Discussion page for English places.
There has been some discussion about how to create/maintain articles on civil parishes in England. There has been discussion on having a bot create the articles but this hasn't yet been done due to not having the code or consensus (generating a code for this is needed so if anyone can that would be appreciated). Although this RFC is mainly aimed at page creation it does also talk about how the data can be added/maintained to existing articles. Previous discussions at Wikipedia:Bot requests#Civil parish bot, Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 79#Civil parish bot and Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 160#Civil parish bot. The 1st, 2nd and 3 (which will probably simply be "no") questions relate to civil parishes, namely their creation/maintenance and if they should be split or merged. The 4th and 5th aren't that relevant here but are related to how to handle other places and their notability so answering these questions isn't so important but please feel free to try to answer then to. Note that I have removed NOMIS due to that fact that its boundaries shown seem to be inaccurate but if you look at this version you can see the boundaries since it the maps are better than City Population De's. Please answer each question in its section and make other comments in the "Discussion" section. My !votes are already on the user page but yours should go here. @ PamD, Acabashi, Amakuru, SilkTork, Redrose64, Spike 'em, Headbomb, DannyS712, Keith D, and Rodw: who have made significant contributions, please feel free to ping anyone else. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc|hist}}
tag, it must be moved to a discussion forum that is neutral but relevant, such as
WT:England. Only then should you add the {{
rfc|hist}}
tag. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
12:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc|hist}}
, without the |rfcid=
parameter - Legobot will need to add a new one. But if you want people to leave well-thought-out, sensible, reasoned comments, don't make it difficult for them. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
18:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc}}
tag needs to come first. This must be followed by your
brief and neutral statement, optional signature and mandatory timestamp, in accordance with
WP:RFCST. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
20:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc}}
tag needs to come first, and it isn't first - it's in one of the sections. Also, the "statement" that you have provided is useless, because
this is how it appears in the RfC listings. People do not care one bit who you are pinging, they want a
brief and neutral statement of the issue, which you have not provided. Try again. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Discussion page for English places.
There has been some discussion about how to create/maintain articles on civil parishes in England. There has been discussion on having a bot create the articles but this hasn't yet been done due to not having the code or consensus (generating a code for this is needed so if anyone can that would be appreciated). Although this RFC is mainly aimed at page creation it does also talk about how the data can be added/maintained to existing articles. Previous discussions at Wikipedia:Bot requests#Civil parish bot, Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 79#Civil parish bot and Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 160#Civil parish bot. The 1st, 2nd and 3 (which will probably simply be "no") questions relate to civil parishes, namely their creation/maintenance and if they should be split or merged. The 4th and 5th aren't that relevant here but are related to how to handle other places and their notability so answering these questions isn't so important but please feel free to try to answer then to. Note that I have removed NOMIS due to that fact that its boundaries shown seem to be inaccurate but if you look at this version you can see the boundaries since it the maps are better than City Population De's. Please answer each question in its section and make other comments in the "Discussion" section. My !votes are already on the user page but yours should go here. @ PamD, Acabashi, Amakuru, SilkTork, Redrose64, Spike 'em, Headbomb, DannyS712, Keith D, and Rodw: who have made significant contributions, please feel free to ping anyone else. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc|hist}}
tag, it must be moved to a discussion forum that is neutral but relevant, such as
WT:England. Only then should you add the {{
rfc|hist}}
tag. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
12:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc|hist}}
, without the |rfcid=
parameter - Legobot will need to add a new one. But if you want people to leave well-thought-out, sensible, reasoned comments, don't make it difficult for them. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
18:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc}}
tag needs to come first. This must be followed by your
brief and neutral statement, optional signature and mandatory timestamp, in accordance with
WP:RFCST. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
20:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
rfc}}
tag needs to come first, and it isn't first - it's in one of the sections. Also, the "statement" that you have provided is useless, because
this is how it appears in the RfC listings. People do not care one bit who you are pinging, they want a
brief and neutral statement of the issue, which you have not provided. Try again. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)