We don't use point form (bulleted list) to write article.
Secondly, for abbreviation, either all dots or no dots. I.e. Calcio Femminile Dilettantistico should be either CFD or "C.F.D.". However, since Italian use dots apparently , as well as consistent with A.C. Milan, dots should be used. But, since the club more commonly refer as "Mozzanica Calcio Femminile", as well as C.F. was ambiguous (may means F.C., football club, or club de fútbol), better leave the name in full form.
Lastly, we don't usually use bold text except the article title. Matthew_hk t c 13:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
|website=
or |work=
(which are the same parameter with italic text output) is different from |publisher=
(usually the company or the organization)
Matthew_hk
t
c
13:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Supercoppa Italiana (women) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dr Salvus 14:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
If you don't believe as I do, discuss at WT:FOOTY and seek a consensus. Dr Salvus 14:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Juventus F.C. (women) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I've arleady opened a treath at WT:FOOTY. Stop edit warring and discuss there
Dr
Salvus
20:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Cozy1298,
Thank you for creating Sophie Roman Haug.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 09:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Alva Selerud, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
17:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Cozy1298!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯
Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (
✍️)
19:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)We don't use point form (bulleted list) to write article.
Secondly, for abbreviation, either all dots or no dots. I.e. Calcio Femminile Dilettantistico should be either CFD or "C.F.D.". However, since Italian use dots apparently , as well as consistent with A.C. Milan, dots should be used. But, since the club more commonly refer as "Mozzanica Calcio Femminile", as well as C.F. was ambiguous (may means F.C., football club, or club de fútbol), better leave the name in full form.
Lastly, we don't usually use bold text except the article title. Matthew_hk t c 13:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
|website=
or |work=
(which are the same parameter with italic text output) is different from |publisher=
(usually the company or the organization)
Matthew_hk
t
c
13:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Supercoppa Italiana (women) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dr Salvus 14:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
If you don't believe as I do, discuss at WT:FOOTY and seek a consensus. Dr Salvus 14:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Juventus F.C. (women) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I've arleady opened a treath at WT:FOOTY. Stop edit warring and discuss there
Dr
Salvus
20:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Cozy1298,
Thank you for creating Sophie Roman Haug.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 09:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Alva Selerud, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
17:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Cozy1298!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯
Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (
✍️)
19:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)