.55 ( talk) 12:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay mate, all sounds good, thanks for the reply.
Hi. Just FYI, there's a discussion going on at Wikipedia:RfA reform 2011/Task force regarding possible changes to the RfA procedure. Richwales ( talk · contribs) 19:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Cooch, I have a small problem. There have been a series of IP users who continue to delete the 2011 SEC regular season championship from this article. The IP users are located in Greenville, South Carolina, and may be the same user with a dynamic IP address. Could we protect the page for a week or so? Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 19:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Cuchullain,
After checking around, and thinking about it, I think the problem is pmanderson. Sure, I would think that, but If you check his block log:
It's enormous.
I was getting quite angry, because I couldn't understand why his arguments didn't make any sense, but he just clearly never backs down.
He really is edit warring the policy isn't he? Blueboar isn't good either, but neither of them are getting consensus (by which I mean, we all agree and then make changes), rather than just ganging up on the policy, like blueboar and pmanderson is.
It's a policy, you're supposed to agree. But I think if stick together and make a good faith effort to enforce that all changes have to be agreed then it will be OK. At the moment blueboar and pmanderson are kinda running wild.
We can't let blueboar and particularly pmanderson or anyone else (me either) make any changes without getting agreement, that clearly doesn't work.
Yes? Can you assume I'm making this offer in good faith? If we get (say) WhatAmIDoing on board we can enforce it, because we would have the majority. I've already put the same thing on his talk page.
Otherwise it's just going to spiral out of control, pmanderson won't back down on anything, and blueboar will tend to back him up. I'm proposing the opposite of edit warring, we go with consensus, and any changes made by pmanderson (or anyone else) gets undone by one of us, and moved to the talk page, where we discuss it, and if it's consensus only then do we action it.
What do you say? Rememberway ( talk) 08:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
There is a new competiton coming to Florida, it will act as a feeder club system to the Axemen. Just want to know your thoughts. Should pages be created for the team/competition or just mentioned in Jacksonville Axemen. http://www.jaxaxe.com/Home/tabid/129/newsid540/501/Default.aspx Youndbuckerz ( talk) 21:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk) 17:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
I disagree with your recent reversion of the article Sibel_Kekilli. If you believe that I used "mangled language" you should change the text in order to improve the language, but keep the information intact instead of just revert the text to the previous version. Following are my considerations regarding the version of the article I have edited:
˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domingos ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
United States National Archives WikiProject |
---|---|
|
Do you think it is time for the National Rugby League USA page to be deleted? The comp has failed to kick off and probably never will, it is likely the USARL will turn pro within 3-10 years at least, with the right structures in place.¬¬¬¬
It might do to merge it with AMNRL. A couple of well-cited sentences in a section of the AMNRL article will probably suffice. I'll think about it when I get some more time. Cúchullain t/ c 14:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)