Hi CrashLandingNew! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! SKAG123 ( talk) 15:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hi CrashLandingNew! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Hyder Ali several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Hyder Ali, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. SKAG123 ( talk) 15:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Sutyarashi (
talk)
16:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Aoidh (
talk)
16:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
CrashLandingNew ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wasn't able to give my comments when I was reported by user:sutyarashi. I have not engaged in an edit war. On few pages, I removed uncited material, which is unreliable and misleading for the readers, with proper edit summary. I have engaged in talk page discussions and even initiated some myself. User:Sutyarashi has been editing articles with a certain POV, which I fact-check from time to time. How can I be blamed for edit warring, when I am just factchecking his edits? I should be unblocked.
Decline reason:
By definition ( WP:3RR) you have engaged in an edit war. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.- Aoidh ( talk) 17:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Aoidh (
talk)
09:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors
assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at
List of Punjabi Muslims. Here is Wikipedia's
welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much!
Grumpylawnchair (
talk)
05:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Indian National Congress, you may be blocked from editing ZenDragoX ( User) | ( Contact) 06:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
10:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Hello @ CrashLandingNew:
Can you please remove the thre Indian flag colors from the infobox of Indian National Congress, as they were recently added by a user without any reference. I am unable to edit the article as it is protected.
I have explained the reasons for these edits here - User Talk:Bairagi Ram#INC. Thanks.
Yours Bairagi Ram ( talk) 23:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi CrashLandingNew! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! SKAG123 ( talk) 15:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hi CrashLandingNew! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Hyder Ali several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Hyder Ali, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. SKAG123 ( talk) 15:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Sutyarashi (
talk)
16:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Aoidh (
talk)
16:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
CrashLandingNew ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wasn't able to give my comments when I was reported by user:sutyarashi. I have not engaged in an edit war. On few pages, I removed uncited material, which is unreliable and misleading for the readers, with proper edit summary. I have engaged in talk page discussions and even initiated some myself. User:Sutyarashi has been editing articles with a certain POV, which I fact-check from time to time. How can I be blamed for edit warring, when I am just factchecking his edits? I should be unblocked.
Decline reason:
By definition ( WP:3RR) you have engaged in an edit war. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.- Aoidh ( talk) 17:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Aoidh (
talk)
09:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors
assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at
List of Punjabi Muslims. Here is Wikipedia's
welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much!
Grumpylawnchair (
talk)
05:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Indian National Congress, you may be blocked from editing ZenDragoX ( User) | ( Contact) 06:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
10:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Hello @ CrashLandingNew:
Can you please remove the thre Indian flag colors from the infobox of Indian National Congress, as they were recently added by a user without any reference. I am unable to edit the article as it is protected.
I have explained the reasons for these edits here - User Talk:Bairagi Ram#INC. Thanks.
Yours Bairagi Ram ( talk) 23:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)