![]() |
Hi Cryogenicity! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Jauerback. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Brendan Dassey, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
17:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, there was acyually a whole series of edits, which you reverted in one go. Much of it was just tidying a messy article that appeared as if duplicated by two people not working together. I also removed factually incorrect unsourced sentences that you've reinstated without a source. Can you help this mess by only reverting the specific sentences you feel need an additional source? (if they're not uncontroversial undisputed right? Not every sentence even on a bio has a source). Cryogenicity ( talk) 17:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
No BLP specifies "material challenged or likely to be challenged". You haven't answered which specific sentences you were reverting as likely to be challenged. Cryogenicity ( talk) 19:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
I'd like you to stop taking content providers for granted and reinstate the tidying up I did preliminary to being able to sensibly improve the article factually, and if you won't clarify why the undisputed facts I corrected/added need a source I will ask at the talk page. Cryogenicity ( talk) 09:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
How do I report you for misrepresenting that every single statement needs a source? And for deleting those edits which were just tidying up a messy article. Cryogenicity ( talk) 13:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
==
==
![]() |
Hi Cryogenicity! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Jauerback. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Brendan Dassey, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
17:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, there was acyually a whole series of edits, which you reverted in one go. Much of it was just tidying a messy article that appeared as if duplicated by two people not working together. I also removed factually incorrect unsourced sentences that you've reinstated without a source. Can you help this mess by only reverting the specific sentences you feel need an additional source? (if they're not uncontroversial undisputed right? Not every sentence even on a bio has a source). Cryogenicity ( talk) 17:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
No BLP specifies "material challenged or likely to be challenged". You haven't answered which specific sentences you were reverting as likely to be challenged. Cryogenicity ( talk) 19:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
I'd like you to stop taking content providers for granted and reinstate the tidying up I did preliminary to being able to sensibly improve the article factually, and if you won't clarify why the undisputed facts I corrected/added need a source I will ask at the talk page. Cryogenicity ( talk) 09:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
How do I report you for misrepresenting that every single statement needs a source? And for deleting those edits which were just tidying up a messy article. Cryogenicity ( talk) 13:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
==
==