Hi CroGamer 1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC) |
Listen here.Opportunity rover ded. DON'T CENSOR MEEEE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.86.139 ( talk) 17:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello CroGamer 1,
I have just seen your request for a mediator to act on the issue of the page about Tihomir Orešković. You described that a WP:3O didn't help. It is important to note that WP:DRN is not a place where a volunteer will act as judge, but rather as mediator. This also means that the compromises that are reached are non-binding. For that reason, I seriously doubt that we will be able to handle your issue, after all, the third opinion didn't help.
You could ask the question on the reliable sources noticeboard or make a request for comment. If you'd still like to start mediation, please let me know by replying to this message and pinging me by putting {{ping|MrClog}} in front of it.
Regards,
MrClog (
talk)
11:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure what your concern about my not seeing/reading your comments is about. I did see and read the discussion above the point at which I commented. The manual threading/indenting of talk pages is unfortunately not very accurate. My response today identifies what I perceive as the difference between your position and mine. Am I missing something? Cheers. —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 16:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Croatian Air Force and Air Defence. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that
Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FOX 52 ( talk) 22:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I reverted your edit to Croatia because adding a bunch of blank lines unnecessarily consumed vertical space in all browsers. There wasn't anything aesthetic about it. If you were trying to align a new section so that graphics from a previous section don't run into it, use the tag {{ clear}} at the end of the section to reset the flow point in the browser's rendering. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 15:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to PlayStation 2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret ( talk) 16:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi CroGamer 1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC) |
Listen here.Opportunity rover ded. DON'T CENSOR MEEEE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.86.139 ( talk) 17:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello CroGamer 1,
I have just seen your request for a mediator to act on the issue of the page about Tihomir Orešković. You described that a WP:3O didn't help. It is important to note that WP:DRN is not a place where a volunteer will act as judge, but rather as mediator. This also means that the compromises that are reached are non-binding. For that reason, I seriously doubt that we will be able to handle your issue, after all, the third opinion didn't help.
You could ask the question on the reliable sources noticeboard or make a request for comment. If you'd still like to start mediation, please let me know by replying to this message and pinging me by putting {{ping|MrClog}} in front of it.
Regards,
MrClog (
talk)
11:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure what your concern about my not seeing/reading your comments is about. I did see and read the discussion above the point at which I commented. The manual threading/indenting of talk pages is unfortunately not very accurate. My response today identifies what I perceive as the difference between your position and mine. Am I missing something? Cheers. —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 16:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Croatian Air Force and Air Defence. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that
Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FOX 52 ( talk) 22:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I reverted your edit to Croatia because adding a bunch of blank lines unnecessarily consumed vertical space in all browsers. There wasn't anything aesthetic about it. If you were trying to align a new section so that graphics from a previous section don't run into it, use the tag {{ clear}} at the end of the section to reset the flow point in the browser's rendering. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 15:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to PlayStation 2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret ( talk) 16:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)